Inside Bitwise’s bet on the debasement trade with Bitcoin-gold ETF

ambcrypto2026-01-24 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-24 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Despite recent underperformance compared to gold, asset managers like Bitwise believe Bitcoin remains a crucial hedge against currency devaluation and fiscal debt. This has led to the launch of the Bitwise Proficio Currency Debasement ETF (BPRO), a combined Bitcoin-gold ETF designed to capitalize on the "debasement trade" narrative. The fund aims to protect investors from the erosion of purchasing power caused by expanding money supply and rising U.S. debt, which now nears $40 trillion. The ETF garnered significant interest, with $13.2 million in trading volume and $52.4 million in assets under management on its first day. Bitwise's internal data indicates strong institutional demand for such alternative hedges, ranking second only to stablecoins. However, the short-term correlation between Bitcoin and gold has recently been negative, with gold surging 78% over the past year while Bitcoin declined 14%. Despite attempts to revert to a positive correlation in 2026, this decoupling has persisted, exacerbated by recent geopolitical tensions and macroeconomic instability. Nonetheless, Bitwise and its competitors are moving forward, betting on the long-term viability of the debasement trade.

Despite underperforming gold for the past few months, asset managers still believe that Bitcoin is a hedge against currency devaluation and fiscal debt.

And this belief has led Bitwise to unveil a combined Bitcoin gold ETF – Bitwise Proficio Currency Debasement ETF (BPRO). This is meant to offer investors exposure to the so-called “debasement trade.”

The trade is a narrative that the demand for safe havens like gold, silver, and Bitcoin will increase as U.S fiscal debts and subsequent currency devaluation slash purchasing power and wealth.

Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan echoed the same, adding that this “hard asset approach” is the missing piece in the portfolio. Especially since traditional stocks and ETFs haven’t helped preserve wealth amid rapid money supply expansion. He added,

“By combining the historical scarcity of gold with the modern, digital scarcity of Bitcoin, BPRO offers a powerful new way to hedge against the persistent decline of fiat currency.”

Bitwise’s BTC-gold ETF hits $13M on day 1

The firm highlighted that U.S debt increased to close to $40 trillion, and the U.S dollar’s purchasing power dropped by 40% over the past two decades – Reinforcing currency ‘debasement’ as a real risk.

Bitwise’s move came a few days after rival asset manager 21Shares launched a similar product.

The BPRO product saw $13.2 million in trading volume and $52.4 million in assets under management (AUM) on day 1, underscoring interest in the “debasement trade.”

In fact, the asset manager’s latest survey showed that alternative hedges against fiat debasement ranked second among the areas institutional investors were most interested in, after stablecoins.

Put differently, the push for a combined BTC and gold ETF or “debasement trade” isn’t just media hype. There is data supporting it.

BTC-gold correlation falters

Here, it’s worth pointing out that the current short-term correlation between BTC and gold doesn’t align with the data.

Over the past year, gold has rallied by 78% while BTC dropped by 14%. Other perceived safe havens such as silver have also soared by 200% – Making BTC a key laggard.

It is unclear whether the negative correlation will continue in 2026. However, this decoupling occurred after the 10 October 2025, crash, pushing the correlation into negative territory in late 2025.

So far in 2026, an attempt to flip the correlation back to positive has failed. Especially after BTC slid lower while gold climbed higher amid this week’s geopolitical tensions and Japan’s bond crisis.


Final Thoughts

  • Bitwise and 21Shares are betting big on the debasement trade and have unveiled a combined BTC and gold ETF as an alternative hedge.
  • Gold-BTC correlation tried to flip to positive, but the recent macro landscape derailed the momentum.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main purpose of Bitwise's new ETF, BPRO?

AThe Bitwise Proficio Currency Debasement ETF (BPRO) is designed to offer investors exposure to the 'debasement trade,' serving as a hedge against currency devaluation and fiscal debt by combining Bitcoin and gold.

QAccording to the article, what real-world data supports the need for a 'debasement trade' hedge?

AThe article cites that U.S. debt has increased to nearly $40 trillion and the U.S. dollar's purchasing power has dropped by 40% over the past two decades, reinforcing currency debasement as a real risk.

QHow did the correlation between Bitcoin and gold perform in the recent past according to the article?

AThe correlation between Bitcoin and gold turned negative in late 2025 after the crash on October 10, 2025. In the past year, gold rallied 78% while Bitcoin dropped 14%, and attempts to flip the correlation back to positive in 2026 have failed.

QWhat was the initial market response to the launch of the BPRO ETF?

AOn its first day, the BPRO ETF saw $13.2 million in trading volume and gathered $52.4 million in assets under management (AUM), indicating significant investor interest.

QAmong institutional investors, how did interest in 'alternative hedges against fiat debasement' rank in Bitwise's survey?

AAccording to Bitwise's latest survey, alternative hedges against fiat debasement ranked as the second area institutional investors were most interested in, right after stablecoins.

İlgili Okumalar

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbit5 saat önce

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbit5 saat önce

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手5 saat önce

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手5 saat önce

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit5 saat önce

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbit5 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片