How MegaETH targets 15K–35K TPS in 7-day mainnet stress test

ambcrypto2026-01-21 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-21 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

MegaETH, a real-time EVM-compatible blockchain, is launching its mainnet on January 22nd with a 7-day stress test aiming to process 11 billion transactions. The project targets a sustained throughput of 15,000–35,000 transactions per second (TPS), having achieved nearly 47,000 TPS in testing. It also boasts a 10-millisecond block time, significantly faster than other blockchains. While prioritizing speed and low latency, concerns about decentralization and potential censorship risks due to centralized sequencing have been noted. The stress test will involve user interaction with gaming applications and backend transactions through a decentralized exchange. Following the test, the public mainnet will launch alongside select DeFi and consumer applications.

MegaETH, the real-time EVM-compatible blockchain, announced that it will launch its mainnet on the 22nd of January. Dubbed the MegaETH stress test, it aims to process 11 billion transactions in 7 days.

They were ” opening mainnet to users for several latency-sensitive apps while the chain is under intense, sustained load.”

The project aims to achieve performance levels comparable to high-speed blockchains such as Solana [SOL] while also providing extremely low latency and high throughput.

It has achieved nearly 47k transactions per second (TPS), noted growthepie in a post on X. MegaETH was targeting a sustained, true TPS of 15k-35k across the 7 days of the stress test.

“In the end, MegaETH will have the largest tx count in history across all EVM chains while users frictionlessly play with the chain.”

Messari reported that the MegaETH testnet achieved a 10‐millisecond block time, far faster than any other blockchain.

While the design prioritizes speed, the report raised concerns about decentralization and potential censorship risks due to centralized sequencing.

MegaETH to push the boundaries of blockchain capabilities

“Stress tests only matter if they’re uncomfortable”, said the blockchain’s post on X. During the test, users can interact with gaming applications such as Stomp.gg, Smasher.fun, and Crossy Fluffle.

On the backend, the team will push a mix of ETH transfers and v3 automated market maker swaps through the decentralized exchange Kumbaya.xyz.

The public mainnet will launch after the global stress test. A selection of day-one DeFi and consumer applications powered by its native stablecoin, USDm, will also be launching.

Messari also documented that in October 2025, MegaETH raised $50 million during the MEGA token sale, which became oversubscribed within minutes. This figure was part of the nearly $75 million raised from various grassroots funding efforts.


Final Thoughts

  • MegaETH is an EVM-compatible blockchain aiming to deliver real-time crypto performance, with a 10 ms blocktime and nearly 47k TPS in testing.
  • The global stress test targets a total of 11 billion transactions in 7 days, starting on the 22nd of January.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main goal of MegaETH's 7-day mainnet stress test starting on January 22nd?

AThe main goal is to process 11 billion transactions in 7 days, targeting a sustained true TPS of 15,000-35,000.

QWhat key performance metrics has MegaETH achieved in testing according to the article?

AMegaETH has achieved nearly 47,000 TPS and a 10-millisecond block time in testing.

QWhat are some of the applications users can interact with during the MegaETH stress test?

AUsers can interact with gaming applications such as Stomp.gg, Smasher.fun, and Crossy Fluffle.

QWhat concerns did the Messari report raise about MegaETH's design?

AThe report raised concerns about decentralization and potential censorship risks due to centralized sequencing.

QHow much funding did MegaETH raise during its MEGA token sale in October 2025?

AMegaETH raised $50 million during the MEGA token sale, which was part of nearly $75 million raised from various grassroots funding efforts.

İlgili Okumalar

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit3 dk önce

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit3 dk önce

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit18 dk önce

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit18 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片