Inside Bitwise’s bet on the debasement trade with Bitcoin-gold ETF

ambcrypto2026-01-24 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-24 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Despite recent underperformance compared to gold, asset managers like Bitwise believe Bitcoin remains a crucial hedge against currency devaluation and fiscal debt. This has led to the launch of the Bitwise Proficio Currency Debasement ETF (BPRO), a combined Bitcoin-gold ETF designed to capitalize on the "debasement trade" narrative. The fund aims to protect investors from the erosion of purchasing power caused by expanding money supply and rising U.S. debt, which now nears $40 trillion. The ETF garnered significant interest, with $13.2 million in trading volume and $52.4 million in assets under management on its first day. Bitwise's internal data indicates strong institutional demand for such alternative hedges, ranking second only to stablecoins. However, the short-term correlation between Bitcoin and gold has recently been negative, with gold surging 78% over the past year while Bitcoin declined 14%. Despite attempts to revert to a positive correlation in 2026, this decoupling has persisted, exacerbated by recent geopolitical tensions and macroeconomic instability. Nonetheless, Bitwise and its competitors are moving forward, betting on the long-term viability of the debasement trade.

Despite underperforming gold for the past few months, asset managers still believe that Bitcoin is a hedge against currency devaluation and fiscal debt.

And this belief has led Bitwise to unveil a combined Bitcoin gold ETF – Bitwise Proficio Currency Debasement ETF (BPRO). This is meant to offer investors exposure to the so-called “debasement trade.”

The trade is a narrative that the demand for safe havens like gold, silver, and Bitcoin will increase as U.S fiscal debts and subsequent currency devaluation slash purchasing power and wealth.

Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan echoed the same, adding that this “hard asset approach” is the missing piece in the portfolio. Especially since traditional stocks and ETFs haven’t helped preserve wealth amid rapid money supply expansion. He added,

“By combining the historical scarcity of gold with the modern, digital scarcity of Bitcoin, BPRO offers a powerful new way to hedge against the persistent decline of fiat currency.”

Bitwise’s BTC-gold ETF hits $13M on day 1

The firm highlighted that U.S debt increased to close to $40 trillion, and the U.S dollar’s purchasing power dropped by 40% over the past two decades – Reinforcing currency ‘debasement’ as a real risk.

Bitwise’s move came a few days after rival asset manager 21Shares launched a similar product.

The BPRO product saw $13.2 million in trading volume and $52.4 million in assets under management (AUM) on day 1, underscoring interest in the “debasement trade.”

In fact, the asset manager’s latest survey showed that alternative hedges against fiat debasement ranked second among the areas institutional investors were most interested in, after stablecoins.

Put differently, the push for a combined BTC and gold ETF or “debasement trade” isn’t just media hype. There is data supporting it.

BTC-gold correlation falters

Here, it’s worth pointing out that the current short-term correlation between BTC and gold doesn’t align with the data.

Over the past year, gold has rallied by 78% while BTC dropped by 14%. Other perceived safe havens such as silver have also soared by 200% – Making BTC a key laggard.

It is unclear whether the negative correlation will continue in 2026. However, this decoupling occurred after the 10 October 2025, crash, pushing the correlation into negative territory in late 2025.

So far in 2026, an attempt to flip the correlation back to positive has failed. Especially after BTC slid lower while gold climbed higher amid this week’s geopolitical tensions and Japan’s bond crisis.


Final Thoughts

  • Bitwise and 21Shares are betting big on the debasement trade and have unveiled a combined BTC and gold ETF as an alternative hedge.
  • Gold-BTC correlation tried to flip to positive, but the recent macro landscape derailed the momentum.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main purpose of Bitwise's new ETF, BPRO?

AThe Bitwise Proficio Currency Debasement ETF (BPRO) is designed to offer investors exposure to the 'debasement trade,' serving as a hedge against currency devaluation and fiscal debt by combining Bitcoin and gold.

QAccording to the article, what real-world data supports the need for a 'debasement trade' hedge?

AThe article cites that U.S. debt has increased to nearly $40 trillion and the U.S. dollar's purchasing power has dropped by 40% over the past two decades, reinforcing currency debasement as a real risk.

QHow did the correlation between Bitcoin and gold perform in the recent past according to the article?

AThe correlation between Bitcoin and gold turned negative in late 2025 after the crash on October 10, 2025. In the past year, gold rallied 78% while Bitcoin dropped 14%, and attempts to flip the correlation back to positive in 2026 have failed.

QWhat was the initial market response to the launch of the BPRO ETF?

AOn its first day, the BPRO ETF saw $13.2 million in trading volume and gathered $52.4 million in assets under management (AUM), indicating significant investor interest.

QAmong institutional investors, how did interest in 'alternative hedges against fiat debasement' rank in Bitwise's survey?

AAccording to Bitwise's latest survey, alternative hedges against fiat debasement ranked as the second area institutional investors were most interested in, right after stablecoins.

İlgili Okumalar

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit16 dk önce

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit16 dk önce

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit31 dk önce

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit31 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片