Could PEPE repeat its April 2024 rally? THESE metrics say yes

ambcrypto2026-02-13 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-13 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The memecoin market is exhibiting a divergence from past rallies, with the sector losing nearly $8 billion. Despite a 47% drop, PEPE shows signs of a potential rebound similar to its April 2024 rally. Key metrics indicate growing bullish momentum: social activity remains strong with high positive sentiment, Open Interest has increased by 15% to $221 million, and large wallets have accumulated significant amounts since October. With the price retesting key support at $0.0000035 and funding rates turning negative, a short squeeze appears likely. If momentum holds, PEPE could break through resistance at $0.0000065, potentially replicating its previous surge.

The memecoin market continues to show why tokens without real utility are behaving differently from past rallies, where FUD often drove short-term capital inflows. Notably, the data justifies this growing divergence.

According to CoinMarketCap, the memecoin sector has already lost nearly $8 billion in 2026, dropping to multi-year lows. In fact, some coins are down more than 60%, leaving only a handful holding relatively stable.

In this context, Pepe’s [PEPE] 47% drop over the same period shows that even OGs aren’t immune. And yet, social activity around PEPE remains strong. Recent tweets hit 888, and positive sentiment jumped to 80.95%.

According to AMBCrypto, the timing here matters.

On the chart, PEPE has retraced back to its early April 2024 support around $0.0000035. During that cycle, it triggered the memecoin’s massive near 152% rally, highlighting how quickly momentum can shift for memecoins.

Building on that, the memecoin’s Open Interest (OI) is moving north, adding nearly $30 million in fresh positions this week. That’s a 15% jump to $221 million, signaling renewed trader positioning for the next potential move.

Taken together, the case for a potential bottom is getting stronger. The question now: With PEPE down 40% this month, could this resilience flip into a classic bear trap, catching shorts off guard if momentum holds?

PEPE’s on-chain metrics hint at potential April-style breakout

On-chain metrics suggest a PEPE short squeeze could be coming.

To begin with, Arkham Intelligence recently flagged a clear divergence between spot and perpetual positions. PEPE’s Funding Rate has flipped negative, showing heavy shorting and traders betting on further downside.

Supporting this divergence, Santiment data shows the top 100 PEPE wallets have accumulated 23.02 trillion PEPE coins since the October crash. The effect is already visible, with PEPE/BTC up 4.3% intraday.

Taken together, this setup looks like a textbook bear trap.

Rising Open Interest, strong rotational flows, and heavy accumulation, all around historically key support, don’t happen by accident. With a negative funding rate in play, bulls are clearly putting shorts at risk.

If this trend holds in the coming days, PEPE could break through its near-term resistance at $0.0000065, potentially repeating its April-style surge. For investors, these on-chain metrics are becoming key signals to watch.


Final Thoughts

  • Rising Open Interest, heavy whale accumulation, and strong social activity signal growing bullish momentum.
  • Negative funding rates and on-chain divergences put shorts at risk, with the memecoin eyeing a breakout toward $0.0000065.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat key on-chain metrics suggest that a PEPE short squeeze could be imminent?

AThe key on-chain metrics suggesting a potential short squeeze include a negative Funding Rate indicating heavy shorting, a significant increase in Open Interest (up $30 million to $221 million), and substantial accumulation by the top 100 wallets (23.02 trillion PEPE coins since October).

QAccording to the article, what was the percentage of PEPE's rally in April 2024 that the current setup might repeat?

AThe article states that PEPE triggered a massive near 152% rally during its April 2024 cycle.

QWhat is the current positive sentiment percentage for PEPE based on social activity mentioned in the article?

AThe positive sentiment for PEPE jumped to 80.95% based on recent social activity.

QWhat critical support level has PEPE's price retraced to, which previously triggered its major rally?

APEPE has retraced back to its early April 2024 support level around $0.0000035.

QWhat is the near-term resistance level that the article suggests PEPE could break through for a potential surge?

AThe article suggests that PEPE could break through its near-term resistance at $0.0000065, potentially repeating its April-style surge.

İlgili Okumalar

From Robinhood to Polymarket: Is the Era of Integrating All Assets on a Single Platform Coming?

