Haiwei Huaxin's Official Seal Seized by Over a Hundred People, High-Stakes Corporate Battle's 'Nuclear Deterrence' in Action Again

marsbit2026-08-21 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-21 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

On August 18th, Haowei Huaxin, a semiconductor firm specializing in gallium arsenide and gallium nitride wafers, reported that over a hundred individuals forcibly entered its offices and seized the company's official seals from a safe, including the corporate, contract, and party committee seals. The incident is the latest escalation in a protracted control dispute. Haowei Huaxin, established in 2010, was originally a joint venture. Control became contested after 2021 when Zhenwei Financial Holding injected capital, becoming the largest shareholder (34.01%), while former parent Haite High-Tech's stake was diluted to 33.79%. An agreed-upon governance structure collapsed, leading to mutual accusations. Haite claimed it was locked out of the subsidiary's premises, while also alleging improper management like livestock being kept on the chip fabrication site. After state-owned Qingdao Haiyue Holdings took over Zhenwei's stake in 2023, Haite accused it of illegally seizing control. Despite Haite winning several legal battles in 2024-2026, which affirmed its rights to nominate directors and the chairman, it failed to regain physical control or recover the seals. The stakes are high: market valuations for Haite's stake in Haowei Huaxin are estimated between 3.7 to 5 billion USD, yet it is only valued at about 83 million USD on Haite's books. Losing control effectively jeopardizes a significant portion of Haite's value. In response to the seal seizure, Haite framed it as a "shareh...

On the evening of August 19th, Haiwei Huaxin posted an announcement on its official WeChat account. The title was calm, but the content was not. The company stated that the previous afternoon, about a hundred people swarmed into the office building, their target clear: the safe where the company seals were kept.

The safe door was pried open, and the party committee seal, the official company seal, the contract seal, and the legal representative's handwritten signature seal were all taken. The end of the announcement included several surveillance screenshot images showing people in similar uniforms. The company said it had reported the incident to the police, and as of the announcement's release, the seals had not been recovered.

A semiconductor company holding a national second-level confidentiality qualification, specializing in 6-inch Gallium Arsenide and Gallium Nitride pure wafer foundry services, lost its seals just like that. Quite unusual.

01| Ownership Relationship

Haiwei Huaxin was established in 2010 by CETC's 29th Research Institute and Hightech, with business involving the defense technology industry, making it a mixed-ownership enterprise with some local background.

In 2015, Hightech acquired Chengdu Jiashi Technology, a subsidiary of the 29th Research Institute, obtaining a 52.91% stake in Haiwei Huaxin and becoming the controlling shareholder. Hightech's own business is aircraft maintenance and pilot training.

The key fact is that the ownership relationship was originally clear. The variable appeared in 2021. That year, Haiwei Huaxin introduced a capital increase from Zhenwei Financial Holding, bringing in a massive 1.289 billion yuan. After the capital increase, Zhenwei Financial Holding held 34.01%, becoming the largest shareholder, while Hightech was diluted to 33.79%, falling to second place. Both sides agreed on a system of checks and balances at the time: Zhenwei would appoint the CFO, while Hightech would nominate three directors and appoint the chairman.

However, this mechanism failed to function.

Hightech stated that since May 2021, it couldn't even gain access to Haiwei Huaxin's premises.

According to information disclosed in court documents, in November 2021, the chairman appointed by Hightech expelled the CFO sent by the Zhenwei side and took away the financial seal and online banking U-shields. Access denied, but seals grabbed—both sides have taken action. Hightech also publicly accused Haiwei Huaxin of keeping over twenty black goats, as well as chickens, ducks, and geese within the factory premises, and planting peanuts and pumpkins on vacant land. Semiconductor production lines have clear requirements for a clean environment; running a chip factory as a pastoral farmstead. These descriptions were so vivid that everyone found them believable, hahaha.

In November 2023, a state-owned entity took over Zhenwei Financial Holding, renaming it Qingdao Haiyue Holdings. According to Hightech's side, after the takeover, Haiyue violated the Company Law and the company's articles of association, forcibly took control, illegally amended the articles, and changed the legal representative to Ma Xiaoli.

02| Lawsuits and Control

The real conflict over money and power came later. Hightech sued the other party, and through several rounds of litigation from 2024 to 2026, Hightech won each time.

This January, the Chengdu Intermediate People's Court issued a final second-instance ruling, revoking the invalid shareholders' and board meetings resolutions made by the Haiyue side. In March, the Trade Arbitration Commission issued a final ruling, confirming Hightech's right to nominate three directors, appoint the chairman, and nominate the general manager.

The judgments were issued, but the seals and certificates still didn't return. According to Hightech, the Haiyue side refused to comply with the effective judgments, ignoring demands to hand over the official seal and take over the financial books. Hightech could only say it won on paper, but didn't win back control.

03| Triple Value Discrepancy

Why is a seal worth over a hundred people showing up at the door? The numbers make it clear.

Someone on Xueqiu calculated based on the optical module market trend, estimating Haiwei Huaxin's valuation between 12 billion and 16 billion yuan.

Hightech's own market capitalization hovers around 9 billion yuan. Based on its 31.41% stake, the corresponding value of Haiwei Huaxin is between 3.7 billion and 5 billion yuan.

However, in Hightech's 2025 annual report, the book value of this long-term equity investment has dropped to only 832 million yuan.

Aircraft maintenance is a mature business with a low ceiling; what Hightech truly wants to bet on is semiconductors. Losing Haiwei Huaxin is equivalent to losing 40% to 50% of its worth.

Put these numbers together: the parent company's market cap is 9 billion yuan, the market values the subsidiary at over 12 billion, yet its book value is only 832 million yuan. On top of that, the parent company can't even enter the subsidiary's door, and can't get the seals back.

04| The Boundary of Seal Retrieval

On August 20th, Hightech responded to the incident, characterizing the action as 'seal retrieval,' categorizing it as shareholder rights protection, and claiming it was the result of consultation and consensus among the other five shareholders besides Qingdao Haiyue. Whether this statement is true or false cannot be judged now. Even if the five shareholders were truly unanimous, getting the seals is just a small step.

In the world of Chinese corporate battles, seal snatching is nothing new and happens repeatedly year after year. 'Not being the first to snatch the seal' has almost become a form of 'nuclear deterrence.'

In August 2014, NVC Lighting founder Wu Changjiang and major shareholder Wang Donglei fell out. Wang Donglei's side brought people into the company and took the official seal, with both sides telling different stories.

In December 2019, Weihai Holdings' shareholder side took away the official seal and online banking U-shields. The Ningbo Securities Regulatory Bureau later ordered corrective actions.

In April 2020, Li Guoqing led people into Dangdang's office area, taking 11 official seals and 36 financial seals; he brought four people at the time. In May of the same year, Bitmain's Zhan Ketuan was at a government service center to collect the business license, which was snatched away in public by people from the other side.

In November 2021, Zhenshutong announced the loss of control over its seals and certificates. The Beijing Securities Regulatory Bureau took regulatory talk measures against the chairman, general manager, and board secretary.

05| Why Take Action

Why does no one take action first, but everyone ends up taking action eventually?

In the operation of Chinese companies, stamping contracts, dealing with banks, and processing changes—nothing can proceed without the seal. Whoever gets the seal in hand first holds the initiative in daily operations. Precisely because everyone knows the other side could also snatch it at any time, a tacit understanding forms in normal times: no one wants to be the first to flip the table.

This tacit understanding is the fragile balance in high-stakes corporate battles. 'Seal snatching' is too typical a phenomenon hanging over the governance of listed companies. Whichever company's governance rots first, its safe should expect trouble.

06| Ownership Undetermined

Balance aside, having the seal in hand is actually not very useful; it doesn't resolve the ownership issue. Perhaps watching too many movies and operas leads people to think it's like the Imperial Sword.

The other party can report it to the police, publish a notice declaring it void, or apply for a new seal and re-register with the bank.

Of course, going through this process takes time, during which the side without the seal cannot sign any contracts. It seems the only thing grabbing the seal accomplishes is buying time. The Weihai seal snatch in 2019 dragged on for four to five years before final resolution.

What Hightech's seal retrieval this time will achieve—whether it leads to Qingdao Haiyue finally handing over the seals and certificates, or triggers another tug-of-war—is uncertain at this point. It's just utterly absurd, letting everyone watch a farce.

An official seal cannot lock down control rights. The answer to listed company management has never been inside a safe.

This article is based on public information and does not constitute investment advice. For any inquiries, please contact [email protected].

Cold Eyes Watch the Market · Sharp Eyes Recognize the Game

This article is from WeChat Official Account: Qingyan Shangping , Author: Qingyan Shangping, Editor: Feng Biao

Trend Kriptolar

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was the core event reported regarding Haowei Huaxin, and how did the company respond?

