Hedge Fund Q1 Interpretation: Everyone Is Selling Software, Buying Chips

marsbit2026-05-27 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-05-27 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Hedge Funds and Mutual Funds Aligned in Q1: Dumping Software, Buying Chips A clear consensus emerged among major U.S. hedge funds and mutual funds in Q1: they were simultaneously selling software stocks and pouring capital into the semiconductor sector. This aggressive rotation pushed semiconductor exposure in hedge fund long portfolios to a record high. Hedge funds delivered a 7% return year-to-date, while only 30% of large-cap active mutual funds outperformed their benchmarks. The average short interest for S&P 500 constituents rose to 3% of market cap, the highest since 2011. Within technology, the structural shift was stark. Hedge funds' semiconductor weighting hit an all-time high, while software fell to its lowest since 2019. Excluding Microsoft, mutual funds' relative overexposure to semis vs. software was the largest since 2012. Microsoft was among the most net-sold stocks by both groups. Hedge funds net purchased semiconductor names like LRCX and AMAT. Strategies diverged on leverage and cash. Hedge funds increased their net exposure to near a one-year high after an initial cut. Mutual funds raised their cash allocation, though it remains historically low at 1.4%. Sector alignment was high in Industrials (both overweight) but divergent in Tech: hedge funds increased their Tech net tilt by a record 853 basis points, while mutual funds reduced theirs. Clear splits also appeared in Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Four stocks appeared on both Goldman's hedge...

Author: Zhao Ying

Source: Wall Street News

In the first quarter, U.S. hedge funds and large mutual funds reached a rare consensus: selling software and rushing into semiconductors, pushing the long-side weight of semiconductors in hedge fund portfolios to a record high.

According to Goldman Sachs' latest "Hedge Fund Trend Monitor" and "Mutual Fund Fundamentals" reports, this analysis covers 1,059 hedge funds (total equity holdings of $4.6 trillion) and 509 large active mutual funds (equity assets under management of $3.9 trillion). The reports show that hedge funds have achieved a return of 7% year-to-date, while only 30% of large mutual funds outperformed their benchmarks, lower than the historical average of 37% since 2007.

The Q1 13F filing data from the U.S. reveals a clear market consensus: hedge funds and mutual funds are simultaneously selling software stocks and flocking to the semiconductor sector. The intensity of this rotation is so great that it has pushed semiconductors' weight in hedge fund long portfolios to an all-time high.

In terms of positioning structure, hedge fund net leverage has rebounded to the 85th percentile over the past five years, near a one-year high; meanwhile, the average short interest as a percentage of market capitalization for S&P 500 constituents has risen to 3%, the highest level since 2011, indicating simultaneous intensification of market long/short activity.

Semiconductor Positioning Hits Record High, Software Faces Systematic Reduction

The structural rotation within the technology sector was the most prominent theme this quarter.

Goldman Sachs data shows that semiconductors' weight in hedge fund long portfolios has risen to its highest level on record, while software's weight has fallen to its lowest since 2019. Regarding mutual funds, their positioning in software has dropped to its lowest level since 2012. Excluding Microsoft, the magnitude of mutual fund overweight in semiconductors relative to software is also the largest since 2012.

At the individual stock level, Microsoft (MSFT) became one of the stocks with the largest net selling by both hedge funds and mutual funds last quarter. Mutual funds also reduced holdings across the remaining members of the "Magnificent Seven." While hedge funds trimmed most "Magnificent Seven" holdings, they achieved net buying in META and AAPL.

For semiconductor stocks, hedge funds net bought LRCX, AMAT, and ASML; mutual funds net bought INTC and SITM.

Leverage and Cash: Hedge Funds Aggressive, Mutual Funds Conservative

Faced with escalating geopolitical tensions in Q1, the response strategies of the two types of institutions showed clear divergence.

Hedge funds initially cut net leverage but then quickly increased positions as markets rebounded in Q2, with net exposure rebounding to near a one-year high. Overall leverage relative to historical levels remains elevated.

