Data: 75% of Traders on Hyperliquid Are Losing Money. What Are the Profitable Ones Using?

marsbit2026-05-20 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-05-20 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

On Hyperliquid, approximately 75% of addresses are losing money, indicating that manual traders are increasingly competing against automated systems. Profitable traders primarily employ one of three approaches: 1) Running systematic, high-frequency strategies (e.g., one address executed 261k trades with a 64.75% win rate), 2) Placing high-conviction, asymmetric bets with large positions (e.g., 50 trades yielding $4.48M at a 28% win rate), or 3) Using algorithms for execution while making manual macro judgments. The article argues that traditional methods like chart patterns or reacting to social media news are often already priced in by bots, making such traders the "exit liquidity" for systematic players. Success now depends on unique narrative timing, structural insights, or conviction during market capitulation.

Author: Stacy Muur

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide: Three-quarters of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money. It's not bad luck; the rules of the game have changed. While you're still looking at candlestick patterns for formations, arbitrage bots have already made their profit. Data shows that truly profitable traders either use algorithmic systematic execution or place large bets on asymmetric opportunities with high conviction. Manual retail traders watching screens are becoming the exit liquidity for others.

About 75% of addresses on Hyperliquid are in a loss-making position.

The reality is that people trading manually on Hyperliquid are competing against systems that never rest. The trading opportunity you just discovered has likely already been priced in by the system.

When you see a certain pattern, chances are it has already been arbitraged.

Extreme funding rates are balanced in an instant.

Technical patterns have already appeared across more than 50 order books.

News headlines are priced in as soon as they appear.

What the most profitable traders are doing:

→1. Running systematic strategies (the second most profitable address executed 261,000 trades this month with a 64.75% win rate)

→ 2. Holding high-conviction positions, betting on asymmetric returns (a wallet made $4.48 million with just 50 trades and a 28% win rate)

→ 3. Using algorithms as execution tools while making macro judgments manually

If you have timing in narratives, structural insight, or conviction when everyone else capitulates, you can still make profitable trades.

But if your trades are based on chart patterns or news you saw on X, you are likely just exit liquidity.

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the article, what percentage of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money, and what is presented as the primary reason?

AApproximately 75% of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money. The primary reason is that manual traders are competing against automated, systemized strategies that execute trades faster and more efficiently, often pricing in opportunities before a human trader can act.

QWhat are the two main strategies used by the most profitable traders on Hyperliquid, as described in the article?

AThe two main strategies are: 1. Running systematic, automated strategies (one example executed 261,000 trades with a 64.75% win rate). 2. Holding high-conviction positions to bet on asymmetric opportunities (one wallet made $4.48M with only 50 trades, despite a 28% win rate).

QThe article suggests that several common trading signals are often ineffective. Name at least three of these signals.

AThree common but often ineffective signals mentioned are: 1. Technical chart patterns (which appear across many order books). 2. Extreme funding rates (which get arbitraged instantly). 3. News headlines (which are priced in immediately upon release).

QWhat role does the article suggest algorithms can play for a trader who still wants to make manual, high-level decisions?

AThe article suggests using algorithms as an execution tool. A trader can make macro or high-level directional judgments manually, and then use an algorithm to handle the rapid, systematic execution of trades based on that judgment.

QAccording to the article's conclusion, what kind of manual trader is most likely to succeed, and what kind is most likely to fail?

AA manual trader who succeeds is likely one acting on deep narrative timing, unique structural insights, or having strong conviction when others are capitulating. A manual trader who fails is likely one whose decisions are based on commonly seen chart patterns or news headlines found on social media (like X), as they become 'exit liquidity' for others.

İlgili Okumalar

Crypto Primary Market Investment and Financing Forward-Looking Weekly Report | Stablecoin Regulation Nears Implementation, ETF Funds Continue to Withdraw, Capital Begins Betting on Payment and Cash Flow

Crypto Market Weekly Report (Jun 1-7, 2026): Capital Shifts Focus to Payments & Cash Flow Market data indicates a significant divergence: while traditional institutional funds continue exiting via BTC and ETH ETFs (recording net outflows of $1.72B and $168M this week, respectively), stablecoin supply continues growing. This suggests capital is shifting from speculative asset allocation toward defensive positioning within on-chain liquidity, awaiting new, concrete opportunities. This trend is reflected in venture capital focus. Weekly fundraising fell 27% to $302M, with investments concentrating on infrastructure with tangible revenue potential: 1. **Stablecoin Infrastructure (28% of funding):** Projects like M0 Protocol ($35M raise) are gaining attention as regulatory clarity (e.g., the GENIUS Act) nears, shifting the focus from legitimacy to building payment and settlement networks. 2. **AI Agent Infrastructure (26%):** Investments are moving from conceptual AI Agents towards the execution and economic layers required for a functional "Agent economy." Key raises include OpenRouter ($40M) and Halliday ($20M). 3. **Real World Assets (RWA) (18%):** The search for on-chain yield and cash flow drives continued interest in RWA platforms like Ondo Finance. Security threats are evolving from smart contract exploits toward key management failures, permission control issues, and regulatory execution risks (e.g., court-ordered asset freezes). **Key Takeaways:** The investment thesis is shifting from narrative-driven bets to revenue and cash-flow-generating protocols. Future attention should be on the progression of stablecoin regulations, the commercial validation of AI Agent economies, and the performance of high-revenue protocols like derivatives platforms.

marsbit7 dk önce

Crypto Primary Market Investment and Financing Forward-Looking Weekly Report | Stablecoin Regulation Nears Implementation, ETF Funds Continue to Withdraw, Capital Begins Betting on Payment and Cash Flow

marsbit7 dk önce

Helius CEO Says Crypto’s ‘Straw Houses’ Face Collapse As AI Raises The Stakes

Helius Labs CEO Mert Mumtaz warns that cryptocurrency is entering a critical security phase, demanding spaceflight-level rigor. He argues crypto's promise of irreversible execution can no longer tolerate the "sloppy" software standards of traditional web apps, where bugs can be patched. Instead, immutable financial code must be provably correct, akin to launching a spaceship. Mumtaz connects this to the historical "software crisis" and the need for formal verification. He criticizes the industry's "facade of decentralization"—reliance on admin keys and emergency interventions—which masks underlying fragility. AI is a dual catalyst: while it empowers attackers to find exploits faster, it also makes rigorous practices like formal verification, audits, and invariant checking more accessible at scale. This will trigger a "trial by fire" and "aggressive natural selection," separating robust "serious infrastructure teams" from fragile "straw house" protocols that may collapse. The ultimate goal is a crypto industry where demonstrable correctness and security are paramount, making it safer and more robust than centralized finance. Mumtaz's warning comes as AI models like Claude advance, compressing the time for both offensive and defensive security research in DeFi.

bitcoinist13 dk önce

Helius CEO Says Crypto’s ‘Straw Houses’ Face Collapse As AI Raises The Stakes

bitcoinist13 dk önce

Buy an NFT First to Get a Ticket? The Largest World Cup Ticket Slump in History

"Ticketing Woes for 2026 World Cup: NFT 'Right-to-Buy' and High Prices Dampen Sales" Despite anticipation for the 2026 FIFA World Cup, with 48 teams and 104 matches across North America, the tournament faces significant unsold tickets, with approximately 180,000 group-stage tickets still available for resale just before kick-off. This unexpected shortfall is attributed to FIFA's controversial new ticketing strategy, which includes an NFT-based "Right-to-Buy" (RTB) system and opaque, dynamic pricing. FIFA introduced RTBs as digital collectibles (NFTs) sold on its FIFA Collect platform. An RTB grants the holder only the right to purchase a ticket for a specific match later, not the ticket itself. This two-step process, criticized for selling "scarcity" first, saw RTBs priced from tens to hundreds of dollars, generating millions in revenue for FIFA. With many tickets remaining available on official channels, the value of these prepaid purchase rights is now being questioned. Compounding the issue are ticket prices, reported to be 2 to 4 times higher than the 2022 Qatar World Cup, and up to 7 times more for marquee matches. FIFA employed dynamic pricing, common in U.S. sports, but lacked transparency on seat availability and exact locations during sales, frustrating global fans facing high travel costs. This has drawn scrutiny from regulators in New York and New Jersey. FIFA's official resale platform also drew criticism for imposing high fees—roughly 10% on sellers and 17% on buyers, allowing FIFA to profit further from secondary market transactions. While FIFA President Gianni Infantino states over 6 million tickets have been sold, the situation highlights a potential disconnect between fan enthusiasm and willingness to pay under an aggressive commercial model.

marsbit15 dk önce

Buy an NFT First to Get a Ticket? The Largest World Cup Ticket Slump in History

marsbit15 dk önce

Dialogue with Morgan Stanley Executive: Wall Street Isn't Rejecting Bitcoin, It's Just Waiting for the Right Time

In a podcast interview, Amy Oldenburg, Head of Digital Asset Strategy at Morgan Stanley, discusses Wall Street's evolving stance on Bitcoin, explaining the bank's measured approach and the road ahead. Oldenburg, with 26 years at Morgan Stanley, traces her perspective to witnessing transformative tech cycles and her experience in emerging markets, where she observed the need for alternative financial systems like mobile money (e.g., M-Pesa). This background informs her view of Bitcoin's value proposition. She clarifies that Morgan Stanley is "client-driven." Regulatory hurdles, particularly as a bank holding company under Federal Reserve oversight, initially slowed their entry. While the firm couldn't act as quickly as independent asset managers, persistent client demand and a changing regulatory environment led to offerings like their low-fee Bitcoin ETP (MSBT). They are now gradually rolling out spot Bitcoin trading on their E*Trade platform. Regarding advisor adoption, Oldenburg cites a "lack of education" as the primary barrier. Morgan Stanley recommends a 0-2% allocation for more conservative portfolios and 2-4% for aggressive ones, but price volatility and confusion about its place in asset allocation persist. She notes competition for investor attention from AI and commodities. Addressing Bitcoin's price stagnation despite institutional buying, Oldenburg points to a confluence of factors: competing investment narratives (AI, quantum computing) and the complex financial landscape. She suggests a catalyst for Bitcoin as a neutral reserve asset might require a "slow-burn crisis" that exposes fragility in traditional systems. For wider bank adoption, including holding Bitcoin on balance sheets, she identifies the need for regulatory clarity to reduce punitive capital treatment and for the asset to be usable as collateral within financial ecosystems. Looking ahead, Oldenburg predicts steady, moderate adoption growth through 2030 rather than an explosive "J-curve." She emphasizes the importance of differentiating Bitcoin from other crypto assets and expresses concern that the core cypherpunk ethos of self-custody is being diluted as traditional finance enters the space. She concludes that the digital asset field remains in its early stages with significant innovation, like AI agents and micropayments, still to come.

marsbit35 dk önce

Dialogue with Morgan Stanley Executive: Wall Street Isn't Rejecting Bitcoin, It's Just Waiting for the Right Time

marsbit35 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片