From Pump.fun to Collector Crypt: Has Solana's Revenue Throne Changed Hands?

链捕手2026-07-02 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-07-02 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

From Pump.fun to Collector Crypt: Is Solana’s Revenue Throne Changing Hands? Solana’s on-chain narrative is expanding from meme coins to tokenized trading cards. Previously, Pump.fun dominated consumer revenue on Solana. However, starting in Q2 2026, Pump.fun's quarterly revenue growth slowed, while Collector Crypt shows a stronger recent growth trajectory. Data indicates Pump.fun's Q1 revenue was $108.3M, dropping 36.1% to $69.2M in Q2 so far. Conversely, Collector Crypt's revenue grew 108.8%, from $12.3M in Q1 to $25.8M in Q2 to date, with recent weekly revenue hitting $5.1M. While Pump.fun remains larger in scale, Collector Crypt demonstrates stronger short-term momentum. Collector Crypt's model involves custodying graded physical trading cards, minting corresponding NFTs on Solana, and selling randomized packs. Revenue comes from pack sales, secondary market fees, and royalties. Its profitability, estimated around 4-5%, stems from bulk card purchases at a discount and a buyback system for users. However, a full-scale reversal in rankings hasn't occurred. Year-to-date, Pump.fun's revenue is ~$177.5M (with its ecosystem at ~$466.5M), vastly exceeding Collector Crypt's ~$38.1M. The shift is more about narrative and recent growth dynamics than total historical volume. Pump.fun relies on speculative token launches, while Collector Crypt focuses on collectibility, scarcity, and real-world asset backing. This highlights a broadening of Solana's consumer revenue sources beyo...

Author: Chloe, ChainCatcher

The narrative on Solana is expanding from meme coins to tokenized trading cards. In the past, Pump.fun was almost the representative application for consumer-side revenue on Solana; but entering the second quarter of 2026, Pump.fun's quarterly revenue began to slow down, while Collector Crypt delivered a stronger recent growth curve.

DefiLlama data shows that Pump.fun's revenue in Q1 was $108.3 million, which has dropped to $69.2 million so far in Q2, a decrease of 36.1% compared to the previous quarter. During the same period, Collector Crypt's revenue curve has clearly trended upward.

Collector Crypt's revenue in Q1 was $12.3 million, rising to $25.8 million so far in Q2, a growth of 108.8%; its recent weekly revenue reached $5.1 million, accounting for about 38% of its 30-day total revenue of nearly $13.5 million. This set of data shows that Pump.fun still has a larger scale, but Collector Crypt is gaining stronger short-term growth momentum.

Summarizing the data, perhaps it's not that Pump.fun has lost scalable growth, but rather that the sources of consumer fees on Solana are beginning to diversify. The meme coin sector remains vast, but tokenized trading cards, random card packs, physical redemption, and on-chain secondary markets are becoming another consumer scenario capable of generating real fees, real transactions, and truly retaining users.

Are Collector Crypt's Profit Sources Stable?

The core operational model of Collector Crypt is to hold physical graded trading cards in custody and mint corresponding NFTs on Solana. Users who purchase random card packs receive digital cards linked to real physical cards; they can then choose to hold the NFT, sell it on-chain, sell it back to the platform, or redeem the physical card.

Collector Crypt's revenue mainly comes from random card pack sales, secondary market transaction fees, and royalties; when calculating revenue, it also deducts buyback costs incurred when users sell cards back to the platform. Furthermore, Collector Crypt purchases trading cards in bulk, acquiring inventory at discounts of about 5% to 15%; after users open packs, if they don't want to keep the cards, they can sell them back to the platform at a price roughly 7% to 15% below market value.

This allows Collector Crypt to retain an operating profit margin of about 4% to 5%. According to estimates, for a $1,000 card pack, Collector Crypt's comprehensive profit margin is about 5.14%; after deducting incentive costs such as user rewards, the net profit margin is about 4.44%.

This model has garnered attention because it's not just about selling on-chain pictures, but about connecting on-chain transactions with real-world collectibles. Collector Crypt surpassed $1 billion in cumulative trading volume in May 2026; the platform opened over 215,000 tokenized trading card packs in a single week, and more than 30% of users have redeemed physical cards.

Solana's Revenue Ranking Has Not Fully Reversed

However, Collector Crypt has not truly replaced Pump.fun in terms of total volume. So far in 2026, Pump.fun's revenue is about $177.5 million, and the overall Pump ecosystem revenue is about $466.5 million; in comparison, Collector Crypt's 2026 revenue is about $38.1 million. In cumulative revenue, Pump.fun exceeds $1 billion, the overall Pump ecosystem is about $1.18 billion, while Collector Crypt is about $58.4 million.

Therefore, the so-called "change of hands on the revenue throne" more accurately describes a narrative shift in recent revenue momentum and daily revenue rankings, rather than a complete reversal in historical cumulative scale.

Pump.fun's model relies on a speculative token-issuance cycle: users continuously issue new tokens, trade on early price curves, then some tokens enter public markets, generating fees at various stages. Collector Crypt's model is another type of consumer cycle: users buy random card packs, receive on-chain vouchers corresponding to physical collectibles, and then engage in on-chain trading, instant sell-back, or physical redemption. Both can generate fees, trading volume, and market attention, but they attract users for different reasons.

Pump.fun leans more towards attention, volatility, and early meme coin positions; Collector Crypt leans more towards collecting, scarcity, gamified experience, and real-world asset anchoring. This is also where the focus of the discussion about Solana's consumer applications is changing: revenue is no longer just from meme coin issuance, but can also come from collectible consumption closer to real-world assets.

Conclusion

Finally, the sustainability of Collector Crypt's revenue first depends on whether demand for random card packs can be maintained. If pack demand remains strong, Collector Crypt's 30-day revenue may continue to approach that of Pump.fun; if demand for random card packs cools, the recent high concentration of Collector Crypt's revenue could turn from a growth signal into a risk.

Additionally, the second growth variable for Collector Crypt is whether it can expand from Pokémon cards to sports cards and other collectibles. Data indicates that Pokémon cards currently dominate Collector Crypt's monthly trading volume; but at physical card shows, sports cards and Pokémon card sales are roughly split 50/50, while on-chain sports cards currently only account for 3% to 4% of Collector Crypt's $88 million monthly trading volume.

The third variable for Collector Crypt is regulatory pressure. If multiple jurisdictions begin to scrutinize the random card pack mechanism using a "loot box regulatory framework," it could slow Collector Crypt's growth.

Therefore, barring changes in the macro environment, Pump.fun will likely remain the larger revenue engine, while Collector Crypt will continue to appear at the top of Solana application revenue rankings. In this scenario, consumer application revenue on Solana will no longer rely solely on meme coin issuance but will gradually diffuse into more consumer scenarios.

The key change for Solana is not that Pump.fun has been completely replaced, but that the consumer revenue structure has broadened. Pump.fun proved that meme coin issuance can become a highly revenue-generating consumer application on Solana; Collector Crypt proves that tokenized physical collectibles can also form real revenue, real transactions, and real user behavior.

Trend Kriptolar

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the article, what is the main difference between Pump.fun's and Collector Crypt's revenue models?

APump.fun's revenue model relies on a speculative cycle of new token issuance and early-stage trading on bonding curves, attracting users with attention, volatility, and early memecoin access. Collector Crypt's revenue model is based on a consumption cycle: users buy randomized card packs containing tokenized, real-world graded trading cards, and then engage in on-chain trading, instant buybacks, or physical redemption, focusing on collection, scarcity, gamification, and real-world asset backing.

QWhat specific reasons does the article give for Collector Crypt's recent stronger growth in revenue compared to Pump.fun?

AThe article attributes Collector Crypt's stronger recent revenue growth to its unique offering of randomized packs linked to real-world collectible trading cards, creating a 'real fee, real transaction, and real user retention' scenario. This has provided stronger short-term growth momentum, evidenced by a 108.8% increase in Q2 revenue year-over-year and recent weekly revenue accounting for 38% of its 30-day total.

QWhat are the three key variables or challenges mentioned that could affect the sustainability of Collector Crypt's growth?

AThe three key variables are: 1) Sustained demand for randomized card packs, 2) The ability to expand from Pokémon cards to other collectibles like sports cards, and 3) Potential regulatory pressure as jurisdictions may scrutinize the 'randomized pack' mechanism under 'blind box' regulatory frameworks.

QBased on the DefiLlama data cited, how do the cumulative revenues of Pump.fun and Collector Crypt compare historically?

AHistorically, Pump.fun holds a significantly larger cumulative revenue. The article states Pump.fun's cumulative revenue exceeds $1 billion, and the broader Pump ecosystem is around $1.18 billion. In contrast, Collector Crypt's cumulative revenue is approximately $58.4 million. Therefore, the shift in 'revenue throne' refers to recent momentum, not a total historical reversal.

QWhat is the article's final conclusion regarding the broader change in Solana's consumer application landscape, beyond just the competition between these two protocols?

AThe article concludes that the key change on Solana is not Pump.fun being replaced, but a broadening of the consumer application revenue structure. While Pump.fun proved memecoin issuance could generate high revenue, Collector Crypt demonstrates that tokenized physical collectibles can also create real revenue, transactions, and user engagement, indicating a diffusion of revenue sources into more diverse consumer scenarios.

İlgili Okumalar

Anyone Can Easily Create Prediction Markets, But Can Limitless' User-Generated Markets Last?

The article discusses the historical challenges of user-generated prediction markets in crypto, where previous attempts like Augur, Omen, Zeitgeist, and Manifold Markets failed due to fragmented liquidity, poor discoverability, and unreliable, slow settlement processes. These issues often led to platforms filled with inactive markets and low user engagement, prompting some, like Polymarket, to shift to a curated model. Limitless recently launched its User-Generated Market (UGM) feature, allowing anyone to create crypto price prediction markets. It addresses past failures through several key design choices: markets are limited to objective, oracle-based price questions (e.g., "Will Asset X be above $Y at time Z?") for instant, automatic settlement via Pyth and Chainlink, eliminating voting disputes. To combat spam and fragmentation, market creation requires burning 100-1000 LMTS tokens (a non-refundable cost), while creators earn 50% of the trading fees generated by their market, aligning incentives. The platform also benefits from an existing active user base and uses an order book model, removing the need for creators to provide initial liquidity. By tackling settlement reliability, liquidity fragmentation, and creator incentives, Limitless presents a new model for sustainable, permissionless prediction markets.

Foresight News19 dk önce

Anyone Can Easily Create Prediction Markets, But Can Limitless' User-Generated Markets Last?

Foresight News19 dk önce

Senator Cynthia Lummis Defends Clarity Act Against Elizabeth Warren’s Criticism

Senator Cynthia Lummis defended the Clarity Act against Senator Elizabeth Warren's criticism that it contains loopholes for illicit cryptocurrency activities like money laundering. Warren cited concerns over an alleged $3.84 billion laundering case involving an Iranian company and a crypto exchange, arguing the bill weakens anti-money laundering rules and consumer protections. Lummis countered that the bill includes over sixteen provisions to combat illicit finance, such as applying Bank Secrecy Act rules to crypto (Section 201), sanctioning foreign jurisdictions like Iran (Section 303), and allowing temporary transaction freezes during investigations (Section 305). She called Warren's claims unfounded. The bill, which aims to clarify regulatory roles for the SEC and CFTC, faces ongoing debate in Congress with a 39% predicted chance of passage. Warren also urged stricter ethics rules following reports of a $1.4 billion crypto gain by former President Trump.

TheNewsCrypto35 dk önce

Senator Cynthia Lummis Defends Clarity Act Against Elizabeth Warren’s Criticism

TheNewsCrypto35 dk önce

Female Billionaire Becomes a VC

The article details how Zhou Qunfei, founder and chairwoman of Lens Technology and once China's "richest woman," has entered the venture capital (VC) space. Zhou's recent investment in the embodied AI unicorn Kuawei Intelligent, contributing several hundred million RMB from her personal funds, brought her VC activities into focus. Her investment vehicle, Changsha Qunxin Investment, has made 17 investments, targeting semiconductor and hard tech companies like ChipOne Technology. Meanwhile, Lens Technology, her listed company, has made strategic bets this year on AI startups such as BrainCo, Xinghai Tu, Qingtian Zu, and Pudu Robotics. Zhou's own story is one of remarkable ascent. Starting as a migrant factory worker in Shenzhen, she built Lens Technology into a powerhouse supplying glass for major tech clients like Apple, with a market cap surpassing 300 billion RMB. Her move mirrors a broader trend among China's self-made industrial tycoons. Figures like Liu Yi of iHealth Labs (an investor in DeepSeek) and Zhu Xingming of Inovance Technology are similarly redirecting family offices and corporate capital away from traditional sectors like real estate. Instead, they are placing strategic bets on frontier technologies—AI, embodied intelligence, brain-computer interfaces, and nuclear fusion—effectively funding China's next wave of technological innovation.

marsbit40 dk önce

marsbit40 dk önce

On the Eve of Its U.S. Journey, SK Hynix Plummets Sharply

Just before its highly anticipated U.S. listing, SK Hynix saw its share price plummet dramatically, losing over 14% in a single day. The sell-off was triggered by market fears of a potential slowdown in AI capital expenditure. This followed a news report suggesting Meta might sell "excess AI compute," which was later amended to remove the word "excess." The initial phrasing sparked a chain reaction in investor sentiment, linking it to a potential peak in AI demand. Despite the sharp downturn, the article argues this is likely an overreaction driven by market sentiment and structural de-leveraging, rather than a fundamental reversal of the AI trend. The author points out that even if Meta proceeds, it could be an optimization of existing assets, not a systemic demand contraction. SK Hynix is in the final stages of its U.S. IPO via an ADR listing on Nasdaq, aiming to raise approximately $29.4 billion—one of the largest such offerings ever. The funds are earmarked for expanding domestic Korean production capacity for HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) and advanced packaging. A key motivation for the U.S. listing is to achieve a valuation re-rating, escaping the so-called "Korea discount" and tapping into the higher valuation multiples typically given to AI-related semiconductor stocks in the U.S. market. In conclusion, the article views the current price drop as a potential buying opportunity, suggesting the long-term industry fundamentals for SK Hynix—particularly its leading position in the crucial HBM market—remain strong. The significant capital raised from the IPO is also seen as a factor that could provide underlying support for the stock post-listing.

Odaily星球日报41 dk önce

On the Eve of Its U.S. Journey, SK Hynix Plummets Sharply

Odaily星球日报41 dk önce

arXiv Breaks Away from Cornell, Officially Takes Flight on Its Own

arXiv, the widely used preprint server, has officially spun off from Cornell University as of July 1, becoming an independent nonprofit organization named arXiv, Inc. Registered in Delaware with 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status, this move ends its 25-year affiliation with Cornell. The new entity will be governed by a board of up to 12 members, with the Simons Foundation and Cornell University serving as founding members for the first five years. Ramin Zabih, a Cornell professor, will serve as interim CEO during the transition. All 26 staff members have transferred to the new organization, and operations—including free access to papers—are expected to remain unchanged for users in the near term. Founded in 1991 by physicist Paul Ginsparg, arXiv hosts over 3.09 million preprints across physics, mathematics, computer science, and other fields, facilitating rapid dissemination of research. Key motivations for independence include financial pressures—arXiv faced a deficit in 2025—and the need for greater operational flexibility to address challenges like the surge in AI-generated submissions. The platform remains committed to its free-access model but will explore broader funding avenues as a standalone entity.

marsbit46 dk önce

arXiv Breaks Away from Cornell, Officially Takes Flight on Its Own

marsbit46 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot

Popüler Makaleler

MEME 2.0 Nedir

Memecoin 2.0: Kripto Para Dünyasında $MEME 2.0'ın Yükselişi Giriş Kripto para dünyasının sürekli gelişen yapısında, yeni bir rakip olarak Memecoin 2.0 ortaya çıktı. $MEME 2.0 sembolüyle öne çıkan bu proje, meme coinlerinin kavramını heyecan verici bir yeni seviyeye taşıyor. Orijinal Memecoin'in bir yan ürünü olarak, bu proje, odağını geleneksel finansal teşviklerden, katılımcı ve eğlenceli bir deneyime kaydırarak kripto topluluğunun dikkatini çekmeyi başardı. Ethereum blockchain'inde faaliyet gösteren Memecoin 2.0, kripto alanında topluluk katılımını cesurca yeniden tanımlıyor. Memecoin 2.0, $MEME 2.0 Nedir? Memecoin 2.0, temelinde topluluk ruhunu ve meme kültürüyle ilişkilendirilen eğlenceyi öncelikli olarak benimseyen bir kripto para projesidir. Pratik kullanım alanlarına ve somut faydalara odaklanan geleneksel kripto paralardan farklı olarak, Memecoin 2.0 dijital para biriminin daha hafif yönünü benimseyerek kendini gösteriyor. Proje, herhangi bir fayda, yapılandırılmış bir yol haritası veya finansal getiri vaadi olmadan varlığını sürdürüyor ve bunun yerine memelere ve ortak keyfe odaklanmış canlı bir topluluk oluşturmayı hedefliyor. Bu sayede, çevrimiçi alanda meme kültürünün artan trendine hitap ederek dijital varlıklar dünyasında benzersiz bir oyuncu haline geliyor. Memecoin 2.0'ın Yaratıcısı, $MEME 2.0 Memecoin 2.0'ın kökenleri üzerine yapılan kapsamlı araştırmalara rağmen, yaratıcısının kimliği belirsizliğini koruyor. Bu anonimlik, birçok projenin sahne arkasında kalmayı tercih eden bireyler veya gruplar tarafından yönetildiği kripto topluluğunda alışılmadık bir durum değil. Yaratıcının kamuya açık bilgilere sahip olmaması, topluluk katılımına odaklanarak bireysel ünlülük yerine topluluğun önemini vurgulayan stratejik bir hamle olarak görülebilir. Memecoin 2.0 Yatırımcıları, $MEME 2.0 Memecoin 2.0 için yatırımcılar veya mali destek ile ilgili bilgiler sınırlıdır. Bu bilgi eksikliği projenin ya kendi kendini finanse ettiğini ya da geleneksel yatırım yapılarına kıyasla topluluğa odaklanmasının farklı bir destekçi türünü çektiğini öne sürebilir. Meme coinlerinin dünyası tipik olarak daha fazla taban katılımı içerdiği için bu yaklaşım, topluluk odaklı projelerin etikleriyle uyumlu bir yapı sergiliyor. Memecoin 2.0, $MEME 2.0 Nasıl Çalışır? Memecoin 2.0 tamamen Ethereum blockchain'inde faaliyet gösteriyor ve bu sayede güvenlik özelliklerinden ve ölçeklenebilirliğinden yararlanıyor. Ethereum'un güçlü yönlerinden faydalanarak, Memecoin 2.0 kullanıcı etkileşimleri için güvenli bir ortam sunarken, işlemlerin hem verimli hem de maliyet etkili olmasını sağlıyor. Memecoin 2.0'ın benzersiz özelliklerinden biri topluluk odaklı yapısıdır. $MEME 2.0 tokeninin değeri ve popülaritesi, kullanıcıların aktif katılımlarından geliyor, içsel faydadan ziyade. Bu tasarım, projenin kripto para biriminin eğlence yönüne odaklanmasını pekiştirerek, gülmenin ve topluluk etkileşiminin başarısını sağlayan gerçek para birimleri olduğunu ima eder. Ayrıca, proje, meme coinlerinin daha geniş ekosisteminin bir parçası olarak yer alıyor; burada her meme coininin değeri, kültür, trendler ve topluluk katılımına göre dalgalanıyor, geleneksel ekonomik prensiplerden ziyade. Memecoin 2.0'ın Zaman Çizelgesi, $MEME 2.0 Memecoin 2.0'ın evrimini ve kilometre taşlarını daha iyi anlamak için, tarihindeki önemli olayları vurgulayan bir zaman çizelgesi: 2024: Memecoin 2.0'ın ortaya çıkışı, orijinal Memecoin'in bir yan ürünü olarak kabul edilir ve Ethereum blockchain'inde faaliyet gösterirken meme coinlerinin gelişen bağlamında kendini konumlandırır. 