Mutual funds, on the other hand, opted to increase cash allocations, raising the cash-to-assets ratio from a historical low of 1.1% at the start of 2026 to 1.4% in early April. However, this level remains historically very low, indicating that mutual funds overall have not significantly withdrawn from equity markets.

Sector Consensus and Divergence: Overweight Industrials, Tech Divergence

Regarding sector allocations, there is high consensus between the two types of institutions, but also clear exceptions. Both hedge funds and mutual funds are overweight the Industrials sector and underweight the Information Technology sector, but their reallocation directions were opposite.

Hedge funds increased their net tilt towards Information Technology by 853 basis points in Q1, the largest single-quarter move for the sector on record, while simultaneously reducing their net tilt towards Industrials by 297 basis points. Mutual funds operated in reverse, increasing Industrials exposure by 24 basis points and cutting Information Technology by 20 basis points.

The two sectors with the most prominent divergence are Financials and Consumer Discretionary: mutual funds are overweight Financials while hedge funds are underweight; hedge funds are overweight Consumer Discretionary while mutual funds are underweight.

Four 'Shared Favorites' Outperform the Market Year-to-Date

Goldman Sachs screened for four stocks appearing simultaneously on both the hedge fund VIP list (GSTHHVIP) and the mutual fund overweight list (GSTHMFOW) this quarter: Boeing (BA), Mastercard (MA), Marvell Technology (MRVL), and Visa (V). MRVL is a new member this quarter, while Citigroup (C) and Vertiv (VRT) exited the list.

These four stocks have generated a year-to-date return of 10%, outperforming the equal-weighted S&P 500 index by 3 percentage points. Over a longer horizon, since 2013, the "Shared Favorites" basket has an annualized return of 16%, but with a high standard deviation of 22%, indicating significantly higher volatility. Currently, the median stock in this basket trades at a P/E of 34x, a significant premium to the S&P 500 median stock's 18x.

Notably, all "Magnificent Seven" stocks are included in the hedge fund VIP list, yet all are underweighted by mutual funds, forming a sharp contrast in attitudes between the two types of institutions towards these core assets.

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the analysis of US 13F holdings, what major shift in positioning did both hedge funds and mutual funds make in the tech sector during the first quarter?

ABoth hedge funds and mutual funds engaged in a significant sector rotation within tech: they sold software stocks and aggressively bought into the semiconductor sector. This shift pushed hedge funds' semiconductor long weight to a record high, while software weight fell to its lowest since 2019.

QWhat was the contrasting strategy between hedge funds and mutual funds regarding their use of leverage and cash in response to market conditions?

AHedge funds and mutual funds adopted divergent strategies. Hedge funds increased their net leverage to near a one-year high. In contrast, mutual funds became more conservative, raising their cash allocation from a record low of 1.1% at the start of 2024 to 1.4% by early April, although this level remains historically low.

QWhich specific stock was net sold the most by both hedge funds and mutual funds last quarter, and which two semiconductor stocks did hedge funds net buy?

AMicrosoft (MSFT) was one of the largest net sells for both hedge funds and mutual funds last quarter. Hedge funds were net buyers of Lam Research (LRCX) and Applied Materials (AMAT), among other semiconductor stocks.

QWhich four stocks were identified as 'Shared Favorites' by Goldman Sachs this quarter, and how has their performance been year-to-date?

AThe four 'Shared Favorites' stocks (appearing on both the hedge fund VIP list and mutual fund overweight list) are Boeing (BA), Mastercard (MA), Marvell Technology (MRVL), and Visa (V). This group has delivered a 10% return year-to-date, outperforming the equal-weighted S&P 500 index by 3 percentage points.

QHow did the positioning of hedge funds and mutual funds differ regarding the 'Magnificent Seven' stocks and the Financials and Consumer Discretionary sectors?

ARegarding the 'Magnificent Seven,' all members are on the hedge fund VIP list but are underweighted by mutual funds. For sector positioning, mutual funds are overweight Financials while hedge funds are underweight. Conversely, hedge funds are overweight Consumer Discretionary, while mutual funds are underweight that sector.

İlgili Okumalar

$52M Ethereum Bet Comes As Tom Lee Says ETH Isn’t Reflecting Its Potential

Bitmine, holding over 5.4 million ETH worth more than $10.5 billion, is nearing its goal to control 5% of Ethereum's circulating supply. Despite the company's recent purchase of 26,497 ETH (valued at roughly $52 million), Ethereum's price has struggled, trading around $2,000 and even declining recently. Bitmine's head, Tom Lee, argues that ETH prices are not reflecting the strengthening fundamentals of the Ethereum network, attributing the lag to being in the early stages of a "crypto spring." He cites long-term trends like AI commerce and tokenization as reasons for Ethereum's enduring importance. Bitmine's strategy treats Ether as a long-term reserve asset, not a short-term trade, explaining why the massive accumulation hasn't yet triggered a corresponding price rally.

bitcoinist4 dk önce

$52M Ethereum Bet Comes As Tom Lee Says ETH Isn’t Reflecting Its Potential

bitcoinist4 dk önce

After Marvell's 32% Surge, the Chinese Chip Family Behind It Emerges

The stock price of Marvell Technology surged 32.5% on June 2nd, driven by NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang highlighting its custom ASICs and optical interconnects as core to AI data center architecture. This event brought attention to the Chinese semiconductor family behind Marvell: the Dai siblings. The story centers on three siblings, all UC Berkeley graduates, whose three-decade entrepreneurial journey aligns with major semiconductor industry shifts. In 1995, youngest sister Dai Wei Li co-founded Marvell with her husband Sehat Sutardja and his brother, focusing on storage controllers. Eldest brother Dai Wei Min founded EDA company Ultima, later sold to Cadence, and later founded VeriSilicon (芯原) in China, becoming a leading semiconductor IP provider. Second brother Dai Wei Jin co-founded EDA firm Silicon Perspective (sold to Cadence) and GPU IP company Vivante, later acquired by VeriSilicon. The combined "Dai-Sutardja" family network extends beyond Marvell. Their ventures and investments form a comprehensive ecosystem for the post-Moore's Law, chiplet era. Key holdings include: Dream Big Semiconductor (AI SuperNICs, acquired by Arm), Alphawave (high-speed SerDes IP, acquired by Qualcomm), and Silicon Box (a chiplet advanced packaging foundry). VeriSilicon itself thrives on the AI ASIC and IP boom in China. Collectively, the family's AI infrastructure-related portfolio is estimated at over $22 billion. Their strategy represents a distinct path: building critical components for open standards and key manufacturing capacity in the chiplet era, rather than pursuing standalone AI chip dominance. While this path may not create the next NVIDIA, it has enabled repeated successful exits and sustained influence within the global semiconductor industry.

