Ethena [ENA] surges 10% as whales step in – Yet THIS remains real test

ambcrypto2026-03-02 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-02 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

ENA surged nearly 10% in 24 hours, rebounding from repeated defenses of the $0.10 support level. Aggregated Open Interest rose to $110.5 million, indicating renewed derivatives activity. Whale orders increased during price dips, suggesting accumulation near support. Price stability above $0.10 is key; a break above $0.13 could shift momentum, while losing $0.10 may renew downside risk. Continuation depends on sustained spot volume and broader market conditions.

Ethena’s ENA token gained nearly 10% over the past 24 hours as buyers stepped in near key support. The move followed renewed positioning amid broader market uncertainty.

Daily data showed ENA traded around $0.1036 on the 1st of March, after bouncing from sub-$0.10 lows. That recovery drew fresh derivatives participation.

That shift set up a closer look at positioning metrics.

ENA’s Open Interest climbs

Ethena’s [ENA] Aggregated Open Interest rose to approximately $110.5 million, according to Coinalyze data. The chart showed a modest uptick alongside price stabilization.

Rising Open Interest during a rebound typically indicated fresh capital entering positions. In this case, the increase remained controlled rather than explosive.

Even so, the structure suggested traders reopened exposure near local support.

That left attention on order flow behavior.

Whale activity resurfaces

CryptoQuant’s Spot Average Order Size data showed periodic spikes in larger orders. Big whale orders appeared during recent price dips.

Such behavior often reflected accumulation during weakness. Larger participants typically stepped in before broader momentum shifted.

However, the broader trend in whale order size remained uneven. Sustained expansion would be needed to confirm a strong conviction.

That history kept sentiment cautious.

Ethena: Structure builds above $0.10

TradingView data showed ENA repeatedly defending the $0.10 zone. The level marked three recent reaction lows.

Price traded near $0.103–$0.104 at the time of writing. Holding above $0.10 kept short-term structure intact.

By contrast, overhead liquidity appeared concentrated near the $0.13 region. That area aligned with prior breakdown levels.

A break above $0.13 could shift near-term momentum. Failure to hold $0.10 may reopen downside risk.

ENA’s rebound coincided with steady Open Interest and visible whale participation. That combination suggested positioning rather than panic covering.

However, continuation depended on sustained Spot Volume and broader market stability.

For now, ENA held above key support. Whether bulls could reclaim higher liquidity zones remained the central question.


Final Summary

  • ENA gained nearly 10% in 24 hours, rebounding from repeated defenses of the $0.10 support zone.
  • Ethena’s Aggregated Open Interest rose to around $110.5 million, indicating renewed derivatives participation.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was the percentage gain of Ethena's ENA token in the past 24 hours and what key support level did it bounce from?

AEthena's ENA token gained nearly 10% in the past 24 hours, rebounding from sub-$0.10 lows after repeatedly defending the $0.10 support zone.

QAccording to Coinalyze data, what was the value of Ethena's Aggregated Open Interest and what does its rise typically indicate?

AEthena's Aggregated Open Interest rose to approximately $110.5 million. A rising Open Interest during a rebound typically indicates fresh capital entering positions.

QWhat did the spikes in CryptoQuant's Spot Average Order Size data suggest about whale activity?

AThe periodic spikes in larger orders, as shown by the data, suggested that big whale orders appeared during recent price dips, which often reflects accumulation during periods of weakness.

QWhat are the two key price levels identified for ENA's near-term momentum, and what would a break above the higher level signify?

AThe two key levels are support at $0.10 and overhead liquidity near $0.13. A break above $0.13 could shift the near-term momentum for ENA.

QWhat two factors does the article suggest are necessary for ENA's price continuation?

AThe article states that ENA's price continuation depends on sustained Spot Volume and broader market stability.

İlgili Okumalar

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: Losses Mount Due to Vulnerable Seed Generation A critical vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets has led to a continued wave of fund thefts. According to Galaxy Research, the total stolen has reached 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $88.6 million) from 4,585 addresses, a significant increase from the initial 594.5 BTC reported on July 30, 2026. Most of the stolen funds remain on the attackers' addresses. The issue is not with the current firmware, which Coinkite has updated, but with seed phrases generated on vulnerable devices between March 2021 and the release of fixed firmware versions. Due to a programmer error, devices switched from using a hardware random number generator to the software-based Yasmarang generator, which was initialized with publicly accessible data like the chip's serial number. This made the seed phrases predictable through offline brute-force attacks, meaning wallets remain at risk until funds are moved to a new wallet generated with the patched firmware. Affected devices include Mk2/Mk3 with firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9 (and up to 5.0.3), Mk4/Mk5 up to version 5.6.0, and Q models up to 1.5.0Q. The only exceptions are seeds created with a high-entropy method like at least 50 independent dice rolls or a strong unique BIP-39 passphrase. All other owners must generate a new seed on the fixed firmware and transfer their assets. A case highlighting the human impact involves a 39-year-old long-term investor who lost 2 BTC (approx. $130,000) in minutes. He had accumulated the Bitcoin over eight years through physical labor, viewing it as a financial lifeline and a retirement plan in a country suffering from hyperinflation. His story underscores that even conservative "buy and hold in cold storage" strategies can be compromised by such underlying technical flaws. From a technical perspective, this incident echoes historical failures where weak random number generators undermined cryptographic security, challenging the assumption that offline storage is automatically foolproof.

cryptonews.ru1 saat önce

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

cryptonews.ru1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片