HYPE Price Rises as Trading Activity and Open Interest Increase

TheNewsCrypto2026-01-28 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-28 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Hyperliquid's native token HYPE has risen to approximately $32.90, marking a 15.67% gain in the past 24 hours, with trading volume reaching $912 million. Market capitalization stands at around $9.93 billion. Open interest on the platform has surged to $790 million, up significantly from $260 million a month prior, driven by increased trading in commodity-linked perpetuals and strong derivatives activity. Technical indicators suggest a short-term recovery after a prolonged consolidation below $30. The RSI nears 70, indicating strong buying momentum, while the MACD and Bull Bear Power Trend also signal growing bullish pressure. Key support is near $28, with resistance in the $34–$36 range. A break above could target $38–$40, though the broader trend depends on sustained market participation.

Hyperliquid’s native token HYPE is trading at around $32.90, showing a 15.67% gain over the past 24 hours. During this period, the price ranged between an intraday low of $27.48 and a high of $34.64. The token’s market capitalization is about $9.93 billion, and 24-hour trading volume is near $912 million, reflecting increased participation in HYPE markets.

Recent activity on Hyperliquid has picked up, with open interest on the platform’s HIP-3 module rising to around $790 million, compared to roughly $260 million a month earlier. The increase has been supported by higher trading in commodity-linked perpetual contracts and steady participation across derivatives markets, alongside strong overall volume on the Hyperliquid decentralized exchange.

HYPE Shows Short-Term Recovery After Extended Consolidation

Looking at the daily chart, HYPE shows a sharp move higher after an extended period of sideways trading below $30. Price had been range-bound for several weeks, with resistance near the mid-$20 levels. The recent breakout above this range aligns with a rebound from earlier lows.

The RSI (14) currently sits near 70, indicating that buying momentum has increased relative to recent weeks. This higher reading suggests that demand has picked up, though it also reflects conditions that may lead to short pauses in upward movement if the indicator stays near the upper zone.

Momentum indicators on the chart also show a shift. The MACD line has moved above the signal line, and the histogram shows rising green bars. That highlighting a pickup in short-term buying interest. At the same time, the Bull Bear Power Trend indicator has turned positive, suggesting that bullish pressure is increasing relative to bearish pressure.

Zooming in, trend-strength readings such as the ADX are moderate, which suggests that while upward momentum is present, the move is not yet part of a prolonged trend. Price action continues to form higher lows after recent basing, but strong resistance remains ahead.

In the near term, key support is seen near $28, where price paused before the recent rally, while resistance lies in the $34–$36 area. A move beyond this zone could open the path toward $38–$40, where selling pressure has been noted in the past.

Overall, Hyperliquid’s price action reflects a short-term recovery phase with higher activity. But the broader trend remains dependent on continued participation and volume in the derivatives markets.

TagsAltcoinCrypto MarketHYPEHyperliquidHyperliquid (HYPE)

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the current trading price of Hyperliquid's native token HYPE and what is its 24-hour gain?

AHYPE is currently trading at around $32.90, showing a 15.67% gain over the past 24 hours.

QHow much has the open interest on Hyperliquid's HIP-3 module increased compared to a month ago?

AThe open interest on Hyperliquid's HIP-3 module has risen to around $790 million, compared to roughly $260 million a month earlier.

QWhat does the RSI (14) level near 70 indicate about the HYPE token?

AThe RSI (14) level near 70 indicates that buying momentum has increased relative to recent weeks, suggesting higher demand but also potential for short pauses in upward movement.

QWhat are the key support and resistance levels for HYPE mentioned in the analysis?

AKey support is seen near $28, while resistance lies in the $34–$36 area. A move beyond this zone could open the path toward $38–$40.

QWhat do the momentum indicators, specifically the MACD and Bull Bear Power Trend, show for HYPE?

AThe MACD line has moved above the signal line with rising green bars on the histogram, indicating a pickup in short-term buying interest. The Bull Bear Power Trend indicator has turned positive, suggesting increasing bullish pressure.

İlgili Okumalar

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit34 dk önce

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit34 dk önce

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit1 saat önce

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片