Cantor Fitzgerald: Crypto Winter to Strengthen Institutions

TheNewsCrypto2025-12-30 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-12-30 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Brett Knoblauch suggests the crypto market is entering an early-stage downturn, or "crypto winter," which may last for months. Unlike previous cycles, this downturn lacks mass liquidations and structural failures, reflecting a market now dominated by institutional players rather than retail traders. The analyst notes a growing divergence between token prices and real infrastructure progress, particularly in DeFi and real-world asset (RWA) tokenization. Tokenized assets reached $18.5 billion in 2025 and are projected to exceed $50 billion by 2026 as banks adopt on-chain settlements. Decentralized exchanges continue gaining market share despite lower trading volumes, and prediction markets are growing, with sports betting volumes surpassing $5.9 billion. Platforms like Robinhood, Coinbase, and Gemini are entering this space, promoting transparency over traditional bookmakers. Cantor warns that Bitcoin's price, only 17% above Strategy’s average purchase price, could trigger concern if it falls further, though large-scale selling is unlikely. The bank views this period as a foundation-building phase, leading to more sustainable and structurally sound industry growth in the future.

The crypto market is possibly setting its foot into the early stages of an elongated downturn. The analyst of Cantor Fitzgerald investment bank, Brett Knoblauch, says that this will hardly act as a preliminary stage to a more stable and institutional phase of industry development.

The analyst further mentions that the segment is in the initial stages of a winter after the recorded four-year Bitcoin cycle. Around 85 days have passed since the price peak, and it may be sustained for months.

The recent downturn is not the same as witnessed in the previous one because of the absence of mass liquidations and structural failures. The market is now mostly influenced by institutional players instead of retail traders.

The analyst also highlighted the increasing gap between token prices and real infrastructure advancement, majorly in the DeFi and RWA sectors.

Growth in Tokenisation and DeFi Infrastructure

In 2025, the volume of tokenised real-world assets witnessed a threefold increase, standing at $18.5 billion. The investment bank, Cantor, wants this figure to be pushed over $50 billion by 2026 as banks adopt on-chain settlements.

Decentralised exchanges will carry on to lay hold of market share from centralised platforms, even at the time of declining trading volumes. Knoblauch also highlighted the growth of prediction markets. The volume of bets in the sports segment passed $5.9 billion.

Robinhood, Coinbase and Gemini have so far entered this niche, asking for more transparent mechanisms in contrast to traditional bookmakers. The main risk is the price of Bitcoin being only 17% over Strategy’s average purchase price.

A fall below this level could alert market participants; however, Knoblauch doubts the firm will initiate selling assets.

A Maturing Market Cycle

Cantor Fitzgerald cautioned that price recovery may remain limited through 2026. According to the bank, this crypto winter could serve as a foundation-building phase, positioning the industry for more sustainable and structurally sound growth in the years ahead.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

BitMine to Launch MAVAN Backed by $12B Ethereum Treasury

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Brett Knoblauch, what is the current state of the crypto market and how long might it last?

AThe crypto market is in the initial stages of an elongated downturn, or 'crypto winter,' which may be sustained for months.

QHow does the current market downturn differ from previous ones, as noted in the article?

AThe current downturn differs due to the absence of mass liquidations and structural failures, and the market is now mostly influenced by institutional players instead of retail traders.

QWhat significant growth was witnessed in the tokenisation of real-world assets (RWA) in 2025, and what is the target for 2026?

AThe volume of tokenised real-world assets witnessed a threefold increase in 2025, standing at $18.5 billion, and Cantor Fitzgerald wants this figure to be pushed over $50 billion by 2026.

QWhat trend does the article highlight regarding decentralized exchanges (DEXs) and centralized platforms?

ADecentralised exchanges (DEXs) will continue to gain market share from centralised platforms, even during a period of declining trading volumes.

QWhat is the main risk mentioned concerning Bitcoin's price, and what is the specific threshold?

AThe main risk is the price of Bitcoin being only 17% above Strategy’s average purchase price. A fall below this level could alert market participants.

İlgili Okumalar

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报7 dk önce

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报7 dk önce

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News24 dk önce

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News24 dk önce

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit52 dk önce

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit52 dk önce

Unlocking $100 Million in Liquidity? Pump.fun's New Policy Tests the 5-Minute Pump Technique

Foresight News, July 21 – Pump.fun has launched its new "BOOST" mode as the standard launch mechanism for new tokens. The core of BOOST is to address the issue of "dead liquidity." Historically, when a token migrates from its bonding curve to a liquidity pool, roughly 20% of its liquidity becomes permanently locked and unusable, a problem the platform estimates costs over $100 million annually. The new mechanism redirects this 20% of funds, which would have been locked, to instead be used for a 5-minute Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP) buyback of the token immediately after migration. The purchased tokens are then permanently burned. For example, this means reserving 17.6 SOL for SOL pairs or about $2516 for USDC pairs at migration. This creates a short-term buying pressure and reduces the token's supply. The goal is to improve the immediate post-launch performance of memecoins, potentially increasing trader retention and transaction volume on the platform. However, critics warn this could lower the bar for token launches, encouraging low-quality projects, and that the brief 5-minute buy pressure might lead to sharper price crashes once it ends if followed by large sell-offs.

Foresight News1 saat önce

Unlocking $100 Million in Liquidity? Pump.fun's New Policy Tests the 5-Minute Pump Technique

Foresight News1 saat önce

What Signals Can Be Read from the Trading Data of India's Largest Asset Manager SBI's IPO?

India's largest asset manager, SBI Funds Management, successfully listed on July 21 with a nearly $10 billion IPO, attracting approximately 42 times subscription. However, the first-day closing price rose only about 6.3%, falling short of the 16% premium anticipated in the grey market. This signals robust demand for core Indian financial assets but also disciplined pricing, indicating the IPO market is selectively open for strong brands with clear growth narratives. The low reported underwriting fees, which led some global banks to reduce participation, highlight a shift in pricing power towards powerful issuers like SBI. Its strong brand, banking parent, and stable cash flows reduced reliance on traditional investment banking sales channels, with local brokers playing a larger role. This fee dynamic may not be replicable for weaker issuers. SBI's performance is seen as a key test for India's IPO pipeline, including potential future large listings like Reliance Jio and NSE. Its success with tempered gains sets a new price anchor: high-quality assets can launch, but excessive valuation premiums are constrained. The true measure of a sustained market reopening will be whether subsequent major offerings can proceed smoothly at reasonable valuations.

marsbit1 saat önce

What Signals Can Be Read from the Trading Data of India's Largest Asset Manager SBI's IPO?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot