How to View the Divergence Between Gold and Oil Prices?

marsbit2026-03-23 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-23 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The article analyzes the divergence between gold and oil prices following the outbreak of the U.S.-Iran war. While oil prices surged significantly, gold experienced a decline, contrary to expectations given its traditional role as a safe-haven asset during geopolitical crises. Gold serves three primary hedging functions: against geopolitical risk, inflation risk, and U.S. dollar risk. Since late 2023, gold had been in a strong bull market, rising from $1,800 to over $5,000, driven by simultaneous geopolitical tensions (e.g., Russia-Ukraine war, Middle East conflicts), inflationary pressures, and a weakening dollar due to the Fed's premature rate cuts. However, after the U.S. "decapitation" strike on Iran, gold prices fell sharply. This was attributed to two main factors: a shift of capital from gold to oil, as investors repositioned portfolios to capitalize on rising oil prices, and a liquidity crisis in U.S. financial markets that forced large-scale sell-offs of gold—a highly liquid asset—to meet redemption demands. More critically, growing pessimism about a prolonged U.S.-Iran conflict raised fears of sustained high oil prices, potential global economic disruption, and a possible reversal of Fed monetary policy (delayed cuts or even renewed hikes). This expectation of tighter policy caused gold’s dollar-related hedging function to reverse, overwhelming its geopolitical and inflation hedging roles and leading to a severe correction. Oil prices also experienced volatility...

Since the outbreak of the US-Iran war, as two commodities highly correlated with geopolitics, crude oil and gold have shown completely different trends: the former has risen sharply, while the latter has fallen slightly. Why is this?

As a natural currency, gold has three major hedging functions: hedging against geopolitical risks, inflation risks, and US dollar risks. The price of gold is simultaneously influenced by these three forces, thus playing varying degrees of hedging roles at different stages.

Since the end of 2023, precious metals have experienced a super bull market, with the price of gold soaring from $1,800 to over $5,000. The reason for such strong upward momentum is that gold simultaneously served as a hedge against geopolitical risks, inflation risks, and US dollar risks.

In October 2023, on top of the Russia-Ukraine war, large-scale conflicts broke out between Israel and Palestine, plunging the Middle East into turmoil. In 2024, the Red Sea crisis erupted, and the Bab el-Mandeb Strait was blockaded. In 2025, Trump took office, and the international order became precarious. These are all manifestations of chaotic geopolitical situations, providing strong support for the price of gold.

On the other hand, in 2023, the US economy shifted from overheating to stagflation. By 2024, influenced by political factors, the Federal Reserve boldly initiated an interest rate-cutting cycle before inflation issue was fully resolved, leading to a resurgence of US dollar liquidity. On one hand, there was mid-cycle easing, and on the other, the risk of secondary inflation. Gold simultaneously served as a hedge against US dollar risks and inflation risks, fueling the takeoff of gold prices.

With all three hedging functions in place, how could the price of gold not rise? In addition, benefiting from the Federal Reserve's easing cycle, both emerging and developed markets, whether in A-shares or US stocks, experienced a bull market.

Now, regarding oil prices, last year's average oil price was significantly lower than the previous year. This was because after Trump took office, he persuaded OPEC to significantly increase crude oil production in an attempt to force Russia to make concessions at the negotiating table. This strategy initially worked, with Putin repeatedly softening his stance on peace talks. If not for the US-Iran war, it was expected that Russia and Ukraine would sign a ceasefire agreement in the first half of this year.

Since the outbreak of the Middle East war, the prices of gold and oil have experienced multiple fluctuations, with their trends diverging due to different causes.

For gold, in mid-to-late January (half a month before the war), as the probability of a US-Iran conflict continued to rise, the price of gold increased, reflecting its geopolitical hedging attribute. According to the market's mainstream expectations at the time, this conflict might be similar to last year's "Midnight Hammer" operation, with a short duration, making it more of a temporary trend.

After the US carried out a "decapitation" strike on Iran, the price of gold rebounded briefly but soon plummeted. This was because the main force shifted from gold to crude oil. Due to the excessive concentration of gold holdings earlier, the main funds chose to sell gold to obtain liquidity for going long on crude oil. In other words, the "position switching" from gold to crude oil led to a fall in gold and a rise in oil.

On the other hand, as overseas markets began to price in a prolonged US-Iran war, risk assets such as US stocks came under pressure, triggering a wave of redemptions. The US financial market faced a liquidity crisis, and as an asset with liquidity second only to cash, gold was heavily sold. In other words, the selling pressure on gold in early March was not because international investors were bearish on gold but rather a self-preservation strategy amid the liquidity crisis.

If it were just a liquidity crisis, the price of gold would often form a "deep V" trend, providing buying opportunities. However, the more troublesome part came later. Since mid-March, overseas expectations for the US-Iran conflict have become more pessimistic, with concerns not only about the potential long-term blockade of the strait but also about the possibility of warring parties launching large-scale attacks on each other's energy facilities. This would keep oil prices at relatively high levels for an extended period, dealing a devastating blow to the global economy and even causing the collapse of the international order. In such a scenario, the Federal Reserve might delay its interest rate-cutting pace or even restart a rate-hiking cycle as it did in 2022. Based on this expectation, the price of gold plummeted, with the extent of the correction breaking the highest record in recent years.

In other words, gold's geopolitical hedging function is still at play, but the current sharp decline in gold prices is driven by expectations of a reversal in the Federal Reserve's monetary policy. The US dollar anti-hedging attribute of gold has overshadowed its geopolitical and inflation hedging attributes, becoming its main driver. Compared to previous declines, the fundamentals of gold have changed. It is no longer a liquidity crisis or profit-taking but rather overseas concerns about the tightening of the Federal Reserve's monetary policy. These concerns are also reflected in risk assets such as A-shares and US stocks, as no one is spared when disaster strikes.

Since the outbreak of the US-Iran war, oil prices have also experienced twists and turns. The reason for this volatility is that overseas investors' perception of geopolitics has deviated. After the "decapitation" strike, oil prices continued to rise, reaching nearly $120 per barrel. However, in early March, as Trump hinted that "the war will end soon," the market began executing "TACO" trades, believing that the Iran situation might ease, and oil prices once plummeted by 30%. However, unlike tariff issues, the initiative in a geopolitical crisis does not lie with Trump. He cannot extricate himself easily while the strait is blockaded. Eventually, the market corrected its expectations for oil, and prices returned to an upward trend.

On geopolitical issues, the market sometimes makes misjudgments, but such pricing deviations are not necessarily bad. A drop in oil prices can反而 provide opportunities to add positions, making it easier for latecomers to enter the market.

Looking ahead, the trends of gold and oil prices will depend on the pace of the US-Iran conflict. If it evolves into a prolonged war like the Russia-Ukraine conflict, gold may lack配置 value in the first half of the year, and in the short term, one might focus on the energy chain. However, the situation could still reverse. The US-Iran war may reach a critical turning point, which will determine whether the Strait of Hormuz can be unblocked in the short term. It all depends on Trump's choice.

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the article, what are the three main safe-haven functions of gold?

AThe three main safe-haven functions of gold are: hedging against geopolitical risks, hedging against inflation risks, and hedging against U.S. dollar risks.

QWhat event in 2025 is mentioned as a factor contributing to the chaotic geopolitical situation that supported gold prices?

ADonald Trump taking office in 2025 is mentioned as a factor that made the international order precarious, contributing to the chaotic geopolitical situation.

QWhy did the price of gold fall sharply after the U.S. 'decapitation' strike on Iran, as explained in the article?

AThe price fell because major funds switched from gold to crude oil, selling gold to obtain liquidity for oil positions. Additionally, a liquidity crisis in U.S. financial markets led to large-scale selling as gold is a highly liquid asset.

QWhat was the main reason for the significant drop in gold prices from mid-March onwards, according to the analysis?

AThe main reason was the market's expectation that the Federal Reserve might delay interest rate cuts or even restart a rate hike cycle due to concerns that the U.S.-Iran conflict could keep oil prices high and severely impact the global economy.

QWhat does the article suggest is the key factor that will determine the future trends of gold and oil prices?

AThe future trends of gold and oil prices will depend on the pace and development of the U.S.-Iran conflict, specifically whether it becomes a protracted war like in Ukraine and the critical issue of whether the Strait of Hormuz can be unblocked in the short term.

İlgili Okumalar

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang, in a conversation with Sequoia Capital's Konstantine Buhler, argues that we are witnessing the most significant computing shift in 60 years—from retrieval-based to generative computing. Instead of just storing and retrieving data, future systems will generate highly personalized content (text, images, video) on demand, powered by massive "AI factories." Huang envisions a global "intelligence network" that will envelop the planet, following the historical patterns of energy and communication grids. He outlines a five-layer investment framework: 1) Energy, 2) Chips/Computers, 3) Infrastructure (data centers), 4) AI Models, and 5) Applications. He predicts this ecosystem will reach a scale of $20 trillion annually. Crucially, Huang pushes back against fears of AI-driven job loss. He distinguishes between specific "tasks" (e.g., typing, analyzing images) and overall "jobs" (e.g., CEO, radiologist). While AI automates tasks, it increases efficiency and demand for the higher-value problem-solving aspects of professions, thus creating more jobs and "up-leveling" careers. The real risk, he asserts, is not being replaced by AI, but being outperformed by someone who effectively leverages it. He urges everyone to embrace AI as a tool for augmented capability and innovation.

marsbit5 dk önce

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

marsbit5 dk önce

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

Titled "I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": AI User Reactions on Reddit Anthropic recently released Claude Fable 5, its first publicly available 'Mythos'-tier model, achieving 80.3% on the SWE-Bench Pro benchmark and significantly outperforming its predecessor and competitors. However, a viral Reddit post titled "Claude Fable made me realize I don't need better models anymore" highlighted a growing user sentiment of "good enough." Top comments expressed "model fatigue," with users stating that earlier models like Opus 4.5/4.8 already sufficed for their workflows. High cost was a key concern, as Fable 5's API is nearly twice the price of Opus 4.8, with users questioning the return on investment and suggesting the field has hit a plateau. The most frequent complaint targeted Fable 5's stringent safety filters. Designed to intercept high-risk requests (e.g., cybersecurity), the system was perceived as overly conservative. Users reported frequent rejections for routine security-related tasks, leading to automatic fallbacks to the older Opus model. Paying users were particularly frustrated, feeling they paid a premium for a less usable product. Dissenting voices came from users with heavy, complex tasks. For workloads like high-energy physics simulations with thousands of code lines, Fable 5's improved long-context understanding and error detection represented a significant, worthwhile leap—described as moving from a "college player to an NBA starter." The debate underscores a divergence between benchmark performance and practical utility. For most users, current models meet their needs, making further advances relevant only for extreme use-cases. The discussion also raised concerns about a potential "Public AI Freeze," where the most powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) remain exclusive to enterprises and governments, while public offerings stagnate. The launch presents two report cards: one of technical excellence and another of user skepticism. Fable 5's ultimate reception may depend on Anthropic's ability to refine its safety filters and justify its cost for specialized, high-demand users.

marsbit13 dk önce

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

marsbit13 dk önce

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

With AI-generated web traffic surpassing human activity, websites face a crisis as AI agents bypass ads, avoid clicks, and scrape data without generating revenue. This disrupts the ad-based internet economy, diverting traffic and reducing site visits. In response, sites are blocking AI crawlers and deploying traps like Cloudflare's "honeypot" pages. Traditional CAPTCHAs are now ineffective against advanced AI. The focus has shifted to behavioral biometrics—analyzing unique human patterns such as cursor movement, typing rhythm, and keystroke dynamics. Companies like IBM and BioCatch use this data to distinguish humans from bots, even detecting fraud through behavioral inconsistencies. Two competing approaches aim to verify human identity centrally. Sam Altman’s World (formerly Worldcoin) uses iris scanning to create unique credentials, though it faces privacy concerns and regulatory bans. Alternatively, cryptographic zero-knowledge proofs offer anonymous verification without revealing personal data, championed by Vitalik Buterin to avoid centralized surveillance. However, both systems have flaws. Centralized solutions risk biometric data misuse, while decentralized models may be exploited through identity rental markets in economically unequal regions. Despite challenges, the author favors cryptographic methods for preserving privacy over pervasive behavioral monitoring that permanently captures and controls personal biometric data.

marsbit21 dk önce

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

marsbit21 dk önce

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

**The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the "Cure" AI Cannot Ignore** Decentralized AI addresses fundamental bottlenecks of centralized AI: scarce and expensive computational resources, excessive control concentration, unverifiable model outputs, and increasing difficulty in acquiring training data due to privacy and regulation. Blockchain offers a path to make intelligence open, verifiable, and economically accessible. The technical stack comprises three layers: 1. **Applications & Services**: The main crypto use cases are "Agentic Finance" (converting natural language into on-chain actions) and "Agentic Payments" for machine-to-machine commerce. Projects like Giza, Infinity Labs, Coinvest AI, and x402 (handling 173M+ transactions) are key players. 2. **Middleware**: This coordination layer enables agents to discover, identify, and transact. Notable projects include Gokite AI (specialized L1), Virtuals (an OS for the agent economy), and especially Bittensor—a network of specialized subnets forming competitive AI micro-economies. 3. **Infrastructure**: The capital-intensive layer providing raw resources. It includes decentralized compute (Akash, Render, Aethir), verifiable inference (Venice AI, OpenGradient), distributed training (Prime Intellect, Templar AI), decentralized storage (Filecoin, Walrus), and privacy/verification layers (Nillion, Arcium, Phala Network) using technologies like ZKPs, MPC, and TEEs. The outlook for 2026-2027 indicates AI demand outpacing infrastructure, with AI agents as a primary growth engine. Computation is becoming an asset class, with on-chain markets as its financial layer. Tokenomics is emerging as a structural advantage for coordinating capital, compute, and data in decentralized AI networks. While still early—with adoption uneven and revenue often trailing token incentives—projects like Bittensor, NEAR, and Virtuals demonstrate a shift from speculative narrative to a new model for coordinating intelligence.

marsbit24 dk önce

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

marsbit24 dk önce

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

Cash Flow as the Moat: A Playbook for Crypto Founders Historically, the most enduring businesses have been built by positioning themselves within the "flow of funds"—facilitating the creation and transfer of value in a network and extracting a portion of it. Cryptocurrency is the first modern technology natively built for this purpose. For startups, failing to architect products and businesses to leverage these principles means missing a major opportunity. Blockchains are inherently network businesses. Each transaction settles on a shared ledger, and every new participant strengthens the underlying network for all. Well-designed network tokens amplify this by aligning users, developers, and validators around growing the network, with value flowing back to contributors in a transparent feedback loop. This model is not new; companies from railroads and Standard Oil to Google, Meta, and AWS have thrived by inserting themselves into critical flows of value (goods, attention, compute). Financial markets make it even clearer: firms like Visa and major market makers generate immense revenue not by predicting markets but by being in the path of transactions. The combination of fund flow and network effects creates one of the most durable business structures. The high margins in traditional finance (payments, custody, lending, FX) represent prime targets. Crypto founders have the opportunity to build the next version—programmable, instant, global, and natively in the flow of funds. The frontier extends beyond finance to areas like computing/GPUs, AI training data, energy, robotics, and space—markets without entrenched intermediaries, ripe for building new, efficient value rails on programmable infrastructure. Founders should ask: Are you in the flow of funds today? Does your revenue scale 10x with the value of activity on your platform? Where in your target market are profit margins highest relative to value created? The opportunity is clear: embed your startup into the new flows of value and let the network effects accumulate.

marsbit26 dk önce

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

marsbit26 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures

Popüler Makaleler

WAR Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! WAR (WAR) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında WAR (WAR) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: WAR (WAR) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınWAR (WAR) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: WAR (WAR) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında WAR (WAR) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

246 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2024.12.11Güncellenme 2026.06.02

WAR Nasıl Satın Alınır

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların WAR (WAR) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.

活动图片