February 4th Market Summary: Software Stock Crash Triggers Chain Reaction, Safe-Haven Assets Rebound Sharply

marsbit2026-02-04 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-04 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

On February 4th, a sharp sell-off in software stocks triggered a broader market downturn and a flight to safety. Major U.S. indices closed lower, with the Nasdaq falling 1.43%. The software sector experienced a severe crisis, with stocks like Salesforce and ServiceNow hitting 52-week lows, driven by fears that AI could disrupt their core business models rather than enhance them. This sentiment spread, causing significant declines in major tech stocks, except for Palantir, which rose on strong earnings. Simultaneously, the cryptocurrency market entered a deep correction, with Bitcoin dropping to a 16-month low below $73,000. Analysts described the situation as a "full-blown crypto winter," citing massive outflows, liquidations, and deteriorating macro conditions. In contrast, safe-haven assets saw a dramatic rebound. Spot gold surged over 5%, marking its largest single-day gain since 2008, as investors reassessed the initial panic over a potential Fed chair nominee and viewed the drop as a buying opportunity. Silver also rose nearly 10%. The market's core conflict is between the deflating AI investment narrative and the relative resilience of the traditional economy, as seen in the outperformance of defensive stocks. Key events to watch include upcoming tech earnings and the delayed Non-Farm Payrolls report.

Written by: Ma Mengniu, Deep Tide TechFlow

US Stocks: The End of Software Stocks

US Market Close on February 4th (Tuesday):

  • Dow Jones: 49,241 points (-0.34%)
  • S&P 500: 6,918 points (-0.84%)
  • Nasdaq: 23,255 points (-1.43%)

This doesn't look like a typical correction; it feels more like a crisis of faith in the tech sector.

The software sector was hit the hardest today. The WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund plummeted 3.2%, marking its sixth consecutive day of decline and setting the longest losing streak of the year.

A large number of enterprise software stocks fell to 52-week lows:

Salesforce down nearly 7%; ServiceNow down nearly 7%; IBM down 6.28%; Workday, Adobe, DocuSign, Asana all hit new lows.

Why the collective crash in software stocks?

The market suddenly realized a harsh reality: AI isn't here to help SaaS companies; it's here to replace them.

Over the past few weeks, investor sentiment toward enterprise software has done a 180. Initially, they thought AI would make these software tools more powerful, but now they see that AI might directly replace their functions. Why pay for a Salesforce subscription if an AI assistant can manage customer relationships directly? Why use ServiceNow if AI can automatically handle service tickets?

This isn't a problem of overvaluation; it's panic over a disrupted business model.

The "Magnificent Seven" tech giants showed mixed performance today:

Microsoft down over 2%; Meta down over 2%; Nvidia down nearly 3%; Apple slightly down.

The only bright spot was Palantir, which reported better-than-expected earnings after hours yesterday and rose 6.8% today. But this lone example highlights the market's selectivity: funds are only willing to pay for companies with real, tangible AI applications.

Nvidia's troubles are intensifying. OpenAI is dissatisfied with Nvidia's latest AI chips, causing a stalemate in their $100 billion investment plan. This isn't just a problem for Nvidia; it's a crack in the entire AI infrastructure investment narrative: if technology is iterating this fast, will the hundreds of billions in capital expenditure being deployed now become obsolete quickly?

PayPal plummeted 15% in pre-market trading today and closed down over 20%.

Earnings report showed: Q4 profit below expectations; disappointing 2026 profit guidance; weak US retail spending; slow growth in branded checkout business.

PayPal's crash is not an isolated event but a clear signal of slowing consumer spending. If even online payment infrastructure is seeing weak growth, it suggests the underlying momentum of the economy is weakening.

The Dow fell only 0.34%, much better than the Nasdaq's 1.43%. The reason:

Defensive sectors provided support: Verizon up 3.59%, Cisco up 3.08%, Walmart up 2.97%; Funds are rotating: from high-valuation tech stocks to value stocks and defensive plays.

This is classic "risk-off" behavior. When investors start doubting the tech stock narrative, they shift towards "old economy" companies with real cash flows, low valuations, and high dividends.

Cryptocurrency: From Bear Market to "Crypto Winter"

Bitcoin fell below $73,000, hitting a 16-month low.

Bitcoin once fell to $72,884, the lowest since November 6, 2024. Ethereum fell below $2200, down 6.5% on the day, Solana fell below $100, down 5.5% on the day.

Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer of Bitwise Asset Management, released a report, stating bluntly:

"This is not a pullback in a bull market, nor a 'buy the dip' opportunity. This is a full-blown, 2022-style, 'The Revenant'-level crypto winter."

He pointed out that the crypto market entered a bear market in January 2025, but many were unwilling to admit it. The good news is, if this is truly a 2022-style bear market, it means the bottom might be near.

Why is crypto crashing so hard?

  • Deteriorating Macro Environment

US tech stock crash, overall risk appetite collapses; Nonfarm payrolls data delayed, market "flying blind"; US dollar rebound, negative for cryptocurrencies

  • Liquidity Drying Up

Over the past week, digital asset investment products saw net outflows of $1.7 billion. Since the start of 2026, cumulative outflows have reached $1 billion. The Head of Research at CoinShares said this "marks a significant deterioration in investor sentiment towards the asset class".

  • Passive Liquidation Spiral

Since last Thursday, over $2 billion in Bitcoin long and short positions have been liquidated. Saturday alone saw liquidations of $2.56 billion, the 10th largest single-day liquidation event in history. Liquidations trigger a chain reaction: price drop → triggers forced liquidation → increased selling pressure → price drops further. This spiral is more deadly in the low-liquidity weekend market.

Where is Bitcoin's Next Stop?

From a technical perspective:

Current support level: $72,000-$70,000 range; If it breaks below $70,000, the next stop is $68,000; More pessimistic scenario: could correct to $58,000-$62,000.

From a fundamental perspective:

Trump's promised "strategic Bitcoin reserve" has seen no progress; Crypto regulation bills like the Clarity Act are progressing slowly; The Fed's hawkish turn (Warsh nomination) is negative for liquidity.

Market Sentiment:

Fear & Greed Index: 14 (Extreme Fear); RSI nearing oversold territory, but not at extremes; Year-to-date, Bitcoin is down 16%.

Precious Metals: Epic V-Shaped Reversal

Spot gold settled around $4,991/oz, up over 5% on the day. It once broke above $5,016 during the session. This is the largest single-day gain since November 2008.

Silver also rebounded strongly, rising nearly 10% to around $87.

Why the V-shaped reversal for gold?

"Warsh Panic" digested.

Last Friday, Trump nominated Warsh for Fed Chair, triggering a historic gold crash (down 11% in a day). The market's first reaction was panic selling: Warsh = Hawkish → Rates stay high → Dollar strengthens → Gold loses appeal.

But today, investors started reassessing:

Warsh won't take office until May at the earliest, the current panic is overdone; Even if Warsh is hawkish, he can't ignore economic data; The market still expects two rate cuts in 2026.

Gold fell from $5600 to $4400, a drop of over 20%. This crash washed out leveraged speculators and created a "golden pit".

Long-term investors and central banks started buying the dip.

JPMorgan reiterated today: 2026 year-end gold target of $6300, calling the current pullback a "high-value re-accumulation opportunity".

Furthermore, the January Nonfarm Payrolls report, originally scheduled for this Friday, was postponed (due to partial government shutdown). This left the market without its most important economic data reference, increasing uncertainty. Uncertainty = Gold's friend.

Overall, gold's long-term logic remains unchanged.

Today's rebound is not a "dead cat bounce" but genuine buying supported by fundamentals:

Global central banks continue buying gold (800 tons expected in 2026); Long-term US dollar depreciation pressures persist; Global "de-dollarization" trend is irreversible; US national debt at $38 trillion, fiscal discipline collapse triggers a crisis of confidence in fiat currency.

JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank both believe gold will rise to $6000-$6300 this year. Near $5000 currently, there's still 20%+ upside.

The Market's Core Contradiction: AI Bubble vs. Economic Resilience

Today's market action exposed a deep contradiction:

On one hand, the AI narrative for tech stocks is being questioned. The software stock crash, Nvidia's hurdles, PayPal's plunge all say the same thing: the pace of AI commercialization can't keep up with the frenzy of capital expenditure. Tech giants are expected to spend $440 billion in capex in 2026; if this investment doesn't generate corresponding returns, the bubble will burst.

On the other hand, traditional economic sectors held firm. Verizon, Cisco, Walmart all rose over 2% today. The Dow fell only 0.34%, much better than the Nasdaq's 1.43%. This shows the economy's foundation isn't collapsing; the market is just repricing tech stock valuations.

Cryptocurrency is caught in the middle: it's neither a true safe-haven asset (gold surged while Bitcoin crashed), nor a pure risk asset (US stocks are just correcting, Bitcoin is in a winter). This "unwanted by both" situation makes the crypto market the most vulnerable sector right now.

Key Things to Watch for the Rest of the Week

Wednesday-Thursday: Tech Giant Earnings

  • Amazon, Alphabet (Google)

If these earnings disappoint, tech stocks could crash further. If they beat expectations, they might temporarily stabilize market sentiment.

Friday (if released): Nonfarm Payrolls Data

Currently postponed due to government shutdown. Once released, it will be key for judging whether the Fed will cut rates in March.

Geopolitics:

  • US-Iran talks on Friday
  • Ukraine peace talk progress

Any deterioration would boost safe-haven assets (gold) and pressure risk assets (stocks, crypto).

İlgili Sorular

QWhat caused the sharp decline in software stocks on February 4th, according to the article?

AThe market realized that AI is not here to help SaaS companies but to replace them, leading to a panic that their business models are being disrupted. This caused a collective crash in software stocks.

QHow did Bitcoin and other major cryptocurrencies perform, and what term was used to describe the market condition?

ABitcoin fell below $73,000, hitting a 16-month low, Ethereum dropped below $2,200, and Solana fell below $100. The market condition was described as a 'full-blown, 2022-style crypto winter' by Bitwise's CIO.

QWhat was the reason behind the significant V-shaped rebound in gold prices?

AThe initial panic over Trump's nomination of the hawkish Warsh as Fed chair was digested, and investors reassessed that the sell-off was overdone. Long-term investors and central banks began buying the dip, viewing it as a high-value accumulation opportunity.

QWhich traditional sectors performed well despite the tech sell-off, and why?

ADefensive sectors like Verizon (up 3.59%), Cisco (up 3.08%), and Walmart (up 2.97%) performed well. This was due to a typical risk-off behavior where investors rotated from high-valuation tech stocks to value and defensive stocks with real cash flows and dividends.

QWhat key events are highlighted as important for the remainder of the week in the article?

AKey events include earnings reports from tech giants like Amazon and Alphabet (Google), the potentially delayed Non-Farm Payrolls data, and geopolitical developments such as US-Iran talks and Ukraine peace negotiations.

İlgili Okumalar

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit1 saat önce

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit1 saat önce

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit1 saat önce

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit1 saat önce

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2 saat önce

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2 saat önce

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2 saat önce

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片