Bittensor (TAO) Loses Support: Are Traders Eyeing the Next Downside Levels?

TheNewsCrypto2026-03-19 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-19 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Bittensor (TAO) is trading around $245.36, down 8.28% in 24 hours, with a daily trading volume of $349.48 million. Despite a 15.59% weekly gain, the price faces potential downside risks, with support near $239.46. A further drop could lead to a death cross, pushing prices below $232.19. A bullish reversal might test resistance at $253.74, possibly rising above $260 with a golden cross. Technical indicators are mixed: MACD shows a bearish trend with a potential reversal attempt. The CMF at -0.09 indicates mild selling pressure, while the Bull Bear Power of -33.8 reflects strong bearish momentum. The RSI at 37.40 suggests bearish sentiment but not yet oversold. If it nears 30, a short bounce may occur. Overall, sellers currently dominate, but a bullish turnaround is possible if buying pressure increases.

At press time, Bittensor (TAO) is trading within the $245.36 range after an 8.28% loss in value over the last 24 hours. Notably, the daily trading volume has reached the $349.48 million zone. The opening price of the asset was at $274.84, and gradually, it hit a low for the day at around $246.

Over the last 7-days, the price chart of TAO reveals its bullish wave, with a 15.59% surge. It opened the week, trading on the downside and followed by multiple ups and downs; it managed to climb higher.

Upon the momentum correction steadily happening on the downside, the Bittensor price might retrace to the $239.46 support range. A continuous loss may trigger the formation of the death cross, and it could push the asset’s price below $232.19. If a bullish reversal emerges for Bittensor, the price could see a move upward, immediately testing the resistance at around $253.74. Assuming the price reinforces, with the emergence of the golden cross, it likely drives the price above $260.

Will the Bulls Keep Bittensor’s Momentum Alive?

TAO’s Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) line has crossed below the zero line, but the signal line stays above it, and gives mixed signals. The broader trend looks bearish, but the recent momentum is trying to turn positive. This setup can hint at a possible reversal attempt.

In addition, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator stationed at -0.09 shows mild selling pressure in the Bittensor market. The capital is flowing out of the asset, and the sellers have a small edge. There will be sideways movements, unless the selling pressure starts to build further.

The Bull Bear Power (BBP) indicator reading of -33.8 implies strong bearish pressure. Moreover, the sellers are clearly in control, pushing the price below its average level. This reflects solid downward momentum, and it may trend lower unless the buyers step in to slow down.

Besides, TAO’s daily Relative Strength Index (RSI), at 37.40, indicates the market is leaning bearish. The price has been under selling pressure, but it is not deeply oversold yet. If the value moves closer to 30, the market may get oversold, where a short bounce might happen.

Top Updated Crypto News

Momentum Shift for FARTCOIN: Will It Stay Range-Bound?

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the current trading range of Bittensor (TAO) and how much value did it lose in the last 24 hours?

ABittensor (TAO) is trading within the $245.36 range after an 8.28% loss in value over the last 24 hours.

QWhat is the potential downside support level for Bittensor if the bearish momentum continues?

AIf the bearish momentum continues, the Bittensor price might retrace to the $239.46 support range, and a continuous loss could push the price below $232.19.

QWhat does the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) indicator suggest about TAO's trend?

ATAO's MACD line has crossed below the zero line, while the signal line stays above it, giving mixed signals. The broader trend looks bearish, but the recent momentum is trying to turn positive, hinting at a possible reversal attempt.

QAccording to the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator, what is the current pressure in the Bittensor market?

AThe Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator is stationed at -0.09, showing mild selling pressure and indicating that capital is flowing out of the asset, with sellers having a small edge.

QWhat does the Bull Bear Power (BBP) indicator reading of -33.8 imply for TAO?

AThe Bull Bear Power (BBP) indicator reading of -33.8 implies strong bearish pressure, indicating that sellers are in control and pushing the price below its average level, reflecting solid downward momentum.

İlgili Okumalar

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit9 dk önce

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit9 dk önce

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit17 dk önce

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit17 dk önce

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News21 dk önce

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News21 dk önce

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit29 dk önce

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit29 dk önce

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit37 dk önce

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit37 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot