Bitwise Accelerates Hyperliquid ETF Debut with Revised Filing

TheNewsCrypto2026-04-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-04-11 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Bitwise Asset Management has filed a second amendment with the SEC for its spot Hyperliquid ETF, changing the ticker to $BHYP and setting a management fee of 0.67%. Bloomberg analyst Eric Balchunas noted that such updates typically signal an imminent launch, suggesting Bitwise aims to capitalize on HYPE's 200% price surge over the past year. The fund, if approved, will track Hyperliquid's price and trade on NYSE Arca. Bitwise also plans to generate additional returns through HYPE staking, a feature not yet confirmed by competitors Grayscale and 21Shares, who have also filed for similar ETFs.

Reportedly, Bitwise Asset Management has filed a second amendment with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), marking a significant milestone on the road to launching its planned spot Hyperliquid exchange-traded fund.

Eric Balchunas, a senior ETF analyst at Bloomberg, noted in Friday’s X post that Bitwise has changed the ticker for its Hyperliquid ETF to $BHYP and set a management fee of 0.67%, or 67 basis points.

Balchunas claims that these information being filed usually indicate that the product is about to be launched. He went on to say that the corporation was probably attempting to cash in while the iron was hot, since HYPE had gone up 200 percent in the last year.

This application comes as other asset managers, including as Grayscale and 21Shares, are also attempting to get in on the action by releasing their own exchange-traded funds (ETFs) linked to the crypto perpetual futures protocol and blockchain. Bitwise filed its Hyperliquid ETF with the SEC in September before the other two. A month later, 21Shares filed theirs, and Grayscale did the same at the end of March.

Investors will be able to track the current price of Hyperliquid via Bitwise’s ETF, which would trade on the NYSE Arca stock market if it is approved. Although neither Grayscale nor 21Shares have made it clear that their funds would aim to earn extra returns via HYPE staking, Bitwise said so in the firm’s first December filing revision.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Spot Bitcoin ETFs See $358M Inflows as BlackRock’s IBIT Leads Surge

TagsBitwiseBlockchain

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the new ticker symbol and management fee for Bitwise's Hyperliquid ETF as per the revised filing?

AThe new ticker symbol is $BHYP and the management fee is 0.67%, or 67 basis points.

QAccording to Eric Balchunas, what does the filing of this information typically indicate about the product?

AIt typically indicates that the product is about to be launched.

QWhich other asset management companies are also attempting to launch ETFs related to the crypto perpetual futures protocol and blockchain?

AGrayscale and 21Shares are also attempting to launch their own related ETFs.

QOn which stock market is Bitwise's Hyperliquid ETF planned to trade if it gets approved?

AIt is planned to trade on the NYSE Arca stock market.

QWhat specific feature did Bitwise mention in its first December filing revision that distinguishes its fund from those of Grayscale and 21Shares?

ABitwise stated that its fund would aim to earn extra returns through HYPE staking, a feature not clearly stated by Grayscale or 21Shares.

İlgili Okumalar

L2 'Recalibration': When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

The article discusses the evolving relationship between Ethereum's Layer 1 (L1) and Layer 2 (L2) solutions, moving beyond the initial "L2 for scaling" model. As Ethereum L1 itself scales (increasing Gas Limit, statelessness, zkEVM), the unique value proposition of L2s shifts from merely providing cheap execution to offering differentiated features like application-specific optimization, privacy, and flexible governance. The piece explores three key themes: 1. **L2's New Role:** L2s are transitioning from a pure scaling technology to a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum L1. 2. **Interoperability as State Trust:** Solving L2 fragmentation is less about cross-chain bridges and more about enabling faster, trust-minimized state verification between environments. This involves initiatives like faster L1 finality, intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), and native account abstraction. 3. **Blurring Layers:** With the potential integration of zk-proofs into L1 validation (making L1 akin to its own "Rollup") and the concept of "Native Rollups," the rigid boundary between L1 and L2 may fade. The future could be a unified system with multiple execution domains (for DeFi, gaming, privacy, etc.) sharing a common security, settlement, and state framework. In conclusion, Ethereum's goal is not to abandon L2s or re-centralize everything on L1, but to re-integrate the fragmented user experience—liquidity, accounts, applications—while preserving the scaling benefits of a multi-environment ecosystem. The endgame is a cohesive "one chain" feeling for users, powered by diverse but securely interconnected execution layers.

marsbit11 dk önce

L2 'Recalibration': When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

marsbit11 dk önce

The Encryption Bill Clarity's Challenge: A Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

U.S. lawmakers are attempting to advance the Clarity Act, a significant crypto market structure bill, but its path is fraught with partisan hurdles. The process has been rocky since January, when a prior bipartisan deal in the Senate Banking Committee was upended. A key compromise in May on "yield" issues allowed the bill to move forward in committee, but only with the conditional support of two Democratic senators, Angela Alsobrooks and Ruben Gallego. They emphasized that their final vote depends on reaching an agreement on ethics provisions for elected officials. Ultimately, the Senate Agriculture Committee passed its version along party lines without Democratic support. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, the demand for strong ethics language has expanded beyond Democrats. Additional controversies surround provisions related to yields (aligning some Republicans with large banks) and developer protections (opposed by enforcement agencies). Core concerns about illicit finance and consumer protection remain central to the debate. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, achieving the necessary bipartisan compromise is proving difficult. While momentum exists—including recent meetings between senators and White House officials—a reconciled bill text faces skepticism. Senator Gallego has stated that without ethics terms acceptable to Democrats, they will not provide the needed votes. The immediate goals for the crypto community in Congress are unclear: a symbolic Senate vote before the August recess, eventual passage into law by 2026, or forging a final compromise framework. The arduous, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support continues, mirroring the traditional legislative grind the industry must now navigate.

Foresight News1 saat önce

The Encryption Bill Clarity's Challenge: A Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

Foresight News1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片