Expert Urges Senate to Pass CLARITY Act for National Security Interests

cryptonews.ru2026-08-10 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-10 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Former U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper is urging the Senate to urgently pass the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act), framing it as a critical national security issue. Esper, who served under President Trump, argues the bill extends crucial U.S. dollar transaction controls into the digital asset ecosystem. He warns that failure to pass it risks losing transparency in international financial flows, undermining U.S. sanctions effectiveness, and ceding ground to China, which is advancing state-controlled digital payment systems. Esper emphasizes that stablecoins, often backed by U.S. Treasuries and processing billions, are central to this new financial landscape. The CLARITY Act would apply Section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act to digital assets, helping prevent sanctioned regimes like North Korea and criminal syndicates from exploiting offshore loopholes. Furthermore, he contends the legislation would foster U.S.-led innovation in cryptocurrencies, allowing American companies to set the rules for the next financial era, much like the private sector built the internet. With time running out, Esper calls on the Senate to lead and pass the bill for the President's signature.

While the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, widely known as the CLARITY Act, awaits a potential Senate vote in September, former Department of Defense officials have emphasized the relevance of this initiative to defense.

Mark Esper, who served as U.S. Secretary of Defense in Donald Trump's first administration, emphasized that the implications of the CLARITY Act extend far beyond the financial services realm and touch upon the U.S. defense complex tied to the dollar.

Esper stressed that the CLARITY Act would establish appropriate provisions extending the controls currently applied to dollar-denominated transactions to the digital asset ecosystem, and that failing to pass it risks losing transparency into international financial flows and the related ability to apply sanctions.

"That's why the CLARITY Act, now pending in the Senate, is not just a financial services bill. It is also a national security bill, and it should be treated as such and passed urgently," he noted in a recently published article.

Stablecoins play a unique role in this new system, as settlements worth billions are already being conducted through them, rivaling the world's largest credit companies, with the majority of their value backed by U.S. Treasury bonds.

In Esper's view, inaction in preserving American dominance in this sphere would allow China, which is already investing in state-controlled digital asset-based payment systems, to set its own rules and ultimately undermine the dollar's role as the de facto standard for savings and settlements.

The CLARITY Act extends the application of Section 311 of the U.S. Patriot Act to the digital asset ecosystem, providing several benefits in combating illicit actors. "This will work to stop North Korea, criminal syndicates, and sanctioned regimes from using offshore loopholes to bypass America's financial perimeter," he said.

No less important, Esper emphasizes that the CLARITY Act will allow cryptocurrency innovation to remain on U.S. soil, enabling American companies to develop protocols for deploying digital assets and achieve dominance in the same way the internet was built: by a U.S.-focused private sector.

"We have a narrow window to set the terms of the next financial age ourselves, not inherit them from our rivals... The Senate must take the lead. It must pass the CLARITY Act and send it to the President for signature," he concluded, despite the diminishing time to pass the CLARITY Act.

end-content

İlgili Sorular

QWho is Mark Esper and what is his position regarding the CLARITY Act?

AMark Esper is the former U.S. Secretary of Defense under President Donald Trump. He strongly advocates for the CLARITY Act, arguing it is a national security bill that should be passed urgently.

QWhat is the primary defense-related concern that the CLARITY Act aims to address, according to the article?

AThe primary defense concern is maintaining the transparency of international financial flows and the efficacy of U.S. sanctions. The Act aims to prevent U.S. adversaries like North Korea, criminal syndicates, and sanctioned regimes from using offshore loopholes in the digital asset ecosystem to bypass the U.S. financial perimeter.

QHow does the article connect the CLARITY Act to competition with China?

AThe article states that inaction could allow China, which is investing in state-managed digital asset payment systems, to set its own rules and ultimately undermine the U.S. dollar's role as the de facto global standard for savings and transactions.

QWhat specific U.S. law does the CLARITY Act seek to extend to the digital asset ecosystem?

AThe CLARITY Act seeks to extend Section 311 of the U.S. Patriot Act to the digital asset ecosystem.

QBesides national security, what other benefit does Mark Esper attribute to the CLARITY Act?

AHe argues that the Act will preserve cryptocurrency innovation within the United States, allowing American companies to develop protocols and achieve dominance in the digital asset space, similar to how the private sector built the internet.

İlgili Okumalar

RIP: Atlas, Which Lived Only 292 Days

On August 9, 2026, OpenAI discontinued its standalone AI browser, Atlas, just 292 days after its launch on October 21, 2025. Initially positioned as a challenger to Chrome and the broader AI browser ecosystem, Atlas aimed to fundamentally redesign how users interact with browsers by deeply integrating ChatGPT. Its features included an AI-powered address bar, a sidebar for webpage analysis, Browser Memories for context retention, and an Agent Mode to automate multi-step tasks like shopping and research. Despite building on Chromium with a custom OWL (OpenAI Web Layer) framework, OpenAI struggled with the immense complexity of maintaining a full-fledged browser. The team spent significant time addressing basic functionalities—password managers, extensions, input methods—that mainstream browsers already handled seamlessly. Atlas's core AI agent capabilities also faced issues with reliability, speed, and security vulnerabilities like prompt injection. Furthermore, Atlas was limited to Apple Silicon Macs, failing to release promised Windows, iOS, and Android versions. This, coupled with the high switching cost for users entrenched in Chrome or Edge's ecosystems, hindered its adoption. By mid-2026, updates slowed, and OpenAI announced its shutdown, opting to integrate Atlas's AI explorations into the ChatGPT desktop app and browser extensions instead. The article contrasts two AI browser development paths: standalone products like Atlas, Perplexity's Comet, and Dia, which redesign the browser around AI but face user migration barriers; and the approach of incumbents like Chrome and Edge, which add AI features atop existing, widely-used platforms. The key question remains whether users need a completely new "AI browser" or simply AI capabilities within their current browser. While Atlas's experiment ended, the broader trend of AI integration into browsing continues.

marsbit29 dk önce

RIP: Atlas, Which Lived Only 292 Days

marsbit29 dk önce

Bitcoin's "Anti-Spam" Update Failed, Lasting Less Than a Day

A Bitcoin update proposal aimed at curbing spam by temporarily banning non-financial data from being stored on the network, BIP-110, has failed decisively. After months of debate, developers attempted to launch a separate blockchain, which collapsed within a day. The failure stemmed from a critical lack of miner support, with less than 1% signaling approval for the update. The vast majority of miners chose to continue mining the main Bitcoin blockchain without providing explanations. Despite this, the initiative's developers proceeded to launch an alternative blockchain—a hard fork of Bitcoin—on August 8. This meant a small subset of miners stopped mining Bitcoin to support the new chain with BIP-110 changes. However, the new network inherited Bitcoin's mining difficulty. With only a tiny fraction of the total computational power, block times stretched to roughly 7 hours instead of the standard 10 minutes, rendering the network practically non-functional. Michael Saylor, founder of major corporate Bitcoin holder MicroStrategy and a vocal opponent of BIP-110, commented: "Bitcoin worked exactly as designed. The BIP-110 fork occurred, and network participants were free to choose which chain to follow. As a result, about 99.85% of the network's hash power remained with Bitcoin." The event had no significant impact on Bitcoin's price, which traded in a narrow range between approximately $64.5k and $65.5k from August 7 through August 10.

cryptonews.ru35 dk önce

Bitcoin's "Anti-Spam" Update Failed, Lasting Less Than a Day

cryptonews.ru35 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片