FTX Scenario? BitMart Accused of Issues With Withdrawals and Insolvency

cryptonews.ru2026-08-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-11 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Cryptocurrency exchange BitMart, which previously announced its closure, is facing accusations of insolvency and withdrawal issues, drawing comparisons to the FTX collapse. Despite announcing a gradual wind-down until January 2027 and assuring users they could withdraw assets, reports emerged of significant problems shortly after. On-chain analysts noted unusually low withdrawal volumes, with some users reporting failed or stuck transactions. BitMart's CEO, Sheldon Xia, eventually broke the company's silence on August 8, 2026, claiming the team was consolidating assets for an orderly shutdown and denied misappropriating funds, mentioning potential court and auditor involvement. However, new complaints arose. A user named BeardStaff claimed $10.1 million was stuck, while Matthew Wang, co-founder of market maker OpenGradient, accused BitMart of insolvency, noting his firm's funds were also trapped. Wang highlighted a suspicious offer from BitMart for high-yield, locked staking just a week before the closure announcement. Numerous other users reported being unable to withdraw sums ranging from thousands to millions of dollars. Several crypto projects, including Gen6, Paxi Network, and Scandic Coin, are pursuing legal action. Data from Arkham Intelligence shows BitMart's wallet holdings have plummeted from over $100 million in early July 2026 to around $36.4 million, while CoinMarketCap data indicates reserves are only $4.6 million, mostly in BitMart's native BMX token.

The cryptocurrency exchange BitMart, which previously announced its closure, has faced criticism, for example from OpenGradient market maker co-founder Matthew Wang. It is being accused of insolvency and delays in withdrawing funds.

What is happening with BitMart?

At the end of July 2026, the company announced its closure. It is assumed that the platform will gradually wind down all operations by the end of January 2027. At the same time, BitMart particularly highlighted the fact that assets can be withdrawn even after the start of the transition period.

Despite this, the very next day on-chain experts Lookonchain reported certain problems with the platform. About $805,000 was withdrawn from it in 24 hours from 58 wallets, which, as analysts emphasized, is little for such a platform.

They also drew attention to the fact that for eight hours, not a single withdrawal from BitMart was recorded. Furthermore, some users directly pointed out the inability to receive funds, as transactions were processed for a long time and with errors.

Since the closure announcement, the exchange has not commented on the situation. Only on August 8, 2026, BitMart CEO Sheldon Xia published a message trying to reassure users.

According to him, the team is still consolidating assets, ensuring an orderly wind-down of operations.

"We have not misappropriated any assets nor have we taken any steps for premature withdrawal of funds or evasion of our obligations. We are considering involving courts and independent third-party auditors to prepare a transparent report," he stated.

New Complaints

On August 9, a user under the pseudonym BeardStaff stated on his X (formerly Twitter) page that a sum of $10.1 million was stuck on the exchange for him. He also pointed to suspicious behavior by team members. For example, his manager Tony deleted his Telegram account, and members of the management are not responding to requests to comment on the situation.

The trader asked BitMart's top management to clarify the situation and provide confirmation that the funds are safe. He also began collecting an evidence base from other victims.

His post was commented on by Matthew Wang. According to him, the funds of the OpenGradient market maker are also stuck on the exchange. He called the platform insolvent.

Furthermore, Wang attached screenshots of BitMart's proposal to lock up crypto assets for a period of six months with yields of up to 15% per annum, put forward a week before the exchange's closure. The CEO of OpenGradient considers this suspicious and unethical.

Numerous other victims commented on the post. The amounts stuck on the exchange range from relatively small, for example $3,000, to substantial.

A user under the pseudonym King David tried to withdraw $24,000 from the platform but received only $5.

"Many of us have begun to wonder if another scenario, similar to FTX, is unfolding here. [...] Now you [Sheldon Xia] have mentioned involving courts and third parties. Whatever legal or commercial complexities arise within BitMart's company, they should not become a burden for customers. We placed our funds with BitMart and are simply asking for them to be returned to us in a timely manner," he emphasized.

The team of the crypto project Gen6 stated that they contacted the Hungarian police due to problems withdrawing $80,000. The organization noted that they intend to use all possible legal levers to secure the return of funds.

Similar statements were also made by Paxi Network and Scandic Coin. They all point out that their withdrawal requests are not being processed.

