Crypto Under Siege? Trump Says Banks Are Trying To Kill It

bitcoinist2026-03-05 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-05 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has accused major US banks of attempting to undermine proposed crypto legislation, specifically the GENIUS Act, by pushing for restrictive terms. The conflict centers around rules for stablecoins, particularly whether holders can earn interest and how banks would be involved. Former President Donald Trump amplified the issue on Truth Social, warning that such actions could drive crypto firms overseas. Negotiations in the Senate Banking Committee have stalled due to industry pushback and disputes over regulatory control, with custody and yield being key sticking points. Both sides are engaged in a public political fight, with crypto firms warning of lost competitiveness and banks advocating for stronger oversight and protections.

Coinbase’s chief publicly accused big banks of trying to choke off parts of a law meant to clear the rules for stablecoins and other crypto products. Brian Armstrong said banks were pushing terms that would make the law less useful to crypto firms, a charge that has widened into a political spat that now involves the White House.

Banks And Crypto Firms Clash

US President Donald Trump’s public comments this week stepped into that fight. He used his social feed to complain that banking interests were trying to “kill” the GENIUS Act, and warned that heavy-handed limits could push crypto firms overseas. According to Bloomberg reporting, the dispute centers on so-called yield rules — whether stablecoin holders should be allowed to earn interest and, if so, how banks would be involved.

Reports say the stalled negotiations have traced back to a Senate markup that failed to move forward. The chair of the Senate Banking Committee paused consideration after industry pushback and complex bargaining over who gets regulatory control. That delay created space for sharp messaging from both sides: crypto leaders warning of lost competitiveness, and banks pressing for protections they say are needed to limit risk.

BTCUSD currently trading at $71,346. Chart: TradingView

Industry Pushback And Stakes

The back-and-forth grew louder after the exchange CEO’s remarks. Coinbase did not retract the claim that banks are seeking to shape rules to their benefit. Reports indicate other crypto companies have voiced similar complaints privately. Banks, for their part, argue they want strong oversight and limits on how digital-asset firms can operate inside the financial system.

Officials said the key sticking point is custody and yield: whether nonbank firms can offer deposit-like returns or whether that activity should remain inside federally regulated banks. Short, clear answers have been hard to find. Negotiators are sorting through technical language that will determine where risk sits and who enforces the rules. That language matters for startups and large firms alike.

Truth Social And Public Pressure

Trump amplified the issue on his platform, drawing public attention and turning a policy squabble into a broader political fight. Truth Social posts framed the banks as obstructionist, and lawmakers on both sides of the aisle picked up the debate in calls and interviews. Reports note the rhetoric is making it harder for negotiators to quietly tweak language without scrutiny.

Bitcoin and other crypto firms have warned that unclear or onerous rules would push talent and capital to other jurisdictions. Officials in the negotiating teams have not released a timetable for action. Data shows regulatory certainty can influence where businesses choose to base key operations, and that factor now seems central to the bargaining.

Featured image from Holmatro, chart from TradingView

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main accusation made by Coinbase's chief against big banks?

ACoinbase's chief, Brian Armstrong, accused big banks of trying to choke off parts of a law meant to clear the rules for stablecoins and other crypto products, pushing terms that would make the law less useful to crypto firms.

QHow did former President Donald Trump get involved in the dispute between banks and crypto firms?

ADonald Trump used his social media platform, Truth Social, to complain that banking interests were trying to 'kill' the GENIUS Act and warned that heavy-handed limits could push crypto firms overseas.

QWhat is the key sticking point in the negotiations between banks and crypto firms, as mentioned in the article?

AThe key sticking point is custody and yield: whether nonbank firms can offer deposit-like returns or whether that activity should remain inside federally regulated banks.

QWhat are the potential consequences of unclear or onerous crypto rules, according to the article?

AUnclear or onerous rules could push talent and capital to other jurisdictions, potentially harming the competitiveness of the U.S. crypto industry.

QWhat role did the Senate Banking Committee play in the current state of the negotiations?

AThe chair of the Senate Banking Committee paused consideration of the legislation after industry pushback and complex bargaining over who gets regulatory control, which stalled the negotiations.

İlgili Okumalar

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: Losses Mount Due to Vulnerable Seed Generation A critical vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets has led to a continued wave of fund thefts. According to Galaxy Research, the total stolen has reached 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $88.6 million) from 4,585 addresses, a significant increase from the initial 594.5 BTC reported on July 30, 2026. Most of the stolen funds remain on the attackers' addresses. The issue is not with the current firmware, which Coinkite has updated, but with seed phrases generated on vulnerable devices between March 2021 and the release of fixed firmware versions. Due to a programmer error, devices switched from using a hardware random number generator to the software-based Yasmarang generator, which was initialized with publicly accessible data like the chip's serial number. This made the seed phrases predictable through offline brute-force attacks, meaning wallets remain at risk until funds are moved to a new wallet generated with the patched firmware. Affected devices include Mk2/Mk3 with firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9 (and up to 5.0.3), Mk4/Mk5 up to version 5.6.0, and Q models up to 1.5.0Q. The only exceptions are seeds created with a high-entropy method like at least 50 independent dice rolls or a strong unique BIP-39 passphrase. All other owners must generate a new seed on the fixed firmware and transfer their assets. A case highlighting the human impact involves a 39-year-old long-term investor who lost 2 BTC (approx. $130,000) in minutes. He had accumulated the Bitcoin over eight years through physical labor, viewing it as a financial lifeline and a retirement plan in a country suffering from hyperinflation. His story underscores that even conservative "buy and hold in cold storage" strategies can be compromised by such underlying technical flaws. From a technical perspective, this incident echoes historical failures where weak random number generators undermined cryptographic security, challenging the assumption that offline storage is automatically foolproof.

cryptonews.ru3 saat önce

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

cryptonews.ru3 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片