Cboe Explores “All-or-None” Options as Event Trading Gains Momentum

ccn.com2026-02-03 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-03 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Cboe Global Markets is exploring a regulated "all-or-none" options product, according to a source. This binary-style product would pay a fixed return if a specified condition is met and nothing if it is not, mirroring the mechanics of event contracts on prediction-market platforms. The move aims to capture growing retail demand for simpler, event-style trades that are easier to understand than traditional options, which involve complex concepts like implied volatility and time decay. Cboe has previously introduced similar binary products, but they were delisted after failing to attract sustained interest. The exploration comes as regulators, including the CFTC, are drafting new rules for event contracts. Competition in event-style trading is increasing, with platforms like Kalshi and traditional firms like CME Group expanding into this space. Cboe is conducting legal and compliance reviews and has held discussions with retail brokerages and market makers. Key factors to watch include whether Cboe files a formal product proposal, broker adoption, and regulatory developments.

Cboe Global Markets is exploring a regulated options product that would deliver an “all-or-none” payout, according to a source familiar with the matter, as the exchange looks to capture growing retail appetite for simpler, event-style trades that resemble prediction markets.

The proposed structure pays a fixed return if a specified condition is met and pays nothing if it is not. That binary-style payoff mirrors the mechanics used by many event contracts on prediction-market platforms.

Try Our Recommended Crypto Exchanges
Sponsored
Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.
"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693291aa4a5bcb62319448b2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Bitget<\/h3>"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693291aa4a5bcb62319448b2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Bitget

promotions
New user rewards up to 6,200 USDT.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693291aa4a5bcb62319448b2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> New user rewards up to 6,200 USDT.
Coins
88
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693293fa4a5bcb6231949c97" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Bitunix<\/h3>"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693293fa4a5bcb6231949c97" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Bitunix

promotions
Receive up to $100,000 worth of exclusive gifts for newcomers upon registration.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693293fa4a5bcb6231949c97" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Receive up to $100,000 worth of exclusive gifts for newcomers upon registration.
Coins
151
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="68f8c175c334f42ea614a1a4" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693294144a5bcb623194a054" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
BTCC<\/h3>"}' data-trk="68f8c175c334f42ea614a1a4" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693294144a5bcb623194a054" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

BTCC

promotions
Get up to 10,055 USDT when you register, verify, and make the first deposit and the first trades.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="68f8c175c334f42ea614a1a4" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693294144a5bcb623194a054" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Get up to 10,055 USDT when you register, verify, and make the first deposit and the first trades.
Coins
162
Claim Offer
Explore All Offers

A Simpler Trade for Retail

The appeal is straightforward. Many retail traders struggle with traditional options concepts such as implied volatility and time decay.

A fixed payout tied to a single condition is easier to understand and easier to size, even if the risk is still total loss on the premium paid.

Cboe declined to provide details on specifications or timing, and the report said the initiative remains in early stages.

Cboe Has Been Here Before

The exchange is not new to binary-style contracts. Cboe has previously introduced binary options linked to the S&P 500 and the Cboe Volatility Index in 2008.

However, those earlier products were later delisted after they failed to attract sustained interest and were dominated by professional traders, not the retail audience Cboe is now courting.

Rulemaking Is Catching Up

Cboe’s exploration lands as regulators move to clarify the rules of the road for event contracts in the U.S.

On Jan. 29, Michael Selig, chairman of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), said the CFTC plans to draft new regulations for “event contracts,” and will withdraw a prior proposal that would have restricted certain politically and sports-linked contracts.

State-level legal challenges continue to shape the regulatory landscape.

In a separate case, a Massachusetts judge ruled Kalshi could not offer sports-related contracts to Massachusetts residents under the state’s gaming rules, rejecting the firm’s argument that federal derivatives oversight fully preempts state gambling authority.

Cboe did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether the proposed all-or-none options would reference specific events, indexes, or other market outcomes.

Competition Is Moving Fast

Prediction markets and event-style trading have expanded sharply in visibility, particularly after recent U.S. election cycles.

Traditional financial firms have started to evaluate how to compete with platforms that package outcomes into simple “yes/no” contracts.

Other major players, including CME Group and FanDuel, have taken steps into the broader “event trading” space as demand grows.

Cboe has held preliminary discussions with retail brokerages and market makers while conducting legal and compliance review, reflecting the reputational baggage associated with “binary options” after past retail fraud scandals in loosely regulated venues.

What To Watch Next

The next signals are practical, not philosophical.

First, whether Cboe moves from internal exploration to a formal product filing, including how it frames the contract terms and eligible underlyings.

Second, whether major brokerages are willing to distribute the product widely, and what suitability and marketing guardrails they require.

Third, the regulatory arc. If the CFTC’s promised event-contract rulemaking produces a clearer framework, it could shape how far “event trading” moves into mainstream retail channels, and how directly exchanges like Cboe can compete with prediction-market platforms.

Top Picks for Bitcoin
  • Best Exchanges for Bitcoin Get A Great Offer When You Join These Exchanges
  • Buy Bitcoin Fast & Easy How To Buy Bitcoin With a Credit Card Now
  • Best Online Casinos for Bitcoin See Our Picks for the Best Crypto Gambling Sites

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is Cboe Global Markets exploring in response to growing retail interest in event-style trading?

ACboe Global Markets is exploring a regulated options product that would deliver an 'all-or-none' payout, which pays a fixed return if a specified condition is met and nothing if it is not.

QHow does the proposed 'all-or-none' options product differ from traditional options?

AThe 'all-or-none' options offer a fixed payout tied to a single condition, making them simpler to understand and size compared to traditional options that involve complex concepts like implied volatility and time decay.

QWhat regulatory developments are influencing Cboe's exploration of event-style contracts?

AThe CFTC plans to draft new regulations for 'event contracts' and will withdraw a prior proposal that would have restricted certain politically and sports-linked contracts, which could shape the framework for such products.

QWhy did Cboe's previous binary-style contracts fail to gain traction?

ACboe's earlier binary options linked to the S&P 500 and the Cboe Volatility Index were delisted after failing to attract sustained interest and were dominated by professional traders rather than the retail audience.

QWhat are the key factors to watch regarding the future of Cboe's 'all-or-none' options?

AKey factors include whether Cboe moves to a formal product filing, the willingness of major brokerages to distribute the product, and the regulatory framework from the CFTC's event-contract rulemaking.

İlgili Okumalar

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手8 saat önce

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手8 saat önce

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit11 saat önce

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit11 saat önce

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手12 saat önce

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手12 saat önce

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit13 saat önce

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit13 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片