Crypto card payments overtake P2P stablecoin transfers: Artemis report

ambcrypto2026-01-15 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-15 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

According to a blockchain analytics report by Artemis, crypto card payments have surpassed peer-to-peer (P2P) stablecoin transfers as the primary driver of on-chain stablecoin activity. The data shows that crypto card payments now operate at a monthly run rate exceeding $15 billion, compared to approximately $11 billion for P2P transfers. This shift indicates that stablecoins are increasingly being used through traditional card networks rather than through direct on-chain transactions. Visa dominates this segment, accounting for over 80% of the tracked volume, while Mastercard holds a smaller but growing share. The growth is attributed to expanding merchant acceptance and integration with existing payment infrastructure, allowing users to spend stablecoins without requiring merchants to directly accept crypto. Although P2P transfers remain important for remittances and cross-border settlements, their growth has been slower. The report highlights a structural evolution in stablecoin usage—from infrastructure-led to interface-led adoption—where cards act as the primary user-facing access point, embedding crypto liquidity into global commerce and driving mainstream adoption.

Crypto-linked card payments have surpassed peer-to-peer [P2P] stablecoin transfers as the dominant driver of on-chain stablecoin activity. This is according to a new report published on 15 January by blockchain analytics firm Artemis.

The report, titled Stablecoin Payments at Scale: How Cards Bridge Digital Assets and Global Commerce, shows that stablecoin volumes routed through crypto cards now exceed direct wallet-to-wallet payments. It marks a structural shift in how stablecoins are being used in practice.

Artemis data indicates that crypto card payments have reached a monthly run rate of over $15 billion, compared with roughly $11 billion in P2P stablecoin transfers.

While P2P usage continues to grow steadily, card-based payments have accelerated faster. The growth is driven by expanding merchant acceptance and tighter integration with existing payment rails.

Cards emerge as stablecoins’ primary payment interface

Rather than replacing traditional payments outright, stablecoins are increasingly being used behind the scenes through familiar card networks.

The report highlights that most stablecoin-backed card transactions ultimately settle through major card processors.

This allows users to spend dollar-pegged tokens without requiring merchants to accept crypto directly.

Visa dominates this segment, accounting for more than 80% of stablecoin card volume tracked in the report. Mastercard represents a smaller but growing share, while regional card programs contribute marginally.

This model has allowed stablecoins to scale in consumer payments without requiring new merchant infrastructure. It effectively embeds crypto liquidity into existing global commerce systems.

P2P payments remain relevant but grow more slowly

Artemis notes that P2P stablecoin transfers continue to play a critical role in remittances, treasury movements, and cross-border settlements, particularly in emerging markets.

However, growth in this segment has been more incremental compared with the rapid expansion seen in card-linked spending.

The divergence suggests that while stablecoins are widely used for moving value between wallets, everyday consumer usage is increasingly mediated through cards rather than direct on-chain payments.

Stablecoin usage shifts from rails to interfaces

The report frames the trend as an evolution from infrastructure-led adoption to interface-led adoption.

Stablecoins remain the settlement layer. However, cards have become the dominant user-facing access point, lowering friction for mainstream users and businesses.

According to Artemis, this dynamic helps explain why stablecoin transaction volumes continue to rise even as direct on-chain payment activity grows at a slower pace.

The findings underline how stablecoins are integrating into traditional financial systems. They do this not by replacing them outrightly, but by quietly powering familiar payment experiences at scale.


Final Thoughts

  • The Artemis report shows a clear shift in how stablecoins are being used, with card-based payments now playing a central role in everyday transactions.
  • As traditional payment rails increasingly bridge digital assets and commerce, stablecoin adoption appears to be moving closer to mainstream consumer behavior rather than remaining a niche crypto-native activity.

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the Artemis report, which method has become the dominant driver of on-chain stablecoin activity?

ACrypto-linked card payments have surpassed P2P stablecoin transfers as the dominant driver of on-chain stablecoin activity.

QWhat is the monthly run rate of crypto card payments compared to P2P stablecoin transfers as reported by Artemis?

ACrypto card payments have reached a monthly run rate of over $15 billion, compared with roughly $11 billion in P2P stablecoin transfers.

QWhich card network dominates the stablecoin card payment segment and what is its market share?

AVisa dominates this segment, accounting for more than 80% of stablecoin card volume tracked in the report.

QWhat key role do P2P stablecoin transfers continue to play, according to the report?

AP2P stablecoin transfers continue to play a critical role in remittances, treasury movements, and cross-border settlements, particularly in emerging markets.

QHow does the report frame the evolution of stablecoin adoption in terms of infrastructure and interfaces?

AThe report frames the trend as an evolution from infrastructure-led adoption to interface-led adoption, where stablecoins remain the settlement layer but cards have become the dominant user-facing access point.

İlgili Okumalar

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit39 dk önce

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit39 dk önce

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit1 saat önce

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片