AThe core event was that on August 18, around a hundred people entered Haowei Huaxin's office building, forced open a safe, and took away several company seals, including the Party Committee seal, company seal, contract seal, and the legal representative's handwritten signature seal. Haowei Huaxin announced the incident on its official WeChat account on August 19, published surveillance images showing people in similar uniforms, and stated that they had reported the case to the police. The seals had not been recovered by the time of the announcement.

QWho are the major shareholders involved in the control dispute over Haowei Huaxin?

AThe major shareholders involved are Hightech (Haite Gaoxin), which was the original controlling shareholder, and Zhengwei Financial Holdings (later restructured and renamed Qingdao Haiyue Holding). After a 2021 capital increase by Zhengwei, it became the largest shareholder with 34.01% stake, diluting Hightech's share to 33.79%. The control struggle intensified after Qingdao Haiyue took over Zhengwei's stake in 2023.

QWhat was the outcome of the legal battles between Hightech and Qingdao Haiyue regarding control of Haowei Huaxin?

AHightech won the legal battles. In January 2024, the Chengdu Intermediate People's Court issued a final second-instance judgment revoking the irregular shareholders' and board of directors' resolutions made by the Haiyue side. In March 2024, the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission issued a final ruling confirming Hightech's rights to nominate three directors, appoint the chairman, and nominate the general manager. However, despite these legal victories, Hightech failed to regain physical control, such as the company seals and financial records.

QWhy does the article refer to 'stealing company seals' as a form of 'nuclear deterrence' in high-end corporate battles?

AThe article uses the metaphor of 'nuclear deterrence' to describe the fragile balance in corporate disputes where possessing the company seals grants control over daily operations (like signing contracts and banking). All parties know the other side could also seize the seals, which creates a mutual deterrent against taking the first aggressive action. This balance is precarious; once broken, it leads to overt conflicts like the seal-grabbing incidents, which are seen as a sign of failed corporate governance.

QAccording to the article, what is the ultimate limitation or ineffectiveness of seizing company seals in such disputes?

ASeizing the company seals does not resolve the underlying ownership or control dispute. The opposing party can report the incident to the police, publicly declare the seals invalid, and apply for new ones, re-registering them with banks. Therefore, the primary effect of seizing seals is to delay the other party's operations by creating a temporary administrative obstacle. The article cites the example of Weihai, where a similar seal-grabbing incident in 2019 led to a protracted struggle lasting four to five years, indicating that real solutions lie in legal and governance mechanisms, not in physical possession of the seals.

İlgili Okumalar

Just Now, Anthropic Unveils Physical MCP: Claude Begins Controlling the Real World

Anthropic has announced the Model Hardware Standard (MHS), a new standard enabling AI agents like Claude to safely control physical devices. Building on the Model Context Protocol (MCP), MHS standardizes communication between AI agents and hardware such as microscopes, robotic arms, and lasers, marking a significant step for AI from the digital into the physical world. Developed in collaboration with HHMI Janelia Research Campus, MHS uses standardized drivers to translate basic commands (e.g., read, write) into a format any programmable device can understand. This drastically reduces integration time from weeks to hours or minutes and allows agents to discover and operate new devices using natural language tags that describe machine properties and safety limits. Agents can control devices via MCP, command-line interfaces, or APIs. They can sequence operations, monitor results, adjust parameters in real-time, and generate deterministic scripts for long-running tasks. Early tests show Claude interacting with hardware exploratively, like a scientist, learning to calibrate a laser and scripting the process. Early adopters and partners include AWS, Automata, Danaher, Doosan Robotics, and Tecan, who are integrating MHS support into their platforms. While promising, challenges remain: Claude's physical reasoning is limited, requiring expert oversight, and MHS currently only works with programmable hardware. Anthropic plans further refinements and broader device support before open-sourcing the standard.

marsbit26 dk önce

Just Now, Anthropic Unveils Physical MCP: Claude Begins Controlling the Real World

marsbit26 dk önce

History's Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate After 4 Years of Holding

**Title: The Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate Over Any 4-Year Holding Period** This article analyzes which major, freely-tradable assets have historically never produced a nominal loss over any rolling 4-year holding window. It concludes that only two distinct categories achieve this: ultra-low-risk contractual assets and Bitcoin. Among traditional risk assets, none maintain a perfect 4-year record. The S&P 500 had negative 4-year periods (e.g., 1929-1932: -64.8%). The Nasdaq 100 fell roughly 60% from 2000-2003. Gold saw a ~47.7% loss from 1981-1984. US real estate declined about 23.3% from 2007-2010. Even long-term US Treasury bonds (e.g., 2021-2024: -19.8%) and corporate bonds can produce 4-year losses due to interest rate and market price risks. In contrast, the first category achieving 100% nominal success includes assets like rolling 3-month US Treasury Bills, 4-year certificates of deposit (CDs), and US Treasuries held to maturity within 4 years. Their "guarantee" stems from contractual obligations and credit backing (e.g., FDIC insurance, US sovereign promise), not price appreciation. The sole exception in the high-risk category is Bitcoin. Analysis of daily data from 2010-2026 across 4,419 rolling 4-year windows shows a 100% positive return rate. The worst 4-year period (April 2021 to April 2025) still yielded a +32.6% total return (~7.3% CAGR). This record is unique because Bitcoin has no issuer, promises no cash flows, and has endured severe drawdowns (70-90%), yet its market price has always recovered within a 4-year span. The key distinction is the source of the "100%": contractual assets offer known, low nominal returns, while Bitcoin's record stems purely from historical price appreciation despite extreme volatility. The article suggests that for Bitcoin, the ability to hold for 4+ years is more critical than active trading strategies.

marsbit33 dk önce

History's Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate After 4 Years of Holding

marsbit33 dk önce

How One Article Moved 45 Billion: The Collapse of a 25-Year-Old 'AI Stock Guru'

This article details the dramatic rise and near-collapse of a hedge fund built by Leopold Aschenbrenner, a 24-year-old former OpenAI researcher. The fund, named Situational Awareness, amassed $45 billion in assets within two years. Its explosive growth stemmed from Aschenbrenner's influential 165-page manifesto predicting AGI's arrival by 2027 and his high-profile Silicon Valley connections. The fund employed an extremely aggressive strategy: high concentration and 400% leverage to bet long on AI infrastructure stocks while shorting legacy software firms. In July, this structure backfired when both sides of the trade reversed simultaneously—AI stocks plunged while shorted stocks rallied—triggering massive losses that nearly wiped out all equity. Major player Jane Street reportedly lost billions. The fund's leveraged public portfolio was ultimately sold at a discount to Citadel. The SEC is now investigating banks like Goldman Sachs for their role in facilitating the fund's high-leverage trades. The article compares this to past blow-ups like Archegos, highlighting systemic failures in risk management where the pursuit of short-term profits overrode due diligence. It questions whether such risky leverage concentrated in the AI sector, currently at record highs, poses a broader systemic threat. Ironically, Aschenbrenner, who studied AI safety at OpenAI, designed a fund structure prone to uncontrolled failure. Days after the crisis, he reportedly raised another $400 million for new investments.

marsbit47 dk önce

How One Article Moved 45 Billion: The Collapse of a 25-Year-Old 'AI Stock Guru'

marsbit47 dk önce

AI Accelerates Everything: Mathematics's Line of Defense Has Fallen, Physics is Already in AI's Crosshairs

This summer, the mathematics community was shaken as OpenAI's Astra model reportedly solved 10 long-standing open problems, and Claude Fable 5 found a potential counterexample to the Jacobian conjecture. This was followed by a major shift in physics: renowned physicist Gavin E. Crooks presented an open problem in stochastic thermodynamics to Claude, which the AI solved completely in days—a task that might take a skilled graduate student months. The problem concerned constraints on entropy production statistics under the Detailed Fluctuation Theorem (DFT), a core concept in non-equilibrium physics. Claude provided a unifying geometric answer: all possible DFT-compatible distributions correspond to a convex "moment body." Its key insight was that for a fixed "gap," the distribution is uniquely determined, making any general DFT distribution a mixture of these basic two-outcome distributions. This structure implies that for given lower-order moments, the nth moment only has a sharp lower bound, with no upper bound. Claude demonstrated that numerous previously published bounds on entropy production are merely low-dimensional projections or "shadows" of this single, unified convex body. The AI-authored paper offers a complete hierarchical characterization of the moment constraints. This case signifies a potential paradigm shift: AI is progressing from solving known problems to aiding in the exploration of fundamental, unsolved scientific questions, heralding an AI-accelerated era for physics.

marsbit48 dk önce

AI Accelerates Everything: Mathematics's Line of Defense Has Fallen, Physics is Already in AI's Crosshairs

marsbit48 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot

Popüler Makaleler

PEOPLE Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

865 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2024.12.12Güncellenme 2026.06.02

PEOPLE Nasıl Satın Alınır

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların PEOPLE (PEOPLE) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.

活动图片