Coinbase CPO Lists 5 Critical Errors US Congress Should Avoid In Stablecoin Regulation

bitcoinist2026-03-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-11 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Coinbase Chief Policy Officer Faryar Shirzad outlines five key mistakes US Congress should avoid in stablecoin regulation. He warns against undermining bipartisan goals of the GENIUS Act, which aims to strengthen the US dollar, boost demand for Treasuries, and keep digital innovation onshore. Shirzad cautions against favoring traditional banks with unverified claims about deposit flight risks, as stablecoins benefit consumers and banks alike. He also emphasizes the need for precise regulatory authority to prevent future misuse and avoid disrupting existing lawful business partnerships. Finally, he urges Congress to consider the voices of millions of crypto investors, not just bank lobbyists, and to enact clear rules that foster innovation in the US rather than driving it abroad.

After the country’s first stablecoin bill (the GENIUS Act) passed last year, the proposed crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act, faced significant delays in the US Congress, particularly due to growing opposition from the traditional banking sector.

In this climate, Coinbase’s Chief Policy Officer, Faryar Shirzad, has outlined five critical recommendations on what Congress should avoid when it comes to regulating stablecoins.

Coinbase CPO Urges Congress Not To Favor Banks

First, Shirzad cautioned against undermining the bipartisan goals established in the country’s stablecoin legislation, which was signed into law last year by President Donald Trump.

He stated that the GENIUS Act aims to strengthen the US dollar, increase demand for US Treasuries, and encourage digital asset innovation within the United States, rather than allowing this innovation to migrate to other countries, such as China.

Coinbase’s CPO said that any amendments to the rewards framework should reinforce these goals, not diminish them.

Shirzad also highlighted the importance of consumer interests, warning against legislative measures that might extract funds from consumers based on unverified claims regarding deposit flight risks.

He noted that stablecoins are designed to make transactions faster and more affordable, with banks themselves being among the foremost adopters.

Revisiting settled laws to favor banks and potentially hamper non-bank platforms would represent poor public policy, especially if rooted in unreliable premises, Shirzad claimed.

Potential Pitfalls For Stablecoins

The Coinbase official also emphasized the need for precise regulatory authority, advising Congress not to introduce vague enforcement powers that could be misused in the future.

Ambiguous regulations could allow succeeding administrations to undermine Congress’s original intent, which could inadvertently lead to the prohibition of lawful activities in the space. Therefore, Shirzad urged lawmakers to establish clear statutory guidelines that provide firm boundaries for any regulations.

Another critical point raised by Shirzad pertains to the need for legislation that does not disrupt existing lawful businesses. He claimed that the stablecoin ecosystem currently involves partnerships among issuers, platforms, and technology providers.

Coinbase’s CPO further claimed that any new legislation should set guidelines for the future rather than retroactively invalidate legitimate commercial agreements or target specific companies.

Finally, Shirzad called for Congress to listen to the voices of voters. While bank executives hold considerable political sway in Washington, he stated that ‘tens of millions of Americans” are invested in cryptocurrencies, and their opinions should carry equal weight. The Coinbase executive concluded:

Stablecoins strengthen the dollar, increase demand for U.S. Treasuries, and modernize payments. They’re also going to be a big commercial opportunity for banks of all sizes. Congress should focus on clear rules that allow innovation to grow in America — not policies that push it offshore.

The daily chart shows Coinbase’s stock, COIN, inching closer to $200 on Tuesday’s trading session. Source: COIN on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

İlgili Sorular

QWhat are the five critical recommendations that Coinbase's CPO outlined for Congress regarding stablecoin regulation?

AThe five recommendations are: 1) Not to undermine the bipartisan goals of the GENIUS Act, 2) Avoid legislative measures that extract funds from consumers based on unverified claims, 3) Not to introduce vague enforcement powers, 4) Ensure legislation does not disrupt existing lawful businesses, and 5) Listen to the voices of voters invested in crypto.

QAccording to the article, what is the primary purpose of the GENIUS Act as stated by Faryar Shirzad?

AThe primary purpose of the GENIUS Act is to strengthen the US dollar, increase demand for US Treasuries, and encourage digital asset innovation within the United States to prevent this innovation from migrating to other countries.

QWhy does Shirzad warn against introducing vague enforcement powers in stablecoin regulation?

AHe warns that ambiguous regulations could allow future administrations to misuse these powers, undermine Congress's original intent, and potentially lead to the prohibition of lawful activities in the crypto space.

QWhat potential negative outcome does Shirzad associate with legislation that favors traditional banks over non-bank platforms?

AHe claims that revisiting settled laws to favor banks would represent poor public policy, as it could hamper non-bank platforms and be based on unreliable premises like unverified claims of deposit flight risks.

QWhat key benefits of stablecoins does the Coinbase executive highlight in his concluding statement?

AHe states that stablecoins strengthen the dollar, increase demand for U.S. Treasuries, modernize payments, and represent a significant commercial opportunity for banks of all sizes.

İlgili Okumalar

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit15 dk önce

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit15 dk önce

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit24 dk önce

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit24 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片