13 Temmuz 2024: Memecoin 2.0, Ethereum ağında topluluk odaklı bir meme coin olarak resmi bir konum alır ve kullanıcıların katılımını ve büyümeye katkı sağlamasını teşvik eden eğlence odaklı yaklaşımını vurgular. Memecoin 2.0'a Dair Anahtar Noktalar, $MEME 2.0 Memecoin 2.0'ı tanımlayan birkaç kritik özellik: Topluluk Merkezli Yaklaşım: Memecoin 2.0'ın temel misyonu, memetik kültürden elde edilen ortak keyfi kullanarak eğlenceli ve katılımcı bir topluluk deneyimi yaratmaktır. Ethereum Üzerinde İnşa Edilmiş: Ethereum blockchain'inde faaliyet göstermek, projeye güvenlik ve ölçeklenebilirlik sağlayan temel bir altyapı sunar. Fayda veya Yol Haritası Yokluğu: Geleneksel kripto paralardan çarpıcı bir şekilde farklı olarak, Memecoin 2.0 herhangi bir faydalı özellik veya finansal getiri vaadinde bulunmamakta, topluluk katılımı ve sosyal etkileşime olan bağlılığını pekiştirmektedir. Memetik Kültüre Odağı: Mem fenomeninin mizahi ve kültürel yönlerini benimseyerek, Memecoin 2.0 kullanıcıların kripto ile çevrimdışı ve çevrimiçi etkileşimde bulunması için bir platform sağlar. Ek Bağlam: Meme Coinlerinin Önemi Meme coinler, kabaca mizah ve ticarete yönelik hafif bir yaklaşım tarafından yönlendirilen belirgin bir kripto para sınıfı olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu paralar genellikle önemli bir fayda veya gelişim yol haritasından yoksundur ve kullanıcıları eğlence, topluluk etkileşimi ve kültürel relevans vaadiyle çeker. Daha geniş kripto ekosisteminde, meme coinler topluluk katılımının önemini yeniden canlandırırken, yalnızca kar odaklı yaklaşımlara karşı bir duruş sergiliyor. Memecoin 2.0 gibi projeler, eğlencenin finansal hedeflerle uyum sağlamasını sağlayarak, blockchain'i yaratıcılık ve sosyal etkileşim için bir oyun alanı haline getiriyor. Sonuç Memecoin 2.0, veya $MEME 2.0, topluluk katılımını katı finansal yapıların üzerinde önceliklendirerek yeni bir kripto para dalgasını temsil ediyor. Mizah ve sosyal etkileşime odaklanarak, meme kültürü etrafındaki ilgiden faydalanıyor. Ethereum blockchain'inde faaliyet göstererek, Memecoin 2.0, teknolojinin yeteneklerinden yararlanırken dijital para biriminin eğlence değerine olan bağlılığında kararlılığını koruyor. Kripto para alanı gelişmeye devam ederken, Memecoin 2.0, dijital varlıkların geleceğinin ortak deneyimlere, gülmelere ve sağlam topluluk bağlantılarına bağlı olabileceğinin bir kanıtı olarak hizmet ediyor. Kripto dünyası belirsiz olsa da, belki de neşe, geleneksel finansal kazanç kadar değerli olabilir.

159 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2024.04.04Güncellenme 2024.12.03

MEME Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! Memeland (MEME) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında Memeland (MEME) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: Memeland (MEME) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınMemeland (MEME) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: Memeland (MEME) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında Memeland (MEME) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

662 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2024.12.12Güncellenme 2026.06.02

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların MEME (MEME) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.