Coinbase CPO Lists 5 Critical Errors US Congress Should Avoid In Stablecoin Regulation

bitcoinist2026-03-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-11 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Coinbase Chief Policy Officer Faryar Shirzad outlines five key mistakes US Congress should avoid in stablecoin regulation. He warns against undermining bipartisan goals of the GENIUS Act, which aims to strengthen the US dollar, boost demand for Treasuries, and keep digital innovation onshore. Shirzad cautions against favoring traditional banks with unverified claims about deposit flight risks, as stablecoins benefit consumers and banks alike. He also emphasizes the need for precise regulatory authority to prevent future misuse and avoid disrupting existing lawful business partnerships. Finally, he urges Congress to consider the voices of millions of crypto investors, not just bank lobbyists, and to enact clear rules that foster innovation in the US rather than driving it abroad.

After the country’s first stablecoin bill (the GENIUS Act) passed last year, the proposed crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act, faced significant delays in the US Congress, particularly due to growing opposition from the traditional banking sector.

In this climate, Coinbase’s Chief Policy Officer, Faryar Shirzad, has outlined five critical recommendations on what Congress should avoid when it comes to regulating stablecoins.

Coinbase CPO Urges Congress Not To Favor Banks

First, Shirzad cautioned against undermining the bipartisan goals established in the country’s stablecoin legislation, which was signed into law last year by President Donald Trump.

He stated that the GENIUS Act aims to strengthen the US dollar, increase demand for US Treasuries, and encourage digital asset innovation within the United States, rather than allowing this innovation to migrate to other countries, such as China.

Coinbase’s CPO said that any amendments to the rewards framework should reinforce these goals, not diminish them.

Shirzad also highlighted the importance of consumer interests, warning against legislative measures that might extract funds from consumers based on unverified claims regarding deposit flight risks.

He noted that stablecoins are designed to make transactions faster and more affordable, with banks themselves being among the foremost adopters.

Revisiting settled laws to favor banks and potentially hamper non-bank platforms would represent poor public policy, especially if rooted in unreliable premises, Shirzad claimed.

Potential Pitfalls For Stablecoins

The Coinbase official also emphasized the need for precise regulatory authority, advising Congress not to introduce vague enforcement powers that could be misused in the future.

Ambiguous regulations could allow succeeding administrations to undermine Congress’s original intent, which could inadvertently lead to the prohibition of lawful activities in the space. Therefore, Shirzad urged lawmakers to establish clear statutory guidelines that provide firm boundaries for any regulations.

Another critical point raised by Shirzad pertains to the need for legislation that does not disrupt existing lawful businesses. He claimed that the stablecoin ecosystem currently involves partnerships among issuers, platforms, and technology providers.

Coinbase’s CPO further claimed that any new legislation should set guidelines for the future rather than retroactively invalidate legitimate commercial agreements or target specific companies.

Finally, Shirzad called for Congress to listen to the voices of voters. While bank executives hold considerable political sway in Washington, he stated that ‘tens of millions of Americans” are invested in cryptocurrencies, and their opinions should carry equal weight. The Coinbase executive concluded:

Stablecoins strengthen the dollar, increase demand for U.S. Treasuries, and modernize payments. They’re also going to be a big commercial opportunity for banks of all sizes. Congress should focus on clear rules that allow innovation to grow in America — not policies that push it offshore.

The daily chart shows Coinbase’s stock, COIN, inching closer to $200 on Tuesday’s trading session. Source: COIN on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

İlgili Sorular

QWhat are the five critical recommendations that Coinbase's CPO outlined for Congress regarding stablecoin regulation?

AThe five recommendations are: 1) Not to undermine the bipartisan goals of the GENIUS Act, 2) Avoid legislative measures that extract funds from consumers based on unverified claims, 3) Not to introduce vague enforcement powers, 4) Ensure legislation does not disrupt existing lawful businesses, and 5) Listen to the voices of voters invested in crypto.

QAccording to the article, what is the primary purpose of the GENIUS Act as stated by Faryar Shirzad?

AThe primary purpose of the GENIUS Act is to strengthen the US dollar, increase demand for US Treasuries, and encourage digital asset innovation within the United States to prevent this innovation from migrating to other countries.

QWhy does Shirzad warn against introducing vague enforcement powers in stablecoin regulation?

AHe warns that ambiguous regulations could allow future administrations to misuse these powers, undermine Congress's original intent, and potentially lead to the prohibition of lawful activities in the crypto space.

QWhat potential negative outcome does Shirzad associate with legislation that favors traditional banks over non-bank platforms?

AHe claims that revisiting settled laws to favor banks would represent poor public policy, as it could hamper non-bank platforms and be based on unreliable premises like unverified claims of deposit flight risks.

QWhat key benefits of stablecoins does the Coinbase executive highlight in his concluding statement?

AHe states that stablecoins strengthen the dollar, increase demand for U.S. Treasuries, modernize payments, and represent a significant commercial opportunity for banks of all sizes.

İlgili Okumalar

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbit23 dk önce

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbit23 dk önce

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbit1 saat önce

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片