Chainalysis Estimates Taxable Crypto Activity at $457 Billion, Says CARF Covers Only a Small Portion

cryptonews.ru2026-08-26 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-26 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

A new Chainalysis report estimates that potentially taxable on-chain cryptocurrency activity reached at least $457 billion globally in 2025. However, international reporting rules like the OECD's Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) cover only a fraction of this amount. CARF, which came into effect on January 1, 2026, requires covered crypto service providers to report client transaction data to tax authorities. According to Chainalysis, CARF rules apply to only about 14% of the identified taxable on-chain activity. The remaining 86%, which includes decentralized exchange trading, peer-to-peer transfers, on-chain income (like staking and mining rewards), and crypto-denominated payments, largely falls outside the framework's scope. The report notes regional breakdowns, with North America leading at $134.6 billion (including an estimated $112.6 billion for the U.S.), followed by the European Union at $125.1 billion. The analysis covers six major blockchains but excludes trading activity on centralized exchanges. The gap is attributed to CARF's focus on regulated intermediaries. Experts involved in CARF's development note it was designed around businesses facilitating crypto transactions. Consequently, much of decentralized finance (DeFi) activity, where no centralized operator or custodial relationship exists, is currently not covered. Regulators are monitoring developments in anti-money laundering rules to potentially address reporting requirements for DeFi platforms in ...

According to a new report from Chainalysis, potentially taxable on-chain crypto activity globally reached at least $457 billion in 2025, while international reporting rules may only cover a portion of it.

The United States accounted for an estimated $112.6 billion of the total, and North America led all regions with $134.6 billion, followed by the European Union with $125.1 billion.

The estimates include realized gains, income from activities such as mining, staking, and lending, as well as payments denominated in cryptocurrency, across the six largest blockchains, but do not account for trading and other activity within centralized exchanges.

Chainalysis stated that transactions falling under the OECD's Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) cover only 14% of the taxable on-chain activity it identified. The remaining 86% includes activity on decentralized exchanges, peer-to-peer transfers, on-chain sources of income, and payments.

Developed by the OECD in 2022, CARF requires covered crypto service providers to report customer transaction data to tax authorities.

CARF covers only 14% of potentially taxable on-chain crypto activity.
Source: Chainalysis

Related: Chainalysis Sues U.S. Over $95M ICE Contract With TRM Labs

Limitations of CARF for Reporting On-Chain Activity Taxes

Data collection under CARF began on January 1, 2026, in 48 jurisdictions, including the United Kingdom and the European Union, and requires covered crypto platforms to collect additional information about customers and their tax residency.

Under CARF, covered crypto service providers collect information about customers and their tax residency and report transaction data to national tax authorities, which can then exchange this information across borders.

The CARF Framework. Source: OECD

CARF's focus on crypto intermediaries also helps explain the gaps highlighted by Chainalysis. Colby Mangles, a former OECD advisor involved in drafting CARF, told Cointelegraph in January that the framework was designed with intermediaries in mind—those that facilitate crypto transactions as a business.

A significant portion of decentralized finance therefore remains outside the reporting perimeter, as there may be no centralized operator or custodial relationship on which to impose reporting obligations.

This may change as regulators develop rules for decentralized platforms. Mangles stated that tax authorities are monitoring developments in anti-money laundering regulation, including attempts to define when DeFi platforms or their operators should be considered regulated crypto service providers.

Magazine: Proposed SEC crypto rules likely won't spark a new ICO boom

end-content

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the Chainalysis report, what was the estimated value of potentially taxable on-chain crypto activity in 2025?

AThe estimated value of potentially taxable on-chain crypto activity in 2025 was at least $457 billion.

QWhich region had the highest amount of this estimated taxable crypto activity in 2025, and what was its value?

ANorth America had the highest amount with an estimated $134.6 billion.

QWhat percentage of the identified taxable on-chain activity does the OECD's CARF (Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework) cover according to Chainalysis?

AAccording to Chainalysis, CARF covers only 14% of the identified taxable on-chain activity.

QWhat types of crypto transactions are largely excluded from CARF's reporting requirements?

ACARF largely excludes activity on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), peer-to-peer transfers, on-chain income sources, and payments, which together account for 86% of the identified activity.

QWhy does a significant portion of Decentralized Finance (DeFi) activity fall outside the scope of CARF?

AA significant portion of DeFi activity falls outside CARF's scope because the framework was designed with intermediaries in mind, and many DeFi platforms may lack a centralized operator or custodial relationship on which reporting obligations can be placed.

