DeFi Education Fund Urges Senators To Reject Proposed Amendments In Crypto Bill Markup

bitcoinist2026-01-15 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-15 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The DeFi Education Fund is urging the Senate Banking Committee to reject specific proposed amendments to a new crypto market structure bill, warning they could harm the DeFi ecosystem and software developers. Key concerns include #42 (Reed, Kim), authorizing Treasury to sanction smart contracts; #45 (Reed), creating a new digital asset definition under the Bank Secrecy Act; and #47 (Reed), removing a provision on unlicensed money transmission. Amendments #72 and #73 (Cortez Masto) aim to narrow developer definitions and expand FinCEN's authority, while #74 and #75 could stifle growth by prohibiting transactions with unlawful protocols. Amendment #104 (Warren) would strike a key distribution carve-out for crypto. The fund argues these changes pose significant risks to innovation and operational flexibility in the decentralized finance space.

As the Senate Banking Committee prepares to mark up the newly proposed draft of the crypto market structure bill, the DeFi Education Fund has released a list of amendments it strongly urges senators to oppose.

In a recent post on social media platform X (formerly Twitter), the organization expressed concerns that the descriptions of the draft indicate potential harm to decentralized finance (DeFi) and could negatively impact software developers.

Red Flags Emerge From Crypto Market Structure Bill Draft

In its message, the DeFi Education Fund emphasized the importance of safeguarding the integrity of the emerging DeFi landscape and called on senators to consider the far-reaching consequences of these proposed changes.

Among the amendments highlighted were Amendment #42, proposed by Senators Reed and Kim, which seeks to authorize the Treasury to sanction smart contracts and centralized platforms involved in illicit activities.

This amendment raised significant red flags for advocates who worry about its implications for innovation and operational flexibility within the decentralized finance ecosystem.

Another amendment of concern, Amendment #45 by Senator Reed, aims to create a specific definition for digital assets under the Bank Secrecy Act.

Similarly, Amendment #47, also from Senator Reed, intends to remove a provision related to federal criminal offense concerning unlicensed money transmission.

These changes, according to the DeFi Education Fund, loom dangerously over the operational landscape for developers and financial institutions that interact with digital assets.

Stifling DeFi Growth

Additionally, Senators Cortez Masto’s proposed amendments, specifically #72 and #73, aim to narrow the definition of non-controlling developers and expand the authority of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) alongside the Treasury for blockchain-enabled platforms.

Amendments #74 and #75 further seek to strengthen existing laws related to money transmission and prohibit transactions involving unlawful DeFi protocols, which the Fund suggests could stifle the industry’s growth.

Amendment #104, proposed by crypto-skeptic Senator Elizabeth Warren, also drew attention by striking a key distribution carve-out for crypto offerings.

This follows similar calls by Summer Mersinger, CEO of the Blockchain Association, who recently claimed that the “Big Bank Lobby” is pushing Congress to change key provisions of the already enacted GENIUS Act concerning stablecoin rewards, further highlighting the current state of the future of crypto in Congress.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap recovery above $3.2 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main concern expressed by the DeFi Education Fund regarding the proposed crypto market structure bill?

AThe DeFi Education Fund is concerned that the proposed amendments could harm the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem and negatively impact software developers.

QWhich amendment, proposed by Senators Reed and Kim, has raised significant red flags for DeFi advocates?

AAmendment #42, which seeks to authorize the Treasury to sanction smart contracts and centralized platforms involved in illicit activities, has raised significant red flags.

QWhat is the purpose of Senator Elizabeth Warren's Amendment #104 according to the article?

AAmendment #104, proposed by Senator Elizabeth Warren, aims to strike a key distribution carve-out for crypto offerings.

QWhich senators proposed amendments to narrow the definition of non-controlling developers and expand FinCEN's authority?

ASenator Cortez Masto proposed amendments #72 and #73, which aim to narrow the definition of non-controlling developers and expand the authority of FinCEN and the Treasury.

QWhat recent claim did Summer Mersinger, CEO of the Blockchain Association, make about the 'Big Bank Lobby'?

ASummer Mersinger claimed that the 'Big Bank Lobby' is pushing Congress to change key provisions of the already enacted GENIUS Act concerning stablecoin rewards.

İlgili Okumalar

Virtuals Is Not Really Doing AI Agent, But the Capital Market for AI Agent

Virtuals is not fundamentally an AI Agent platform, but a capital market for AI Agents. Its core innovation is transforming AI Agents from functional tools into tradable assets that can be issued, owned, traded, and community-driven. This creates a Crypto-native growth model: narrative drives asset creation, speculation fuels initial distribution, and community members become stakeholders, fostering viral spread. The project is evolving beyond being a simple launchpad. Through its Agent Commerce Protocol (ACP), it aims to build a commercial network where Agents can collaborate, provide services, and settle payments on-chain. The concept of "Agentic GDP" (aGDP) is introduced to measure this ecosystem's economic activity. While early growth was heavily fueled by speculation and a Base chain ecosystem, Virtuals now faces a critical juncture. Market attention is shifting from its ability to generate hype to its capacity to foster real, sustainable commercial activity among Agents. Its long-term success hinges on proving that these tokenized Agents can form a genuinely productive and autonomous economy, moving beyond being merely high-volatility AI assets.

marsbit10 dk önce

Virtuals Is Not Really Doing AI Agent, But the Capital Market for AI Agent

marsbit10 dk önce

From Presale to Public Markets, Ozak AI’s Pricing Gap Represents a 100x Upside Rarely Seen in New AI Tokens

Ozak AI is generating significant investor interest ahead of its public market launch. Currently priced at $0.014 in its final presale phase, the token has already seen a 1,300% increase from its initial price. With over $7 million raised and a fixed listing price of $1, early investors could see returns of up to 71x, with potential for 100x growth if post-launch momentum continues. The project is a predictive AI platform combining AI and blockchain to provide market forecasts and trading strategies. Its ecosystem includes 24/7 Predictive Agents, secure Data Vaults for user information, and a native $OZ token for accessing features, staking, and rewards. A recent partnership with AImstrong aims to enhance DeFi performance through predictive yield strategies and risk management. As Ozak AI transitions from presale to public trading, its current pricing represents a notable gap compared to its anticipated market potential, positioning it as a highly watched new AI token.

TheNewsCrypto15 dk önce

From Presale to Public Markets, Ozak AI’s Pricing Gap Represents a 100x Upside Rarely Seen in New AI Tokens

TheNewsCrypto15 dk önce

The AI Agent Era Accelerates Its Arrival: Questflow Defines a New Paradigm of Financial Intelligence with On-Chain AI Brokerage

The AI Agent era is accelerating, with the CB Insights AI 100 list highlighting global investment confidence. The focus has shifted from whether AI works to its speed of deployment and ability to manage complex workflows, with autonomous AI Agents driving this transformation. At the forefront is Questflow, a Singapore-based startup redefining financial intelligence through its on-chain AI brokerage. Unlike tools that merely provide data dashboards, Questflow deploys AI Agents that proactively scan markets, form judgments, and execute trades via a conversational interface—operating 24/7 without requiring manual confirmation for each decision. This embodies the new AI paradigm of agents capable of executing multi-step workflows autonomously. Questflow's mission is to democratize institutional-grade trading intelligence. Historically reserved for the ultra-wealthy, this capability is now accessible starting from just $1 through Questflow's "AI Clone + Copy Trade" model. The platform charges only a 1% execution fee, aligning its incentives directly with users and eliminating traditional management or performance fees. The timing is opportune, aligning with key trends identified by CB Insights: the scalable deployment of AI Agents, accelerated AI adoption in financial services, and the maturation of on-chain infrastructure. With robust liquidity on platforms like Hyperliquid and Polymarket, alongside advancements in AI reasoning and non-custodial wallet security, Questflow is positioned to merge the roles of broker, fund, and exchange into a single, accessible platform for millions.

链捕手39 dk önce

The AI Agent Era Accelerates Its Arrival: Questflow Defines a New Paradigm of Financial Intelligence with On-Chain AI Brokerage

链捕手39 dk önce

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

Titled "Why Putting a Price on Social Interaction Is Doomed to Fail," this article critiques attempts to monetize social networks directly through SocialFi models, arguing their inevitable failure stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of media dynamics. Using Marshall McLuhan's theory of "hot" and "cold" media, the author posits that social networks are inherently "cold" media. Their value isn't contained in individual posts but is co-created through user participation, interpretation, and fragmented, ongoing interaction (e.g., replies, shares). This ambiguity and need for user involvement are core to their function. The article asserts that SocialFi projects like Friend.tech failed because introducing real-time, tradable financial pricing (a definitive "hot" signal) into this "cold" environment doesn't add a layer—it replaces the medium's essence. The unambiguous price signal overshadows and nullifies the nuanced, participatory social signal. Users become traders, not participants, and when speculative profits vanish, the underlying social ecosystem—never genuinely cultivated—collapses entirely. This principle extends beyond crypto. The author argues platforms like Twitter have gradually "heated up" through metrics (likes, retweets counts, algorithmically defined value), shifting users from participants to performers and eroding organic engagement. The solution isn't to abandon capital but to manage its entry point. Successful models like Substack, Patreon, or Bandcamp allow capital to "condense" at specific, isolated nodes (e.g., subscriptions, one-time payments) without permeating and "heating" every social interaction. They preserve the core "cold," participatory medium while enabling monetization at designated boundaries. The NFT boom and bust serves as a stark parallel: the ancient "cold" medium of collecting (valued for story, community, gradual accumulation) was rapidly destroyed by platforms that introduced real-time floor prices, rarity scores, and trading dashboards, transforming collectors into speculators and vaporizing cultural value when prices fell. The core lesson: "Liquidity equals heat." Injecting high liquidity and definitive pricing into a "cold" participatory medium doesn't optimize it; it fundamentally alters and destroys its value-creating mechanism. The future lies not in pricing every social gesture but in finding precise, non-invasive points for capital to condense without overheating the entire ecosystem.

marsbit47 dk önce

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

marsbit47 dk önce

Trump Media’s Crypto Bet Implodes With Massive $406M Quarterly Loss

Trump Media & Technology Group, parent company of Truth Social, reported a massive $406 million net loss in Q1 2026, sharply up from $31.7 million a year earlier. The collapse was driven primarily by $370 million in unrealized losses from digital asset investments. These include a $61 million loss on 756 million Cronos tokens and a nearly $500 million gap on 9,542 Bitcoin purchased near the 2025 market peak, though Bitcoin's recent recovery has reduced that paper loss. Adding to turmoil, CEO Devin Nunes resigned in late April. Meanwhile, the company's core media revenue was only $871,200, a minimal increase. Despite the financial losses, the company generated $18 million in operating cash flow by selling options on its pledged Bitcoin holdings. Its stock, once valued at over $97, now trades around $9, reflecting a more than 90% decline from its 2022 peak.

bitcoinist53 dk önce

Trump Media’s Crypto Bet Implodes With Massive $406M Quarterly Loss

bitcoinist53 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures