Hyperliquid Launches D.C. Policy Center Backed By $28 Million In HYPE Tokens

bitcoinist2026-02-19 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-19 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Hyperliquid has announced the creation of the Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC), a new Washington, D.C.-based organization backed by a $28.7 million allocation of HYPE tokens. The center will be led by Jake Chervinsky, former executive of the Blockchain Association and Variant, and aims to advocate for clearer federal regulations for decentralized finance (DeFi). HPC will focus on educating lawmakers and regulators about DeFi protocols and pushing for a legal framework for perpetual derivatives, which are popular in crypto but face regulatory uncertainty in the U.S. The initiative also includes key hires from legal and policy backgrounds to support its mission.

Hyperliquid (HYPE) announced on Wednesday that its Foundation will back the creation of the Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC), a new Washington, D.C.-based organization designed to advocate for clearer federal rules governing decentralized finance (DeFi).

Jake Chervinsky To Lead Hyperliquid Policy Center

The new center will be led by Jake Chervinsky, who previously held senior roles at the Blockchain Association, one of the industry’s leading trade groups, and at venture capital firm Variant.

As HPC’s inaugural CEO, he is expected to lead efforts to engage lawmakers and regulators at a time when digital asset policy is shifting away from previous roadblocks that hampered the sector’s growth in the United States.

In comments to Fortune, Chervinsky said the United States is at a pivotal juncture in determining how decentralized finance should be integrated into the country’s financial framework.

The center’s mission will be to help members of Congress and federal agencies better understand how DeFi protocols function and to offer technical expertise as regulators craft rules that can accommodate the technology, the executive asserted.

He emphasized that much of today’s financial regulatory system was designed for an earlier, analog era. In his view, those frameworks are poorly suited to decentralized protocols, which enable users to trade digital assets on automated platforms that operate without centralized intermediaries.

HPC Backs Perpetuals Framework

Among the center’s top priorities will be establishing a legal structure for perpetual derivatives, commonly known as “perps.” These instruments, which do not have expiration dates, are widely traded on offshore crypto exchanges and account for a significant share of global digital asset activity.

Chervinsky contends that perpetuals offer advantages over traditional options and futures contracts because they are simpler and provide more direct exposure to underlying assets. Despite their popularity abroad, they have yet to gain a foothold in mainstream US finance, in part due to regulatory uncertainty.

To fund the initiative, the foundation affiliated with Hyperliquid is contributing 1 million HYPE tokens. At current prices of $28.75 per token, that allocation is valued at approximately $28.7 million.

The 1D chart shows HYPE testing the $28 support on Wednesday. Source: HYPEUSDT on TradingView.com

In addition to Jake Chervinsky’s role in the new venture, the founding team includes Policy Counsel Brad Bourque, formerly an associate at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, and Policy Director Salah Ghazzal, who previously served as Policy Lead at Variant.

The Hyperliquid Policy Center is also building out its leadership bench and is currently recruiting for key roles, including Chief of Staff, Head of Communications, and Head of Government Relations.

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC) and what is its primary mission?

AThe Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC) is a new Washington, D.C.-based organization backed by the Hyperliquid Foundation. Its primary mission is to advocate for clearer federal rules governing decentralized finance (DeFi) by helping members of Congress and federal agencies better understand how DeFi protocols function and offering technical expertise to regulators.

QWho is leading the Hyperliquid Policy Center and what is his background?

AJake Chervinsky is leading the Hyperliquid Policy Center as its inaugural CEO. He previously held senior roles at the Blockchain Association, a leading industry trade group, and at the venture capital firm Variant.

QWhat is one of the top regulatory priorities for the HPC, and why is it important?

AOne of the top priorities for the HPC is establishing a legal structure for perpetual derivatives ('perps'). These instruments are widely traded on offshore crypto exchanges and represent a significant share of global digital asset activity, but they have yet to gain a foothold in mainstream US finance due to regulatory uncertainty.

QHow is the Hyperliquid Foundation funding the new policy center, and what is the value of the contribution?

AThe Hyperliquid Foundation is funding the initiative by contributing 1 million HYPE tokens. At the current price of $28.75 per token, this allocation is valued at approximately $28.7 million.

QBesides Jake Chervinsky, who else is on the founding team of the Hyperliquid Policy Center?

AThe founding team also includes Policy Counsel Brad Bourque, formerly an associate at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, and Policy Director Salah Ghazzal, who previously served as Policy Lead at Variant.

İlgili Okumalar

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

Title: Arbitrum Poses as Hacker to Recover Stolen Funds from KelpDAO Last week, KelpDAO suffered a hack resulting in nearly $300 million in losses, marking the largest DeFi security incident this year. Approximately 30,765 ETH (worth over $70 million) remained on an Arbitrum address controlled by the attacker. In an unprecedented move, Arbitrum’s Security Council utilized its emergency authority to upgrade the Inbox bridge contract, adding a function that allowed them to impersonate the hacker’s address and initiate a transfer without access to its private key. The council’s action, approved by 9 of its 12 members, moved the stolen ETH to a frozen address in a single transaction before reverting the contract to its original state. The operation was coordinated with law enforcement, which attributed the attack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Community reactions are divided: some praise the recovery of funds, while others question the centralization of power, as the council can upgrade core contracts without governance votes. However, such emergency mechanisms are common among major L2s. Despite the partial recovery, over $292 million was stolen in total, with more than $100 million in bad debt on Aave and remaining funds scattered across other chains. The incident highlights escalating security challenges in DeFi, with state-sponsored hackers employing advanced tactics and L2s responding with elevated countermeasures.

marsbit4 dk önce

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

marsbit4 dk önce

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit58 dk önce

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbit58 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片