İlgili Okumalar

a16z: Top Talent Flows to AI Infrastructure, Infrastructure Design Will Be 'Redesigned from Scratch'

a16z Unveils "Machine Age Fund": AI Infrastructure Faces Massive Overhaul Silicon Valley VC giant a16z (Andreessen Horowitz) has launched a new "Machine Age Fund" dedicated to AI infrastructure, citing a vast and growing "supply-demand fracture." Key takeaways: * **Unlimited Demand vs. Constrained Supply:** AI demand is growing exponentially (estimated near 1000% annually for tokens), while supply chains for chips, memory, data centers, and power are booked through 2027-2028. GPU prices are rising against historical trends. * **A Resource Problem, Not Engineering:** The bottleneck is no longer software engineering but physical resources (hardware, power, cooling). Money and compute directly translate to intelligence output, removing traditional scaling limits. * **Complete Infrastructure Rebuild Needed:** Existing data centers and computing stacks, designed for a different era, are hitting physical limits. Everything needs rethinking from first principles: chip architecture, memory hierarchy, networking, power delivery (shifting to 800V DC), and cooling (moving to liquid). * **Investor & Founder Shift:** Top entrepreneurs are increasingly moving into hardware, with deals in the space rising from ~3-5% to over 20-30% of a16z's top-tier deal flow. Founders need to be "systems thinkers" who understand manufacturing and supply chains. * **Massive Economic Scale:** Training a frontier model now costs $3-5B. With inference needing to recoup ~$10B, saving 20% in efficiency ($2B) can justify developing a custom ASIC for a single model—a previously unthinkable economic dynamic. * **Long-Term Horizon:** a16z believes we are in the very early stages of a decades-long era where compute is applied to vast new domains (science, materials, biology, creative work). The firm re-frames AI as "Machine Intelligence," emphasizing the critical, foundational role of hardware in this new age.

marsbit26 dk önce

a16z: Top Talent Flows to AI Infrastructure, Infrastructure Design Will Be 'Redesigned from Scratch'

marsbit26 dk önce

Claude's Safety Mechanism Backfires Spectacularly, AI Deletes Developer's 700GB Home Directory in a Fit of Rage

Claude's safety mechanisms backfired spectacularly, leading an AI to delete a developer's entire 700GB home directory. The developer, Guillemot, asked Claude Fable 5 to write a script to create isolated sandbox folders in /tmp for AI agents and clean them up afterward, ensuring files in use wouldn't be deleted. Because the task involved risky delete operations, Claude's built-in safety system triggered an "adversarial review," automatically downgrading the model from the capable Fable 5 to the more conservative Opus 5, and then to Opus 4.8, to perform a security check. The Opus 4.8 model successfully tested the script, correctly identifying the /tmp and home directories as off-limits for deletion. However, during the cleanup phase that followed the test, it reused a variable name from the testing phase. This variable contained the path to the user's home directory. Consequently, the model executed a delete command on that exact path it had just deemed unsafe, wiping out 700GB of data. The intended /tmp directory remained untouched. The incident highlights critical flaws in Anthropic's safety downgrade system, which community developers have criticized for being overly sensitive, reducing model capability for complex tasks, and being "sticky" for an entire session once triggered. The irony is that a mechanism designed to hand off dangerous tasks to a safer, more conservative model instead delegated it to a weaker model that made a catastrophic error in variable scope and path handling.

marsbit48 dk önce

Claude's Safety Mechanism Backfires Spectacularly, AI Deletes Developer's 700GB Home Directory in a Fit of Rage

marsbit48 dk önce

Starting from Anthropic, Dissecting the Hyperliquid Perpetual Contract Sector

The article explores the emergence of pre-IPO perpetual synthetic asset markets on Hyperliquid's HIP-3 protocol, focusing on platforms like Ventuals, Trade.xyz, and Entropy. It begins with the intense secondary market demand for Anthropic stock, as illustrated by Jesse Leimgruber's experience. The HIP-3 protocol allows anyone to launch a perpetual DEX by locking $40M, with 30% of Hyperliquid's volume flowing through it. The piece details the rise and fall of Ventuals, the first major platform for trading pre-IPO synthetics like Anthropic and SpaceX. Its failure was due to extreme funding rates (reportedly hitting 8,700% annualized for Anthropic) and a pricing model vulnerable to thin liquidity, leading to a 45% crash in a SpaceX contract. Trade.xyz succeeded by using a simple 30-minute internal TWAP for pricing and dominates HIP-3 volume. Entropy, backed by a $14M Ribbit Capital-led round, attempts to improve on Ventuals by capping funding rates and using a hybrid oracle that blends its order book with private market valuations, while pricing Anthropic by total market cap. However, it struggles with accurately pricing private companies like Anthropic, unlike public stocks like SanDisk (SNDK) where arbitrage bots align prices. The article concludes by noting a potential Kraken testnet deployment on HIP-3, suggesting regulated entities may adopt its technology within permissioned frameworks. The evolution of these platforms highlights the challenges and iterative progress in creating decentralized markets for private company exposure.

marsbit1 saat önce

Starting from Anthropic, Dissecting the Hyperliquid Perpetual Contract Sector

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片