marsbit49 dk önce

After Marvell's 32% Surge, the Chinese Chip Family Behind It Emerges

marsbit49 dk önce

Microsoft is Afraid of Being Marginalized by AI Giants

Microsoft, once the defining force of the PC era, now faces a familiar challenge in the AI age: the risk of being relegated to a profitable but invisible infrastructure provider. This anxiety was laid bare at Build 2026, where CEO Satya Nadella unveiled a major strategic pivot. The catalyst was a quiet April agreement that dissolved Microsoft's exclusive licensing and cloud-hosting deal with OpenAI, its once-vital partner. This erased Microsoft's key AI moat. With OpenAI and Anthropic defining AI applications and gaining enterprise traction—even within Microsoft's own ranks—Nadella had to answer: without exclusivity, what is Microsoft's role? The answer was a suite of seven in-house AI models, a developer-focused AI workstation (Surface RTX Spark Dev Box), and, most crucially, the Agent 365 platform for enterprise AI governance. The models, notably targeting Anthropic's strengths in coding and enterprise, signal a defensive move. However, the broader strategy is to make the models themselves less decisive. Financially, Microsoft's AI revenue is strong, driven largely by Azure running others' models. Yet its user-facing products like Copilot show weak penetration and engagement. Microsoft earns infrastructure money but lacks direct user mindshare. Nadella's core fear is being "hollowed out." As OpenAI and Anthropic prepare for IPOs and gain financial independence, they may build their own infrastructure, threatening Azure's lucrative AI revenue stream. Microsoft's window is to entrench itself deeper: not as the model creator, but as the indispensable platform for securely deploying, managing, and governing all AI models within the enterprise through Agent 365. Build 2026 revealed Microsoft's bet: in the AI era, the ultimate power lies not in any single model, but in the enterprise "operating system" that controls them. Nadella is determined to ensure Microsoft is the driver of this new era, not just a passenger.

marsbit1 saat önce

Microsoft is Afraid of Being Marginalized by AI Giants

marsbit1 saat önce

US Stocks Surge 16% in Two Months: Only 4 Occurrences in History, the Most Recent Was Just Before the 1987 Crash

U.S. stocks have surged 16% over April and May, a gain seen only four times since WWII, according to Deutsche Bank strategist Henry Allen. Three prior instances followed recessions, but the sole non-recession precedent was in early 1987, months before the "Black Monday" crash. The current rally is underpinned by AI enthusiasm and strong data, but its speed without an economic recovery is historically unprecedented. Meanwhile, credit spreads remain near record lows despite growing consumer strain—the U.S. savings rate hit just 2.6% in April, a level last seen before the Global Financial Crisis, and consumer sentiment is at its lowest since 1952. Market risks are concentrated. While stocks and credit markets appear immune to geopolitical tensions, sovereign bonds tell a different story. Treasury yields have tracked oil prices and recently hit multi-year highs, creating a widening divergence with equities. Surprisingly stable oil prices, despite the prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz, have been a key pillar for risk assets. However, if the blockage persists, this support could fade, raising the risk of a stagflation shock not currently priced in.

marsbit1 saat önce

US Stocks Surge 16% in Two Months: Only 4 Occurrences in History, the Most Recent Was Just Before the 1987 Crash

marsbit1 saat önce

CPU, Quietly Returning to the Center of the AI Computing Power Stage

Over the past three years, AI computing power narratives have been dominated by GPUs. However, starting in 2026, this story began to shift. While training large models remains GPU-intensive, the rapid growth of inference and AI agent workloads, which require high levels of task orchestration, concurrency, and data flow management, has highlighted a renewed critical role for CPUs. These are tasks GPUs are not designed to handle. Intel's recent launch of the Xeon 6+ processor, built on its Intel 18A process and featuring up to 288 efficiency cores (E-cores), exemplifies this strategic pivot. It is positioned not as a mere companion to GPUs but as the essential "control plane" for AI infrastructure, optimized for high-density, energy-efficient, and high-throughput workloads characteristic of AI agents and inference. This "CPU resurgence" is not about CPUs outperforming GPUs in raw computation. It reflects a systemic bottleneck: as AI scales from training single models to deploying countless intelligent agents, the demand for coordination and data handling surges. Major cloud providers are also developing their own high-density ARM-based server CPUs for similar workloads. However, Intel's success with this strategy faces significant challenges. Competition includes NVIDIA's integrated CPU-GPU solutions, the expanding adoption of cloud vendors' in-house ARM CPUs, and the crucial market test of Intel's 18A manufacturing process against rivals like TSMC's N2. In conclusion, CPUs are indeed reclaiming a central, though redefined, role in AI compute—managing the complex orchestration that enables massive-scale AI deployment. While the trend is clear, which company will ultimately lead this CPU resurgence remains an open question to be decided in the data centers of 2027 and beyond.

marsbit1 saat önce

CPU, Quietly Returning to the Center of the AI Computing Power Stage

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片