Has Elon Musk Completely Abandoned Dogecoin? Here’s The Last Time He Tweeted About It

bitcoinist2026-03-13 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-13 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Elon Musk, a key figure behind Dogecoin's massive 36,000% rally in 2021, has significantly reduced his public engagement with the meme cryptocurrency. His last direct tweet about Dogecoin was over a year ago, in November 2024, where he defended its flat inflation mechanism as a feature rather than a flaw. Although Musk still subtly endorses Dogecoin by liking and reposting related content, his direct mentions have ceased. Furthermore, the recent launch of X Money (formerly Twitter) shows no integration of Dogecoin, despite earlier hopes. The payment feature, along with previous initiatives like Tip Jar, supports only Bitcoin and Ethereum, signaling a shift away from Dogecoin in Musk’s ventures.

Elon Musk’s role in the growth of Dogecoin over the years cannot be overstated, as the billionaire served as the cornerstone of the 36,000% rally that caught attention back in 2021. The support for the meme coin also continued long after this, moving Dogecoin into the payments sector as well. However, following Musk’s acquisition of Twitter (now X) in 2023, his involvement and tweets about the meme coin began to decline, and have become nonexistent in the last year.

When Did Elon Musk Last Tweet About Dogecoin?

Doing a search on Elon Musk’s account on X shows that his last tweet directly mentioning Dogecoin was more than a year ago. The tweet, which was made back in November 2024, was explaining why the inflation mechanism used for the cryptocurrency was actually important.

According to Musk, Dogecoin having a flat inflation rate was actually a feature of its creation and not a bug. This is because the flat inflation rate translates to a decreasing percentage inflation, and is therefore a good thing for the digital asset to have.

Related Reading: Buying XRP At These Prices Is Like Buying Bitcoin At $200

Interestingly, this is the only tweet that mentioned Dogecoin directly that came up on Musk’s account for the year 2024. Other tweets were back in 2023, moving into 2022, when the billionaire was still very active in his support for Dogecoin. But despite not mentioning Dogecoin directly, Musk has continued to subtly show support for the meme coin by endorsing posts about DOGE, as well as reposting posts made by other X users.

No Sign Of DOGE In X Money

Even though Elon Musk has been vocal in the past about the merits of Dogecoin as a payment cryptocurrency, the launch of the new X Money feature could be the final nail in the coffin that suggests the X owner is moving away from the meme coin. There have been multiple leaks of the X Money feature from a closed testing phase, but none of them show or mention DOGE being used in the app.

Earlier in the week, Musk announced that the company was ready to launch early public access for X Money in April. But still, there has been no sign of DOGE. So far, there have been reports of X Money offering a card, allowing users to earn interest on cash, allowing direct deposits, cash backs, and easy money transfers between users, with the feature working like a bank. However, there has been no mention of DOGE or any cryptocurrencies for that matter.

Even with the launch of the Tip Jar feature, which allowed X users to send crypto to other X users, only the likes of Bitcoin and Ethereum made the cut. So far, there has been no integration of Dogecoin into X, dashing the hopes that investors had when the billionaire had first acquired Twitter amid the hype.

DOGE begins another recovery trend | Source: DOGEUSDT on Tradingview.com

İlgili Sorular

QWhen was the last time Elon Musk directly tweeted about Dogecoin, and what did he say?

AElon Musk's last direct tweet about Dogecoin was on November 13, 2024. He stated that Dogecoin's flat inflation rate, which results in a decreasing percentage inflation, is a feature, not a bug.

QWhat evidence from the article suggests that Elon Musk might be moving away from Dogecoin?

AThe evidence includes his significant decline in tweets about Dogecoin, the lack of any mention or integration of DOGE in the new X Money feature, and the fact that only Bitcoin and Ethereum were included in X's Tip Jar feature.

QWhat is the 'X Money' feature, and how does its launch relate to Dogecoin?

AX Money is a new feature on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) that offers banking-like services such as a card, earning interest on cash, direct deposits, cash back, and money transfers. Its launch is significant because there has been no mention or integration of Dogecoin or any other cryptocurrency, despite Musk's past promotion of DOGE for payments.

QBesides direct tweets, how has Elon Musk shown subtle support for Dogecoin on X?

AHe has shown subtle support by endorsing posts about DOGE and reposting content from other X users that is related to the meme coin.

QWhat was Elon Musk's historical role in the Dogecoin market according to the article?

AElon Musk's role was a cornerstone of Dogecoin's massive growth, being instrumental in its 36,000% rally in 2021. He continued to support the meme coin long after, helping to move it into the payments sector.

İlgili Okumalar

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit2 dk önce

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit2 dk önce

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News6 dk önce

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News6 dk önce

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit14 dk önce

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit14 dk önce

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit23 dk önce

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit23 dk önce

In Order to Buy Investigational Weight-Loss Drugs, a Group of Americans Learn to Use Bitcoin Payments

To purchase the experimental weight-loss drug retatrutide, Americans like Zach are turning to Bitcoin despite initial skepticism. Retatrutide, an unapproved triple-agonist from Eli Lilly, offers significant weight loss but is inaccessible through U.S. channels. Buying from domestic resellers costs around $3,600 annually, whereas Zach found a Chinese seller offering a year’s supply for $240—with Bitcoin as the only payment option. This price disparity led him to learn cryptocurrency for the transaction. Online sellers of such “research chemicals” or peptides often use Bitcoin because traditional payment systems avoid the regulatory and legal risks. Chainalysis data shows crypto payments to grey-market peptide sellers reached $32 million in Q1 2026, suggesting an annualized volume exceeding $100 million, though this remains a fraction of the estimated $1-3 billion black market. The trend intersects with communities like DeSciNYC, where events on peptides draw crowds interested in biohacking and longevity, indicating shared interests between crypto and wellness circles. However, potential FDA moves to legalize certain peptides could shift demand away from the black market and reduce the need for crypto payments.

marsbit25 dk önce

In Order to Buy Investigational Weight-Loss Drugs, a Group of Americans Learn to Use Bitcoin Payments

marsbit25 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片