Crypto card payments overtake P2P stablecoin transfers: Artemis report

ambcrypto2026-01-15 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-15 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

According to a blockchain analytics report by Artemis, crypto card payments have surpassed peer-to-peer (P2P) stablecoin transfers as the primary driver of on-chain stablecoin activity. The data shows that crypto card payments now operate at a monthly run rate exceeding $15 billion, compared to approximately $11 billion for P2P transfers. This shift indicates that stablecoins are increasingly being used through traditional card networks rather than through direct on-chain transactions. Visa dominates this segment, accounting for over 80% of the tracked volume, while Mastercard holds a smaller but growing share. The growth is attributed to expanding merchant acceptance and integration with existing payment infrastructure, allowing users to spend stablecoins without requiring merchants to directly accept crypto. Although P2P transfers remain important for remittances and cross-border settlements, their growth has been slower. The report highlights a structural evolution in stablecoin usage—from infrastructure-led to interface-led adoption—where cards act as the primary user-facing access point, embedding crypto liquidity into global commerce and driving mainstream adoption.

Crypto-linked card payments have surpassed peer-to-peer [P2P] stablecoin transfers as the dominant driver of on-chain stablecoin activity. This is according to a new report published on 15 January by blockchain analytics firm Artemis.

The report, titled Stablecoin Payments at Scale: How Cards Bridge Digital Assets and Global Commerce, shows that stablecoin volumes routed through crypto cards now exceed direct wallet-to-wallet payments. It marks a structural shift in how stablecoins are being used in practice.

Artemis data indicates that crypto card payments have reached a monthly run rate of over $15 billion, compared with roughly $11 billion in P2P stablecoin transfers.

While P2P usage continues to grow steadily, card-based payments have accelerated faster. The growth is driven by expanding merchant acceptance and tighter integration with existing payment rails.

Cards emerge as stablecoins’ primary payment interface

Rather than replacing traditional payments outright, stablecoins are increasingly being used behind the scenes through familiar card networks.

The report highlights that most stablecoin-backed card transactions ultimately settle through major card processors.

This allows users to spend dollar-pegged tokens without requiring merchants to accept crypto directly.

Visa dominates this segment, accounting for more than 80% of stablecoin card volume tracked in the report. Mastercard represents a smaller but growing share, while regional card programs contribute marginally.

This model has allowed stablecoins to scale in consumer payments without requiring new merchant infrastructure. It effectively embeds crypto liquidity into existing global commerce systems.

P2P payments remain relevant but grow more slowly

Artemis notes that P2P stablecoin transfers continue to play a critical role in remittances, treasury movements, and cross-border settlements, particularly in emerging markets.

However, growth in this segment has been more incremental compared with the rapid expansion seen in card-linked spending.

The divergence suggests that while stablecoins are widely used for moving value between wallets, everyday consumer usage is increasingly mediated through cards rather than direct on-chain payments.

Stablecoin usage shifts from rails to interfaces

The report frames the trend as an evolution from infrastructure-led adoption to interface-led adoption.

Stablecoins remain the settlement layer. However, cards have become the dominant user-facing access point, lowering friction for mainstream users and businesses.

According to Artemis, this dynamic helps explain why stablecoin transaction volumes continue to rise even as direct on-chain payment activity grows at a slower pace.

The findings underline how stablecoins are integrating into traditional financial systems. They do this not by replacing them outrightly, but by quietly powering familiar payment experiences at scale.

Final Thoughts

The Artemis report shows a clear shift in how stablecoins are being used, with card-based payments now playing a central role in everyday transactions.
As traditional payment rails increasingly bridge digital assets and commerce, stablecoin adoption appears to be moving closer to mainstream consumer behavior rather than remaining a niche crypto-native activity.

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the Artemis report, which method has become the dominant driver of on-chain stablecoin activity?

ACrypto-linked card payments have surpassed P2P stablecoin transfers as the dominant driver of on-chain stablecoin activity.

QWhat is the monthly run rate of crypto card payments compared to P2P stablecoin transfers as reported by Artemis?

ACrypto card payments have reached a monthly run rate of over $15 billion, compared with roughly $11 billion in P2P stablecoin transfers.

QWhich card network dominates the stablecoin card payment segment and what is its market share?

AVisa dominates this segment, accounting for more than 80% of stablecoin card volume tracked in the report.

QWhat key role do P2P stablecoin transfers continue to play, according to the report?

AP2P stablecoin transfers continue to play a critical role in remittances, treasury movements, and cross-border settlements, particularly in emerging markets.

QHow does the report frame the evolution of stablecoin adoption in terms of infrastructure and interfaces?

AThe report frames the trend as an evolution from infrastructure-led adoption to interface-led adoption, where stablecoins remain the settlement layer but cards have become the dominant user-facing access point.

İlgili Okumalar

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit14 dk önce

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

In a candid interview, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang challenged competitors like Google and Amazon, admitted past strategic errors, and criticized U.S. export controls on AI chips. He framed Nvidia’s role as turning “electricity in, tokens out,” emphasizing the complexity and value of AI inference. Huang dismissed rival custom chips like Google’s TPU and Amazon’s Trainium as inflexible and niche, claiming their growth relies heavily on clients like Anthropic. He also acknowledged missing early investment opportunities in OpenAI and Anthropic. On China, Huang warned that export restrictions risk pushing the country toward self-sufficiency and could cost U.S. leadership in AI. Finally, he explained Nvidia’s acquisition of Groq as a move to serve premium, low-latency token markets. Throughout, Huang emphasized ecosystem trust and Nvidia’s central role in global AI infrastructure.

marsbit20 dk önce

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

marsbit20 dk önce

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

ARK Invest, a major investor in SpaceX, provides an analysis following SpaceX's confidential IPO filing on April 1, 2026, targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation and up to $75 billion in funding for a Nasdaq listing around June 2026. This would be the largest IPO in history. The valuation implies a price-to-sales ratio of ~95x based on ~$18.5B in projected 2025 revenue. ARK argues this reflects future potential, not current reality. Key drivers include Starlink, with over 10M users and $20B+ in 2026 revenue, launch services which have reduced costs by ~95% since 2008, and the strategic merger with xAI in February 2026, enabling vertically integrated AI and orbital computing. ARK’s investment thesis is based on SpaceX's proven execution of ambitious goals, like reusable rockets and global satellite internet. The firm notes that significant value creation often occurs pre-IPO, and its Venture Fund offers exposure to SpaceX’s earlier private stages. Post-IPO, the fund will manage the position per standard lock-up and rebalancing processes, maintaining flexibility to reinvest in other private innovations. The analysis is based on public estimates and ARK research; the S-1 filing is not yet public. This is not investment advice.

marsbit21 dk önce

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

marsbit21 dk önce

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

The article discusses the legislative stalemate in the US over the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (CLARITY Act), which aims to regulate crypto assets. A key point of contention is whether stablecoins should be allowed to pay interest, with crypto companies opposing a ban and banks supporting it. Moody's analyst Abhi Srivastava states that, for now, stablecoins do not pose a significant threat to traditional banks due to existing efficient payment systems and the current prohibition on yield-bearing stablecoins. This limits their appeal for pulling deposits from banks at scale. However, with the stablecoin market cap exceeding $300 billion and growth in tokenized assets, banks could face future pressure from deposit outflows. The crypto industry warns that failure to pass the bill could lead to stricter regulatory crackdowns. Negotiations continue with little progress, despite both sides desiring a resolution.

bitcoinist1 saat önce

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

bitcoinist1 saat önce

Not a Price Hike, but a Supply Cut? Oil Prices Have Crossed the Tipping Point

The global oil market has passed a critical point, shifting the focus from price increases to potential physical supply shortages. The core issue is a time mismatch: even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens, shipping disruptions have already caused significant delays, which will continue to deplete onshore crude inventories for weeks. Refinery behavior acts as an amplifier. Reduced runs in Asia and Europe don’t reflect weaker demand but instead shrink product inventories, raising fuel prices and refining margins, which in turn encourages higher runs—creating a self-reinforcing cycle. If the Strait remains closed beyond April, traditional pricing models may fail. The market could face an unprecedented physical shortfall of 11-13 million barrels per day—roughly four times historical disruption levels. In such a scenario, price becomes an inadequate balancing tool. The only way to rebalance the market would be policy-driven demand destruction, similar to COVID-era lockdowns. Current prices around $95/barrel are insufficient to balance the market. Key signals to watch include inventory levels, policy announcements, and the pace of involuntary demand contraction. Geopolitically, the situation appears likely to worsen before improving, with little room for compromise between the US and Iran.

marsbit2 saat önce

Not a Price Hike, but a Supply Cut? Oil Prices Have Crossed the Tipping Point

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures