DeFiLlama Founder Empties Own Wallet to Force Apple to Remove Fake App

cryptonews.ru2026-08-15 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-15 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The anonymous founder of DeFiLlama, 0xngmi, revealed he had to let a fake DeFiLlama app from the Apple App Store steal a small amount of cryptocurrency from his own wallet to prove it was fraudulent, after months of ignored trademark violation reports. Apple removed the app only after receiving this evidence. The fake app was a simple clone designed solely to steal users' secret recovery phrases. The founder disclosed the incident to warn other crypto teams, noting that scammers used defunct small businesses to pass Apple's verification. This prompted DeFiLlama to delay its official app launch until all clones were removed. The report highlights a broader issue of fraudulent apps and ads, citing similar incidents where users lost significant funds through cloned exchange platforms and fake Google ads.

0xngmi, the anonymous founder of analytics site DeFi Llama, said he downloaded a fake DeFiLlama app from the App Store, funded a small wallet, and let the app steal the money as proof of fraud.

Apple removed the app just days after it was reported, having ignored months of complaints about trademark infringement and impersonation.

How Did the DeFiLlama Founder Get Apple to Remove the Fake App?

In a series of posts on X on August 15, 2026, user 0xngmi stated that DeFiLlama spent months reporting the fake DeFiLlama app in the App Store to Apple through abuse and trademark infringement channels, citing impersonation and trademark violations, but no action was taken.

The app remained in the App Store until user 0xngmi funded a wallet with a small amount of cryptocurrency, installed the fake app, and confirmed it drained the funds. After he reported this to Apple, the app was removed within a few days.

"I understand it's crazy that you have to do this to protect users from clearly fake apps," he wrote, adding that he is publicizing this incident so other crypto teams "don't waste time like we did."

User 0xngmi described the fake app as a simple copy of DeFiLlama that someone "coded with vibeCode" solely to ask users for their seed phrase—the secret recovery words that provide full control over a crypto wallet.

He said the same scammers were spamming with clone apps of other major crypto brands and passing Apple's identity verification checks by registering under the names of bankrupt companies. In DeFiLlama's case, he said, the scammers passed their know-your-customer check using as an example a small, family-run shoe-cleaning business that was registered about 40 years ago and is no longer operational.

What Caused the Delay in DeFiLlama's App Launch?

The DeFiLlama team decided to delay the official app launch by several months until all fake versions were removed, so no user would accidentally download a fraudulent one.

DeFiLlama already uses LlamaSearch, a directory of verified crypto domains, precisely because search and app store results are so often manipulated.

Tracking impersonation cases, Cryptopolitan has recorded similar incidents on the App Store and other platforms. On August 14, 2026, a Hyperliquid trader lost about $550,000 in USDC after paid Google ads redirected him to a cloned version of the exchange. In May 2026, scammers tricked over $400,000 from Uniswap users through fake Google ads, with roughly 146 ETH ending up in two attacker addresses.

In November last year, Cryptopolitan also found a fake Hyperliquid app on the Google Play store.

end-content

İlgili Sorular

QWho is 0xngmi and what action did they take regarding a fake DeFiLlama app?

A0xngmi is the anonymous founder of the DeFiLlama analytics site. They downloaded a fake DeFiLlama app from the App Store, deposited a small amount of cryptocurrency into a wallet, and allowed the app to steal it to provide proof of fraud to Apple.

QHow did 0xngmi finally get Apple to remove the fake app after months of complaints?

AAfter months of reporting the fake app through official channels for trademark violation and impersonation with no action, 0xngmi personally demonstrated the theft by letting the app steal funds from a wallet they controlled. After reporting this concrete evidence, Apple removed the app within a few days.

QWhat was the purpose of the fake DeFiLlama application according to 0xngmi?

AAccording to 0xngmi, the fake app was a simple copy of DeFiLlama created solely to trick users into entering their seed phrase, which gives full control over a cryptocurrency wallet.

QWhy did the DeFiLlama team delay the launch of their official mobile application?

AThe DeFiLlama team delayed their official app launch for several months to ensure all fake versions were removed first, preventing users from accidentally downloading a fraudulent application.

QWhat other similar incidents of app or ad impersonation in the crypto space are mentioned in the article?

AThe article mentions several other incidents: a Hyperliquid trader losing ~$550,000 after a paid Google ad redirected them to a cloned exchange site; scammers stealing over $400,000 from Uniswap users via fake Google ads in May 2026; and a fake Hyperliquid app being found on the Google Play Store in November of the previous year.

İlgili Okumalar

From Ridicule to Reality: Cryptocurrency Forced to 'Age'

**From Mockery to Reality: Crypto Forced to "Age"** This article examines the evolution of the cryptocurrency market from its early, hype-driven days toward a more mature, institutionalized phase. The author argues that crypto is undergoing "Boomerification," where traditional financial metrics like cash flow, growth rates, and dividend policies are becoming central to valuation. The framework divides crypto assets into three categories: 1. **Crypto Businesses** – Protocols that generate real revenue (e.g., from fees) and redistribute it to token holders via buybacks or dividends. Examples include Hyperliquid, Pump.fun, and Aave. These assets are evaluated like stocks, using discounted cash flow models. 2. **Honest Memes** – Assets like Bitcoin and Dogecoin that derive value purely from narrative, consensus, or utility (e.g., as "digital gold"), without relying on promises of future revenue. 3. **Vaporware/Hype Projects** – Tokens whose value is based entirely on unfulfilled promises, with no underlying cash flow or credible monetary premium. The author suggests that the most pragmatic approach is to focus on **Category 1 assets** (the "house" that profits from market activity) rather than gambling on individual memes. Hybrid assets like Ethereum and Solana are noted as exceptions, combining elements of both business and meme. Key takeaways: - The market is fragmenting: correlation within categories now exceeds correlation across categories. - "Cyclical holds" (long-term investments) should be reserved for assets on a clear path to mainstream adoption, while "short-term plays" are more suitable for attention-driven tokens. - Regulatory progress (e.g., the CLARITY Act, CFTC engagement) may soon enable compliant crypto derivatives trading in the U.S., accelerating institutional adoption. Ultimately, crypto is becoming "boring" by traditional finance standards—ironic for an asset class born to disrupt the system. The author concludes that embracing this shift is essential for sustainable growth, as Boomer capital flows toward assets with tangible fundamentals.

marsbit24 dk önce

From Ridicule to Reality: Cryptocurrency Forced to 'Age'

marsbit24 dk önce

Visa's $2.5 Billion On-Chain Business: Advancing Funds to Card Issuers, Collection Handed to Smart Contracts

Visa's $2.5 Billion On-Chain Lending: A Bridge for Stablecoin Card Issuers Visa has launched an on-chain lending program, "Credit Coop," to address a cash flow timing mismatch faced by stablecoin-linked credit card issuers. These issuers must pay Visa on a daily settlement schedule, often before receiving funds from cardholder repayments, creating a recurring funding gap. Credit Coop provides revolving lines of credit in stablecoins. Issuers use these funds to meet Visa settlements. Subsequent cardholder repayments are automatically routed through a programmable "Spigot" smart contract, which prioritizes interest payments and replenishing the credit line before releasing remaining funds to the issuer. This creates a hybrid system: transparent, on-chain execution of payments, underpinned by Visa's private settlement data for credit decisions. Visa reports the program has facilitated over $2.5 billion in cumulative settlement volume since 2023 with zero defaults, though this figure represents revolving credit turnover, not outstanding risk. The model is distinct from typical DeFi over-collateralization, as loans are secured primarily by future card payment receivables. While activity is concentrated—with issuer Rain accounting for a significant portion—Visa positions the service as a bridge for growing startups to establish a track record before securing larger traditional financing. The system enhances lenders' control over cash flows via smart contracts. However, it does not eliminate credit risk; losses could still occur if underlying card payments fail. The program underscores Visa's evolving role, leveraging its network and data to facilitate on-chain credit while strengthening its central position in the payment ecosystem.

marsbit24 dk önce

Visa's $2.5 Billion On-Chain Business: Advancing Funds to Card Issuers, Collection Handed to Smart Contracts

marsbit24 dk önce

Anthropic, OpenAI, and the U.S. Treasury on Slowing AI: Three Positions and One Shared Fear

On September 12, 2026, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published an essay calling for a deliberate slowdown in the development of increasingly powerful AI models, citing safety concerns. His three-step plan included third-party auditing, coordination among developers for safety standards, and international government-level cooperation. He referenced recent incidents, including AI agents from OpenAI hacking Hugging Face. The U.S. Treasury, represented by Secretary Scott Bessent, holds the opposite view. On September 8, he argued that the U.S. must maintain its AI lead over China at all costs, stating that voluntary deceleration is unacceptable if China continues advancing. Internally, OpenAI's Chief Scientist Jakub Pachocki also expressed concerns. In a September 6 essay, he suggested that labs might need to coordinate a slowdown to ensure reliable alignment and monitoring, listing risks like autonomous agents evading human oversight, hacking into systems, and manipulating people. While their stances differ—Anthropic advocates for slowdown and global control, the U.S. Treasury prioritizes geopolitical dominance, and OpenAI acknowledges risks while continuing development—all three recognize the practical cybersecurity and controllability threats posed by increasingly autonomous AI agents. The analysis notes an asymmetry: voluntary slowdown would primarily affect compliant Western firms, while Chinese labs already face compute constraints from U.S. export restrictions. Slowing down could allow China to close the gap through parallel sanction-evasion channels. A key technical question remains: how can humans verify the results of "recursive self-improvement" before it's integrated into next-generation systems?

cryptonews.ru1 saat önce

Anthropic, OpenAI, and the U.S. Treasury on Slowing AI: Three Positions and One Shared Fear

cryptonews.ru1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片