How to View the Divergence Between Gold and Oil Prices?

marsbit2026-03-23 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-23 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The article analyzes the divergence between gold and oil prices following the outbreak of the U.S.-Iran war. While oil prices surged significantly, gold experienced a decline, contrary to expectations given its traditional role as a safe-haven asset during geopolitical crises. Gold serves three primary hedging functions: against geopolitical risk, inflation risk, and U.S. dollar risk. Since late 2023, gold had been in a strong bull market, rising from $1,800 to over $5,000, driven by simultaneous geopolitical tensions (e.g., Russia-Ukraine war, Middle East conflicts), inflationary pressures, and a weakening dollar due to the Fed's premature rate cuts. However, after the U.S. "decapitation" strike on Iran, gold prices fell sharply. This was attributed to two main factors: a shift of capital from gold to oil, as investors repositioned portfolios to capitalize on rising oil prices, and a liquidity crisis in U.S. financial markets that forced large-scale sell-offs of gold—a highly liquid asset—to meet redemption demands. More critically, growing pessimism about a prolonged U.S.-Iran conflict raised fears of sustained high oil prices, potential global economic disruption, and a possible reversal of Fed monetary policy (delayed cuts or even renewed hikes). This expectation of tighter policy caused gold’s dollar-related hedging function to reverse, overwhelming its geopolitical and inflation hedging roles and leading to a severe correction. Oil prices also experienced volatility...

Since the outbreak of the US-Iran war, as two commodities highly correlated with geopolitics, crude oil and gold have shown completely different trends: the former has risen sharply, while the latter has fallen slightly. Why is this?

As a natural currency, gold has three major hedging functions: hedging against geopolitical risks, inflation risks, and US dollar risks. The price of gold is simultaneously influenced by these three forces, thus playing varying degrees of hedging roles at different stages.

Since the end of 2023, precious metals have experienced a super bull market, with the price of gold soaring from $1,800 to over $5,000. The reason for such strong upward momentum is that gold simultaneously served as a hedge against geopolitical risks, inflation risks, and US dollar risks.

In October 2023, on top of the Russia-Ukraine war, large-scale conflicts broke out between Israel and Palestine, plunging the Middle East into turmoil. In 2024, the Red Sea crisis erupted, and the Bab el-Mandeb Strait was blockaded. In 2025, Trump took office, and the international order became precarious. These are all manifestations of chaotic geopolitical situations, providing strong support for the price of gold.

On the other hand, in 2023, the US economy shifted from overheating to stagflation. By 2024, influenced by political factors, the Federal Reserve boldly initiated an interest rate-cutting cycle before inflation issue was fully resolved, leading to a resurgence of US dollar liquidity. On one hand, there was mid-cycle easing, and on the other, the risk of secondary inflation. Gold simultaneously served as a hedge against US dollar risks and inflation risks, fueling the takeoff of gold prices.

With all three hedging functions in place, how could the price of gold not rise? In addition, benefiting from the Federal Reserve's easing cycle, both emerging and developed markets, whether in A-shares or US stocks, experienced a bull market.

Now, regarding oil prices, last year's average oil price was significantly lower than the previous year. This was because after Trump took office, he persuaded OPEC to significantly increase crude oil production in an attempt to force Russia to make concessions at the negotiating table. This strategy initially worked, with Putin repeatedly softening his stance on peace talks. If not for the US-Iran war, it was expected that Russia and Ukraine would sign a ceasefire agreement in the first half of this year.

Since the outbreak of the Middle East war, the prices of gold and oil have experienced multiple fluctuations, with their trends diverging due to different causes.

For gold, in mid-to-late January (half a month before the war), as the probability of a US-Iran conflict continued to rise, the price of gold increased, reflecting its geopolitical hedging attribute. According to the market's mainstream expectations at the time, this conflict might be similar to last year's "Midnight Hammer" operation, with a short duration, making it more of a temporary trend.

After the US carried out a "decapitation" strike on Iran, the price of gold rebounded briefly but soon plummeted. This was because the main force shifted from gold to crude oil. Due to the excessive concentration of gold holdings earlier, the main funds chose to sell gold to obtain liquidity for going long on crude oil. In other words, the "position switching" from gold to crude oil led to a fall in gold and a rise in oil.

On the other hand, as overseas markets began to price in a prolonged US-Iran war, risk assets such as US stocks came under pressure, triggering a wave of redemptions. The US financial market faced a liquidity crisis, and as an asset with liquidity second only to cash, gold was heavily sold. In other words, the selling pressure on gold in early March was not because international investors were bearish on gold but rather a self-preservation strategy amid the liquidity crisis.

If it were just a liquidity crisis, the price of gold would often form a "deep V" trend, providing buying opportunities. However, the more troublesome part came later. Since mid-March, overseas expectations for the US-Iran conflict have become more pessimistic, with concerns not only about the potential long-term blockade of the strait but also about the possibility of warring parties launching large-scale attacks on each other's energy facilities. This would keep oil prices at relatively high levels for an extended period, dealing a devastating blow to the global economy and even causing the collapse of the international order. In such a scenario, the Federal Reserve might delay its interest rate-cutting pace or even restart a rate-hiking cycle as it did in 2022. Based on this expectation, the price of gold plummeted, with the extent of the correction breaking the highest record in recent years.

In other words, gold's geopolitical hedging function is still at play, but the current sharp decline in gold prices is driven by expectations of a reversal in the Federal Reserve's monetary policy. The US dollar anti-hedging attribute of gold has overshadowed its geopolitical and inflation hedging attributes, becoming its main driver. Compared to previous declines, the fundamentals of gold have changed. It is no longer a liquidity crisis or profit-taking but rather overseas concerns about the tightening of the Federal Reserve's monetary policy. These concerns are also reflected in risk assets such as A-shares and US stocks, as no one is spared when disaster strikes.

Since the outbreak of the US-Iran war, oil prices have also experienced twists and turns. The reason for this volatility is that overseas investors' perception of geopolitics has deviated. After the "decapitation" strike, oil prices continued to rise, reaching nearly $120 per barrel. However, in early March, as Trump hinted that "the war will end soon," the market began executing "TACO" trades, believing that the Iran situation might ease, and oil prices once plummeted by 30%. However, unlike tariff issues, the initiative in a geopolitical crisis does not lie with Trump. He cannot extricate himself easily while the strait is blockaded. Eventually, the market corrected its expectations for oil, and prices returned to an upward trend.

On geopolitical issues, the market sometimes makes misjudgments, but such pricing deviations are not necessarily bad. A drop in oil prices can反而 provide opportunities to add positions, making it easier for latecomers to enter the market.

Looking ahead, the trends of gold and oil prices will depend on the pace of the US-Iran conflict. If it evolves into a prolonged war like the Russia-Ukraine conflict, gold may lack配置 value in the first half of the year, and in the short term, one might focus on the energy chain. However, the situation could still reverse. The US-Iran war may reach a critical turning point, which will determine whether the Strait of Hormuz can be unblocked in the short term. It all depends on Trump's choice.

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the article, what are the three main safe-haven functions of gold?

AThe three main safe-haven functions of gold are: hedging against geopolitical risks, hedging against inflation risks, and hedging against U.S. dollar risks.

QWhat event in 2025 is mentioned as a factor contributing to the chaotic geopolitical situation that supported gold prices?

ADonald Trump taking office in 2025 is mentioned as a factor that made the international order precarious, contributing to the chaotic geopolitical situation.

QWhy did the price of gold fall sharply after the U.S. 'decapitation' strike on Iran, as explained in the article?

AThe price fell because major funds switched from gold to crude oil, selling gold to obtain liquidity for oil positions. Additionally, a liquidity crisis in U.S. financial markets led to large-scale selling as gold is a highly liquid asset.

QWhat was the main reason for the significant drop in gold prices from mid-March onwards, according to the analysis?

AThe main reason was the market's expectation that the Federal Reserve might delay interest rate cuts or even restart a rate hike cycle due to concerns that the U.S.-Iran conflict could keep oil prices high and severely impact the global economy.

QWhat does the article suggest is the key factor that will determine the future trends of gold and oil prices?

AThe future trends of gold and oil prices will depend on the pace and development of the U.S.-Iran conflict, specifically whether it becomes a protracted war like in Ukraine and the critical issue of whether the Strait of Hormuz can be unblocked in the short term.

İlgili Okumalar

TechFlow Intelligence: Trump-Linked Companies Transfer $12 Million in Assets Before China Visit, 'The Big Short' Protagonist Warns of Stock Market Bubble Again

The article reports multiple developments across tech, crypto, and finance. In AI, Mozilla used AI for large-scale code review, Google confirmed hackers used AI to find zero-day exploits, and OpenAI deployed GPT-5.5 to find errors in math benchmarks. A court ruled Anthropic's scanning and destroying books for AI training as fair use, while its Claude platform launched on AWS. Google's new video model 'Omni' was leaked. In crypto/Web3, Trump-linked companies transferred $12M in crypto assets before a China visit. BlackRock chose Ethereum for tokenized funds, and a hacker stole $174k via a malicious NFT that tricked an AI. Jack Dorsey's first tweet NFT plummeted from $2.9M to under $5. In chips/hardware, TSMC approved an additional $20B for its Arizona plant. Apple's Tim Cook and Elon Musk will accompany Trump to China, while Nvidia's Jensen Huang is notably absent. For markets, Michael Burry warned of parabolic stock rises and suggested near-total sell-offs, with online discussions comparing current sentiment to the 1999 bubble. Other notes include WTI oil surpassing $100, a 20% price hike for Beijing-Shanghai high-speed rail, and new products like Unitree's $26.9k humanoid robot. The underlying theme suggests AI is becoming infrastructure, creating pressure on old systems while a new order is not yet ready, leaving investors anxious.

marsbit14 dk önce

TechFlow Intelligence: Trump-Linked Companies Transfer $12 Million in Assets Before China Visit, 'The Big Short' Protagonist Warns of Stock Market Bubble Again

marsbit14 dk önce

2026 New Policy Interpretation: The "Mutual Pursuit" of Intelligent Agents and AI Terminals, and the Three Major Value Reconstructions in the AIoT Industry

In May 2026, China's national ministries released two pivotal policy documents that jointly establish a strategic "dual-track" framework for the AIoT industry. The "Intelligent Agent Standardized Application and Innovation Development Implementation Opinions" defines the "soul"—positioning intelligent agents as core AI products. The "Artificial Intelligence Terminal Intelligence Grading" national standard defines the "body"—establishing a four-tier capability ladder (L1 to L4) for AI hardware. This synchronized policy approach is globally unique, moving beyond market-led (US) or risk-focused (EU) models. It frames AIoT as a new type of "intelligent infrastructure," comparable to electricity or the internet in historical significance. The core analysis identifies a value evolution from IoT 1.0 (connection) to AIoT 4.0 (collaboration, represented by the forward-looking L4 level). This "L4" signifies a paradigm shift: from users operating tools to delegating tasks to agent-like devices ("Intelligent Action of All Things"). The article outlines three strategic paths for companies: becoming Standard Definers, Scenario Integrators (focusing on 19 specified application areas), or Infrastructure Builders. A critical 18-24 month window is identified for strategic positioning. A "Four Levers" strategy is proposed: leveraging Standards (L-level certification), leveraging Scenarios (deep vertical focus), leveraging Open Source (for cost reduction and ecosystem influence), and leveraging Momentum (engaging in global protocol ecosystems). In conclusion, these policies are a starting gun for a decade-long industrial transformation, shifting the industry narrative from "Intelligent Connection of All Things" to "Intelligent Action of All Things," with companies needing to choose their赛道and execution strategy decisively.

marsbit1 saat önce

2026 New Policy Interpretation: The "Mutual Pursuit" of Intelligent Agents and AI Terminals, and the Three Major Value Reconstructions in the AIoT Industry

marsbit1 saat önce

Splashing Out 27 Billion Yuan, OpenAI Establishes New Company to Accelerate AI Deployment

On May 11th, OpenAI announced the formation of a new company, "OpenAI Deployment Company," with an initial investment of over $4 billion (approximately 27.2 billion RMB). This venture aims to help businesses build and deploy AI solutions. OpenAI is also acquiring the AI consulting firm Toromo to rapidly scale the deployment company's capabilities. This new entity, majority-owned by OpenAI, brings together 19 investment, consulting, and system integration partners, led by TPG with co-lead founding partners including Advent International, Bain Capital, and Brookfield. OpenAI's Chief Revenue Officer, Denise Dresser, stated that while AI is becoming increasingly capable, the current challenge lies in integrating these systems into core business infrastructure and workflows. The deployment company is designed to bridge this gap and translate AI capabilities into operational impact. This move comes as OpenAI emphasizes the next competitive phase will depend on the efficiency of deploying AI in real business scenarios. The company reports over 1 million businesses already use its products and APIs. OpenAI is significantly increasing its investments in computing power, with co-founder Greg Brockman stating the company expects to spend $50 billion on compute this year, a dramatic increase from $3 million in 2017. The announcement follows OpenAI's recent completion of a record $122 billion funding round in late March, led by Amazon, Nvidia, and SoftBank, valuing the company at $852 billion post-money. Major strategic investors committed $110 billion as a base for this round. Concurrently, OpenAI is advancing its core model development. It has shifted focus from its Sora video generator to developing advanced robotics and AI models that interact with the physical world. It has also begun allowing select users access to a new model specialized in identifying software vulnerabilities and is reportedly preparing to launch an enhanced image generation model in the coming weeks. According to reports citing founder Sam Altman, OpenAI is considering an IPO as early as 2027, with a potential valuation around $1 trillion.

marsbit1 saat önce

Splashing Out 27 Billion Yuan, OpenAI Establishes New Company to Accelerate AI Deployment

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures

Popüler Makaleler

WAR Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! WAR (WAR) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında WAR (WAR) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: WAR (WAR) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınWAR (WAR) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: WAR (WAR) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında WAR (WAR) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

156 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2024.12.11Güncellenme 2026.04.28

WAR Nasıl Satın Alınır

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların WAR (WAR) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.

活动图片