Duan Yongping's Bottom-Fishing in CoreWeave Is Turning into a Battleground for Bulls and Bears

marsbit2026-05-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-05-11 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

CoreWeave's Q1 2026 earnings report has intensified the ongoing bull-bear battle over the AI infrastructure stock. While revenue doubled year-over-year to $2.08B and the firm's remaining performance obligation (RPO) surged to nearly $100B, its net loss more than doubled to $740M. The critical point of contention is profitability: while adjusted EBITDA margin was a robust 56%, the adjusted operating margin collapsed to just 1% due to soaring infrastructure and sales costs. A weaker-than-expected Q2 revenue guidance further triggered an 11.4% single-day stock drop. The bull thesis hinges on CoreWeave's massive order backlog, deep strategic ties with NVIDIA (as a customer, investor, and key supplier), and a diversified client base now including Anthropic and Meta. The bear case focuses on the "scale at all costs" model, where expanding revenue leads to wider losses, ballooning debt ($25B), and massive capital expenditures ($6.8B in Q1). Insider selling by executives contrasts with a notable new investor: Chinese investor Duan Yongping initiated a small position (0.12% of his portfolio) in Q4 2025 near the stock's lows. The coming Q2 report is seen as a key test for management's promise of a profit margin recovery.

Author: Deep Tide TechFlow

On May 8, AI cloud computing power supplier CoreWeave (CRWV) plunged 11.4% in a single day, closing at $114.15. This marked another "earnings day decline" since the company's IPO in March last year. However, unlike previous drops, this decline coincided with a more dramatic contrast: Duan Yongping, widely known in the Chinese-speaking community as a disciple of Warren Buffett, had just established his first position in CoreWeave in Q4 2025, with an allocation of approximately $20 million. Based on the position size and the Q4 average price, the entry point was close to CoreWeave's lowest level for the year in December 2025.

CoreWeave is currently one of the most divisive AI assets in the US stock market. On one side lies the narrative of being the "picks and shovels" seller with nearly $100 billion in order backlog and deep ties to Nvidia; on the other side is the financial reality of widening losses despite scale expansion and continuous insider selling. The Q1 earnings report acted like a prism, making this divergence exceptionally clear.

Q1 Earnings: Revenue Doubles but Losses Widen, Q2 Guidance Punctures Valuation

CoreWeave's Q1 revenue was $2.08 billion, a 112% year-over-year increase and a 32% sequential increase, surpassing the LSEG market expectation of $1.97 billion. However, adjusted loss per share was $1.12, worse than the expected loss of $0.90. Net loss expanded to $740 million, more than doubling from $315 million in the same period last year.

What truly ignited the sell-off was the forward guidance. The company provided a Q2 revenue range of $2.45 billion to $2.6 billion, with a midpoint of $2.53 billion, far below the market expectation of $2.69 billion. Simultaneously, the lower limit of full-year 2026 capital expenditure was raised from $30 billion to $31 billion, which CFO Nitin Agrawal attributed to rising component costs.

The fragility of the profit structure was exposed. Q1 adjusted EBITDA reached $1.16 billion (a 56% margin), seemingly impressive, but adjusted operating profit was only $21 million, with the operating margin compressed to 1%. The reason lies in technology and infrastructure costs soaring 127% year-over-year to $1.27 billion, and sales & marketing expenses skyrocketing over 6 times year-over-year to $69 million. Revenue is growing, but costs are growing faster.

CEO Michael Intrator emphasized on the earnings call: "We have reached hyperscale." He disclosed that the company now has 10 customers committed to spending over $1 billion each. Compared to 2024 when 62% of revenue relied on Microsoft as a single customer, concentration risk has significantly improved. Intrator also expects CoreWeave's annualized revenue to exceed $30 billion by the end of 2027.

Bull Narrative: $100 Billion Order Backlog, Deep Ties with Nvidia

The core supporting the bull case is the order backlog. As of the end of Q1, CoreWeave's remaining performance obligations (RPO) amounted to $99.4 billion, a net increase of approximately $33 billion sequentially and nearly quadrupling year-over-year. Intrator stated that new contracts signed in Q1 alone exceeded $40 billion.

The client list is also reshaping market perceptions. In Q1, Anthropic was added as a customer, providing computing power for its Claude series models; a $2.1 billion AI cloud agreement was signed with Meta; trading firm Jane Street committed to approximately $6 billion in orders and separately completed a $1 billion equity investment. Nvidia again purchased $2 billion worth of CoreWeave Class A common stock this quarter. This global largest GPU supplier is simultaneously an investor and a major customer of CoreWeave. This triple-role binding relationship is referred to as Nvidia's "favored son."

Regarding financing structure, CoreWeave completed an $8.5 billion investment-grade HPC (High-Performance Computing) secured delayed draw term loan (DDTL) in Q1, priced below 6%, hailed by management as "groundbreaking." Year-to-date, the company has secured over $20 billion in debt and equity financing, with the weighted average cost of debt decreasing by approximately 80 basis points. S&P Global Ratings concurrently revised CoreWeave's credit rating outlook from "stable" to "positive."

Bear Logic: Less Profitable as it Scales, Debt Snowball Growing Larger

However, another set of numbers in the earnings report is causing anxiety. Q1 capital expenditure reached $6.8 billion, and the company expects Q2 capital expenditure to further climb to between $7 billion and $9 billion. The Q2 interest expense guidance range is $650 million to $730 million, reflecting the rapid swelling of debt.

The total debt is already staggering. As of the end of Q1, CoreWeave's total debt stood at approximately $25 billion. Relative to the company's current annualized revenue level, this leverage is significantly higher than that of traditional cloud service providers. Morgan Stanley data shows that CoreWeave's debt financing for the full year 2025 amounted to about $11.8 billion, far exceeding its equity financing of about $1.5 billion. The company's core expansion tool is the DDTL, a "book first, finance later" model that uses order contracts as collateral to secure bank financing for GPU procurement.

The sharpest criticism comes from profit quality. Although management repeatedly emphasized the 56% EBITDA margin, the adjusted operating margin was only 1%. The "real" gross margin after deducting technology and infrastructure costs was about 4%, showing compression both sequentially and against market expectations. Intrator attributed this on the earnings call to the temporary effect of rapid scaling, where the dilution effect on margins from newly added capacity is immense when a company expands dramatically from a 1-gigawatt operational scale. He promised this was the "margin low point" and that margins would gradually recover in future quarters.

But the market is currently unwilling to pay for this promise. While analysts from Morgan Stanley and Jefferies gave positive reviews, CoreWeave has experienced short-term pullbacks after each earnings report previously, with this decline being one of the steeper post-earnings drops.

Insider Selling Continues, Mirroring Duan Yongping's Bottom-Fishing

Around the earnings release, CoreWeave insiders maintained their selling pace. CEO Mike Intrator sold 307,693 shares in late April; co-founders Brian Venturo and Chen Goldberg also recorded sales; institutional shareholder Magnetar Financial had previously sold over $300 million worth. Latest disclosures show that another major shareholder recently sold approximately 1.2 million shares.

This forms a stark contrast with Duan Yongping's position-building in Q4. According to a 13F filing disclosed by H&H International Investment in February 2026, Duan Yongping established his first position in CoreWeave of 299,900 shares in Q4 2025, at a time when the stock had retreated more than 65% from its highs, and market concerns over its debt structure had peaked.

It's noteworthy that CoreWeave accounts for only 0.12% of Duan Yongping's total H&H holdings, constituting a "small pilot" position. In the same quarter, Duan massively increased his stake in Nvidia by over 1110% and established new positions in Credo Technology (high-speed connectivity) and Tempus AI (AI healthcare). These three new AI positions combined account for less than 0.3% of his portfolio. This indicates Duan's true heavy bet is Nvidia itself, with CoreWeave being more like a small extension of his bet on the downstream AI computing power supply chain.

The Crucial Question Now: Inflection Point or Trap?

Intrator posed a somewhat emotional rhetorical question during the Q&A session: "I've always felt that everyone is staring at the stock price tree and missing the entire forest."

This statement aptly summarizes the current bull-bear standoff. Bulls see a forest of nearly $100 billion in contract backlog, a diversified customer base, a triple-binding relationship with Nvidia, and an upgraded credit rating. Bears see a tree of 1% operating margins, widening net losses, aggressive capital expenditures, and persistent insider selling.

CoreWeave's stock price is still up nearly 80% year-to-date and has gained over 200% since its IPO. But when the bull case for a stock rests on a distant narrative and the bear case on current numbers, every earnings report becomes a battleground for these two narratives. Duan Yongping previously stated in an interview with Fang Sanwen: "AI is a massive revolution brought about by a qualitative leap in computing power, with an impact potentially exceeding that of the internet and the industrial revolution. There is a clear AI bubble now, and 90% of companies may be eliminated, but the survivors will become the next-generation giants." His 0.12% light position itself acknowledges the uncertainty of this gamble.

The next test is already clear: the Q2 earnings report. If the operating margin does not recover as promised by management, the credibility of the "forest" narrative will face a genuine stress test.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat were the key highlights and concerns from CoreWeave's Q1 2026 earnings report?

ACoreWeave's Q1 2026 revenue was $2.08 billion, up 112% year-over-year and exceeding expectations. However, the company's net loss widened to $740 million and it provided weaker-than-expected Q2 revenue guidance. A major concern was the adjusted operating profit margin collapsing to just 1%, despite a high adjusted EBITDA margin of 56%, due to surging technology and infrastructure costs.

QWhat are the main arguments of the bulls (optimists) and bears (pessimists) on CoreWeave?

ABulls are optimistic due to CoreWeave's massive $99.4 billion Remaining Performance Obligations (RPO), deep strategic and financial ties with NVIDIA, a diversified and growing client base including Anthropic and Meta, and recent credit rating upgrades. Bears are pessimistic because the company is scaling unprofitably, with operating margins near zero, rapidly escalating capital expenditures and debt (now ~$25 billion), and persistent insider selling by executives and major shareholders.

QWhat is the significance of Duan Yongping's (段永平) investment in CoreWeave, and how does it contrast with insider activity?

ADuan Yongping, a well-known value investor in China, initiated a small position in CoreWeave (worth ~$20 million, ~0.12% of his portfolio) in Q4 2025 when the stock was near its yearly low. This 'dip-buying' action contrasts sharply with recent and ongoing insider selling by CoreWeave's CEO, co-founders, and major institutional shareholders like Magnetar Financial. Duan's position is seen as a high-conviction, speculative bet on the AI infrastructure theme, while insider sales raise questions about near-term confidence.

QHow is CoreWeave financing its aggressive expansion, and what are the associated risks?

ACoreWeave is financing its massive GPU procurement and data center build-out primarily through debt, specifically a novel 'Delayed Draw Term Loan (DDTL)' structure secured by its customer contracts. The company raised $8.5 billion in such debt in Q1 alone. The major risk is the rapid ballooning of its total debt to approximately $25 billion, leading to high interest expenses. This 'asset-light, contract-heavy' model creates significant financial leverage, making the company highly sensitive to execution risks and potential slowdowns in AI demand.

QWhat is the critical test for CoreWeave's investment narrative according to the article?

AThe next critical test is the Q2 2026 earnings report. Management, particularly CEO Michael Intrator, has promised that Q1 represented the 'low point' for operating margins and that profitability should improve in subsequent quarters. If the Q2 report fails to show a meaningful rebound in operating profit margins, the company's long-term growth narrative (the 'forest') will face severe credibility pressure from the current poor financial metrics (the 'tree'), potentially leading to further significant stock price volatility.

İlgili Okumalar

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit4 dk önce

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit4 dk önce

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit33 dk önce

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit33 dk önce

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX Learn36 dk önce

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX Learn36 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片