From Competing on Experience to Building Assets: Hyperliquid is Moving Ahead of CEXs

比推2026-01-28 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-28 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Amidst a general market stagnation, Hyperliquid ($HYPE) has demonstrated notable independent growth, signaling a shift in the Perp DEX narrative. Rather than competing solely on user experience akin to centralized exchanges (CEXs), Hyperliquid is expanding into synthetic assets—including commodities like crude oil, precious metals, and foreign currencies—through its HIP-3 protocol. This positions it not just as a decentralized exchange, but as a crypto-native, Nasdaq-like platform for global asset trading. The move reflects a broader trend of on-chain liquidity integrating with real-world assets, a direction also being explored by major CEXs like Bitget, OKX, and Bybit. Hyperliquid’s advantages include narrower spreads, faster execution, and 24/7 availability compared to traditional platforms. It leverages on-chain transparency, permissionless listings, and fee redistribution to challenge the opaque, centralized models of CEXs and traditional finance—focusing on code-based trust rather than decentralization rhetoric.

Author: Haotian

Original Title: While CEXs Are Still Competing on Experience, Hyperliquid Is Already Trading Precious Metals and Forex

While mainstream assets remain stagnant, $HYPE's independent bullish surge is indeed thought-provoking. Many are asking why the Perp DEX sector has been quiet lately, but @HyperliquidX's performance has already provided the answer:

1) The narrative ceiling has shifted. The old story of Perp DEXs approaching CEX-level experience is no longer compelling. It seems Hyperliquid is breaking away from the internal competition of being a "user-friendly DEX" and is expanding into a full range of synthetic assets through the HIP-3 protocol.

It is transitioning from the goal of outperforming CEXs as a user-friendly DEX to becoming a chain-based Nasdaq narrative that best serves Crypto Native users. The shift from pure Crypto speculation to seamless trading of crude oil, forex, and precious metals directly elevates the vision;

2) The "reverse flow" of on-chain liquidity into real-world assets. Observing exchanges like Bitget, OKX, and Bybit building platforms around the "asset tokenization" narrative indicates that the growth ceiling for pure Crypto assets has been reached.

Don’t doubt it—when you find that the spread for trading silver on-chain is narrower than on CEXs, the response is faster than brokers, and it operates 24/7 without interruption, it ceases to be just a DEX and transforms into an all-weather global asset routing hub. This is an inevitable outcome of on-chain liquidity beginning to reverse-flow into real-world assets. Whoever takes the lead in championing this will emerge as the winner;

3) A dimensional shift in rule-making. In the past, Perp DEXs were imitating and trying to match the experience of CEXs, but Hyperliquid has clearly elevated the game. The new rule logic includes absolute on-chain transparency, permissionless listing, fee rebate mechanisms, and other emerging market rules.

Ultimately, it uses code-based trust to dismantle the black-box advantages of CEXs and TradFi. Interestingly, decentralization isn’t even mentioned.

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original Link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7606559

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main narrative shift that Hyperliquid is undergoing according to the article?

AHyperliquid is shifting from being a 'user-friendly DEX' focused on competing with CEXs in crypto perpetual trading to becoming a 'chain-based Nasdaq' narrative, expanding into synthetic assets like crude oil, foreign exchange, and precious metals to attract broader asset trading.

QHow does Hyperliquid's new strategy represent a 'dimensional reduction attack' on traditional rules?

AHyperliquid uses code-based trust to eliminate the black-box advantages of CEXs and TradFi by offering absolute on-chain transparency, permissionless listing of new assets, and fee rebate mechanisms, rather than merely imitating CEX user experience.

QWhat advantage does Hyperliquid claim over CEXs when trading assets like silver?

AHyperliquid claims to offer narrower price spreads, faster response times than brokers, and 24/7 non-stop trading for assets like silver, making it an all-weather global asset routing hub rather than just a DEX.

QWhy are exchanges like Bitget, OKX, and Bybit moving towards 'asset tokenization' narratives?

AThey recognize the growth bottleneck of pure crypto assets and are exploring asset tokenization to leverage on-chain liquidity to integrate real-world assets, a trend that Hyperliquid is pioneering.

QWhat key feature of Hyperliquid's HIP-3 protocol supports its expansion into synthetic assets?

AHIP-3 protocol enables Hyperliquid to offer permissionless listing and trading of synthetic assets, including commodities and forex, facilitating its transition to a full-chain asset trading platform.

İlgili Okumalar

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit23 dk önce

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit23 dk önce

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit31 dk önce

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit31 dk önce

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News35 dk önce

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News35 dk önce

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit42 dk önce

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit42 dk önce

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit51 dk önce

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit51 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot