Crypto market’s weekly winners and losers – POL, JASMY, NIGHT, ZEC

ambcrypto2026-01-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-11 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The crypto market started the new year with initial strength but quickly returned to volatility, with Bitcoin and Ethereum posting minor weekly losses. Among the weekly winners, Polygon (POL) surged nearly 50% with strong network activity and steady user engagement, despite overbought RSI conditions. Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL) gained 22%, facing resistance near $1.05-$1.10 but holding support above $0.85 with slowing momentum. JasmyCoin (JASMY) rose from $0.0065 to over $0.0095 on high volume, then entered consolidation with bullish indicators remaining positive. The overall market showed mixed movement, with these assets standing out amid broader uncertainty.

The new year started with a bang, but the excitement didn’t last long.

After a strong first week, the crypto market has fallen back into its all-too-familiar cycle of ups and downs. Bitcoin [BTC] and Ethereum [ETH] both made negligible moves, with weekly losses of 0.95% and 1.60%.

So how did the rest of the market hold up?

Weekly winners

Polygon [POL] – Usage numbers skyrocket

What makes POL’s rally stand out is that the network didn’t flinch while the price took off. Daily active addresses held steady through early January, with transactions climbing in step with other major EVM chains.

Polygon [POL] pushed nearly 50% higher in a short span, breaking out cleanly with expanding volume. RSI was overbought, and capital didn’t rush out yet.

As long as activity stays firm and users keep showing up, the move up is set to go much higher.

Virtuals Protocol [VIRTUAL] – Hitting supply with little panic selling

After a run-up, Virtuals Protocol [VIRTUAL] price action has slowed down too. However, this looks like momentary trouble, with gains of 22% posted at press time.

The coin pulled back after a high-volume supply zone just above the $1.05-$1.10 range.

Volume Profile data showed heavy prep around the $1.00 mark, which may be why price stalled and slipped instead of pushing straight through.

Importantly, this wasn’t a breakdown. RSI hit 63 at the time of writing, which means momentum was slowing without giving in. Price held well above the $0.85 support zone, where earlier demand stepped in.

For now, it may be consolidation under resistance.

JasmyCoin [JASMY] – Rose and stopped just as fast

JasmyCoin [JASMY] had a strong week, going from the $0.0065 region and pushing above $0.0095 before slowing down. The surge came with higher volume, which means the rally had real substance and is likely to hold.

Since then, price has started to go sideways in a tight range, so the market is probably taking a moment to assess after the run.

RSI was elevated and MACD was in positive territory, so bullish momentum was intact. As long as JASMY holds above the $0.0065-$0.0067 support zone, it is expected that the coin will consolidate.

Other notable winners

İlgili Sorular

QWhat were the weekly price changes for Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) as mentioned in the article?

ABitcoin (BTC) had a weekly loss of 0.95%, and Ethereum (ETH) had a weekly loss of 1.60%.

QWhich cryptocurrency experienced a price rally of nearly 50% with expanding volume and overbought RSI?

APolygon (POL) pushed nearly 50% higher with expanding volume and an overbought RSI.

QWhat was the key reason cited for JasmyCoin's (JASMY) price surge having 'real substance'?

AThe surge came with higher volume, which means the rally had real substance and is likely to hold.

QAround what price level did Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL) encounter a high-volume supply zone that caused it to pull back?

AVirtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL) pulled back after a high-volume supply zone just above the $1.05-$1.10 range.

QWhat is the critical support zone that JasmyCoin (JASMY) needs to hold above to continue its consolidation?

AJasmyCoin (JASMY) needs to hold above the $0.0065-$0.0067 support zone to continue consolidating.

İlgili Okumalar

Hands-on with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview: Tencent's AI, Finally Competitive?

Tencent's Hunyuan AI team has released its latest language model, Hy3 preview, marking a significant step forward for the company's AI capabilities. With 295B total parameters and support for 256K context length, the model employs a mixture-of-experts architecture. It shows improvements in complex logic, instruction following, contextual learning, code generation, and agent task execution. In testing, Hy3 preview demonstrated strong performance in multi-step logical reasoning but showed occasional instability in identifying traps in trick questions. It performed well in extracting key information from disordered meeting transcripts and accurately followed new linguistic rules. As an AI agent, it successfully built functional applications like a Snake game and generated data analysis dashboards, though it sometimes fell short in fully completing complex open-ended tasks. In natural language use, it produced coherent and stylistically appropriate narratives with reduced “AI-like” tone. Priced competitively, Hy3 preview is already integrated into Tencent’s key products, including Tencent Cloud and WorkBuddy. While not leading in every benchmark, it represents a solid, practical model that signals Tencent’s renewed momentum in AI development.

marsbit1 saat önce

Hands-on with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview: Tencent's AI, Finally Competitive?

marsbit1 saat önce

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

A sophisticated crypto laundering operation was executed following the $292 million hack of Kelp DAO on April 18. The attack, attributed to the North Korean Lazarus group, began with anonymous infrastructure preparation using Tornado Cash to fund wallets untraceably. The hacker exploited a vulnerability in Kelp’s cross-chain bridge, stealing 116,500 rsETH. To avoid crashing the market, the attacker used Aave and Compound as laundering tools—depositing the stolen rsETH as collateral to borrow $190 million in clean, liquid ETH. This move triggered a bank run on Aave, causing an $8 billion drop in TVL. After consolidating funds, the attacker fragmented them across hundreds of wallets to evade detection. A major breakpoint was THORChain, where over $460 million in volume—30 times its usual activity—was processed in 24 hours, converting ETH into Bitcoin. This shift to Bitcoin’s UTXO model exponentially increased tracing complexity by shattering funds into countless untraceable fragments. The final destination was Tron-based USDT, the primary channel for illicit crypto flows. From there, funds were cashed out via OTC brokers in China and Southeast Asia, using unlicensed underground banks and UnionPay networks outside Western sanctions scope. Ultimately, the laundered money supports North Korea’s weapons programs, which rely heavily on crypto hacking for foreign currency. The incident underscores structural challenges in DeFi: its openness, composability, and lack of central control make such laundering not just possible, but inherently difficult to prevent.

marsbit1 saat önce

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

marsbit1 saat önce

Behind DeepSeek V4's Stunning Debut: Silicon Valley Is 'Building Walls,' China Is 'Paving Roads'

China's AI landscape is witnessing a strategic divergence from Silicon Valley’s closed-source competition to a collaborative open-source ecosystem. On April 24, DeepSeek released V4, a top-ranked open-source model on Hugging Face, featuring breakthroughs like million-token context length with minimal KV cache and native support for domestic chips like Huawei’s Ascend. Similarly, Kimi’s K2.6, released days earlier, also adopted open-source principles. Unlike U.S. giants such as OpenAI and Anthropic—locked in revenue disputes and tactical product clashes—Chinese firms embrace shared innovation. DeepSeek and Kimi openly build on each other’s advances, like the MLA architecture and Muon optimizer, avoiding redundant R&D and driving down costs. DeepSeek V4 focused on pushing base model capabilities, while Kimi specialized in Agent-based applications. Although U.S. firms lead in revenue and valuation, China’s open-source models achieve comparable performance at a fraction of the cost (e.g., DeepSeek V3 trained for $5.58M vs. GPT-5’s $500M+). With token usage growing exponentially, China’s collaborative model promises scalable, affordable AI built on domestic hardware, shaping a more accessible path to AGI.

marsbit1 saat önce

Behind DeepSeek V4's Stunning Debut: Silicon Valley Is 'Building Walls,' China Is 'Paving Roads'

marsbit1 saat önce

OpenClaw vs. Hermes: Which One Is Right for You?

Two leading AI agent projects, OpenClaw and Hermes, represent a fundamental divergence in design philosophy rather than just a feature competition. OpenClaw, a GitHub phenomenon, prioritizes user control and customization, offering a powerful, flexible platform for building and orchestrating agents. It boasts a massive ecosystem with over 44,000 skills, extensive model flexibility (supporting Anthropic, OpenAI, and others), and deep integrations across multiple messaging platforms. In contrast, Hermes Agent, developed by Nous Research, champions automation and efficiency. It is designed for lower cost and a lower barrier to entry, learning and improving automatically from user workflows. It runs tasks in isolated environments for security and offers significantly lower token costs out-of-the-box. The choice between them mirrors historical tech divides like Windows vs. Mac. OpenClaw is for users who want maximum control, customization, and don't mind a complex setup. Hermes is the smarter default for those seeking an affordable, easy-to-use agent that learns autonomously. The real competition is not about which is better, but which philosophy—a programmable personal OS or a self-evolving work proxy—better suits the user's needs for control, cost, and ease of use.

marsbit1 saat önce

OpenClaw vs. Hermes: Which One Is Right for You?

marsbit1 saat önce

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit7 saat önce

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit7 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures

Popüler Makaleler

JASMY Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! JasmyCoin (JASMY) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında JasmyCoin (JASMY) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: JasmyCoin (JASMY) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınJasmyCoin (JASMY) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: JasmyCoin (JASMY) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında JasmyCoin (JASMY) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

194 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2024.12.12Güncellenme 2025.03.21

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların JASMY (JASMY) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.