Hyperliquid unveils lobbying arm ahead of U.S. elections – Details

ambcrypto2026-02-19 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-19 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Hyperliquid, a leading perpetual DEX, has launched a lobbying group called the Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC) ahead of the U.S. elections. Led by pro-crypto lawyer Jake Chervinsky, HPC aims to address regulatory challenges in DeFi and perpetual derivatives markets. The project is funding the initiative with 1 million HYPE tokens, worth approximately $29 million, to advocate for laws that protect users and builders. Founder Jeff Yan emphasized the importance of U.S. financial regulation in democratizing finance. Despite Hyperliquid's success—with over $1 billion in revenue and $4 trillion in trading volume—concerns exist about regulatory risks, including potential tax evasion or sanctions bypassing by traders. Analysts suggest the move may be a precaution against possible anti-crypto policies if Democrats regain congressional control, which could heighten regulatory scrutiny.

Hyperliquid, the popular perpetual DEX platform, has unveiled a lobby group ahead of the U.S elections.

In a statement, the lobby, Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC), said that it seeks to “answer toughest policy questions facing perpetual derivatives and decentralized financial (DeFi) markets.”

It added,

“We will bridge the gap between law and next-generation market infrastructure.”

The project said it will unstake 1 million HYPE tokens to fund the advocacy outfit. As of the press time, that would translate to approximately $29 million.

Long-time pro-cryptocurrency lawyer and DeFi advocate, Jake Chervinsky, will lead HPC.

According to the project, the move could help set a smooth path forward and cover the regulatory risks from U.S regulators.

Commenting on the same, Hyperliquid Founder Jeff Yan said,

“Democratizing finance requires education and advocacy for laws that protect users and builders alike.”

He added,

“Global financial regulation will be shaped in the United States, and we must work to ensure that these new policies thoughtfully embrace the potential of the new financial system enabled by Hyperliquid.”

Community reactions

Hyperliquid has been live for about three years now. However, it is already outpacing incumbents like Binance and Coinbase on crypto perpetual markets and other metrics.

In fact, the platform has expanded to non-crypto assets that now account for over 30% of its overall trading volume.

With a cumulative revenue of over $1 billion and nearly $4 trillion in perpetual volumes, Hyperliquid has clearly become a crypto success story.

But beneath the growth story, there’s been speculation that most traders on the platform could be running a regulatory arbitrage for tax evasion or even bypassing sanctions.

For critics, these allegations could be a regulatory risk for Hyperliquid if the Department of Justice (DoJ) or the U.S Treasury comes knocking. In fact, Hyperliquid supporters agreed that the platform’s growth could be derailed either by the DoJ probe or a security breach.

Besides, the market is pricing an increasing chance of Democrats retaking control of Congress in the 2026 midterms.

If so, the previous anti-crypto movement may resurface and exacerbate Hyperliquid’s regulatory risk. And to some extent, this may partially explain the recent lobby move.

Ryan Scott, a trader and analyst, echoed a similar stance and added,

“It is clear why. Hyperliquid is not regulated or attached to any regulated entity. They are prepping for the Dems to come in and cause havoc.”

It remains to be seen whether the move will clear the perceived regulatory risk to the platform.


Final Summary

  • Hyperliquid has unveiled an advocacy arm, Hyperliquid Policy Center, to push for DeFi regulatory clarity ahead of the U.S elections.
  • Analysts believe the platform may be preparing for any changes at the Congress, especially if anti-crypto Democrats retake control.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the name of the lobbying group unveiled by Hyperliquid and what is its primary goal?

AThe lobbying group is called the Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC), and its primary goal is to answer the toughest policy questions facing perpetual derivatives and decentralized financial (DeFi) markets, aiming to bridge the gap between law and next-generation market infrastructure.

QHow is Hyperliquid funding its new advocacy group and what is leading it?

AHyperliquid is funding the advocacy group by unstaking 1 million HYPE tokens, which is approximately $29 million at press time. It is being led by long-time pro-cryptocurrency lawyer and DeFi advocate, Jake Chervinsky.

