Institutions Are Taking Over the Crypto Market: Is This the End of Decentralization, or the Prelude to a New Cycle?

比推2025-12-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-12-11 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The cryptocurrency market is undergoing a structural shift in 2025, with institutional investors now accounting for approximately 95% of capital inflows, while retail participation has declined to 5–6%. According to Aishwary Gupta of Polygon Labs, this transition is driven by maturing infrastructure rather than market sentiment. Major asset managers like BlackRock, Apollo, and Hamilton Lane are allocating portions of their portfolios to digital assets via ETFs and on-chain tokenized products, leveraging public blockchains that meet traditional finance compliance standards. Key drivers include yield generation through tokenized treasuries and institutional staking, followed by efficiency gains from faster settlements, shared liquidity, and programmable assets. While retail investors retreated due to losses from meme coin cycles, Gupta believes they will return as more regulated and transparent products emerge. He argues that institutional involvement does not undermine decentralization; instead, it enhances legitimacy and fosters a hybrid financial ecosystem where DeFi, NFTs, and traditional assets coexist on public chains. Although increased compliance may limit some experimentation, it promotes more sustainable innovation. Looking ahead, institutional liquidity is expected to reduce market volatility and accelerate the growth of real-world asset tokenization and cross-chain interoperability infrastructure. This evolution signals crypto’s transition from a speculative asset...

Author: Centreless

Original Title: Institutional Dominance in the Crypto Market: The End of Decentralization or the Beginning of a New Era?


In 2025, the cryptocurrency market has reached a structural turning point: institutional investors have become the absolute main force, while retail investors have noticeably cooled off. Aishwary Gupta, Global Head of Payments and Real-World Assets at Polygon Labs, recently stated in an interview that institutional capital now accounts for approximately 95% of the total inflows into cryptocurrency, with the retail proportion dropping to just 5%-6%, indicating a significant shift in market dominance.

He explained that the shift towards institutions is not driven by sentiment, but is a natural result of maturing infrastructure. Major asset management giants, including BlackRock, Apollo, and Hamilton Lane, are allocating 1%-2% of their investment portfolios to digital assets, accelerating their deployment through ETFs and on-chain tokenized products. Citing Polygon's collaboration cases as examples—such as JPMorgan testing DeFi transactions under the supervision of the Monetary Authority of Singapore, Ondo's tokenized treasury project, and AMINA Bank's regulated staking—Gupta demonstrated that public chains are now capable of meeting the compliance and audit requirements of traditional finance.

The two main drivers for institutional entry are yield demand and operational efficiency. The first phase primarily focuses on obtaining stable returns through methods like tokenized treasuries and bank-grade staking; the second phase is driven by the efficiency improvements brought by blockchain, such as faster settlement speeds, shared liquidity, and programmable assets, which are prompting large financial institutions to experiment with on-chain fund structures and settlement models.

In contrast, the exit of retail investors is mainly due to losses and a loss of trust caused by the previous Meme coin cycle. However, Gupta emphasized that this is not a permanent loss; as more regulated and risk-transparent products emerge, retail investors will gradually return.

Addressing concerns that institutional entry might weaken the decentralized ethos of cryptocurrency, Gupta argued that as long as the infrastructure remains open, institutional participation will not centralize the blockchain but will instead enhance its legitimacy. He pointed out that the future financial network will be a fused system where DeFi, NFTs, treasuries, ETFs, and various other assets coexist on the same public chain.

Regarding whether institutional dominance might stifle innovation, he acknowledged that some experimentation would be limited in a more compliance-focused environment. However, in the long run, this will help the industry build a more robust and scalable path for innovation, rather than relying on high-speed trial-and-error that "breaks the rules."

Looking ahead, he stated that institutional liquidity will continue to enhance market stability, with reduced speculation leading to lower volatility. The tokenization of real-world assets (RWA) and institutional-grade staking networks will develop rapidly. Interoperability will also become crucial, as institutions require infrastructure capable of seamlessly transferring assets across chains and across rollup layers.

Gupta emphasized that institutional entry is not a "takeover" of crypto by traditional finance, but a process of jointly building new financial infrastructure. Cryptocurrency is gradually evolving from a speculative asset into a core underlying technology of the global financial system.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original article link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7594862

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the current proportion of institutional inflows in the cryptocurrency market according to Aishwary Gupta?

AInstitutional investors currently account for approximately 95% of the total inflows in the cryptocurrency market, with retail investors making up only 5-6%.

QWhat are the two main drivers for institutional entry into the crypto market as mentioned in the article?

AThe two main drivers are yield generation (through tokenized treasuries and bank-grade staking) and operational efficiency (faster settlement, shared liquidity, and programmable assets).

QHow does Gupta respond to concerns that institutional participation might undermine decentralization in crypto?

AGupta argues that as long as the infrastructure remains open, institutional participation will not centralize blockchains but instead enhance their legitimacy and contribute to a hybrid financial network.

QWhat impact does institutional dominance have on market stability and volatility according to the article?

AInstitutional liquidity is expected to increase market stability and reduce volatility, as speculative activities decrease.

QWhat key area of development does Gupta highlight as critical for institutional adoption in the future?

AInteroperability is emphasized as crucial, enabling institutions to seamlessly transfer assets across chains and rollup layers.

İlgili Okumalar

The Economist: The Real Threat of Cryptocurrency to Traditional Banks

The Economist article "The Real Threat Cryptocurrency Poses to Traditional Banks" examines the escalating tensions between the traditional banking sector and the crypto industry. Despite both benefiting from a more favorable regulatory environment, especially following the passage of the GENIUS Act which provided a legal framework for stablecoins, a significant power shift is occurring. Banks' most immediate concern is regulatory arbitrage in stablecoins. Although the GENIUS Act prohibits issuers from paying interest to prevent deposit outflows, companies like Circle circumvent this by sharing revenue with exchanges, which then pay "rewards" to users. Banks are demanding this loophole be closed. Furthermore, crypto firms are breaking into the core of the financial system. In a landmark move, U.S. regulators granted national bank trust charters to five digital asset firms, including Circle and Ripple, allowing them to provide custody services nationwide. The collective impact of these developments poses a profound threat. The core of the banks' dilemma is their waning political influence. Crypto has firmly entrenched itself within the right-wing, anti-establishment political sphere, amassing a massive war chest for lobbying. Banks are no longer the most powerful financial voice in the Republican party. In a ironic twist, they now sometimes find themselves allied with Democratic senators and left-leaning groups who share concerns over stablecoin risks, proving that political alliances in this battle are increasingly unpredictable.

深潮17 dk önce

The Economist: The Real Threat of Cryptocurrency to Traditional Banks

深潮17 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片