According to Arkham Intelligence, wallets associated with BitMart hold crypto assets worth $36.4 million. As of early July 2026, the balance exceeded $100 million.

According to CoinMarketCap, the exchange's reserves amount to $4.6 million. And most of it is in the native token BMX.

end-content

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the article, what is the primary accusation against the BitMart crypto exchange?

AThe primary accusation against BitMart is insolvency and delays in processing withdrawals of funds, with users and analysts suggesting it could be following a scenario similar to FTX.

QWhat specific evidence did analysts from Lookonchain provide to suggest BitMart was having problems?

AOn-chain analysts from Lookonchain reported that over 24 hours, only about $805,000 was withdrawn from BitMart across 58 wallets, which they noted was very low for such a platform. They also highlighted an 8-hour period with no recorded withdrawals at all.

QWhat did CEO Sheldon Xia announce in his August 8 statement regarding BitMart's situation?

AIn his statement on August 8, CEO Sheldon Xia claimed the team was still consolidating assets to ensure an orderly wind-down of operations. He denied misappropriating any assets and stated the company was considering involving courts and independent third-party auditors to prepare a transparent report.

QWhat suspicious action did Matthew Wang, co-founder of OpenGradient, highlight regarding BitMart's activities before its closure?

AMatthew Wang highlighted a suspicious and unethical proposal from BitMart, made just a week before announcing its closure, that offered users up to 15% annual yield for locking their crypto assets on the platform for six months.

QWhat discrepancy is reported between the assets held on BitMart's wallets and its official reserves according to the article?

AThe article reports a discrepancy between on-chain data and official reserve figures. According to Arkham Intelligence, BitMart's wallets hold crypto assets worth $36.4 million, down from over $100 million in early July. However, CoinMarketCap data shows the exchange's official reserves are only $4.6 million, mostly in its native BMX token.

İlgili Okumalar

U.S. Aims at Iran's Crypto Sector Due to Oil Payments Exceeding $100 Billion

The U.S. Treasury Department has expanded sanctions on Iran to target its digital asset sector, citing over $100 million in cryptocurrency payments allegedly used to facilitate Iranian oil sales. The Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced new sectoral sanctions covering digital assets, technology, gold, aviation, and shipping, alongside sanctions against nearly 60 entities, individuals, and vessels linked to nuclear, missile, cyber, and oil networks. The move allows OFAC to sanction foreign persons and firms operating in or supporting Iran’s crypto sector, which the Treasury stated is increasingly used as a "tool of choice" to circumvent sanctions, including by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Specific targets include Ukrainian broker Ivan Obukhov and his UAE-registered firm Foscom FZE, accused of processing over $100 million in crypto payments to facilitate oil sales for the IRGC’s Quds Force. This follows recent U.S. actions against Iran-linked crypto exchanges, including sanctions against UK-based Zedcex and Zedxion in January, four Iranian exchanges including Nobitex in June, and exchanges Shelbit and Aban Tether in August. Unlike previous targeted sanctions, the new measures establish a framework to penalize broader involvement in Iran’s crypto sector, significantly expanding OFAC’s authority under Executive Order 13902. Designated persons’ U.S.-linked property will be blocked, and foreign banks facilitating significant transactions for them may face U.S. account restrictions.

cryptonews.ru40 dk önce

U.S. Aims at Iran's Crypto Sector Due to Oil Payments Exceeding $100 Billion

cryptonews.ru40 dk önce

Conversation with Charles Zhang: Amidst the AI Frenzy, Why Pursue 'Anti-Efficiency' Content?

