Ceasefire Indefinitely Extended, How Long Will the US-Iran Conflict Continue to Be a Tug-of-War?

marsbit2026-04-22 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-04-22 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

President Trump has indefinitely extended the ceasefire with Iran while maintaining a naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, stating the truce will last until Iran presents a new proposal and negotiations conclude. The decision follows the collapse of planned peace talks after Iranian representatives refused to attend, calling U.S. conditions unacceptable. Iran has not requested the extension and maintains a firm stance, keeping the strait closed as long as the blockade persists. The prolonged standoff has heightened global market volatility, with oil prices rising sharply. Despite the temporary truce, the lack of a clear diplomatic framework and mutual distrust suggest the situation remains a fragile, unstable equilibrium, with risks of escalation persisting.

Original Title: Trump Extends Iran Ceasefire, Blockade as Peace Talks Stumble

Original Author: Courtney Subramanian and Jennifer A Dlouhy,Bloomberg

Original Compilation: Peggy,BlockBeats

Editor's Note: US President Donald Trump announced an indefinite extension of the ceasefire with Iran just before the agreement was set to expire, while continuing the maritime blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Trump stated that the US would extend the ceasefire until Iran submits a new proposal, "and regardless of the outcome, until the negotiations conclude"; he also emphasized that without this blockade, "it would be impossible to reach any agreement with Iran."

From a strategic perspective, the US is attempting through the combination of "extending the ceasefire + maintaining the blockade" to avoid an immediate escalation into full-scale war while continuing to pressure Iran to make concessions on nuclear issues and negotiation terms. However, Iran has neither accepted the negotiation conditions nor proactively requested an extension of the ceasefire. Instead, it has maintained a firm response in terms of energy exports and military posture, leading to a stalemate between the two sides on the core issues of "whether to negotiate and how to negotiate."

More notably, this confrontation has begun to spill over into global markets. As a critical channel for global energy transportation, the blockade and repeated reopening of the Strait of Hormuz have not only intensified oil price volatility but also amplified uncertainties in the energy and shipping systems. In the short term, the ceasefire extension provides a certain buffer for the market; but in the medium to long term, in the absence of a clear negotiation structure and basic mutual trust, this passively extended ceasefire resembles a fragile balance that could be broken at any time.

As diplomatic paths continue to be blocked and military deterrence intensifies, the next phase of this conflict will depend on whether the two sides return to the negotiating table or slide toward more intense confrontation.

Below is the original text:

US President Donald Trump announced an indefinite extension of the ceasefire with Iran just before the agreement was set to expire; meanwhile, the US continues to maintain a maritime blockade of the Strait of Hormuz after the collapse of the originally planned peace talks between the two sides.

Trump stated on his social platform Truth Social that Pakistan, as the mediator, requested the US to postpone launching a new round of strikes. The US will extend the ceasefire deadline until Iran submits a new proposal and "regardless of the outcome, until the negotiations conclude." In another post, he also stated that without this blockade, "it would be impossible to reach any agreement with Iran—unless we blow up the rest of their country, including their leaders!"

US Vice President JD Vance was originally scheduled to travel to Pakistan to restart negotiations with Iran, but representatives from Tehran refused to attend, stating that the conditions proposed by the US were "unacceptable." Iran's semi-official Tasnim News Agency stated that there is currently "no realistic possibility" for Iran to participate in negotiations.

A White House official confirmed in a statement that the Vice President's scheduled trip on Tuesday will not take place.

This statement contrasts sharply with Donald Trump's remarks earlier that day. At the time, he stated in an interview with CNBC that if Iran did not meet his conditions, "I expect bombing to occur," and claimed that the US military "is eager and ready to act at any time." In a phone interview on Monday, Trump also stated that if an agreement was not reached, it was "highly unlikely" that he would extend the current ceasefire.

Driven by the news of the ceasefire extension, oil prices rose for the second consecutive day. After accumulating a nearly 9% increase over the previous two trading sessions, Brent crude price is currently around $98 per barrel. In January of this year, oil prices once fell below $60, and in March, they reached a high of $119.50. The average retail price of gasoline in the US is currently about $4 per gallon, compared to about $3 before the war broke out on February 28.

Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif thanked Trump for extending the ceasefire in a statement, "buying time for ongoing diplomatic efforts to proceed smoothly."

Former US Deputy National Security Advisor and current Philip Solondz Distinguished Fellow at the Washington Institute, James F. Jeffrey, appeared on 'Bloomberg Businessweek Daily' to discuss the ceasefire extension and engaged in a dialogue with hosts Carol Massar and Tim Stenovec.

He posted on platform X: "I sincerely hope both sides will continue to abide by the ceasefire agreement and reach a comprehensive 'peace agreement' in the second round of negotiations in Islamabad, thereby achieving a permanent end to the conflict."

Senior Iranian officials had not responded to Donald Trump's statement by nighttime Tehran time. Iran's semi-official Tasnim News Agency, quoting unnamed sources, stated that Iran did not request an extension of the ceasefire. Simultaneously, the media outlet stated that as long as the US maintains the maritime blockade, Iran will not reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

Iran's semi-official Fars News Agency quoted a statement from the military stating that the Iranian armed forces "are in a state of full combat readiness, with fingers on the trigger."

Security personnel guard a checkpoint near the Serena Hotel in Islamabad on April 22. Photo: Aamir Qureshi / AFP / Getty Images.

These developments mark the latest round of back-and-forth between Washington and Tehran since April 7, when the two sides announced a two-week ceasefire. Since then, the two sides have continuously publicly disputed the terms of the agreement and alternately closed and reopened the Strait of Hormuz. Before the war, about one-fifth of the world's oil and liquefied natural gas exports passed through this strait.

According to data intelligence company Vortexa, at least two fully loaded Iranian oil tankers have sailed out of the Persian Gulf this week and breached the US blockade. The company's data also shows that Iran still has the capacity to export oil, with at least 34 oil tankers and gas carriers related to Iran passing through the Strait of Hormuz and navigating past the naval blockade.

The British Navy stated on Wednesday that an Iranian gunboat fired upon a container ship near the Strait of Hormuz, causing "serious damage" to its bridge, but fortunately, there were no casualties.

US Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren from Massachusetts criticized President Donald Trump for lacking a clear plan regarding the Iran conflict. Warren expressed these views on the 'Balance of Power: Evening Edition' program.

The UK and France are convening military planners from over 30 countries for a two-day summit to discuss how to ensure the Strait of Hormuz remains open. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron have been leading the coordination of a plan aimed at keeping the strait open after the Iran war ends, though they have rejected Trump's request for allies to use force to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

After the initial ceasefire was announced, a round of negotiations took place between the US and Iran but ended in failure. US officials stated that Iran was unwilling to accept restrictions on its nuclear program; while the Iranian side stated that the US had put forward a series of demands that it could not accept.

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf Source: AFP / Getty Images

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, who led the Tehran delegation in the first round of negotiations, stated on Monday that Iran would not "accept negotiations under the shadow of threat."

Although the ceasefire extension may soothe investor sentiment in the short term, the path to a lasting agreement to end the war remains fraught with uncertainty. This conflict, now in its eighth week, has resulted in thousands of deaths, triggered a global energy crisis, and increased pressure on both sides to find an "exit path."

Donald Trump demands that Iran abandon its pursuit of nuclear weapons and hand over its nuclear materials. Tehran denies having any such intentions and refuses to hand over its enriched uranium.

Alex Vatanka, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, stated that Trump has somewhat "painted himself into a corner" because he does not actually want to return to military conflict.

"He made a strategic mistake in thinking that raising his voice and increasing pressure on the Iranians would work," Vatanka said. "This approach doesn't work with this regime. Quiet pressure often works better than public pressure."

Original link

İlgili Sorular

QWhat did President Trump announce regarding the ceasefire with Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz?

APresident Trump announced an indefinite extension of the ceasefire with Iran and the continuation of the maritime blockade of the Strait of Hormuz.

QWhy did the planned peace talks between the U.S. and Iran fail to proceed?

AThe talks failed because Iran refused to attend, stating that the conditions proposed by the U.S. were 'unacceptable'.

QHow has the situation in the Strait of Hormuz affected global oil markets?

AThe blockade and repeated closures of the Strait of Hormuz have increased oil price volatility and amplified uncertainty in energy and shipping systems, causing Brent crude prices to rise.

QWhat is Iran's current stance on negotiations and the U.S. blockade?

AIran has maintained a hardline response, refusing to negotiate under threat and stating it will not reopen the Strait of Hormuz as long as the U.S. maintains its maritime blockade.

QWhat are the key demands the U.S. has made of Iran in this conflict?

AThe U.S. has demanded that Iran abandon its pursuit of nuclear weapons and hand over its nuclear materials, specifically its enriched uranium.

İlgili Okumalar

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbit3 dk önce

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbit3 dk önce

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit33 dk önce

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit33 dk önce

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit1 saat önce

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit1 saat önce

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX Learn1 saat önce

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX Learn1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures

Popüler Makaleler

WAR Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! WAR (WAR) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında WAR (WAR) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: WAR (WAR) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınWAR (WAR) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: WAR (WAR) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında WAR (WAR) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

217 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2024.12.11Güncellenme 2026.06.02

WAR Nasıl Satın Alınır

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların WAR (WAR) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.

活动图片