‘Customers are awake’- Eric Trump slams banks over stablecoin yield opposition

ambcrypto2026-03-05 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-05 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Eric Trump, son of former U.S. President Donald Trump, has criticized banks for their strong opposition to stablecoin yields, calling it "anti-retail, anti-consumer, and anti-American." He claims banks are fighting crypto platforms that offer 4–5%+ yields, but are losing as customers become aware. Tensions between banks and crypto have escalated, threatening the CLARITY Act. Recently, Kraken became the first crypto firm to gain access to the Fed’s payment rails, a move opposed by banks citing financial risks. President Trump also warned banks against undermining his crypto agenda. The rift risks stalling the crypto bill, with prediction markets showing a 71% chance of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026, down from 78%.

Eric Trump, the son of U.S. President Donald Trump, has criticized banks’ strong opposition to stablecoin yield.

In a statement on the 4th of March, Eric Trump said the banks’ fight against stablecoin yield is “anti-retail, anti-consumer, and anti-American.”

He added,

“The banks are desperately targeting crypto/stablecoins, where platforms plan to offer 4–5%+ yields or rewards. Fortunately, the big banks are losing this fight as customers wake up to the games...”

The rift between crypto and banks has worsened over the past few months and threatened to stall the crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act.

There have been ongoing negotiations to reach a stablecoin yield deal between the two industries to advance the bill. However, the recent grant of access to Fed payment rails to Kraken has irked the banks.

Banks oppose Kraken’s access to Fed payment rails

On Wednesday, Kraken became the first crypto-native firm to gain access to the Fed’s payment rails. It had applied for a license five years ago and only received approval this week.

Although crypto supporters hailed the update as a watershed moment for the sector, banks, through the American Bankers Association (ABA), strongly opposed it.

According to the banking lobby, the move was rushed and could expose the financial system to risks.

Interestingly, President Trump also recently warned the banks against undermining his crypto agenda.

He cautioned the bank lobby against pushing to amend the stablecoin law, the GENIUS Act, or holding the CLARITY Act hostage over stablecoin yield.

Will banks stall the crypto bill?

Whether banks will come back to the negotiating table to advance the CLARITY Act remains unclear.

However, the recent developments don’t augur well for the previously optimistic outlook of the potential passage of the CLARITY Act by mid-2026.

Even so, prediction site Polymarket showed a 71% chance of the CLARITY Act becoming law in 2026.

However, the odds had dropped sharply from 78% to 71% in the past two days, amid a deepening rift between banks and crypto alongside the Trump Administration.

That said, the recent crypto market recovery could be affected if the rift deepens and derails the CLARITY Act’s progress.


Final Summary

  • Eric Trump joined his father, U.S. President Donald Trump, in slamming banks’ strong opposition to stablecoin yield.
  • It is unclear whether banks will withdraw support for the CLARITY Act after opposing Kraken’s limited access to the Fed’s payment rails.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat did Eric Trump criticize banks for regarding stablecoins?

AEric Trump criticized banks for their strong opposition to stablecoin yield, calling it 'anti-retail, anti-consumer, and anti-American.'

QWhich crypto firm recently gained access to the Fed's payment rails, and why did banks oppose it?

AKraken became the first crypto-native firm to gain access to the Fed's payment rails. Banks, through the American Bankers Association (ABA), opposed it, claiming the move was rushed and could expose the financial system to risks.

QWhat is the name of the crypto market structure bill that is threatened by the rift between banks and crypto?

AThe crypto market structure bill threatened by the rift is called the CLARITY Act.

QAccording to Polymarket, what are the odds of the CLARITY Act becoming law in 2026?

AAccording to Polymarket, there is a 71% chance of the CLARITY Act becoming law in 2026, though the odds dropped from 78% in the past two days.

QWhat did President Donald Trump recently warn banks about concerning his crypto agenda?

APresident Donald Trump warned banks against undermining his crypto agenda, cautioning them against pushing to amend the stablecoin law (the GENIUS Act) or holding the CLARITY Act hostage over stablecoin yield.

İlgili Okumalar

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

This text explores the unexpected connection between Pinduoduo founder Colin Huang and blockchain, as suggested in his article *Turning Capitalism Upside Down*. Huang argues Pinduoduo's core business is about managing "uncertainty." He posits that wealth flows to the rich because they absorb life's uncertainties (e.g., illness, job loss) that devastate the poor, who pay a premium for certainty through insurance or stable prices. Pinduoduo's model attempts a "reverse insurance": by aggregating consumer demand via group-buying and flash sales, it creates a large, predictable order for manufacturers. This certainty allows factories to remove risk premiums, passing savings back as lower prices, thus partially reversing the wealth flow. The key obstacle, Huang notes, is that an individual's buying intent is an unreliable promise. He then asks if blockchain is the natural solution for this "reverse insurance." The text elaborates that blockchain, through smart contracts with binding deposits, could transform casual intent into a costly-to-break, enforceable commitment. This replaces interpersonal trust with coded rules, making promises credible, pricable, and resistant to fraud. Finally, the author draws a parallel to Bitcoin, framing two paths to creating certainty: the "Pinduoduo path" of aggregating decentralized will into scale, and the "Bitcoin path" of locking rules into immutable code. Both sacrifice something—personal freedom or system flexibility—to manufacture trust and predictability.

链捕手1 saat önce

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

链捕手1 saat önce

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

**Summary:** "The Memory Magnate Who Built a Trillion-Dollar Empire, Yet Never Became the Richest" explores the journey of Zhu Yiming, founder of GigaDevice (603986) and co-founder of the soon-to-IPO ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). The article positions GigaDevice, a fabless chip designer now valued at ~¥340 billion, as a prequel to the massive IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer) venture, CXMT. Starting in 2005 with minimal capital, Zhu strategically "picked up the pieces" by focusing on niche markets like NOR Flash and microcontrollers (MCUs), areas major players were exiting. This allowed GigaDevice to grow into a diversified semiconductor company, maintaining robust profitability even during industry downturns by controlling costs. However, the piece argues that in the highly cyclical and capital-intensive memory chip industry, the fabless model has limits. True resilience and scale require the ability for "counter-cyclical expansion" – investing heavily during downturns – a tactic only possible for IDMs like Samsung or SK Hynix. This insight led Zhu to partner with the Hefei city government in 2016 to establish CXMT, an IDM focused on DRAM. Zhu's symbolic moves, like forfeiting salary and diluting his equity, were crucial in securing the massive state and bank funding needed. CXMT's equipment base is now valued even higher than that of BYD's vast auto manufacturing empire. Despite the potential for CXMT to reach a market cap of ¥1-2 trillion upon its IPO, Zhu's indirect stake in both companies is estimated below 3%, placing his personal wealth far below that of China's top billionaires. The article concludes that his strategic vision built a trillion-yuan memory landscape, but the capital structure necessary to achieve it precluded a personal fortune of similar scale.

marsbit1 saat önce

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

marsbit1 saat önce

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

The XRP Ledger is drawing attention as daily network fees have fallen below $400. While low fees align with XRPL's design for affordable transactions and are often seen as a strength, the metric can also serve as an indicator of network demand and paid transaction volume. This data point of around $3,100 in weekly fee burn highlights the stark contrast with higher-fee chains like Ethereum and Bitcoin. The development fuels an ongoing debate. Proponents view low fees as a sign of efficiency and accessibility, while critics may question if the network is generating sufficient high-value activity relative to its market cap and payments-focused narrative. The article cautions against overstating the finding, noting a single low-fee day does not signify network failure. It instead adds context to discussions about XRPL's usage, especially alongside Ripple's broader initiatives in stablecoins (RLUSD), AI payments, and enterprise infrastructure. The report recommends monitoring for a fee rebound, checking transaction counts for a fuller picture, and confirming the trend via native explorers like Bithomp. It frames the story within a larger market shift where on-chain data, protocol updates, and infrastructure developments are becoming crucial alongside price action. The editorial stance is to present the verified data, explain its significance for assessing network activity, and avoid hype, positioning it as part of the daily crypto conversation.

bitcoinist5 saat önce

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

bitcoinist5 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片