Conversation with CoinGecko CEO: Building a Crypto Data Platform from Scratch with $200, Regularly Evaluating Acquisition Intentions

marsbit2026-03-15 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-15 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Bobby Ong, co-founder and CEO of CoinGecko, built the cryptocurrency data platform from scratch with just $200 over 12 years, without venture capital. In a recent interview, he shared his journey into crypto in 2013, driven by an economics background and interest in Bitcoin's fixed supply and self-custody model. He remains optimistic about NFTs, viewing them as essential for tokenizing real-world assets, though he believes future crypto winners have yet to emerge. Ong discussed CoinGecko’s origins, including its name choice for being adaptable and fun, and highlighted the 2021 DeFi boom as a key growth driver, as the platform was early to track DeFi tokens. He explained the company’s decision to avoid VC funding, which fostered creativity and disciplined, low-cost marketing like SEO optimization. When comparing CoinGecko to competitor CoinMarketCap, Ong acknowledged CoinMarketCap’s stronger SEO due to earlier market entry but emphasized CoinGecko’s broader token coverage and data accuracy. He also addressed rumors about a potential $500 million sale, stating that while CoinGecko regularly evaluates strategic options, including acquisitions, there is no perfect timing for such decisions—it depends on the team and circumstances.

Source: When Shift Happens

Compiled by: Felix, PANews

Bobby Ong is the co-founder and CEO of the cryptocurrency data platform CoinGecko, which he built from scratch with $200 over 12 years without venture capital.

In the podcast, Bobby shared his personal experience and entrepreneurial journey, believing that CoinMarketCap's only advantage over CoinGecko is SEO, and responded to rumors of "selling at a $500 million valuation." The following are the highlights of the conversation.

Self-taught programming, entered the crypto field in 2013

Host: TM Lee was the CEO of CoinGecko for so many years. Why did you decide to swap roles with him?

Bobby Ong: Because both the crypto market and the company have reached a turning point. In the early days, it was like the "Wild West," but now large banks and institutions are entering, and the industry is changing for the better. Secondly, after 10 years of growth, CoinGecko has nearly 100 employees, and management direction requires leveraging different strengths. TM (former CEO) is a technical genius at heart. He now serves as president, focusing more on 0-to-1 R&D. I have taken over as CEO, responsible for the overall vision, operations, and direction, each playing to our strengths.

Host: What attracted you to the crypto field in 2013?

Bobby Ong: I have a background in economics. I studied economics at University College London, one of the best universities in the world for learning about money. I spent three years studying money, right after the big financial crisis. I was in university from 2009 to 2012, learning about bank runs, interest rate setting, federal deposit insurance, etc. However, after graduation, I saw the phenomenon of "negative interest rates" in reality, which shattered my understanding of textbook economics. So I quickly threw my university textbooks in the trash.

After graduation, I taught myself programming and spent a lot of time on tech forums. I learned about Bitcoin on the Hacker News forum. After reading the whitepaper, I tried to buy some Bitcoin. A few days later, the Bitcoin arrived, and I withdrew it to a self-custody wallet.

What really struck me at the time was: this is money I control myself. The money in your bank account isn't really yours; if the bank fails, your money is gone. What interested me more was Bitcoin's money supply: only 21 million coins, with a fixed supply. At that time, quantitative easing was happening, and the government was printing money to devalue the dollar. Who knows if the rules will change again in the future?

So the narrative of having hard money, digital gold, was very solid: the rules are written in stone and hard to change (unless everyone agrees). Also, in war-torn countries, many assets are real estate; you can't take them across the border, but Bitcoin can be carried in your pocket. For many people, this is a life-changing thing. Most of these traits still hold true today, even more so. So I think the foundation of cryptocurrency hasn't changed over the years.

Still bullish on NFTs, the big winners of future assets have yet to emerge

Host: What's the story with Pudgy Penguins?

Bobby Ong: One day I received an email saying they wanted me to invest in Pudgy Penguins. I am a big fan of NFTs. I had a call with Luca Netz and invested an amount. What I didn't know at the time was that Luca had been rejected by many VCs. I just wanted to support a fellow entrepreneur. He would be a winner in this space. I didn't know he faced so many challenges. For me, it was clear, but I guess not everyone had the same vision.

Host: What are your thoughts on NFTs in 2026?

Bobby Ong: Still bullish on NFTs. In this world of billions of tokens, a large portion will be non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Although NFTs seem to be in a downturn now, they will come back at some point. The vast majority of assets in the real world (such as real estate, contracts) are inherently non-fungible, and NFT technology is the inevitable choice for putting these assets on-chain.

Host: Who will be the winners of future asset appreciation?

Bobby Ong: I think it's something that hasn't appeared yet. Look at the tech industry: in 2000, you couldn't have imagined Uber or Airbnb. The Uber and Airbnb of crypto haven't arrived yet. Nowadays, companies grow to 1 billion users or $1 billion much faster than before. Old assets won't die; Bitcoin will always be around. But will Pudgy Penguins still be around in 5 years? Will CryptoPunks still be around? Who knows.

CryptoPunks is the first NFT series and may have historical artistic value. Pudgy Penguins ultimately depends on the team's execution. But there will always be new things in crypto, so you have to stay agile.

The DeFi explosion in 2021 was a turning point for the company

Host: Why the name CoinGecko? What was the early startup phase like?

Bobby Ong: In April 2014, I co-founded CoinGecko with TM Lee. At that time, crypto companies usually had very serious names like Coinbase or CoinDesk, but we wanted to use an animal name to add fun. We chose "Gecko" because geckos are adaptable, extremely fast, and widespread. We considered "CoinTeddy," but obviously, no one likes the bearish implication of "bear market."

In the first five years of the startup, to mitigate risk and fulfill a scholarship contract, I worked full-time in digital marketing until the crypto market exploded at the end of 2017, when I went full-time into CoinGecko. At that time, CoinGecko was extremely rudimentary, just a simple domain and basic server, scraping prices and social media data for a few hundred tokens, with almost no visual design.

Host: What was the turning point in development?

Bobby Ong: The turning point was the DeFi explosion in 2021. We did a lot that year, the most important being tracking the DeFi market. At that time, mainstream platforms didn't value long-tail assets on DEXs, while CoinGecko, by fully integrating on-chain data, tracked all DeFi tokens and gained a large number of users. At that time, CoinGecko was the only platform that could track these coins. We were ahead by 6-12 months, solidifying our position as the "go-to destination for crypto data."

No funding, forcing low-cost creative marketing

Host: Why not take VC money?

Bobby Ong: Early on, we talked to VCs, but no one really understood what cryptocurrency was, especially VCs here in Malaysia. Then we also went to the US. I talked to some people at Stanford and some in Silicon Valley, but they were a bit dismissive, thinking that making money from ads definitely wouldn't work. Well, if the Silicon Valley people themselves couldn't see it, there was nothing to be done. Of course, there must have been some VCs in Silicon Valley paying attention to this field.

We always kept operations lean. Bootstrapping was also interesting, like an experiment to see how far we could go without funding. I think not having financial resources was a creative constraint. It was a limitation we set for ourselves. The benefit was that no VCs forced us to spend at all costs to grow, but on the other hand, we had no cash.

So, how should we promote ourselves? How to do marketing? How to let the world know about CoinGecko without so much money? I couldn't go to conferences everywhere, sponsor parties, etc. I had to find low-cost, creative ways to promote us. This actually made our marketing team more disciplined. Optimizing search engine (SEO) was one important way we achieved growth at very low cost. Additionally, there were many other methods to help us grow quickly.

Host: What advice do you have on fundraising?

Bobby Ong: If you want to grow fast, go raise funds. But if you accept a slower pace of development, then you don't necessarily need to raise funds; you can develop at your own pace and control your own destiny. The benefit of not raising from VCs is that we never had to write any investor reports and didn't face any pressure from VCs.

If you need to grow fast or need to validate an idea, then raise funds. But it is advised to raise enough to reach a certain level and push the company to the next stage. However, raising too much money too early is not good because eventually, you will have too much money and lack discipline. You might have countless ways to squander the money, leading to over-hiring or doing all sorts of ridiculous things.

CoinMarketCap is strong in SEO, regularly evaluating investment choices

Host: How should users choose between CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko?

Bobby Ong: You need to understand the game rules of these two companies and how it affects users. We do what we think is good for the community and strive to provide users with the right data. Many users first discover CoinMarketCap through SEO, but after using it for a while, they find that CoinGecko's data is more accurate, covers more coins, and we have also started building Gecko Terminal, which includes even more coins, including all tokens on various DEXs on-chain. Many developers using our API also realize that reliability, accuracy, and uptime are stronger.

There are also subtle differences, like metadata, how we manage listings, how we check for updated information, etc. Ordinary users might not notice these, but industry insiders can immediately see the difference between CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap and the work we do.

Host: Where is CoinMarketCap stronger than CoinGecko?

Bobby Ong: They are definitely stronger than us in SEO. They started 11 months earlier than us, and they got a lot of media coverage. Generally, media coverage brings a lot of backlinks, which helps improve SEO ranking. Then, when journalists want to write an article next time, they search for the token, find CoinMarketCap, and start writing. So they built a virtuous cycle. We have been trying to surpass them in SEO, but it's not easy. This is one of their advantages; they have a very strong position in the existing market.

Host: There have been recent rumors that CoinGecko might sell for $500 million. What are your thoughts on this?

