Brother Sun "Rights Protection" Stands Up Against the Trump Family, WLFI Is the Real Scythe in the Crypto Circle

Odaily星球日报2026-04-13 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-04-13 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The article details the controversy surrounding World Liberty Financial (WLFI), a cryptocurrency project linked to the Trump family. It reports that WLFI allegedly used the DeFi lending protocol Dolomite, whose co-founder is also a WLFI advisor, as a disguised channel to sell tokens by collateralizing around 5 billion WLFI tokens to borrow approximately $75 million in stablecoins. Despite WLFI's claims that the loans were for ecosystem development and posed no liquidation risk, critics argue it was a way for insiders to cash out, shifting risk to retail investors. The piece highlights WLFI's significant price decline—over 66% since its September 2025 launch—and suggests the Trump family and insiders are the main source of selling pressure, as they control nearly 74% of the token supply. It also revisits WLFI’s prior move to blacklist 272 addresses, including those of investor Justin Sun, under the pretext of preventing large-scale sell-offs, which now appears to be an effort to reduce competition for their own sales. Sun publicly accused WLFI of exploiting users, freezing assets, and treating the crypto community as a "personal ATM." WLFI countered by threatening legal action. The author notes that while Sun’s criticism may gain sympathy, a legal battle in the U.S. against the well-connected Trump family would be risky for him. Finally, the article concludes that WLFI exemplifies how powerful elites can exploit crypto’s regulatory gray areas for profit, and urges the commu...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Golem (@web3_golem)

The true face of WLFI has finally been seen clearly by the crypto circle.

On April 9th, foreign media reported that the Trump family's crypto project, World Liberty Financial (WLFI), had conducted multiple collateralized loans through the DeFi lending protocol Dolomite, sparking market concerns about insider trading and USD1 liquidity risks. According to statistics, WLFI used approximately 5 billion WLFI tokens as collateral and mobilized about 75 million USD in stablecoins cumulatively through Dolomite and Coinbase Prime.

Coincidentally, Dolomite co-founder Corey Caplan is also an advisor to WLFI. Although WLFI responded that borrowing stablecoins was to create value for the ecosystem and there was no liquidation risk, and WLFI even repaid 25 million USD1 loans on April 11th, tracking the on-chain path of the borrowed stablecoins makes it clear to anyone that Dolomite is essentially a disguised token selling channel for the WLFI team.

Well-known trader Pickle Cat also believes that WLFI is performing a confidence trick by buying back at high prices with the left hand while borrowing real money with low-value collateral with the right hand. In the end, only the retail investors locked in the Dolomite pool are bearing the risk, so she decisively chose to liquidate all her WLFI spot holdings.

WLFI's price performance since its listing has already said it all. WLFI officially launched on September 1, 2025, and began executing token buybacks in late September of the same year. However, the token has since fallen by over 66%, down about 70% from its peak. So, where is the selling pressure in the market coming from? Most likely from the Trump family and their related interests. Firstly, because it's unlikely they only have Dolomite as one disguised selling channel. Secondly, only they hold large amounts of WLFI tokens and can "sell without restrictions."

Even before WLFI officially launched, Odaily Planet Daily had analyzed WLFI's token holding structure and selling pressure, concluding that the Trump family was the largest source of selling pressure. Out of a total supply of 100 billion tokens, the pre-sale accounted for only 26.05%, while the remaining 73.95% was entirely controlled by the team. (Related reading:WLFI Unlock Countdown: Trump's 15.75% Whale Holdings, Can the Market Withstand the "Presidential Selling Pressure"?)

Furthermore, after the WLFI token officially launched, the team blacklisted 272 addresses, including addresses belonging to Sun Yuchen, under the pretext of protecting user funds and preventing large-scale selling by whales. This move was applauded by the community at the time. But only now, faced with the continuous decline of WLFI, have we come to our senses: the real purpose of freezing the whale addresses was to facilitate their own selling.

The story doesn't end here. After the WLFI team's actions were exposed, Sun Yuchen couldn't sit still anymore. The renowned "Sun Cut" (Sun Ge) doesn't take losses like this—only you can sell, but I can't? So he confronted WLFI once more.

Sun Yuchen Confronts WLFI Again

On April 12th, Sun Yuchen posted on platform X, condemning the WLFI team for extracting fees from users, secretly implanting backdoors to control user assets, freezing investor funds, and using the crypto community as a personal ATM, among other actions. The WLFI team didn't just let Sun's accusations slide; they responded by saying Sun Yuchen is best at playing the victim, fabricating baseless accusations to cover up his own misconduct, and stated they would see him in court.

To understand this drama, we need to review the relationship between Sun Yuchen and WLFI.

WLFI and Sun Yuchen had a honeymoon period. In November 2024, Sun Yuchen announced an investment of 30 million USD into WLFI through the entity TRON DAO, becoming WLFI's largest investor and project advisor at the time. This deal was interpreted then as a political donation from Sun Yuchen to Trump, especially since Trump's election as president was already a foregone conclusion, and crypto figures wanted to build good relations. So it was a win-win: WLFI got the money, and Sun Yuchen opened a channel to connect with the US President.

But when the WLFI token actually launched, the WLFI team kicked Sun Yuchen to the curb. On September 5, 2025, World Liberty Financial (WLFI) blacklisted addresses related to Sun Yuchen, involving approximately 540 million unlocked tokens and 2.4 billion locked tokens. The WLFI team's reason was straightforward: they suspected someone was selling off to suppress the token price. WLFI blacklisted 272 addresses in one go.

Although Nansen CEO Alex Svanevik later stated that Sun Yuchen had not engaged in dumping, and his transfers occurred after the WLFI token had already plummeted, the truth behind WLFI's drop might have been mass profit-taking by retail investors and further panic-driven price crashes. But because WLFI used the community as a shield, Sun Yuchen didn't step out to confront them head-on.

However, some still spoke up for Sun Yuchen. CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju believed that even if Sun Yuchen sold his unlocked tokens, it was his right, as he had autonomy over his assets, and WLFI had no right to freeze user addresses. It's ironic—the Trump family has repeatedly stated in public that "de-banking" was a major reason they chose to join the crypto space, as their family assets had been frozen by the banking system multiple times. But how is their action of blacklisting user addresses any different from the banks that rejected them? This kind of "pseudo-decentralized" behavior deserves condemnation.

That said, although Sun Yuchen's situation is worthy of sympathy, if he chooses to go head-to-head with WLFI, he might not come out ahead. Because behind WLFI stands the Trump family and a group of top-tier elites with deep roots in both American politics and business. Which one can Sun Yuchen afford to offend?

Moreover, given Sun Yuchen's own regulatory history, political situation, and past controversies, if he really ends up in a US court against WLFI, winning the lawsuit might be out of the question; escaping unscathed might be something to be庆幸 (grateful) for.

So, for Sun Yuchen's "rights protection" campaign, he can make noise in the court of public opinion and posture alongside retail investors. But actually taking it all the way to a US courtroom? Better forget it.

The Second Lesson the Trump Family Taught the Crypto Circle

We have to admit that WLFI is the second lesson the Trump family taught the crypto circle (the first lesson was, of course, TRUMP). Its real purpose was never to break traditional banking restrictions or make DeFi better, but to疯狂敛财 (frantically amass wealth) in the grey areas of financial regulation.

Many people were unwilling to admit or ignored this before because the name Trump was still very valuable. In the bull market sentiment, power and influence were automatically translated into a sense of security and a moat. Coupled with Trump's extremely friendly attitude towards crypto during the campaign and early in his term, crypto users did not launch large-scale protests or FUD. The Trump family ate the meat in the crypto market, and we could跟着喝口汤 (follow along and have some soup).

But things are different now. In the broader context, with "Crypto Czar" David Sacks shifting his focus to AI, and Trump being deeply involved in the US-Iran conflict with no time to spare for the crypto industry, the光环 (halo) of the Trump name isn't worth as much anymore. When Trump is no longer our crypto president, what光环 (halo) does his family have left? (Related reading:"Crypto Czar" Steps Down: 130-Day Political Performance Ends, How Much of Trump's Crypto Promises Remain?)

At the same time, specifically regarding the WLFI project, influenced by the token's performance, governance controversies, freezing incidents, and other factors, this滤镜 (filter) has long been torn to shreds in the minds of users. The crypto circle is certainly not innocent; being willing to pay a premium for power and influence, to pay for political backgrounds, is itself a form of speculative collusion. But from now on, when facing "shoddy projects" like WLFI, crafted by American elites in the crypto field, we should have the courage to say no.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main controversy surrounding the World Liberty Financial (WLFI) project as described in the article?

AThe main controversy involves WLFI, a Trump family-affiliated crypto project, being accused of using the DeFi lending protocol Dolomite as a disguised channel for the team to sell tokens. WLFI allegedly collateralized around 5 billion WLFI tokens to borrow approximately $75 million in stablecoins, raising concerns about insider trading and liquidity risks for USD1.

QWhy did WLFI freeze addresses, including Justin Sun's, and what was the alleged real reason behind this action?

AWLFI officially froze 272 addresses, including Justin Sun's, claiming it was to protect user funds and prevent large holders from massive selling. However, the article suggests the real reason was to restrict selling by major holders, making it easier for the WLFI team themselves to sell their own tokens without competition.

QWhat was the nature of the initial relationship between Justin Sun and the WLFI project?

AInitially, Justin Sun, through TRON DAO, invested $30 million in WLFI, becoming its largest investor and a project advisor. This was widely seen as a political donation to gain favor with then-President-elect Donald Trump, creating a mutually beneficial relationship for both parties.

QWhat does the article suggest is the 'second lesson' the Trump family taught the crypto circle with WLFI?

AThe article suggests the 'second lesson' is that WLFI's true purpose was not to break traditional banking limitations or improve DeFi, but to amass wealth疯狂敛财 in the gray areas of financial regulation, exploiting the initial value of the 'Trump' name during the bull market.

QAccording to the article, what are the key reasons cited for the declining value and光环 (halo) of the Trump name in the crypto space?

AThe declining value is attributed to a shift in the macro environment: 'Crypto Czar' David Sacks focusing on AI, President Trump being preoccupied with the U.S.-Iran conflict and having less time for crypto, and the project's own issues like token performance, governance controversies, and the address freezing scandal, which collectively damaged its reputation.

İlgili Okumalar

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

With the broader market showing signs of recovery, a new wave of interest has emerged around Ethereum-based meme coins. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD, built upon the Uniswap v4 Hook protocol, are capturing market attention. Their market capitalizations range from millions to tens of millions of dollars, injecting much-needed focused liquidity into a market lacking narratives. This article explores whether this trend signifies an incoming "Hook Summer" and its potential impact on UNI's price. Hooks are essentially plug-in smart contracts for Uniswap v4 liquidity pools, allowing developers to inject custom logic at key points in a pool's lifecycle (like initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps). This transforms the AMM into programmable building blocks. Key highlighted projects include: * **sato**: Peaked over $38M market cap. It utilizes a v4 curve for minting/burning; buying locks ETH as reserve to mint new tokens, while selling redeems ETH from the reserve and burns tokens. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, promoted as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Reached nearly $6.6M. It's a lending AMM protocol where buying LO0P tokens locks them as collateral, allowing users to borrow ETH from the pool reserve at 40% LTV, aiming to improve capital efficiency for idle ETH in LPs. * **FLOOD**: Peaked near $6M. Its mechanism directs asset reserves from buys into Aave v3 to generate yield, with fees and interest retained in the pool to potentially influence the token's price long-term. In the long term, the development of the Hook ecosystem can attract users and liquidity to Uniswap v4, benefiting UNI's fundamentals—especially combined with the recent activation of the protocol fee switch, where a portion of fees is used to burn UNI. However, in the short term, these Hook-based tokens are unlikely to directly drive significant UNI price appreciation. Their impact is moderated by factors like token sustainability, price volatility, and broader market and regulatory conditions. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) still trails behind v2 and v3, indicating adoption and growth will take time. The article concludes that while the Hook ecosystem provides long-term "nourishment" for UNI, its short-term role is more of a "catalyst" than a "booster." Readers are cautioned that these are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

Odaily星球日报6 dk önce

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

Odaily星球日报6 dk önce

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Said We'd Sell Bitcoin, But Never Be a Net Seller In a recent podcast, MicroStrategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor clarified the company's stance on potentially selling Bitcoin. Following MicroStrategy's earnings call statement about being prepared to sell BTC to fund dividends for its STRC (Strategic) credit product, Saylor emphasized the distinction between selling and being a "net seller." Saylor explained the core business model: MicroStrategy sells credit instruments like STRC and uses the proceeds to buy Bitcoin, which is viewed as "digital capital" expected to appreciate around 30-40% annually. A portion of these capital gains can then be used to pay the dividends on the credit products. He stressed that even if the company sells some Bitcoin for dividends, it simultaneously buys much more with new credit issuance. For example, after raising $3.2 billion from STRC sales in April, the dividend obligation was only $80-90 million, making the company a net buyer. The clarification aims to counter market narratives questioning the value of Bitcoin on MicroStrategy's balance sheet if it were never sold, and to dismiss claims of a "Ponzi scheme." Saylor reiterated his personal philosophy for investors: "Don't be a net seller of bitcoin" and ensure your Bitcoin holdings increase each year. Saylor also discussed Bitcoin's role as the foundation for "digital credit," noting that STRC has become the largest and most liquid preferred stock issue in the U.S., offering high risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He highlighted Bitcoin's deep liquidity, stating that even large purchases by MicroStrategy do not move the market significantly, which is driven by macro factors, geopolitical tensions, and capital flows from ETFs and credit products. Finally, Saylor reflected on his early inspiration from sci-fi books, which motivated his path to MIT, and maintained his fundamental thesis on Bitcoin remains unchanged: it is superior digital capital enabling superior digital credit.

