How MegaETH targets 15K–35K TPS in 7-day mainnet stress test

ambcrypto2026-01-21 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-21 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

MegaETH, a real-time EVM-compatible blockchain, is launching its mainnet on January 22nd with a 7-day stress test aiming to process 11 billion transactions. The project targets a sustained throughput of 15,000–35,000 transactions per second (TPS), having achieved nearly 47,000 TPS in testing. It also boasts a 10-millisecond block time, significantly faster than other blockchains. While prioritizing speed and low latency, concerns about decentralization and potential censorship risks due to centralized sequencing have been noted. The stress test will involve user interaction with gaming applications and backend transactions through a decentralized exchange. Following the test, the public mainnet will launch alongside select DeFi and consumer applications.

MegaETH, the real-time EVM-compatible blockchain, announced that it will launch its mainnet on the 22nd of January. Dubbed the MegaETH stress test, it aims to process 11 billion transactions in 7 days.

They were ” opening mainnet to users for several latency-sensitive apps while the chain is under intense, sustained load.”

The project aims to achieve performance levels comparable to high-speed blockchains such as Solana [SOL] while also providing extremely low latency and high throughput.

It has achieved nearly 47k transactions per second (TPS), noted growthepie in a post on X. MegaETH was targeting a sustained, true TPS of 15k-35k across the 7 days of the stress test.

“In the end, MegaETH will have the largest tx count in history across all EVM chains while users frictionlessly play with the chain.”

Messari reported that the MegaETH testnet achieved a 10‐millisecond block time, far faster than any other blockchain.

While the design prioritizes speed, the report raised concerns about decentralization and potential censorship risks due to centralized sequencing.

MegaETH to push the boundaries of blockchain capabilities

“Stress tests only matter if they’re uncomfortable”, said the blockchain’s post on X. During the test, users can interact with gaming applications such as Stomp.gg, Smasher.fun, and Crossy Fluffle.

On the backend, the team will push a mix of ETH transfers and v3 automated market maker swaps through the decentralized exchange Kumbaya.xyz.

The public mainnet will launch after the global stress test. A selection of day-one DeFi and consumer applications powered by its native stablecoin, USDm, will also be launching.

Messari also documented that in October 2025, MegaETH raised $50 million during the MEGA token sale, which became oversubscribed within minutes. This figure was part of the nearly $75 million raised from various grassroots funding efforts.


Final Thoughts

  • MegaETH is an EVM-compatible blockchain aiming to deliver real-time crypto performance, with a 10 ms blocktime and nearly 47k TPS in testing.
  • The global stress test targets a total of 11 billion transactions in 7 days, starting on the 22nd of January.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main goal of MegaETH's 7-day mainnet stress test starting on January 22nd?

AThe main goal is to process 11 billion transactions in 7 days, targeting a sustained true TPS of 15,000-35,000.

QWhat key performance metrics has MegaETH achieved in testing according to the article?

AMegaETH has achieved nearly 47,000 TPS and a 10-millisecond block time in testing.

QWhat are some of the applications users can interact with during the MegaETH stress test?

AUsers can interact with gaming applications such as Stomp.gg, Smasher.fun, and Crossy Fluffle.

QWhat concerns did the Messari report raise about MegaETH's design?

AThe report raised concerns about decentralization and potential censorship risks due to centralized sequencing.

QHow much funding did MegaETH raise during its MEGA token sale in October 2025?

AMegaETH raised $50 million during the MEGA token sale, which was part of nearly $75 million raised from various grassroots funding efforts.

İlgili Okumalar

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

Title: Arbitrum Poses as Hacker to Recover Stolen Funds from KelpDAO Last week, KelpDAO suffered a hack resulting in nearly $300 million in losses, marking the largest DeFi security incident this year. Approximately 30,765 ETH (worth over $70 million) remained on an Arbitrum address controlled by the attacker. In an unprecedented move, Arbitrum’s Security Council utilized its emergency authority to upgrade the Inbox bridge contract, adding a function that allowed them to impersonate the hacker’s address and initiate a transfer without access to its private key. The council’s action, approved by 9 of its 12 members, moved the stolen ETH to a frozen address in a single transaction before reverting the contract to its original state. The operation was coordinated with law enforcement, which attributed the attack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Community reactions are divided: some praise the recovery of funds, while others question the centralization of power, as the council can upgrade core contracts without governance votes. However, such emergency mechanisms are common among major L2s. Despite the partial recovery, over $292 million was stolen in total, with more than $100 million in bad debt on Aave and remaining funds scattered across other chains. The incident highlights escalating security challenges in DeFi, with state-sponsored hackers employing advanced tactics and L2s responding with elevated countermeasures.

marsbit11 dk önce

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

marsbit11 dk önce

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit1 saat önce

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片