Demand 'Significantly Exceeds' Supply! NVIDIA Targets 70% Growth, Is NVDA's Next Stop $275?

2026-08-27 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-27 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Nvidia stated in its conference call that current supply can support approximately 70% growth for the next fiscal year, but real demand is higher. Commercialization of AI inference strengthens the bull thesis, while supply and gross margin will determine the subsequent upside.

Earnings Call Becomes Key to Stock Reversal After Results Announcement

NVIDIA reported adjusted earnings per share of $2.22 for the second quarter of fiscal year 2027, more than doubling year-over-year; revenue reached $96.2 billion, a 106% increase. After-hours trading post-earnings was initially cautious, but as the conference call revealed details on demand and supply, the stock price turned to rise approximately 4.4%.

When discussing the expectation of about 70% revenue growth for the next fiscal year, Jensen Huang stated: "We have the supply to support 70% growth, but our demand significantly exceeds that level." He also noted that the company is working with suppliers to try and meet customer needs as much as possible, but bottlenecks in areas like memory must be transparently disclosed to investors.

AI is Generating Profitable Tokens

Jensen Huang emphasized two points on the call: AI is already useful, and AI is generating profitable tokens. According to NVIDIA's assessment, if customers have more computing power, they can generate more tokens that bring profit. This indicates that the current demand for computing power isn't solely driven by the model training race but also stems from inference and application workloads that are already generating revenue.

He also mentioned that competition isn't entirely negative for NVIDIA. Many custom XPUs serve only one specific cloud platform or one type of service, whereas NVIDIA's infrastructure covers the full AI lifecycle and can run open or closed models across different cloud platforms. As long as models are successful, the training and inference demands will ultimately drive NVIDIA's sales.

Why Strong Earnings Initially Might Still Lead to Decline

Investors previously worried that even if NVIDIA beat the publicly stated analyst expectations, it might not surpass the market's higher "whisper numbers." NVIDIA has seen situations in past quarters where earnings exceeded expectations but the stock price still fell because investors had already priced in strong growth ahead of time.

The eventual strengthening of this rally was due to management providing forward-looking signals more important than the quarterly numbers: the high growth for the next fiscal year isn't due to a lack of orders but is constrained by supply; new platforms are entering production; AI inference is forming verifiable commercial returns. This information shifted the market's focus from "Has growth peaked?" back to "Can supply catch up with demand?"

What Investors Should Watch Next

First, whether the supply chain can provide sufficient memory, networking equipment, and system capacity. If demand is strong but cannot be fulfilled, revenue growth may still be constrained. Second, the third-quarter gross margin guidance is approximately 74%, slightly down from 75% in the second quarter, necessitating observation of whether new platform ramps and rising costs will continue to squeeze margins. Third, whether customer capital expenditures can continue growing in 2027 will determine if the approximately 70% revenue growth rate can be realized.

The post-earnings gain of over 4% indicates the market accepted the "demand exceeds supply" explanation. However, high-valuation stocks are very sensitive to changes in expectations: if subsequent orders, deliveries, and gross margins are all realized, the stock price will still have fundamental support; if supply constraints translate into revenue losses, or if AI customer returns fall short of expectations, volatility will significantly increase.

İlgili Okumalar

When Real Estate Ownership Goes Digital: What Happens to Your Rights, Risks, and Liquidity?

"Tokenizing Real Estate: Rights, Risks, and the Path to Liquidity" While tokenizing real-world assets (RWA) gains traction, real estate presents unique complexities. Beyond technical token issuance, critical challenges remain: enforcing legal rights, managing the underlying physical asset, and creating genuine secondary market liquidity. This article explores these issues through OneAsset, a Dubai-based commercial real estate (CRE) tokenization platform. OneAsset moves away from simply offering asset fragmentation. Instead, it focuses on institutional-grade infrastructure, prioritizing asset quality, legal enforceability, and operational fundamentals. Each property is held in an independent, single-asset vault, backed by a legally separate Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) for bankruptcy remoteness. Investors acquire tokens representing the economic rights to a specific property, with precise legal claims defined by the underlying SPV structure. OneAsset emphasizes that tokenization cannot transform a poor-quality asset. Its initial focus is on institutional investors and quality Dubai-based CRE, selected for stable tenant cash flows and a clear regulatory environment. The platform integrates compliance by design, aiming to embed investor qualification and transfer rules directly into the token architecture. A core insight is that asset fragmentation does not automatically create liquidity. True liquidity depends on the asset's inherent quality—its location, cash flow, and valuation—as well as sufficient buyer demand. The goal is not just tradability, but making real estate rights more easily priced, verified, and reallocated. Looking ahead, the article discusses the potential for "AiFi" (AI-powered finance). For AI agents to autonomously allocate capital, investment assets like real estate tokens must become truly "machine-readable." This requires a high degree of standardization in legal rights, valuations, cash flows, and compliance data—a direction OneAsset is pursuing through its structured data reporting. In conclusion, real estate tokenization is shifting from a technology narrative to a focus on asset fundamentals. Blockchain can enhance efficiency and programmability, but it cannot replace sound underwriting, property management, or legal execution. The real work begins after the asset is on-chain.

marsbit25 dk önce

When Real Estate Ownership Goes Digital: What Happens to Your Rights, Risks, and Liquidity?

marsbit25 dk önce

After Affecting Two Generations, Meta Ordered to Pay $18 Billion in Damages

After more than two decades, a legal parallel has emerged. In 1998, major U.S. tobacco companies settled for $206 billion, leading to strict advertising bans and warning labels that significantly reduced smoking rates. On August 26, 2026, Meta reached a landmark settlement with U.S. attorneys general, agreeing to pay up to approximately $18 billion and implement mandatory changes to Facebook and Instagram. This historic settlement, one of the largest against a tech company, stems from allegations that Meta deliberately designed addictive features like infinite scroll and push notifications, harming youth mental health and violating child privacy laws. Facing a potential $1.4 trillion lawsuit and a series of unfavorable jury verdicts, Meta chose to settle on the eighth day of trial to avoid a catastrophic ruling. The core of the agreement is not just the financial penalty, which Meta will pay over 10 years, but a series of strict, 10-year product mandates for young users. These include a hard two-hour daily time limit (combined across apps), a default "nighttime block" from midnight to 6 AM, restricted notifications during school hours, hidden "like" counts, an optional non-algorithmic feed, and stronger age verification. An independent auditor will monitor compliance. Crucially, roughly 30% ($5.3 billion) of Meta's payment is contingent on YouTube and TikTok adopting similar measures and paying around $5 billion each. This move aims to create an industry-wide standard and prevent Meta from being competitively disadvantaged. The settlement is being likened to Big Tobacco's "tobacco moment." By legally framing addictive algorithm design as a "public nuisance," it sets a powerful precedent. Nearly 3,000 similar cases are pending against other social media giants, signaling a fundamental shift in regulatory pressure. The era where platforms could deny the addictive impact of their designs on children is effectively over.

marsbit31 dk önce

After Affecting Two Generations, Meta Ordered to Pay $18 Billion in Damages

marsbit31 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片