CARF Global Implementation Timeline Overview: What Are the Commitments of Mainland China and Hong Kong?

marsbit2026-01-28 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-28 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

CARF (Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework) is a global framework for the automatic exchange of tax-related data on crypto-assets, targeting crypto-asset service providers as reporting entities. As of the end of 2025, 76 jurisdictions have committed to implementing CARF, with a phased rollout plan. The first group, including the UK and EU member states, will begin automatic information exchange in 2027. The second group, which includes Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and Hong Kong, is scheduled to fully implement the framework in 2028. Data collection for reportable transactions will begin one year prior, starting in 2026. Hong Kong has explicitly committed to implementing CARF. It plans to start collecting crypto-asset transaction data in 2027 and commence automatic tax information exchange with partner jurisdictions in 2028. Service providers operating in Hong Kong must establish compliance and reporting mechanisms. In contrast, Mainland China has not yet committed to CARF and is not included in any of the implementation batches. It is also not listed by the OECD as a jurisdiction with relevance that has yet to commit. Under its current regulatory framework, which imposes strict limitations on crypto-asset activities, there are no legal crypto-asset service providers that could be integrated into the CARF system. Therefore, in the short term, Mainland China does not meet the conditions for participating in CARF's routine information exchange. It is noted that Mainland C...

Author: Fintax

Basic Positioning of CARF

CARF is a framework for the automatic exchange of tax-related information on crypto-assets, with crypto-asset service providers as the reporting entities, used to support tax authorities in various jurisdictions in obtaining information related to transactions involving their taxpayers.

Global Implementation Progress and Timeline

According to information released by the OECD Global Forum, as of the end of 2025, 76 countries and regions have committed to implementing CARF and will advance its implementation in batches.

The first group of jurisdictions plans to commence the first automatic information exchange in 2027, primarily including the UK and EU member states, etc.; the second group of jurisdictions plans to fully implement in 2028, including Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and China Hong Kong, etc.

According to the institutional arrangement, the collection of relevant transaction data will commence one year in advance, starting from 2026, crypto-asset service providers will need to systematically organize reportable transaction information.

Figure 1: Overview of CARF Implementation Progress in Major Jurisdictions

China Hong Kong: Clear Participation and Timetable Advancement

In the aforementioned arrangement, China Hong Kong has clearly committed to implementing CARF and will advance related work according to the international timetable.

Hong Kong plans to start collecting crypto-asset transaction data from 2027 and commence automatic tax information exchange with other cooperating jurisdictions in 2028.

Crypto-asset service providers operating under Hong Kong's regulatory framework need to establish corresponding data compliance and reporting mechanisms, and relevant reportable transactions will be included in the cross-border information exchange process.

Mainland China: Not Yet Committed and Outside the Implementation Scope

In comparison, Mainland China has not yet made an implementation commitment to CARF.

As of the current stage, Mainland China is not included in any implementation batch of CARF, nor has it been listed by the OECD as a jurisdiction that is relevant but has not yet committed to participation.

Under the current regulatory framework, the mainland adopts a strict restrictive attitude towards cryptocurrency trading activities, and there are no legal crypto-asset service providers within the country that can be纳入 the CARF reporting system; therefore, it does not currently meet the institutional conditions for participating in CARF's regularized information exchange.

Future Possibilities and Realistic Judgment

It should be pointed out that Mainland China has fully implemented CRS since 2018 and has mature experience in financial account information exchange.

If future crypto-asset regulatory policies are adjusted, the mainland has the institutional and technical conditions to对接 CARF.

However, given the current policy environment, the possibility of Mainland China joining this framework around the 2027 launch of CARF and in the following years remains relatively low.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the CARF and what is its primary purpose?

AThe CARF (Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework) is an international framework for the automatic exchange of tax-related information on crypto-assets. It targets crypto-asset service providers as the reporting entities, aiming to support tax authorities in various jurisdictions in obtaining information related to transactions involving their taxpayers.

QHow many jurisdictions have committed to implementing the CARF as of the end of 2025, and what is the implementation timeline?

AAs of the end of 2025, 76 countries and regions have committed to implementing the CARF. The first group of jurisdictions, including the UK and EU member states, plan to commence the first automatic information exchange in 2027. The second group, which includes Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and Hong Kong, China, is scheduled to fully implement the framework in 2028.

QWhat is the commitment and implementation plan of Hong Kong, China regarding the CARF?

AHong Kong, China has explicitly committed to implementing the CARF. It plans to start collecting crypto-asset transaction data from 2027 and begin automatic exchange of tax information with other cooperating jurisdictions in 2028. Crypto-asset service providers operating under Hong Kong's regulatory framework will need to establish corresponding data compliance and reporting mechanisms.

QWhat is the current status of Mainland China's commitment to the CARF?

AMainland China has not yet made a commitment to implement the CARF. It is not included in any of the implementation batches listed by the OECD and is not currently classified as a relevant jurisdiction that has yet to commit. Under its current regulatory framework, which imposes strict restrictions on crypto-asset activities, there are no legitimate crypto-asset service providers that could be incorporated into the CARF reporting system, making short-term participation unlikely.

QDoes Mainland China have the foundational experience to potentially join the CARF in the future?

AYes, Mainland China has comprehensive experience in financial account information exchange, having fully implemented the CRS (Common Reporting Standard) since 2018. This provides it with the technical and institutional foundation to potentially adapt to the CARF requirements if its crypto-asset regulatory policy were to change in the future. However, given the current policy environment, the possibility of joining the CARF around its 2027 launch or in the subsequent few years remains relatively low.

İlgili Okumalar

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

This article presents a scenario-based forecast for the crypto industry from 2026 to 2029, arguing that the next major cycle will be driven not by technological narratives but by legal access to real-world assets. The author predicts that by mid-2026, pre-IPO perpetual contracts for top private companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic on platforms like Hyperliquid will become the primary gateway for accessing quality assets, as most crypto-native tokens fail to capture real value. The much-hyped AI x Crypto intersection largely fails except for prediction markets, which thrive on betting on AI model supremacy. By 2027, public blockchain foundations are forced to choose between catering to retail speculation or building compliant infrastructure for institutions, with many opting for the latter. Growth in stablecoins and tokenized private credit/equity hits a "triple ceiling" due to regulatory and political uncertainty rather than market demand. The pivotal shift is forecast for 2028. A major liquidation event in pre-IPO perpetuals exposes the structural flaw of synthetic markets lacking a real underlying asset anchor. In response, regulatory changes finally allow the public solicitation of private securities resales to verified accredited investors. This creates a legitimate secondary market for real company equity, which then becomes the core asset class of the new bull market, relegating synthetic perps to a niche role. By 2029, the industry becomes "boring" but foundational. Tokens without claims on real cash flows or assets cease trading. Stablecoin growth is steady but politically capped. Crypto infrastructure fades from view as it gets absorbed into traditional finance backends. The article's central thesis is that the key bottleneck for crypto's next phase is legal and regulatory channels for real asset ownership, not technology.

marsbit1 saat önce

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

marsbit1 saat önce

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit8 saat önce

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit8 saat önce

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手8 saat önce

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手8 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片