CLARITY Act Gains Momentum as SEC, CFTC Align and Senate Advances Crypto Rules

ccn.com2026-02-18 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-18 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

U.S. lawmakers and regulators are advancing efforts to establish a clearer regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. The CLARITY Act (Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025), which has passed the House and gained reported White House backing, aims to resolve the long-standing jurisdictional stalemate between the SEC and CFTC. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has urged Congress to pass the bill "this spring." Key developments include the Senate Agriculture Committee advancing its own market-structure bill, which builds upon the CLARITY Act. Furthermore, SEC Chair Paul Atkins announced that the SEC and CFTC are coordinating through "Project Crypto" to develop a clearer token classification approach, serving as a bridge until legislation is enacted. The push seeks to provide predictability for crypto exchanges, brokers, and issuers by defining regulatory oversight and reducing reliance on enforcement-driven interpretations. The end goal is a negotiated legislative package that creates a more stable and defined U.S. crypto framework.

Key Takeaways
  • Reported White House backing is refocusing attention on the CLARITY Act as Congress debates crypto market structure.
  • SEC Chair Paul Atkins said the SEC and CFTC are coordinating via “Project Crypto” as a bridge toward legislation.
  • The Senate Agriculture Committee advanced a separate market-structure bill it says builds on the House-passed CLARITY Act.

U.S. lawmakers and regulators are ramping up the push for a clearer crypto rulebook as the Senate advances market-structure legislation and the SEC signals deeper coordination with the CFTC ahead of potential reforms.

According to reports, the White House is backing the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (H.R. 3633) , framing the move as an attempt to break the SEC–CFTC stalemate that has shaped crypto oversight for years.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Feb. 13 that Congress should pass CLARITY “this spring,” as the administration pushes for a clearer market structure for digital assets.

Try Our Recommended Crypto Exchanges
Sponsored
Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Bitget

promotions
New user rewards up to 6,200 USDT.
Coins
89
Claim Offer

Bitunix

promotions
Receive up to $100,000 worth of exclusive gifts for newcomers upon registration.
Coins
151
Claim Offer

ChangeNow

promotions
Receive 0.4% of the volume from each transaction with your referral link.
Coins
217
Claim Offer
Explore All Offers

House Passed CLARITY Act, Senate Is Next

The CLARITY Act is already a House product.

The bill text on Congress.gov lays out a framework for regulating digital assets across the SEC and CFTC, with the core objective of clarifying who oversees what in U.S. spot markets.

That makes the Senate the next gate: committee markups, cross-committee negotiations, and whether leadership schedules a market-structure package for a floor vote.

What the Bill Would Change

The bill is designed to reduce the industry’s reliance on enforcement-driven interpretation by creating clearer categories and compliance expectations for intermediaries.

For exchanges, brokers, issuers, and market makers, the prize is predictability.

This means fewer gray-zone listing decisions and a more stable understanding of which regulator is in charge of which activity.

SEC and CFTC Say They’re Coordinating

At a House hearing on Feb. 11, 2026, SEC Chair Paul S. Atkins told lawmakers he supports Congress enacting the CLARITY Act.

He described a joint SEC–CFTC effort dubbed “Project Crypto.”

Atkins said the effort would work toward a clearer token classification approach and would serve as a bridge while legislation moves through Congress.

That coordination matters because implementation is often where market-structure bills bog down.

When agencies start aligning publicly, it signals they expect something durable to emerge from Capitol Hill.

Senate Agriculture Advances a Parallel Framework

The Senate Agriculture Committee said on Jan. 29, 2026, it advanced the Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act.

They describe it as legislation that builds on the House-passed CLARITY Act and incorporates provisions negotiated with Senate Democrats.

The takeaway is that the Senate is not starting from scratch.

The likely endgame is a negotiated package that uses CLARITY as the backbone, with Senate-side additions to secure votes and address consumer-protection concerns.

What To Watch Next

The near-term catalysts are procedural: Senate committee markups, Banking–Agriculture coordination, and whether leadership gives market structure floor time.

For now, the direction of travel is clearer than it has been in years: reported White House backing, active Senate drafting, and explicit SEC–CFTC coordination are all pointing toward a more defined U.S. crypto framework, just not on a fixed timeline yet.

Top Picks for Bitcoin
  • Best Exchanges for Bitcoin Get A Great Offer When You Join These Exchanges
  • Buy Bitcoin Fast & Easy How To Buy Bitcoin With a Credit Card Now
  • Best Online Casinos for Bitcoin See Our Picks for the Best Crypto Gambling Sites

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main purpose of the CLARITY Act (H.R. 3633) as discussed in the article?

AThe main purpose of the CLARITY Act is to create a clearer regulatory framework for digital assets by defining the oversight roles of the SEC and CFTC, thereby breaking the regulatory stalemate and providing more predictable compliance expectations for crypto market intermediaries like exchanges and brokers.

QWhat is 'Project Crypto' and which regulatory chairs are involved in it?

A'Project Crypto' is a joint coordination effort between the SEC and CFTC, mentioned by SEC Chair Paul Atkins. It aims to develop a clearer approach to token classification and serve as a bridge while comprehensive crypto legislation moves through Congress.

QWhich Senate committee has advanced a bill related to the CLARITY Act, and what is it called?

AThe Senate Agriculture Committee has advanced a related bill called the Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act, which is described as building upon the House-passed CLARITY Act and incorporates provisions negotiated with Senate Democrats.

QAccording to the article, what did Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent say about the timeline for passing the CLARITY Act?

ATreasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on February 13 that Congress should pass the CLARITY Act 'this spring,' as the administration pushes for a clearer market structure for digital assets.

QWhat key benefit does the article suggest the CLARITY Act would provide for crypto exchanges and market participants?

AThe article suggests the CLARITY Act would provide greater predictability for crypto exchanges, brokers, and market makers by reducing reliance on enforcement-driven interpretation, creating clearer regulatory categories, and establishing a more definitive understanding of which regulator oversees which market activity.

İlgili Okumalar

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit1 saat önce

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit1 saat önce

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit1 saat önce

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit1 saat önce

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit2 saat önce

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit2 saat önce

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit3 saat önce

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit3 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片