Dialogue with Charles Zhang: In the Era of AI's Sprint, Why Create "Anti-Efficiency" Content Standing out among China's early internet pioneers, Charles Zhang, founder and CEO of Sohu, maintains a distinct personal identity. He keeps a consistent public presence and embodies traits of high-energy individuals: sleeping only 4-5 hours daily, running 5km or marathons, and hosting frequent offline tech forums and dialogues with Nobel laureates. He has shifted focus from external business expansion to internal self-reconstruction, adhering to his own pace. "People aren't afraid of being busy; the busier you are, the better your health. Having nothing to do can lead to emotional issues and poor health." Marking the 10th anniversary of his live-streamed "Charles Zhang's English Class," he recently took it offline for a real-world classroom session. Following this, he discussed the course's decade-long journey, Sohu Video's content ecosystem, and the value of content in the AI era. **Pen and Mouth Diligence: A Class Against Instant Mastery** His English class began in August 2016 on "Qianfan Live." He spends about 40 minutes daily preparing, reviewing dozens of news headlines, reading five in detail, and selecting three for the lesson. Over ten years, he has completed over 2000 live sessions totaling more than 110,000 minutes, with over 52 million views. Initially, the stream was a way to "talk more" and combat emotional struggles. He started by repeating after TV news anchors, then moved to live-streaming with the launch of Qianfan Live. It was 40% for personal emotional regulation ("like a monk chanting sutras"), 30% to deliver authentic news, and 30% to promote the new platform. This daily "ritual" helped him overcome depression, leading to what he calls his "peak life state." From a product perspective, it was counter-intuitive—launched without prior market research or growth strategies, based on the founder's personal need that resonated with users. Yet, his content creation follows a strict routine. The decade of covering geopolitics, economics, tech, health, and society has built a vast "knowledge compound interest" system. In an age of AI summaries and algorithmic content, Zhang insists on "hard work": meticulous reading, handwritten notes, and manually created teaching materials, refusing AI-generated content. The English class is now a fixed daily rhythm; preparing for his weekly physics class requires a full day of solitary deduction on a blackboard. In his live streams, Zhang positions himself as a "content creator," not a CEO or teacher. He sees physics as extreme brain training and English as a "sensor" to understand the world. This explains why a top entrepreneur persists for a decade in seemingly "unprofessional" pursuits—it's the information input and psychological healing method he found during a low point. It's fundamentally an "anti-efficiency" commitment. He believes the meaning of reading lies in finding community and spiritual support, not just fleeting conversation points. For today's media, he states: "Reading news isn't the goal. As humans with many confusions, we need reference points, to find a group, find kindred spirits, or seek support and spiritual nourishment. Large language models can't satisfy these starting points; they only give you information." This offers solace and a value defense for media professionals impacted by AI summaries. **"Don't Think Earth Stops Turning Because AI Arrived"** A content creator expressed anxiety: after feeding their article to AI, it produced a more comprehensive, profound version, making their work feel valueless. Zhang responded with an analogy: "Carrots from the market, with a bit of soil, not glossy, taste delicious and flavorful. Tomatoes forced by chemical fertilizer have no taste at all." He sees AI giving world content a "plastic feel," but acknowledges its significant role in improving information access efficiency, especially in physics and social science research where he often queries AI for quick professional answers. The key, Zhang stresses, is that the outside world still needs to guide our perspective. LLMs provide "information," while the outside world offers "viewpoints." He cares deeply about *what* that external viewpoint is and *how* someone thinks about an issue. "Don't think the Earth stops turning because AI arrived," he analyzes. AI currently replaces rule-based work, noting significant impact on the software industry with many programmers laid off as even less experienced people can now write decent code. However, AI cannot yet replace arts, social sciences, emotions, and creative content. "Hollywood remains thriving, producing great works. Oscars will continue, Nobel Literature Prizes will still be awarded—all by real people, with works conceived by real people." While wary of AI, Zhang isn't anti-technology and is open to its applications. Sohu itself has launched AI assistants. In Sohu's AI practice, Zhang defines his role as a "large language model corpus provider." He believes LLM training is inseparable from human-original content as its data foundation, so original content retains irreplaceable value. "The era of self-media indeed offers everyone new ways to discover their strengths and achieve growth." He suggests every young person should consider self-media. Most importantly, the bottom line of content creation should be "authenticity." If using AI avatars, they must be clearly labeled; not doing so and misleading viewers wastes their time, especially when people still prefer real human content. Behind AI's sprint lie unavoidable realities. As AI quickly provides seemingly perfect answers, people grow accustomed to accepting "summarized" results, omitting processes of questioning, deduction, and trial-and-error, leading to a decline in deep thinking. Zhang's "anti-efficiency" practice with his two live-streamed classes is his answer to AI's狂奔: In an algorithm-driven era chasing ultimate efficiency, don't expect AI to fill inner voids. Read books, speak in front of a camera, sweat on a running track, and build connections with real people.

marsbit50 dk önce

Conversation with Charles Zhang: Amidst the AI Frenzy, Why Pursue 'Anti-Efficiency' Content?

marsbit50 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片