Bybit EU Launches USDC and EURC Stablecoin Earn Campaigns Across Europe

TheNewsCrypto2026-02-20 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-20 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Bybit EU, the European arm of the crypto exchange and a MiCA-licensed provider, has launched new stablecoin Earn campaigns featuring USDC and EURC to promote responsible digital asset usage in Europe. The initiative, which began on February 2nd, offers fixed-term savings products with APRs ranging from 14% to 20%, aiming to encourage long-term financial habits rather than short-term speculation. Co-CEO Mazurka Zeng stated that integrating these regulated stablecoins supports financial literacy within a compliant European framework. The campaigns are part of Bybit EU’s broader effort to expand access to MiCA-aligned stablecoins for trading, savings, and payments. A concurrent "Consistency Counts" trading competition with a 110,000 USDC prize pool is also underway.

Through the announcement of new stablecoin campaigns and initiatives featuring USDC and EURC, digital assets issued by regulated entities of Circle, Bybit EU, the European arm of Bybit and a MiCA-licensed crypto-asset service provider with headquarters in Vienna, has made the announcement. The purpose of these campaigns and initiatives is to encourage responsible usage of digital assets throughout Europe.

Through the implementation of this effort, the use of USDC and EURC is expanded throughout the regulated platform of Bybit EU. This opens the door to stablecoin-based products that are intended for trading and payments inside a European framework that is compliant. Bybit EU’s emphasis on practical use cases that enable educated and structured involvement with digital assets is also reflected in this effort.

In the initial phase of this initiative, which began on February 2nd, the focus is on stablecoin Earn products that are intended to help financial literacy and long-term planning. Users of the programs are encouraged to build good savings habits and put idle funds to work toward stated goals, such as maintaining a financial buffer, planning ahead, or supporting longer-term ambitions. This is in contrast to the practice of short-term speculating.

The Earn offerings consist of a new user-exclusive twenty percent annual percentage rate (APR) for a USDC 10-day Fixed Earn, a USDC 10-day Fixed Earn at fourteen percent (APR), a USDC thirty-day Fixed Earn at sixteen percent (APR), and a EURC–USDC Cross-Yield thirty-day at fifteen percent (APR).

In order to assist customers save money with a plan rather than following short-term market fluctuations, these fixed-term solutions are meant to give clarity and predictability while also helping consumers save money.

“Integrating USDC and EURC enables us to expand access to regulated stablecoins while promoting more thoughtful and responsible ways for users to engage with digital assets,” said Mazurka Zeng, Co-CEO of Bybit EU. “Through savings-focused Earn products, we aim to support financial literacy and long-term participation within a regulated European environment.”

Within the context of European markets, this campaign focuses on the ways in which regulated stablecoins may facilitate innovation that is user-centric and responsible. Bybit EU has begun accepting registrations for the “Consistency Counts” trading competition, which is being held concurrently with the Earn campaigns.

At the event, there is a prize fund of 110,000 USDC, and those who demonstrate consistency and discipline will be rewarded. Users may anticipate even more meaningful methods to utilize USDC and EURC throughout the platform as future integrations across the Bybit EU product suite approach. These integrations will include ways to improve the daily usability of the Bybit Card.

Fully-reserved stablecoins such as EURC and USDC are two of the most prominent examples in the world. Both EURC and USDC are natively live on the internet, and they make use of blockchain networks to provide companies, developers, and people with the ability to conduct worldwide transactions in a manner that is both near real-time and inexpensive. Both EURC and USDC are in accordance with the regulatory framework established by the European Union for Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA).

With the extension of USDC and EURC on Bybit EU, a significant step has been taken toward increasing access to regulated stablecoins in Europe. This will allow a larger variety of use cases spanning trading, savings, and payments. In order to fulfill its continuous commitment to responsible involvement and long-term user engagement, Bybit EU will continue to provide support for the stablecoin ecosystem by means of new campaigns and initiatives throughout the course of time.

The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR) in Austria has granted authorization to Bybit EU GmbH, which falls under the category of Crypto-Asset Service Provider (CASP) in Austria. It is via the bybit.eu platform that Bybit EU provides services to consumers located across the whole of the European Economic Area (EEA), with the exception of Malta.

Through its authorization, Bybit EU GmbH is able to provide the following services:
Providing custody and administration of crypto-assets on behalf of its customers, as well as exchange of crypto-assets for funds, exchange of crypto-assets for other crypto-assets, placement of crypto-assets, and transfer services for crypto-assets on behalf of its clients.

Bybit EU GmbH is neither the operator of a trading platform for crypto-assets nor provides investment advice.

Disclaimer: This press release is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or an offer to buy or sell digital assets. The products and services mentioned herein are subject to applicable laws and regulations in the relevant jurisdictions and may not be available in certain regions

TagsBybitexchange

İlgili Okumalar

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit1 saat önce

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit1 saat önce

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit1 saat önce

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit1 saat önce

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit2 saat önce

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit2 saat önce

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit3 saat önce

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit3 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片