From 'Punishment' to 'Acceptance': SEC's 2% Discount Tears Open Compliance Gap for Stablecoins

比推2026-02-21 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-21 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

This article discusses a significant policy shift by the U.S. SEC regarding the capital treatment of payment stablecoins held by broker-dealers. On February 19, the SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets issued new guidance allowing broker-dealers to apply a 2% discount—rather than a punitive 100% haircut—to certain stablecoin holdings when calculating net capital requirements. This change aligns stablecoins with money market funds and other low-risk assets, making it financially viable for regulated entities to hold and use them. The move is seen as a major step toward integrating digital assets into mainstream finance. It follows the passage of the GENIUS Act in July 2025, which established a federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins. The SEC’s guidance is designed to bridge the gap between existing rules and the new law, enabling broker-dealers to use stablecoins for settlement, trading, and tokenized securities without excessive capital penalties. The author highlights that this shift is part of a broader effort by the SEC to move away from enforcement-heavy regulation under former Chair Gary Gensler and toward a more structured, inclusive approach. The change is expected to encourage more institutional participation, improve liquidity, and support the use of stablecoins in cross-border payments and financial inclusion. However, challenges remain, including ongoing tensions between federal and state regulators and pending legislation to clarify the classifica...

Author: Tonya M. Evans

Compiled by: Golem

Original title: The 'Stablecoin Revolution' on the Balance Sheet: SEC Uses '2% Discount' to Tear Open a Gap for Digital Asset Compliance

On February 19, the Division of Trading and Markets of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a new Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document clarifying how broker-dealers should handle payment stablecoins under the net capital rule. Subsequently, SEC Crypto Assets Working Group Chair Hester Peirce immediately issued a statement titled "Just a 2% Haircut".

Peirce stated that SEC staff would not object if broker-dealers applied a "2% haircut" rather than a punitive 100% haircut to their proprietary positions in eligible payment stablecoins when calculating net capital.

While this may sound esoteric, this accounting adjustment could be one of the most impactful moves to practically integrate digital assets into the mainstream financial system since the SEC began softening its stance on cryptocurrency in early 2025.

Minimum Net Capital and Haircuts

To understand why, we first need to understand what a "haircut" means in the broker-dealer world.

Under Rule 15c3-1 of the Securities Exchange Act, broker-dealers must maintain a minimum net capital, or more precisely, a liquidity buffer to protect clients if the firm gets into trouble. When calculating this buffer, firms must apply "asset haircuts" to different assets on their books, reducing their reported value to reflect risk. Consequently, riskier or more volatile assets receive larger haircuts, while cash does not.

Previously, some broker-dealers self-imposed a 100% haircut on stablecoins, meaning these holdings were completely excluded from their capital calculations. The result was that the cost of holding stablecoins was prohibitively high, making it financially unsustainable for regulated intermediaries.

The 2% haircut now changes this calculation entirely, placing payment stablecoins on equal footing with money market funds holding similar underlying assets, such as U.S. Treasuries, cash, and short-term government bonds.

As Peirce pointed out, the reserve requirements for authorized stablecoin issuers under the GENIUS Act are actually stricter than the "eligible securities" requirements for registered money market funds, including government money market funds. In her view, given the actual backing assets of these instruments, a 100% haircut was overly harsh.

This is crucial because stablecoins are the "backbone" of on-chain transactions. They are the means by which value flows on the blockchain and the prudent engine that powers trading, settlement, and payments.

If broker-dealers cannot hold these tokens without draining their capital positions, they cannot effectively participate in tokenized securities markets, facilitate the creation of physical exchange-traded products (ETPs), or provide the integrated crypto and securities services that institutions increasingly demand.

Timely Announcement of the "2% Haircut" Statement

The timing of this "2% haircut" announcement is critical.

The GENIUS Act, signed by President Trump on July 18, 2025, created the first comprehensive federal payment stablecoin framework. The Act established reserve requirements, a licensing process, and a regulatory mechanism for stablecoin issuers, placing them under a regulatory framework that distinguishes payment stablecoins from other digital assets.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is currently implementing the application process for insured depository institutions to issue payment stablecoins through their subsidiaries. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is also establishing its own framework. In short, federal regulators are racing against the clock to finalize key implementation rules before the July 2026 deadline.

Peirce's statement and its accompanying FAQ effectively bridge the gap between the legislative framework of the GENIUS Act and the SEC's own rulebook.

The definition of "payment stablecoin" in the FAQ is deliberately forward-looking: before the effective date of the GENIUS Act, it relies on existing state-level regulatory standards, such as state money transmitter licenses, requirements consistent with the reserve requirements stipulated in the Act, and monthly attestation reports from CPA firms. After the GENIUS Act takes effect, this definition will transition to the Act's own standards.

This two-track approach means broker-dealers do not have to wait for the full implementation of the GENIUS Act to start treating stablecoins as legitimate trading instruments.

Peirce also indicated that the guidance is just the beginning. She invited market participants to comment on how to formally amend Rule 15c3-1 to incorporate payment stablecoins and sought input on other SEC rules that may need updating. This open request for feedback suggests the Commission is considering more than just a one-off FAQ, but rather a more systematic integration of stablecoins into its regulatory system.

Policy Impacting Regulatory Precision

Since the establishment of the Crypto Assets Working Group in January 2025 under the leadership of then-Acting Chairman Mark Uyeda, the SEC has been systematically and gradually moving away from the enforcement-led regulatory approach of former Chairman Gary Gensler's era.

For example, the SEC issued guidance on broker-dealer custody of crypto assets, clearly stating that crypto asset securities do not need to meet control requirements in paper form, allowing broker-dealers to assist in the creation and redemption of physical ETPs, and explaining how alternative trading systems (ATS) can support crypto pair trading.

Furthermore, the FAQ page containing today's stablecoin guidance has evolved into a comprehensive resource covering everything from transfer agent obligations to the protection (or lack thereof) of non-security crypto assets by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC). For the traditional financial services industry, the practical and direct impact of these measures is significant:

Banks and broker-dealers evaluating whether to enter the digital asset space can now get a clearer picture of how their stablecoin holdings will be treated for capital purposes.
Companies previously hesitant due to the operational cost of maintaining significant positions (which ultimately had a net value of zero on the balance sheet) can now reconsider.
Custodians, clearing companies, and ATS operators exploring tokenized securities settlement now know that the settlement asset (stablecoins) will not be seen as a regulatory burden.

The follow-on effects for everyday investors, especially those historically underserved by traditional financial services, are equally important. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has noted that stablecoins have proven their utility in cross-border payments, savings vehicles in emerging markets, and broader channels for financial participation.

When regulated intermediaries can hold and transact in stablecoins without incurring massive capital penalties, more of these services can be offered through trusted, regulated channels, rather than through unregulated offshore platforms where consumer risks are higher.

Federal vs. State Friction Continues

Of course, this does not exist in a vacuum, and friction between federal and state governments persists. The implementation timeline for the GENIUS Act is very tight. State regulators must complete certification of their regulatory frameworks by July 2026.

Consumer fraud protection concerns raised by figures like New York Attorney General Letitia James remain unresolved. Interaction between federal and state regulation will inevitably create friction. Furthermore, broader market structure legislation aimed at clarifying which digital assets are securities and which are commodities is still pending in the Senate.

Therefore, the 2% haircut, however minor or obscure it may seem, represents something deeper: federal securities regulators are actively adapting existing rules to include stablecoins as functional financial instruments, rather than merely marginalizing them.

Whether this adaptation can keep pace with the market, and whether the implementation of the GENIUS Act can deliver on its promises, remains to be seen. But in the journey from regulatory hostility to regulatory integration, it is this technical, often unseen work that determines whether policy translates into practice.

Twitter: https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group: https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original article link: https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7613536

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the SEC's new policy regarding the haircut on payment stablecoins for broker-dealers?

AThe SEC's new policy allows broker-dealers to apply a 2% haircut, instead of a punitive 100% haircut, on eligible payment stablecoin holdings when calculating net capital.

QWhy is the 2% haircut significant for the integration of stablecoins into the mainstream financial system?

AThe 2% haircut places payment stablecoins on equal footing with money market funds holding similar underlying assets, making it financially viable for regulated intermediaries to hold stablecoins and participate in tokenized securities markets and crypto-integrated services.

QWhat legislation provides the federal framework for payment stablecoins that the SEC's guidance aligns with?

AThe GENIUS Act, signed into law on July 18, 2025, establishes the first comprehensive federal payment stablecoin framework, setting reserve rules, licensing processes, and regulatory mechanisms.

QHow does the SEC's guidance define 'payment stablecoin' before and after the GENIUS Act takes effect?

ABefore the GENIUS Act is fully implemented, the definition relies on existing state-level regulatory standards. After the Act takes effect, the definition will shift to the standards set by the GENIUS Act itself.

QWhat broader shift in the regulatory approach towards crypto assets does this SEC guidance represent?

AThis guidance is part of a systematic shift away from the enforcement-led approach of the previous SEC chair, Gary Gensler, towards a more integrative regulatory framework that accommodates digital assets within existing rules.

İlgili Okumalar

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit2 saat önce

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit2 saat önce

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手2 saat önce

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手2 saat önce

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit5 saat önce

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit5 saat önce

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手6 saat önce

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手6 saat önce

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit7 saat önce

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit7 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures