Centrifuge and Pharos Partner to Expand Onchain Access for Institutional Assets

TheNewsCrypto2026-02-17 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-17 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Centrifuge and Pharos have partnered to enhance the distribution and usability of institutional-grade onchain assets, such as tokenized U.S. Treasuries (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA). The collaboration addresses key challenges in institutional onchain finance, including fragmented distribution, regulatory barriers, and limited post-issuance activity outside the U.S. and Western Europe. By integrating Centrifuge’s tokenization infrastructure with Pharos’ high-performance Layer 1 blockchain, the partnership aims to create a unified ecosystem for asset accessibility, liquidity, and execution. Both CEOs emphasize that tokenization alone is insufficient—the focus is on building robust infrastructure to enable active, composable financial systems for institutional assets.

Today, Centrifuge and Pharos announced a collaboration aimed at facilitating the large-scale distribution and operation of institutional-grade assets onchain via a common infrastructure architecture, such as tokenized U.S. Treasuries (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA).

The partnership focuses on addressing distribution, one of the main issues facing institutional onchain finance. Even though tokenization has advanced significantly, many institutional assets are still inaccessible, dispersed across platforms, or passive after they are issued. The goal of this collaboration is to make institutional assets useable in live onchain financial systems when they are issued.

Regulatory, onboarding, custody, and operational barriers still affect access to U.S. dollar-denominated credit and treasury products in many areas outside of the U.S. and Western Europe. Even with tokenization, these goods’ distribution is often dispersed and indirect, which restricts their capacity to actively spread once onchain or reach new users.

The collaboration tackles these issues at the system level by fusing Pharos’ inclusive, execution-first Layer 1 with Centrifuge’s institutional-grade tokenization infrastructure and asset standards. With its high-performance infrastructure and ecosystem connectivity, Pharos acts as a strategic liquidity and distribution layer for assets issued via Centrifuge, enabling deeper onchain liquidity pathways and wider capital entrance. Assets may be accessible, pooled, allocated, and reused instead of being static after issue thanks to this integrated ecosystem, which includes wallet access, platform and enterprise channels, and execution capability.

“Tokenization alone does not solve the access and usability problem,” said Bhaji Illuminati, CEO of Centrifuge Labs. “This partnership focuses on building the distribution and infrastructure layer that allows institutional assets to function within real onchain financial environments.”

Pharos is an inclusive financial Layer 1 that uses a modular architecture and native deep-parallel execution to facilitate high-throughput, real-world financial operations. The network is designed to support ongoing onchain operations and accommodate significant institutional asset activity.

“The challenge isn’t demand, it’s infrastructure,” said Wish Wu, CEO of Pharos. “This collaboration focuses on creating an environment where institutional assets can move onchain and remain active within open, composable financial systems.”

This collaboration is a first step toward practical onchain finance, in which institutional assets are backed by infrastructure intended for long-term participation, distribution, and execution in addition to being represented onchain.

As the future financial-grade infrastructure of global finance for everyone, Pharos is the inclusive financial Layer 1 for RealFi, where institutional-grade assets and real value move onchain and may be combined with decentralized assets. To enable asset-native ecosystems, Pharos blends deep-parallel execution, modular design, and built-in compliance. Supported by Hack VC, Faction VC, and other international TradFi investors, the project was developed by Ant Group’s engineers and leadership.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main goal of the partnership between Centrifuge and Pharos?

AThe main goal is to facilitate the large-scale distribution and operation of institutional-grade assets onchain, making them usable in live onchain financial systems upon issuance.

QWhat specific types of institutional assets are mentioned in the collaboration?

AThe collaboration focuses on tokenized U.S. Treasuries (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA).

QAccording to Centrifuge Labs' CEO, what problem does tokenization alone not solve?

ATokenization alone does not solve the access and usability problem for institutional assets onchain.

QWhat role does Pharos play in this partnership according to the article?

APharos acts as a strategic liquidity and distribution layer with its high-performance infrastructure and ecosystem connectivity, enabling deeper onchain liquidity pathways and wider capital entrance.

QWhat are some key technical features of the Pharos network mentioned in the article?

APharos uses a modular architecture and native deep-parallel execution to facilitate high-throughput, real-world financial operations and support ongoing onchain institutional asset activity.

İlgili Okumalar

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

**Summary: Rising Interest Rates Are Not the Killer of Tech; EPS Is: The "Keep the Strong, Ditch the Weak" Strategy After the AI Theme Plunge** The author argues that the sharp sell-off in tech and AI-related stocks, triggered by a strong US jobs report that heightened Fed rate hike fears, represents a "pullback to pick up passengers" rather than a "car crash." The true end of a tech bull market is not determined by an extra 25 basis point hike, but by industry overcapacity and the disproval of earnings per share (EPS) expectations. Historical analysis shows that during past rate hike cycles, the Nasdaq-100 often outperformed, provided EPS growth remained strong. The current phase is seen as a shift from a "broad narrative-driven rally" to a "focused verification stage" for AI. The investment strategy should be to "keep the strong, ditch the weak." * **Retain exposure** to high-conviction AI infrastructure leaders with clear order visibility, stable margins, strong cash flow, and upward EPS revisions (e.g., AI servers, advanced packaging, optical modules, key cloud suppliers). * **Reduce exposure** to high-beta, narrative-driven stocks with unclear profit paths (e.g., some quantum computing, space, or speculative chip stocks), especially on rebounds. Valuation concerns should focus on whether earnings can catch up to high multiples, not on high P/E alone. Crowded positioning signals a concentration into quality assets, not necessarily a market top. The upcoming Q2 earnings season will be a key validation point. The core principle is to hold stocks with proven EPS, while using macro events (CPI data, central bank meetings) to manage timing and risk.

marsbit35 dk önce

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

marsbit35 dk önce

CLARITY Act Hits New Roadblock As Ethics Agreement Collapses In Senate Talks

The CLARITY Act has encountered a new obstacle as a bipartisan Senate group's agreement on ethics provisions collapsed. Republicans reportedly reversed their position on a key element that would have allowed state attorneys general to sue the Department of Justice for failing to enforce ethics rules related to President Trump. Democrats viewed this as an "about face" from a prior tentative deal. As a counter-proposal, Republicans suggested limiting enforcement authority to the Attorney General and mentioned impeachment as a potential remedy for violations. The impasse leaves the crypto market structure bill's path to a full Senate vote uncertain. Another major hurdle involves law enforcement groups' concerns that the bill could hinder investigations into blockchain-related crimes like money laundering. The White House Crypto Council is scheduled to meet with these groups to address these issues, particularly around the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. Key Democratic senators have stated their support for the CLARITY Act is contingent on adequately addressing both ethics and law enforcement concerns.

bitcoinist1 saat önce

CLARITY Act Hits New Roadblock As Ethics Agreement Collapses In Senate Talks

bitcoinist1 saat önce

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

SpaceX's potential IPO is priced at $135 per share, aiming to raise $75 billion and valuing the company at approximately $1.77 trillion, which would make it the largest IPO in history. This valuation has sparked intense debate among investors. Bullish analysts, including major underwriters Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, argue the valuation is justified by SpaceX's long-term potential. They see it not just as a rocket company but as a future leader in space infrastructure, with key growth drivers being Starlink satellite internet, low-cost rocket launches, and future AI-related ventures. They project revenues reaching hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars by 2030-2040. ARK Invest's model suggests a 2030 enterprise value could reach $2.5 trillion. Bearish analysts from independent research firms like Morningstar, PitchBook, and New Constructs contend the IPO price is excessively high, already pricing in unrealistic future growth. Using DCF and sum-of-the-parts models, they estimate fair value between $780 billion and $1.7 trillion, significantly below the IPO target. They highlight risks such as the speculative nature of AI projections, over-dependence on Elon Musk, high growth expectations, and corporate governance concerns. Trefis set a target price of just $79 per share. While both sides acknowledge SpaceX's unique position in commercial space, the core disagreement centers on whether the $135 share price offers a reasonable margin of safety or is overly optimistic. Despite the valuation controversy, reported strong demand for the IPO indicates significant market interest.

marsbit2 saat önce

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

marsbit2 saat önce

Japan’s Largest Banks Eye FY2026 Stablecoin Rollout Amid Regulatory Push

Japan's three largest banks—MUFG Bank, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp., and Mizuho Bank—are advancing plans to launch a jointly-issued yen-pegged stablecoin by the end of fiscal year 2026 (March 31, 2027). They have established a voluntary council to develop the operational framework, governance, and issuance infrastructure for the token, which will be issued under a trust agreement. The move aligns with Japan's regulatory push to expand its yen-based digital asset market, following 2022 amendments to the Payment Services Act that restrict stablecoin issuance to licensed entities like banks and trust companies. The banks, which began exploring this initiative in late 2025, aim to support a wide range of use cases and are considering future collaborations with other financial institutions. This development occurs alongside other yen-stablecoin launches and recent political proposals to promote such tokens for settlement in Asia.

bitcoinist2 saat önce

Japan’s Largest Banks Eye FY2026 Stablecoin Rollout Amid Regulatory Push

bitcoinist2 saat önce

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

The article discusses the evolution of on-chain credit, distinguishing three markets: overcollateralized crypto lending, unsecured lending (largely unsuccessful), and asset-backed credit (ABC). ABC, backed by identifiable real-world collateral with legal recourse, is identified as the fastest-growing category and the only one credibly addressing adverse selection—the core problem in credit where the riskiest borrowers self-select. Current growth in on-chain Real World Assets (RWAs), particularly tokenized private credit funds (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge), is substantial but often merely "wraps" existing fund structures, inheriting their risks rather than solving adverse selection at the protocol level. The regulatory landscape is a key driver, with the US GENIUS Act (prohibiting stablecoin issuers from paying yield) and the proposed CLARITY Act (closing loopholes on indirect yield) set to redefine permissible yield-bearing products. This makes vaults (like ERC-4626) the critical architecture—they become the primary compliant vehicle for delivering yield, functioning as issuance, disclosure, distribution, and recovery mechanisms. The author's thesis is that the correct post-GENIUS/CLARITY architecture involves building ABC solutions where credit assessment, structure, and recovery are encoded directly into the smart contract vault layer, moving beyond mere tokenized fund wrappers to solve adverse selection fundamentally and ensure regulatory compliance.

Foresight News3 saat önce

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

Foresight News3 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures