Chainlink eyes DeFi dominance? Assessing $70B TVS, ETF inflows & more…

ambcrypto2026-01-29 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-29 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Despite the 2025 market cycle's hype, institutional investors appear hesitant towards "fundamentals-led" narratives, as seen with Ethereum's price decline despite strong on-chain activity. A clear divergence emerged in ETF flows, with Chainlink's Grayscale ETF (GLNK) attracting $4.05 million in inflows while Ethereum's saw significant outflows. Chainlink's ETF inflows even outpaced Dogecoin's, despite its smaller market cap, suggesting institutional interest may be driven by fundamentals rather than short-term speculation. This is supported by Chainlink's growing role in DeFi, including its integration into Korea's stablecoin expansion via the Global Alliance for KRW Stablecoins (GAKS) and a record $70 billion in Total Value Secured (TVS). These factors position Chainlink as a key infrastructure player, attracting institutional capital based on adoption, trust, and real-world utility.

Despite all the hype in the 2025 cycle, it doesn’t look like institutions are fully buying the “fundamentals-led” story.

Take Ethereum, for example: Down 11% in 2025, and still it saw strong on-chain activity.

For context, the Fuska and Pecta upgrades cut fees and eased congestion, with daily transactions even hitting a record 2.3 million, showing that the upgrades have started delivering results in the 2026 cycle so far.

Still, big money isn’t really showing up.

On-chain strength, institutional hesitation

ETF flows saw nearly $664 million in outflows this week alone. In contrast, Chainlink’s [LINK] Grayscale ETF (GLNK) pulled in $4.05 million in inflows, marking a clear divergence.

To put that in perspective, Ethereum’s [ETH] Grayscale Spot ETF (ETHE) saw $52 million in outflows over the same period. For Layer-1s, that kind of divergence in institutional flows doesn’t look like a short-term rotation.

Building on that, SoSoValue data showed an even clearer contrast.

Chainlink’s ETF flows continue to outpace Dogecoin’s [DOGE], whose net inflows still trail LINK, even though DOGE’s market cap is nearly 3× larger.

Technically, this suggests ETF capital rotating into Chainlink isn’t chasing short-term moves. Instead, it raises the question: Is LINK one of the few high-cap assets still seeing a fundamentals-driven institutional rally?

Chainlink pushes to hold DeFi dominance as rivalry intensifies

The 2025 cycle set the stage for bringing DeFi back to the mainstream.

Data from DeFiLlama as of press time showed total value locked (TVL) across all Layer-1s climbing to $170 billion, reclaiming the level for the first time since it was lost after the 2022 bear market, pointing to a return of on-chain liquidity.

Naturally, that growth spilled into key sectors like stablecoins, RWA, and AI.

Enter Chainlink, now part of the Global Alliance for KRW Stablecoins (GAKS), putting it right at the center of Korea’s stablecoin expansion.

Put simply, Chainlink isn’t sitting out the DeFi race.

By integrating into global stablecoins (the backbone of DeFi rails), it clearly strengthens LINK’s core fundamentals in privacy, compliance, and interoperability, positioning the network as a key infrastructure player.

Meanwhile, the network’s total value secured (TVS) hit a record $70 billion in Q4 2025, reflecting the total assets powered by Chainlink’s oracles and marking a clear sign of its adoption, trust, and real-world usage.

Given this, it’s no surprise that institutional interest is picking up. In this context, Chainlink’s ETF flows appear less speculative and more fundamentally driven, making LINK a clear standout among its rivals.


Final Thoughts

  • While Ethereum’s and Dogecoin’s spot ETFs saw major outflows, Chainlink continues to attract inflows, signaling institutional capital is favoring LINK over other high-cap assets.
  • With TVS hitting $70 billion, global stablecoin integration, and key infrastructure strengths, Chainlink is cementing its role as a core DeFi player.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main divergence observed between Chainlink's and Ethereum's ETF flows in the article?

AWhile Ethereum's Grayscale Spot ETF (ETHE) saw $52 million in outflows, Chainlink's Grayscale ETF (GLNK) pulled in $4.05 million in inflows, indicating a clear preference for LINK.

QWhat key metric did Chainlink achieve in Q4 2025 that demonstrates its adoption and trust?

AChainlink's Total Value Secured (TVS) hit a record $70 billion, reflecting the total assets powered by its oracles.

QHow does the article explain the significance of Chainlink joining the Global Alliance for KRW Stablecoins (GAKS)?

AIt puts Chainlink at the center of Korea's stablecoin expansion, strengthening its core fundamentals in privacy, compliance, and interoperability, and positioning it as key DeFi infrastructure.

QAccording to the article, why do Chainlink's ETF inflows appear to be fundamentally driven rather than speculative?

AThe inflows are occurring alongside major fundamental developments like record TVS and global stablecoin integration, rather than just chasing short-term price moves.

QWhat overall trend in the DeFi market does the article highlight with the $170 billion Total Value Locked (TVL) figure?

AIt shows that on-chain liquidity is returning, with TVL reclaiming a $170 billion level for the first time since it was lost after the 2022 bear market.

İlgili Okumalar

Aave Is Surrendering the Throne of DeFi Lending Due to Its Own Stupidity

Aave, a leading DeFi lending protocol, is facing a severe crisis and losing its dominant market position due to its poor handling of a recent security incident. The crisis began when Kelp DAO suffered a hack resulting in a loss of $292 million in rsETH. In the aftermath, approximately $17.2 billion in funds flowed out of Aave as user panic escalated. The article criticizes Aave's crisis management as "extremely foolish." Instead of promptly offering reassurance or committing to cover the potential bad debt—estimated between $123.7 million and $230.1 million, which Aave could have afforded—the protocol initially deflected blame, emphasizing that its code was not at fault. This delay and lack of a clear guarantee led to widespread user anxiety, triggering a bank run-like scenario where users withdrew funds or borrowed aggressively from other pools, causing liquidity shortages. Meanwhile, Aave’s competitor Spark—a fork of Aave’s own code—has benefited significantly. Having removed support for rsETH months earlier, Spark avoided any losses from the incident and has since seen its TVL grow by nearly $2 billion, attracting major deposits such as over $1.24 billion from Justin Sun. Spark has actively capitalized on the situation, publicly criticizing Aave’s security reputation. Although Aave’s founder Stani eventually announced a relief plan named "DeFi United" with several partners and a personal donation, the damage to user trust and capital outflows may be irreversible. The article concludes that Aave is losing its throne in DeFi lending to aggressive competitors like Spark, Morpho, and Jupiter Lend.

Odaily星球日报24 dk önce

Aave Is Surrendering the Throne of DeFi Lending Due to Its Own Stupidity

Odaily星球日报24 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片