Bobby Ong: CoinGecko is a profitable, independent, and bootstrapped company. We often evaluate our strategic options, like whether to raise funds in the early stages. The discussion now might be slightly different because the industry is constantly changing. We are looking for opportunities, seeing what's on the market, seeing what choices there are, and then seeing how best to position CoinGecko to make it better, stronger, and provide the best products and services for our users and customers in the coming years. We don't comment on specific cases like this, but what I mean is, we regularly evaluate various options.

Host: When is the best time to sell?

Bobby Ong: There is never a so-called best time to sell. Timing also depends somewhat on luck. Ultimately, it depends on the co-founders, founders, or founding team, and what is right. And, ultimately, companies are acquired, not sold.

Related reading: CoinGecko seeks sale: The end of the era of independent crypto data

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was the initial investment and funding strategy for CoinGecko, as shared by CEO Bobby Ong?

ABobby Ong started CoinGecko with an initial investment of $200 and built it over 12 years without any venture capital funding. The company has been self-funded and profitable, allowing it to operate independently and avoid external pressure from investors.

QAccording to Bobby Ong, what is the main advantage that CoinMarketCap has over CoinGecko?

ABobby Ong stated that CoinMarketCap's main advantage over CoinGecko is its superior Search Engine Optimization (SEO). They started 11 months earlier and received extensive media coverage, which generated many backlinks and helped them establish a strong position in search rankings.

QWhat does Bobby Ong identify as the turning point for CoinGecko's growth and why?

AThe turning point for CoinGecko was the DeFi explosion in 2021. CoinGecko was the first platform to comprehensively track DeFi tokens from various decentralized exchanges (DEXs), giving it a 6-12 month lead over competitors and solidifying its position as the go-to destination for crypto data.

QHow does Bobby Ong view the future of NFTs and which type of assets does he believe will be the big winners?

ABobby Ong remains bullish on NFTs, believing that a significant portion of the multi-billion token world will be non-fungible tokens (NFTs). He thinks the big winners in future asset appreciation have not yet emerged, comparing it to how tech giants like Uber and Airbnb were unknown in 2000, and emphasizes that the crypto space will continue to innovate with new projects.

QWhat is Bobby Ong's response to the rumor about CoinGecko potentially being sold for $500 million?

ABobby Ong did not confirm the specific rumor but stated that CoinGecko is a profitable, independent, and self-funded company. He mentioned that they regularly evaluate strategic options, including potential acquisitions, to position CoinGecko for future growth and better serve their users and clients, but they do not comment on specific cases.

İlgili Okumalar

Blocked Its Own Treasure, WeChat AI Steps Up

Tencent's stock surged over 10% on June 2nd amid reports that WeChat, with 1.43 billion monthly users, is finalizing tests for a native AI Agent. The reported feature, accessible by swiping right from the main interface, allows users to issue commands in natural language. The AI then decomposes tasks and automatically calls upon relevant Mini Programs within WeChat to complete actions like ordering food, booking tickets, or making payments, creating a closed-loop service execution system. This strategic shift follows the internal conflict and subsequent "blocking" of Tencent's standalone AI app, Yuanbao, by WeChat for violating sharing rules during a 2026 Spring Festival promotion. The incident highlighted a lack of internal consensus and exposed the weakness of competing in the standalone AI assistant arena against rivals like ByteDance's Doubao (345M MAU) and Alibaba's Qianwen. The new WeChat AI Agent aims to leverage WeChat's unique assets—its massive user base, standardized Mini Program APIs, WeChat Pay, and identity system—to move from simple content generation to actual task execution. Analysts note this changes the competitive landscape from model benchmarks to which AI can connect to more real-world services. However, success depends on key variables: the capability of Tencent's underlying Hunyuan model, managing massive inference costs, and redesigning incentives for Mini Program developers whose traffic might be bypassed. The move is seen as an attempt to keep user service intent within WeChat's ecosystem as AI begins to redefine how users access services.

marsbit1 dk önce

Blocked Its Own Treasure, WeChat AI Steps Up

marsbit1 dk önce

ByteDance Adopts Arm CPUs, Jensen Huang: So Sad I Didn't Buy Arm

**Summary:** At Computex 2026, Arm CEO Rene Haas announced that ByteDance and Oracle have adopted Arm's self-designed Arm AGI data center CPU. The company expects significant revenue growth from this product, projecting $20 billion in demand for the 2027/2028 fiscal years. Haas noted that restricting AI-capable CPUs from the US to China is nearly impossible due to their widespread applications. Arm's stock has surged dramatically this year, notably rising 16% after NVIDIA's Arm-based Vera CPU and RTX Spark announcements. A highlight was the informal, humorous on-stage conversation between Haas and NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang. Huang joked about NVIDIA's failed attempt to acquire Arm and playfully lamented selling his Arm shares. Both executives showed a clear sense of camaraderie and shared regret over the missed merger. Key technical topics were discussed: 1. **AI PC Design:** Huang explained NVIDIA's RTX Spark superchip (with a 20-core Arm CPU) is designed for future AI agents that will autonomously run and use tools on PCs, blending local and cloud processing. 2. **Agent vs. OS:** Huang emphasized the operating system remains crucial, as AI agents rely on its APIs and tools to function. 3. **Growth Constraints:** He identified the shift to "useful AI" that generates profitable tokens as a primary driver for immense, almost limitless, computational demand. Haas outlined Arm's strategy across PC and data centers. For PCs, Arm collaborates with partners like NVIDIA and MediaTek, offering its compute subsystem (CSS) for custom SoCs. In data centers, its Arm AGI CPU (built on TSMC's 3nm process) has gained major partners including OpenAI, Meta, and now ByteDance and Oracle. Arm presented a multi-year roadmap for its in-house CPU line. The article concludes that while GPUs dominated the AI training race, the explosion of AI agents is shifting significant focus to CPUs for inference, state management, and tool orchestration. The industry is trending towards vertical integration, with companies like cloud providers designing chips and chip/IP firms offering full solutions, all competing to deliver more efficient computing per watt.

marsbit22 dk önce

ByteDance Adopts Arm CPUs, Jensen Huang: So Sad I Didn't Buy Arm

marsbit22 dk önce

New Wall Street Play: Yen Shorts Still Adding, But Japan Stocks Don't Rely on Carry Trade Unwinding

On June 3rd, USD/JPY hit 160.44, its highest level since July 2024, while the Nikkei 225 surged past 68,000 points. Contrary to popular narratives of an imminent "carry trade unwind" akin to August 2024, data reveals a more complex picture. Speculative net short positions in yen futures have actually increased, reaching -114,667 contracts by late May, suggesting traders are doubling down rather than retreating. Meanwhile, Japan's Finance Ministry conducted its largest-ever single-round FX intervention (11.73 trillion yen) in April-May but failed to hold the 160 yen line. The Nikkei's rally is not driven by carry trade dynamics. Foreign investors are aggressively buying Japanese stocks, with net purchases in 2026 running nearly 16 times higher than 2025 levels. This inflow is concentrated in AI and semiconductor-related stocks like SoftBank and Socionext, fueled by positive sector outlooks, rather than being a flight from unwinding yen shorts. Furthermore, the Nikkei has continued climbing despite the Bank of Japan's (BOJ) rate hikes to 0.75%. This disconnect exists because the current equity boom is fueled by AI-driven foreign investment, not reliant on cheap yen funding. However, this relationship remains fragile. Should the BOJ hike rates further (e.g., to 1.0%) while dollar weakness increases carry trade costs, the trajectories of the yen and Japanese stocks could reconverge, potentially triggering volatility.

marsbit26 dk önce

New Wall Street Play: Yen Shorts Still Adding, But Japan Stocks Don't Rely on Carry Trade Unwinding

marsbit26 dk önce

Broadcom's Q3 Guidance Misses Expectations by $12 Billion, After-Hours Trading Plummets Over 13%, AI Narrative "Cooling"?

On June 3, Broadcom released record Q2 FY26 results with revenue of $22.19B, up 48% YoY, and AI chip sales of $10.8B, up 143%. Adjusted EPS of $2.44 beat estimates. However, its Q3 AI semiconductor revenue guidance of $16B, while up over 200% YoY, fell roughly $1.2B (7%) short of analyst consensus expectations of $17.2B. This miss, coupled with slightly weaker-than-expected software revenue, triggered a severe market reaction. CEO Hock Tan maintained the FY26 AI revenue outlook of over $100B but did not raise it, disappointing investors who had priced in more robust growth. The stock plummeted over 13% in after-hours trading, erasing roughly $270B in market cap. The sell-off extended to peers like Marvell. A key concern for markets, particularly for Chinese optical module suppliers, was Tan's comment that the contribution of AI networking (e.g., Ethernet switches, optical interconnect chips) to AI revenue, currently near 40%, is expected to normalize to around 30% over time, signaling a potential peak in growth for that segment. Despite the guidance shortfall, Tan reiterated that AI demand remains "insatiable" and reaffirmed the long-term target of exceeding $100B in AI revenue by FY27. The reaction highlights the heightened sensitivity and premium valuation placed on AI-exposed stocks, where anything less than stellar guidance can prompt significant profit-taking. The broader question is whether this represents a cooling AI narrative or a correction in overstretched valuations.

marsbit26 dk önce

Broadcom's Q3 Guidance Misses Expectations by $12 Billion, After-Hours Trading Plummets Over 13%, AI Narrative "Cooling"?

marsbit26 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片