CFTC Withdraws Proposed Ban on Sports and Political Prediction Markets

TheNewsCrypto2026-02-05 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-05 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has withdrawn its 2024 proposal to ban sports and political prediction markets. CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig stated the agency will not proceed with final rules on the matter and will instead initiate new rulemaking based on a revised interpretation of the Commodity Exchange Act. The withdrawn proposal had sought to prohibit event contracts related to topics such as war, terrorism, and other outcomes deemed against public interest. The CFTC also repealed a 2025 staff advisory that had caused confusion. The new rulemaking aims to provide clearer guidelines, reduce regulatory uncertainty, and support innovation while reassessing the CFTC’s role in ongoing litigation regarding event contract jurisdiction. This shift signals a potential alignment of federal regulation with market practices amid ongoing tensions with state governments that often treat such contracts as unlicensed gambling.

The CFTC has pulled its 2024 proposal that aimed to ban sports and political prediction markets, saying it will not proceed with final rules on the issue. CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig said the agency will instead initiate new rulemaking based on a sound interpretation of the Commodity Exchange Act.

Proposal Withdrawal and Advisory Repeal

The proposed rule, initially proposed in June 2024, aimed to ban a wide array of event contracts, including those related to wars, terrorism, and other outcomes deemed not in the public interest. The CFTC also withdrew a 2025 staff advisory regarding sports-related event contracts, which it believed had confused in the market.

As Chairman Selig stated, markets were left confused by the advisory, and he hopes the new rulemaking process will provide clearer guidance. The CFTC aims to set standards that will enable innovation and provide clarity for entities subject to CFTC regulation.

In this regard, “event contracts” is a term that defines financial contracts that allow traders to place bets on the outcome of future events, such as election results or sports, as governed by the federal government. The nature of platforms that offer event contracts includes those that offer futures or swap markets for real-world events.

Some prediction markets have faced challenges from the state government, which views event contracts as unlicensed gambling, thus creating a conflict of regulation between the federal and state governments. The withdrawal of the proposal may signal a shift towards aligning federal regulation with market realities.

New Rulemaking on the Horizon

Chairman Selig has directed the staff of the CFTC to initiate a new rule on event contracts that will reflect the new interpretation of the law by the agency. This new interpretation will help to provide a clearer set of guidelines for prediction markets, while at the same time reducing uncertainty for exchanges and intermediaries that list event contracts. Chairman Selig has also stated that the CFTC will reassess its role in current litigation related to the jurisdiction of event contracts.

The withdrawal of the proposed prohibition on sports and political prediction markets by the CFTC is a significant change in the policy of federal regulation of event contracts. The CFTC’s move to withdraw the proposed prohibition in favor of new rulemaking proposals is an attempt to ensure a balance between legal certainty and innovation. As the regulatory environment evolves, the future of prediction markets may be marked by a clean regulatory environment.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Binance Completes Second Bitcoin Purchase for SAFU, Adding 1,315 BTC

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was the main action taken by the CFTC regarding its 2024 proposal on prediction markets?

AThe CFTC withdrew its 2024 proposal that aimed to ban sports and political prediction markets and will not proceed with final rules on the issue.

QWhat did the CFTC also withdraw alongside the proposed rule, and why?

AThe CFTC also withdrew a 2025 staff advisory regarding sports-related event contracts because it had created confusion in the market.

QAccording to Chairman Selig, what is the CFTC's new approach to event contracts?

AChairman Selig stated the CFTC will initiate new rulemaking based on a sound interpretation of the Commodity Exchange Act to provide clearer guidance and enable innovation.

QWhat regulatory conflict is mentioned regarding prediction markets in the United States?

AThere is a conflict between federal and state governments, as some state governments view event contracts as unlicensed gambling.

QWhat is the expected outcome of the CFTC's withdrawal and new rulemaking direction?

AThe move is expected to provide a clearer regulatory framework, reduce uncertainty for exchanges, and align federal regulation with market realities to balance legal certainty and innovation.

İlgili Okumalar

Who Will Take Over After SpaceX's IPO?

SpaceX is set to go public on June 12 with a $1.8 trillion valuation, but only about 5.56 billion shares (4.2% of the total) will be initially available for trading. Buy-side pressure is expected in three distinct waves. First, the IPO subscription at a fixed $135 per share, which is oversubscribed by nearly 4 times. Second, immediate secondary market trading post-listing. Third, and most significant, the forced buying by passive index funds. The Nasdaq 100 index has modified its rules to include SpaceX just 15 trading days after its IPO, despite its small float, which will compel hundreds of tracking funds to buy large quantities of stock. However, this initial supply shortage will not last. A staged lock-up release is designed for the approximately 54% of shares held by VCs, early employees, and other insiders (excluding Elon Musk's 42%, which is locked for 366 days). Releases begin after the Q2 earnings report, with subsequent unlocks at multiple intervals up to 180 days post-IPO. This means selling pressure from insiders will gradually increase throughout the latter half of the year. A key counterbalance is scheduled for mid-December during the Nasdaq 100's annual rebalancing. By then, the public float will have expanded significantly, forcing index funds to buy more shares, potentially providing institutional support after months of insider selling.

marsbit30 dk önce

marsbit30 dk önce

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

On June 11, Anthropic apologized not for a model failure, but for a lack of transparency. Its new Claude Fable 5 model was found to be secretly rerouting requests from users engaged in advanced AI model development to a weaker version, Opus 4.8, without any notification. The company's response—promising future notifications for such "downgrades"—was met with user skepticism. The article argues the core issue isn't technical but commercial: Anthropic's "safety" measures are primarily a business strategy. A key feature, the "intelligent safety classifier," marketed as user protection, is described as a tool for "competitive defense" to protect Anthropic's market lead by limiting rivals' research capabilities. This covert mechanism was designed for low "false positives," precisely targeting AI researchers. Anthropic's model involves a calculated three-step process: publishing alarming security research to amplify public anxiety, offering its Fable 5 model with a "safety classifier" as a premium-priced solution, and cashing in through a planned high-value IPO. This contrasts with OpenAI's more direct "tool-and-traffic" approach. The apology, merely changing a secret downgrade to a visible one, is seen as a business "patch" rather than a principled shift. The incident risks damaging Anthropic's "safest AI" reputation among the developer community, which underpins its valuation and appeal to government and corporate clients. Ultimately, the article concludes that for Anthropic, safety is a business, and the apology is merely customer service for that business.

marsbit50 dk önce

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

marsbit50 dk önce

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

**Summary:** A growing "anti-college" movement is gaining traction among elite circles in Silicon Valley, challenging the traditional value of a four-year university degree. Proponents argue that college has become an expensive, slow, and increasingly irrelevant waste of time, especially in the fast-paced tech world where opportunities pass by quickly. The movement is led by figures like billionaire Peter Thiel, who criticizes universities for high costs, ideological indoctrination, and stifling true innovation. His "Thiel Fellowship" pays young people to drop out and pursue ventures. Companies like Palantir Technologies (co-founded by Thiel) fuel this trend with programs like the "Meritocracy Fellowship," which offers high school graduates paid internships as an alternative to immediate college enrollment, promising a practical "Palantir Degree." Key drivers include: 1. **Economics:** Skyrocketing student debt versus the allure of immediate, high-paying tech jobs or startup funding. 2. **Technology:** AI and online tools lowering barriers to self-education and product development, making formal instruction seem inefficient. 3. **Culture:** A backlash against perceived "woke" ideology and DEI policies in universities, coupled with a belief that these institutions suppress meritocracy and masculine drive. The movement is notably male-dominated. Critics, like economist David Deming, warn against overgeneralizing from dropout success stories (survivorship bias). He emphasizes that genuine autodidacts are rare, corporate training is narrowly focused, and the "college wage premium" remains high for most people. University liberal arts education, he argues, builds adaptable problem-solving skills and broad perspectives. The debate highlights a deeper crisis in education. The core model of the modern university appears increasingly mismatched with the speed of the information age. The movement signals a shift in the locus of learning from institutional "education" to personal, active "learning" powered by the internet and AI. Ultimately, this may not mean the end of university, but rather a painful evolution. The future likely holds more hybrid, personalized, and lifelong learning pathways. The central question becomes: in a world changing faster than any curriculum, how do we best learn?

marsbit1 saat önce

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

marsbit1 saat önce

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

The commercialization of generative AI is facing a critical inflection point as a potential price war looms. According to The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI is considering a significant cut to its token fees to compete with rival Anthropic, signaling a shift from a growth-at-all-costs model focused on token consumption. This move comes as both companies, reportedly losing billions on compute, prepare for IPOs, and as enterprise customers face "bill shock" from switching to usage-based token billing. Reports indicate poor ROI, with one analysis finding only 18 cents of every dollar spent on AI tokens generates user-facing value. The industry's initial phases—from flat-rate subscriptions to aggressive subsidies—have given way to a reckoning with real costs. Analysts debate the future: some predict a bifurcation between premium, high-cost models for complex tasks and cheaper alternatives for routine work, while others believe overall spending will still rise as agentic AI increases tokens per task. Notably, Chinese model DeepSeek's low-cost API is gaining traction with U.S. enterprises, adding competitive pressure. The core challenge is redefining value beyond token volume ("tokenmaxxing") toward measurable productivity ("valuemaxxing"), as the entire AI value chain, from cloud providers to chipmakers, feels the ripple effects of unsustainable pricing.

marsbit1 saat önce

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

marsbit1 saat önce

The Bitcoin 400-Day Cycle: Historical Performance Shows How Low The Bottom Goes

A crypto analyst forecasts a continued Bitcoin bear market, predicting a potential price bottom around October 2026 based on a historical 400-day cycle pattern. The analysis suggests Bitcoin is currently 252 days into a bear phase that typically lasts 364-400 days, indicating another 112-148 days of downward pressure. The projected cycle low could be around $30,000, representing a more than 75% decline from recent all-time highs near $126,000. The analyst dismisses arguments that current market factors like ETFs make this cycle different, noting the pattern has held for over a decade. Another expert aligns, forecasting a bottom between $30,000-$40,000 by late Q3 or early Q4 2026 and rejecting the possibility of Bitcoin reaching $100,000 this year.

bitcoinist1 saat önce

The Bitcoin 400-Day Cycle: Historical Performance Shows How Low The Bottom Goes

bitcoinist1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures

Popüler Makaleler

BAN Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! Comedian (BAN) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında Comedian (BAN) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: Comedian (BAN) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınComedian (BAN) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: Comedian (BAN) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında Comedian (BAN) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

473 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2024.12.11Güncellenme 2026.06.02

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların BAN (BAN) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.