链捕手10 dk önce

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

链捕手10 dk önce

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

"SK Hynix Chinese Staff Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts" Driven by the AI boom, South Korea's SK Hynix is experiencing record performance, with media reports predicting massive year-end bonuses for its employees, making them highly desirable in the matchmaking market. However, this prosperity starkly contrasts with the situation for the company's Chinese employees. According to reports, SK Hynix operates under a rule allocating 10% of operating profit for employee bonuses. While projections suggest Korean employees could receive bonuses reaching millions of RMB, a Chinese employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed the disparity: "If they get 3 million, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that." After adjustments based on KPI ratings, this employee's highest bonus was slightly over 100,000 RMB. Bonuses are paid annually in Korea but semi-annually in China. During the industry downturn in 2023-2024, Chinese employees received no bonus at all. The gap extends beyond bonuses. Recruitment posts for SK Hynix's Chinese factories (in Wuxi, Dalian, Chongqing) show engineer monthly salaries ranging from 10,000 to 35,000 RMB, with a 13th-month salary promised. Chinese employees also receive standard benefits like annual leave but lack stock incentives, which are reportedly unavailable to them. Furthermore, management positions in China are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though industry observers note a gradual increase in local middle managers over time. SK Hynix has confirmed the 10% bonus rule but cautioned that specific future bonus amounts remain unpredictable. The company forecasts strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products for the next 2-3 years, driven by AI infrastructure investment. This focus on business-to-business markets may continue to constrain supply for consumer products, potentially prolonging price increases for components like memory.

链捕手24 dk önce

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

链捕手24 dk önce

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

"SK Hynix's Staggering Bonus Gap: Chinese Staff Receive Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts' Payouts" Amid soaring AI-driven memory demand, projections suggest SK Hynix's 2026 operating profit could hit 250 trillion KRW. Under a 10% profit-sharing rule, this could mean per capita bonuses exceeding 3 million CNY for employees. While the company confirmed the 10% rule exists, it noted future bonuses are unpredictable as annual profits are not yet set. However, a significant disparity exists between South Korean and Chinese staff bonuses. A Chinese SK Hynix employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed that if Korean colleagues receive a 3 million CNY bonus, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that amount, roughly around 150,000 CNY. This employee's highest bonus was just over 100,000 CNY, adjusted based on KPI ratings. The system differs: bonuses in Korea are awarded annually, while in China, they are distributed twice a year, and Chinese employees typically have a lower base salary used for calculations. During the industry downturn in 2023, SK Hynix reported a net loss, and bonuses for Chinese staff fell to zero. Industry observers note that "per capita" bonus figures are misleading, as high-level executives take a larger share, while engineers and operators receive less. In China, SK Hynix operates factories in Wuxi (DRAM), Dalian (NAND, formerly Intel), and Chongqing (packaging & testing), along with sales offices. Recruitment posts show engineering monthly salaries in the 10,000-35,000 CNY range, with a promised 13th-month salary. Standard benefits like annual leave are provided, but Chinese employees generally do not receive stock incentives, and management positions are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though some industry experts believe local management may rise over time. Looking ahead, SK Hynix expects strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products to continue exceeding supply for the next 2-3 years, driven primarily by B2B, not consumer, demand. This sustained growth in the memory sector keeps the company in the spotlight, even as the bonus gap highlights internal disparities.

marsbit44 dk önce

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

marsbit44 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures

Popüler Makaleler

SUN Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! SUN (SUN) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında SUN (SUN) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: SUN (SUN) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınSUN (SUN) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: SUN (SUN) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında SUN (SUN) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

596 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2024.12.12Güncellenme 2025.03.21

SUN Nasıl Satın Alınır

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların SUN (SUN) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.

活动图片