From Robinhood to Polymarket: The Era of All-in-One Asset Platforms Is Coming Asset classes are rapidly converging. Platforms that once specialized in single categories—such as stocks, cryptocurrencies, or prediction markets—are now moving toward offering all three. Robinhood pioneered this model, starting with equities, adding crypto in 2018, and prediction markets in 2025. This strategy has proven resilient: when crypto revenues fell, other segments like options and stocks filled the gap. Now, prediction market leaders Polymarket and Kalshi are moving in the same direction, both announcing perpetual futures trading on April 21, 2026, pending regulatory approval. These futures will cover assets like Bitcoin, gold, and stocks such as Nvidia. This trend mirrors the consolidation seen in consumer tech, like smartphones replacing dedicated cameras and MP3 players. Younger users, accustomed to interacting with multiple asset types from an early age, will increasingly demand unified platforms. A key competitive advantage in prediction markets is collateral utilization—idle assets locked during betting periods. Polymarket’s move into perpetuals may be a strategy to generate yield from that capital, similar to earlier DeFi integrations like PolyAave. As the regulatory landscape evolves, traditional finance is also likely to incorporate crypto and prediction markets, further accelerating this convergence.

marsbit7 dk önce

From Robinhood to Polymarket: Is the Era of Integrating All Assets on a Single Platform Coming?

marsbit7 dk önce

OpenAI Goes Left, DeepSeek Goes Right

On April 24, 2026, DeepSeek released V4, a Chinese large language model offering a free "million-token context window," enabling it to process vast amounts of data like entire books or years of corporate documents in one go. In contrast, OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, released around the same time, is more powerful but significantly more expensive, charging up to $180 per million output tokens. DeepSeek’s strategy represents a shift from a pure AI research firm to a heavy-infrastructure player, building data centers in Inner Mongolia’s Ulanqab to bypass U.S. chip export restrictions. This move, supported by Huawei’s Ascend chips and China’s cheap green electricity, highlights a fundamental divergence in AI development models: U.S. firms focus on high-cost, high-margin services, while Chinese players like DeepSeek prioritize accessibility and affordability. Facing intense talent poaching from tech giants, DeepSeek is seeking a $44 billion valuation funding round to retain researchers and scale infrastructure. Meanwhile, Chinese manufacturers are compressing AI models to run on smartphones, making AI accessible offline and across the Global South. Through open-source models and localized solutions, Chinese AI is empowering non-English speakers and low-income users, driving a form of "digital equality." While Silicon Valley builds walled gardens, DeepSeek and others are turning AI into a public utility—like tap water—flowing freely to those previously left behind.

marsbit33 dk önce

OpenAI Goes Left, DeepSeek Goes Right

marsbit33 dk önce

$292 Million KelpDAO Cross-Chain Bridge Hack: Who Should Foot the Bill?

On April 18, 2026, an attacker stole 116,500 rsETH (worth ~$292M) from KelpDAO’s cross-chain bridge in 46 minutes—the largest DeFi exploit of 2026. The stolen assets were deposited into Aave V3 as collateral, causing $177–200M in bad debt and triggering a cascade of losses across nine DeFi protocols. Aave’s TVL dropped by ~$6B overnight. This legal analysis argues that KelpDAO and LayerZero Labs share concurrent liability, with fault apportioned 60%/40%. KelpDAO negligently configured its bridge with a 1-of-1 decentralized verifier network (DVN)—a single point of failure—despite LayerZero’s explicit recommendation of a 2-of-3 setup. LayerZero, which operated the compromised DVN, failed to secure its RPC infrastructure against a known poisoning attack vector. Both protocols’ terms of service cap liability at $200 (KelpDAO) or $50 (LayerZero), but these limits are likely unenforceable due to unconscionability, gross negligence exceptions, and potential securities law invalidation (if rsETH is deemed a security under the Howey test). Aave’s governance also faces fiduciary duty claims for raising rsETH’s loan-to-value ratio to 93%—far above competitors’ 72–75%—without adequately assessing bridge risks, amplifying the systemic fallout. Practical recovery targets include LayerZero Labs (a registered Canadian entity), KelpDAO’s founders, auditors, and identifiable Aave governance delegates. The incident underscores escalating legal risks for DeFi protocols, infrastructure providers, and governance participants.

marsbit1 saat önce

$292 Million KelpDAO Cross-Chain Bridge Hack: Who Should Foot the Bill?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片