QAccording to the article, what are the two main regulatory risks that could derail Hyperliquid's growth?

AThe two main regulatory risks are a potential probe by the Department of Justice (DoJ) or the U.S. Treasury, and a security breach on the platform.

QWhy does the article suggest that Hyperliquid's lobby move may be partially explained by the upcoming U.S. elections?

AThe market is pricing in an increasing chance of Democrats retaking control of Congress in the 2026 midterms. If this happens, the previous anti-crypto movement may resurface, exacerbating Hyperliquid's regulatory risk, which the lobby aims to address.

QWhat did trader and analyst Ryan Scott say about the reason for Hyperliquid's lobbying efforts?

ARyan Scott stated that Hyperliquid is not regulated or attached to any regulated entity and that they are preparing for the Democrats to come into power and 'cause havoc,' which explains the need for the lobby.

İlgili Okumalar

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

**Summary:** A growing "anti-college" movement is gaining traction among elite circles in Silicon Valley, challenging the traditional value of a four-year university degree. Proponents argue that college has become an expensive, slow, and increasingly irrelevant waste of time, especially in the fast-paced tech world where opportunities pass by quickly. The movement is led by figures like billionaire Peter Thiel, who criticizes universities for high costs, ideological indoctrination, and stifling true innovation. His "Thiel Fellowship" pays young people to drop out and pursue ventures. Companies like Palantir Technologies (co-founded by Thiel) fuel this trend with programs like the "Meritocracy Fellowship," which offers high school graduates paid internships as an alternative to immediate college enrollment, promising a practical "Palantir Degree." Key drivers include: 1. **Economics:** Skyrocketing student debt versus the allure of immediate, high-paying tech jobs or startup funding. 2. **Technology:** AI and online tools lowering barriers to self-education and product development, making formal instruction seem inefficient. 3. **Culture:** A backlash against perceived "woke" ideology and DEI policies in universities, coupled with a belief that these institutions suppress meritocracy and masculine drive. The movement is notably male-dominated. Critics, like economist David Deming, warn against overgeneralizing from dropout success stories (survivorship bias). He emphasizes that genuine autodidacts are rare, corporate training is narrowly focused, and the "college wage premium" remains high for most people. University liberal arts education, he argues, builds adaptable problem-solving skills and broad perspectives. The debate highlights a deeper crisis in education. The core model of the modern university appears increasingly mismatched with the speed of the information age. The movement signals a shift in the locus of learning from institutional "education" to personal, active "learning" powered by the internet and AI. Ultimately, this may not mean the end of university, but rather a painful evolution. The future likely holds more hybrid, personalized, and lifelong learning pathways. The central question becomes: in a world changing faster than any curriculum, how do we best learn?

marsbit18 dk önce

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

marsbit18 dk önce

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

The commercialization of generative AI is facing a critical inflection point as a potential price war looms. According to The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI is considering a significant cut to its token fees to compete with rival Anthropic, signaling a shift from a growth-at-all-costs model focused on token consumption. This move comes as both companies, reportedly losing billions on compute, prepare for IPOs, and as enterprise customers face "bill shock" from switching to usage-based token billing. Reports indicate poor ROI, with one analysis finding only 18 cents of every dollar spent on AI tokens generates user-facing value. The industry's initial phases—from flat-rate subscriptions to aggressive subsidies—have given way to a reckoning with real costs. Analysts debate the future: some predict a bifurcation between premium, high-cost models for complex tasks and cheaper alternatives for routine work, while others believe overall spending will still rise as agentic AI increases tokens per task. Notably, Chinese model DeepSeek's low-cost API is gaining traction with U.S. enterprises, adding competitive pressure. The core challenge is redefining value beyond token volume ("tokenmaxxing") toward measurable productivity ("valuemaxxing"), as the entire AI value chain, from cloud providers to chipmakers, feels the ripple effects of unsustainable pricing.

marsbit22 dk önce

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

marsbit22 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片