Ethena team steps in with $12 mln buy – But ENA keeps sliding

ambcrypto2026-01-08 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-08 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

After initially climbing from $0.19, ENA faced rejection at $0.26 and declined for two consecutive days, dropping to $0.22 before a slight rebound. At the time of writing, ENA was trading at $0.23, down 7.27%, indicating strong downward pressure. In response, the Ethena team intervened by purchasing 50 million ENA tokens worth $12.18 million within 24 hours, increasing their total holdings to 789.8 million ENA. Other major holders also increased their accumulations, with a net positive balance change of 88.36 million ENA. Despite these efforts, ENA continued to decline due to aggressive retail selling. On January 8th, sell volume significantly exceeded buy volume, resulting in a negative Buy Sell Delta of -6.85 million. ENA fell below the EMA50, and its Stochastic Momentum Index indicated strengthening bearish momentum. Current conditions suggest further losses toward the $0.20 support level. A reversal would require holding above $0.23 and reclaiming the EMA50 at $0.25 to potentially target $0.30.

After hiking from a low of $0.19, Ethena got rejected at $0.26 and has since declined for two consecutive days. As such, ENA dropped to a low of $0.22 before slightly rebounding.

At press time, ENA traded at $0.23, down 7.27% on the daily charts, indicating sharp downward pressure.

Interestingly, after the market retracement, the Ethena team jumped into the market and attempted to pump the altcoin through accumulation.

Team wallet scoops up $12 million ENA

According to Arkham data, the ENA team wallet scooped up 25 million ENA worth $5.93 million from Bybit.

The team’s move was a buildup to another purchase executed a day earlier, in which the team withdrew 25 million ENA for $6.25 million. In total, they withdrew 50 million ENA worth $12.18 million over a 24-hour period.

Even more importantly, these two activities were a return to an old pattern after offloading a significant amount of tokens a week ago.

A week ago, the team deposited 40 million ENA worth $8.16 million. Now, after closing the gap created with the sale, the wallet’s total holdings rose to 789.8 million ENA, worth $185 million.

Significantly, this team’s move was not an isolated case, as top holders jumped into the market after ENA retraced.

Over the past 24 hours, top holders increased their holdings by 171.65 million ENA, while they offloaded only 83.29 million.

In doing so, Holder’s Balance Change remained positive and settled at 88.36 million ENA, a clear sign of aggressive spot accumulation.

With the team accumulating, backed by other top holders, it signals strong conviction with the market, as they anticipate a market recovery from the current slip.

Historically, increased accumulation from major players has followed price appreciation as demand absorbs the arising selling pressure.

Why did ENA slip?

Despite the team’s continued effort, ENA recorded a sharp drop as other market participants, especially retail, rushed to cash out.

According to Coinalyze, sellers overpowered buyers on the 8th of January, with sell volume at 22.59 million compared to 15.75 million in buy volume.

As a result, the altcoin recorded a negative Buy Sell Delta of -6.85 million, a clear sign of aggressive spot selling. Often, seller dominance has accelerated an asset’s downward pressure, a prelude to lower

Can these purchases prop up ENA?

Ethena’s team to boost ENA’s price movement by absorbing the arising sell pressure failed for now. In fact, ENA fell below EMA50, signaling strengthening bearish pressure.

At the same time, its Stochastic Momentum Index (SMI) made a bearish crossover and dropped deeper into the bearish zone to 42.

This downward spiral suggested strengthened bearish momentum backed by strong seller pressure. Thus, sellers took control of the market, rendering recent purchases inadequate for a trend reversal.

Therefore, prevailing market conditions point to further losses for ENA. Thus, the altcoin could drop towards the $0.20 support level.

However, if the team’s effort is finally positively felt, ENA could reclaim EMA50 at $0.25 and target $0.30. For this outlook to hold, the altcoin must hold above $0.23.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was the total amount of ENA tokens and their value that the Ethena team purchased over a 24-hour period?

AThe Ethena team purchased a total of 50 million ENA tokens worth $12.18 million over a 24-hour period.

QWhat was the price of ENA at press time and what was its daily percentage decline?

AAt press time, ENA traded at $0.23, down 7.27% on the daily charts.

QAccording to the article, what does a negative Buy Sell Delta of -6.85 million indicate for ENA?

AA negative Buy Sell Delta of -6.85 million is a clear sign of aggressive spot selling, indicating that sellers overpowered buyers.

QWhat key technical indicator did ENA fall below, signaling strengthening bearish pressure?

AENA fell below the EMA50 (Exponential Moving Average), signaling strengthening bearish pressure.

QWhat is the critical support level that ENA could drop towards if the prevailing market conditions continue?

AIf the prevailing market conditions continue, ENA could drop towards the $0.20 support level.

İlgili Okumalar

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

When launching a crypto payment business, obtaining the necessary licenses is the crucial first step. However, the second, and arguably more critical, step is designing a comprehensive operational framework that forms a coherent business loop. This loop must be clearly understood and executable by all stakeholders: banks, payment partners, exchanges, on-chain analytics providers, regulators, and your internal team. Many projects mistakenly believe a single license permits all operations. Licenses merely grant entry; they don't define how the specific business functions. The real challenge lies in detailing every aspect of the workflow. This involves clarifying the customer base, the flow of fiat and crypto assets, the settlement process, and establishing clear lines of responsibility for risks like AML compliance, sanctions screening, chargebacks, and regulatory inquiries. A robust framework must answer seven core questions: Who are the clients and merchants? Who collects fiat and crypto? Who handles conversion and custody? And who is ultimately accountable for compliance and risk management? Projects often fail not from a lack of licensing, but during due diligence when they cannot convincingly explain these operational details. Therefore, beyond securing licenses, the priority must be constructing a closed-loop system. This system ensures the business model is transparent, risks are managed, responsibilities are delineated, contracts are aligned, and the entire process is comprehensible to partners and regulators. The true competitive edge in crypto payments lies not in acquiring a license quickly, but in integrating licensing, banking, compliance, and operations into a sustainable and executable whole.

marsbit22 dk önce

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

marsbit22 dk önce

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Arthur Hayes argues that the current AI market is a bubble poised to burst, which will exert downward pressure on the crypto market in the near term. The core trigger is rising oil prices due to the US-Iran conflict and a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Higher energy costs directly increase the operational expenses of AI data centers, squeezing profit margins for companies like Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI. Hayes predicts that persistent inflation from high oil prices will force Trump, in a bid to win the November election, to turn public sentiment against the AI industry. He may propose regulations and taxes on data centers and AI companies to appeal to voters concerned about costs and job displacement. Such political rhetoric could shatter market confidence. Furthermore, the market is unlikely to healthily absorb the massive concurrent IPOs of SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI, which together seek valuations in the trillions. The combination of soaring energy costs, overwhelming equity supply, and negative political pressure will puncture the AI bubble. Hayes notes that nearly all new USD liquidity since 2022 has flowed into AI, leaving crypto like Bitcoin behind. When the AI bubble bursts, liquidity will contract sharply, pulling down all risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. In response, Hayes's fund, Maelstrom, has sold all AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. It maintains core positions in Bitcoin and Ethereum while increasing exposure to energy sector equities, betting on rising oil and gas prices. He expects Bitcoin to bottom after the AI-led market decline, before rallying again with future monetary easing.

Foresight News36 dk önce

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Foresight News36 dk önce

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

After To C and To B, the Next Wave is To A: Serving AI Agents In a recent quarterly earnings call, Meituan's Wang Xing introduced a new concept: To A (To Agent), signifying that future business services will increasingly target AI Agents as primary clients, not just consumers or merchants. This shift implies that internet giants must now consider how to make their services more appealing for AI Agents to recommend, fundamentally altering traditional distribution logic. This "To A era" is prompting an unusual trend of alliances among major tech companies. Unlike previous competitive battles, firms like Meituan, Tencent, JD.com, Huawei, OPPO, and OpenAI are rapidly forming partnerships. The reason is strategic: as AI Agents become the primary user interface, handling tasks from a single command (e.g., "Book a Japanese restaurant for tomorrow"), the risk for platforms is being bypassed entirely. Companies are positioning themselves within this new value chain. Three primary strategies are emerging: 1. **Super-Entry Points + Service Providers:** Platforms like Tencent's Yuanbao, WeChat, and ChatGPT aim to be the first-stop Agent, integrating various services (food delivery, shopping, travel) from partners like Meituan and JD.com. 2. **Apps as Callable Services:** Companies like Meituan, JD.com, and Uber are ensuring their core services remain accessible and callable by external Agents, shifting from front-end apps to back-end capabilities. 3. **System-Level Agent Entry Points:** Smartphone makers (Huawei, Honor, OPPO) are leveraging their OS-level AI assistants to control the initial user command, redistributing it to relevant service apps. While alliances offer mutual benefit—entry points gain service capabilities, and service providers gain traffic—inherent conflicts of interest exist. A dominant Agent platform could eventually attempt to connect directly with suppliers (restaurants, hotels), bypassing current aggregators like Meituan or Ctrip. Other unresolved challenges include the potential for Agent recommendations to become a new form of paid ranking and unclear accountability for faulty recommendations. The current rush to form alliances is a defensive move by service providers to secure their position before the landscape solidifies. In this To A-driven restructuring, the greatest risk is not losing the race but failing to hear the starting gun.

marsbit45 dk önce

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

marsbit45 dk önce

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

As humanoid robots become increasingly lifelike, they confront a significant psychological barrier known as the "Uncanny Valley Effect," a concept proposed by Japanese roboticist Masahiro Mori in 1970. This phenomenon describes a dip in human comfort and acceptance when robots appear almost, but not perfectly, human. Minor imperfections in facial expressions, eye movements, or skin texture trigger a subconscious sense of unease, as the brain detects something trying, yet failing, to mimic a person. Examples range from the controversial human-like robot Sophia to animated characters in films like *The Polar Express*. The effect poses a key design challenge for robotics companies. Some, like Boston Dynamics, avoid it entirely by creating highly capable but visibly mechanical robots. Others, like Hanson Robotics, push for greater human likeness despite the risk. For consumer robots, especially in homes, most manufacturers opt for stylized or clearly mechanical designs to ensure broader acceptance. While the Uncanny Valley remains a powerful force, its impact may diminish over time through technological advancements that achieve near-perfect realism or through generational familiarity as people grow accustomed to interacting with humanoid machines. Ultimately, navigating this psychological frontier requires as much understanding of human perception as of robotics technology itself.

marsbit45 dk önce

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

marsbit45 dk önce

Over $31 Million Stolen from Humanity, Is the Team Behind It Paving the Way for a New Project?

The article reports a major security incident involving Humanity Protocol (H), resulting in over $31 million stolen. The team attributes the hack to a private key leak from a Humanity Foundation member, leading to a rapid sale of H tokens and a 90% price drop. However, prominent on-chain investigator ZachXBT suggests the event might be an "exit scam" orchestrated by the team, rather than an external hack. This suspicion is fueled by the team's controversial history, including past management failures, legal issues, and previous scandals like outsourced technology and problematic airdrops. Further investigation reveals that the core team behind Humanity is already involved with a new project called "Everything," which recently secured funding. This has led to community speculation that the alleged hack is a deliberate scheme to abandon the H project while shifting focus and resources to their new venture, leaving investors to bear the losses. The article questions whether this is a genuine security failure or a premeditated "rug pull" strategy.

Odaily星球日报1 saat önce

Over $31 Million Stolen from Humanity, Is the Team Behind It Paving the Way for a New Project?

Odaily星球日报1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures