Coinbase Users Locked Out: Unable To Buy, Sell, Or Transfer Crypto

bitcoinist2026-02-12 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-12 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Coinbase experienced a significant service disruption on Wednesday, preventing users from buying, selling, or transferring cryptocurrency. The outage occurred just before the company's Q4 2025 earnings report, causing its stock (COIN) to drop 8% to $140. Coinbase acknowledged the issue on social media, deployed a fix, and assured users that funds were secure, but did not disclose the root cause. Ahead of earnings, Monness Crespi double-downgraded COIN from buy to sell, citing a $120 price target and predicting continued weakness in the crypto market.

Cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase (COIN) experienced an unexpected service disruption on Wednesday, just hours before the company is scheduled to report its fourth‐quarter 2025 earnings.

The outage left users temporarily unable to buy, sell, or transfer digital assets on the platform, triggering concern among customers and adding pressure to the company’s stock.

Platform Disruption Hits Coinbase

In a post on X (previously Twitter) Coinbase acknowledged the issue, stating that some customers were unable to conduct transactions on the platform. The company assured users that it was investigating the problem and emphasized that customer funds remained secure.

Shortly afterward, Coinbase Support announced that a fix had been deployed and that teams were monitoring the platform to ensure services were fully restored. However, the company did not provide details about the root cause of the disruption or explain what led to the interruption in trading activity.

Coinbase shares (COIN) fell sharply during Wednesday’s trading session. As of this writing, the stock is trading at $140, marking an 8% decline over the past several hours. The drop comes as analysts prepare for what many expect to be a challenging fourth‐quarter report.

The daily chart shows COIN’s valuation drop. Source: COIN on TradingView.com

$120 Price Target Issued For COIN

Research firm Monness Crespi took a notably cautious stance ahead of the earnings announcement. The firm issued a double downgrade on Coinbase stock, moving its rating from buy to sell.

Analyst Gus Gala described earlier expectations of a steady recovery through 2026 as “foolish,” citing the historical depth and duration of crypto bear markets.

Monness Crespi now anticipates continued weakness through the first half of the year and has revised its 2026 and 2027 projections to levels below Wall Street consensus estimates. Gala also set a $120 price target for the stock, suggesting that more attractive entry points may emerge later.

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was the main issue that Coinbase users experienced according to the article?

ACoinbase users were temporarily unable to buy, sell, or transfer digital assets on the platform due to an unexpected service disruption.

QWhat action did Coinbase take to address the service disruption?

ACoinbase acknowledged the issue on X, investigated the problem, deployed a fix, and had teams monitoring the platform to ensure services were fully restored.

QHow did the service disruption affect Coinbase's stock (COIN) price?

ACoinbase shares fell sharply, trading at $140 and marking an 8% decline during Wednesday's trading session.

QWhich research firm issued a double downgrade and a $120 price target for Coinbase stock?

AResearch firm Monness Crespi issued a double downgrade, moving its rating from buy to sell, and set a $120 price target for the stock.

QWhat reason did analyst Gus Gala give for the cautious stance on Coinbase's recovery expectations?

AAnalyst Gus Gala described earlier expectations of a steady recovery as 'foolish,' citing the historical depth and duration of crypto bear markets.

İlgili Okumalar

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

**Summary:** A growing "anti-college" movement is gaining traction among elite circles in Silicon Valley, challenging the traditional value of a four-year university degree. Proponents argue that college has become an expensive, slow, and increasingly irrelevant waste of time, especially in the fast-paced tech world where opportunities pass by quickly. The movement is led by figures like billionaire Peter Thiel, who criticizes universities for high costs, ideological indoctrination, and stifling true innovation. His "Thiel Fellowship" pays young people to drop out and pursue ventures. Companies like Palantir Technologies (co-founded by Thiel) fuel this trend with programs like the "Meritocracy Fellowship," which offers high school graduates paid internships as an alternative to immediate college enrollment, promising a practical "Palantir Degree." Key drivers include: 1. **Economics:** Skyrocketing student debt versus the allure of immediate, high-paying tech jobs or startup funding. 2. **Technology:** AI and online tools lowering barriers to self-education and product development, making formal instruction seem inefficient. 3. **Culture:** A backlash against perceived "woke" ideology and DEI policies in universities, coupled with a belief that these institutions suppress meritocracy and masculine drive. The movement is notably male-dominated. Critics, like economist David Deming, warn against overgeneralizing from dropout success stories (survivorship bias). He emphasizes that genuine autodidacts are rare, corporate training is narrowly focused, and the "college wage premium" remains high for most people. University liberal arts education, he argues, builds adaptable problem-solving skills and broad perspectives. The debate highlights a deeper crisis in education. The core model of the modern university appears increasingly mismatched with the speed of the information age. The movement signals a shift in the locus of learning from institutional "education" to personal, active "learning" powered by the internet and AI. Ultimately, this may not mean the end of university, but rather a painful evolution. The future likely holds more hybrid, personalized, and lifelong learning pathways. The central question becomes: in a world changing faster than any curriculum, how do we best learn?

marsbit1 dk önce

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

marsbit1 dk önce

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

The commercialization of generative AI is facing a critical inflection point as a potential price war looms. According to The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI is considering a significant cut to its token fees to compete with rival Anthropic, signaling a shift from a growth-at-all-costs model focused on token consumption. This move comes as both companies, reportedly losing billions on compute, prepare for IPOs, and as enterprise customers face "bill shock" from switching to usage-based token billing. Reports indicate poor ROI, with one analysis finding only 18 cents of every dollar spent on AI tokens generates user-facing value. The industry's initial phases—from flat-rate subscriptions to aggressive subsidies—have given way to a reckoning with real costs. Analysts debate the future: some predict a bifurcation between premium, high-cost models for complex tasks and cheaper alternatives for routine work, while others believe overall spending will still rise as agentic AI increases tokens per task. Notably, Chinese model DeepSeek's low-cost API is gaining traction with U.S. enterprises, adding competitive pressure. The core challenge is redefining value beyond token volume ("tokenmaxxing") toward measurable productivity ("valuemaxxing"), as the entire AI value chain, from cloud providers to chipmakers, feels the ripple effects of unsustainable pricing.

marsbit5 dk önce

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

marsbit5 dk önce

The Bitcoin 400-Day Cycle: Historical Performance Shows How Low The Bottom Goes

A crypto analyst forecasts a continued Bitcoin bear market, predicting a potential price bottom around October 2026 based on a historical 400-day cycle pattern. The analysis suggests Bitcoin is currently 252 days into a bear phase that typically lasts 364-400 days, indicating another 112-148 days of downward pressure. The projected cycle low could be around $30,000, representing a more than 75% decline from recent all-time highs near $126,000. The analyst dismisses arguments that current market factors like ETFs make this cycle different, noting the pattern has held for over a decade. Another expert aligns, forecasting a bottom between $30,000-$40,000 by late Q3 or early Q4 2026 and rejecting the possibility of Bitcoin reaching $100,000 this year.

bitcoinist24 dk önce

The Bitcoin 400-Day Cycle: Historical Performance Shows How Low The Bottom Goes

bitcoinist24 dk önce

Hedgeye’s New Bitcoin ETF Filing Targets One Of BTC’s Biggest Problems

Hedgeye has filed for a "Hedged Bitcoin" ETF, ticker HBIT, designed to offer Bitcoin exposure with reduced volatility. The fund would hold spot Bitcoin ETFs while using an options strategy, guided by Hedgeye's proprietary "Risk Range" signals, to manage downside risk. This approach aims to provide a smoother investment experience, particularly during market downturns, but the filing notes it may also limit upside potential during strong rallies. The strategy involves buying and writing both standardized and customizable FLEX options. The registration with the SEC is pending, and the proposal represents a growing trend of crypto products focused on altering Bitcoin's risk/return profile rather than simply tracking its price.

bitcoinist1 saat önce

Hedgeye’s New Bitcoin ETF Filing Targets One Of BTC’s Biggest Problems

bitcoinist1 saat önce

Is Dogecoin Dead Or Could The SpaceX IPO Lead To A Revival?

Dogecoin is facing doubts about its future as its price hovers near multi-year lows and investor enthusiasm wanes. Lacking its previous narrative momentum and with modest institutional ETF inflows, it has struggled alongside the broader meme-coin downturn. However, the upcoming SpaceX IPO, seeking a massive $1.75 trillion valuation, is generating discussion as a potential catalyst. While the IPO has no direct link to Dogecoin, the event will refocus global attention on Elon Musk, whose past endorsements have significantly boosted the cryptocurrency. Some investors see this renewed spotlight as a chance for revived interest, though it remains uncertain if attention alone can drive a sustained recovery amid ongoing market challenges.

bitcoinist3 saat önce

Is Dogecoin Dead Or Could The SpaceX IPO Lead To A Revival?

bitcoinist3 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures