BitMart Research Institute Weekly Highlights: A Comprehensive Market Analysis Amidst the Stalemate in the Middle East and Stagflation Expectations

marsbit2026-03-24 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-24 tarihinde güncellendi

I. Macro Level (Macro)

1. Geopolitics and the Middle East Conflict

Negotiations between Trump and Iran have seen repeated progress and setbacks, with a significant gap remaining between the demands of both sides. It is expected that the situation in the Middle East will likely remain in a state of "fighting while talking" for the next 2 to 4 weeks. From a political motivation perspective, Trump intends to push for a de-escalation of the conflict in the first half of the year to avoid facing both high oil prices and a pressured stock market as the election cycle enters its second half.

2. Federal Reserve Monetary Policy and FOMC Meeting (Hawkish)

Recently, the overall stance of major central banks, including the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, and the Bank of Japan, has turned more hawkish. The market has even begun to price in the possibility of the Fed "not cutting rates" or even "raising rates again" this year. The latest FOMC meeting was generally hawkish in tone: the dot plot showed an increase in the number of officials supporting only one rate cut this year; meanwhile, the Fed raised its inflation expectations, and Powell downplayed signals of a weakening labor market. Additionally, the previously dovish official Waller also shifted to support holding rates steady, further strengthening market expectations of a hawkish stance.

3. Diverging Risks of Stagflation and Recession

Risk Underestimation Camp: Some argue that the authenticity of the current non-farm payroll data is questionable, and inflation has been consistently above the 2% target for several years. If a significant external shock occurs, the U.S. economy could easily slide into stagflation or even recession, and the market is still not fully pricing in this risk.

Opposing View: Others believe that the U.S. is now a net exporter of energy, with far less dependence on oil imports compared to the 1970s and 1980s. Therefore, high oil prices alone are not enough to drag the U.S. into typical stagflation. The deeper risk of stagflation may instead come from long-term fiscal expansion and the erosion of the Federal Reserve's independence. However, if key Middle Eastern straits are blockaded for an extended period, and the Fed maintains a hawkish stance to suppress inflation, or even raises rates again, the market's main trading logic could shift from "stagflation trade" to "recession trade."

4. Performance of Traditional Financial Assets and Trading Strategies

Gold Plummets: Gold has not recently demonstrated its typical safe-haven attributes; instead, it has seen a significant decline against the backdrop of rising expectations for central bank tightening and liquidity pressure.

Hedging Suggestions: In the face of short-term uncertainty, it is advisable to hold risk assets while appropriately allocating positions related to the VIX (Volatility Index), as well as fertilizer and natural gas stocks that benefit from the logic of natural gas shortages, as defensive hedging tools. If the market can navigate through the volatility of the next 1 to 3 months, risk assets may still present good performance opportunities in the second half of the year.

II. Cryptocurrency Level (Crypto)

1. Market Trends and Sentiment

Amid intensified macro volatility, Bitcoin (BTC) has shown stronger resilience compared to gold, generally maintaining relative stability around $70,000. Recently, BTC rebounded from $76,000 before falling back and entering a consolidation phase. Current spot and futures market trading volumes are relatively low, while the options market is more active. The rise in put option (Put) skew and prices reflects increased market避险 (risk-off) and panic sentiment.

2. Institutional Moves and ETFs

Institutional capital allocation is showing divergence. MicroStrategy's Bitcoin buying intensity has noticeably cooled, dropping from weekly additions of ten to twenty thousand coins in the past to about 1,000 coins. However, other institutions continue to buy Ethereum on a large scale, with weekly purchases of around 60,000 coins. Overall, Bitcoin spot ETFs are still maintaining slight net inflows.

3. On-Chain Data and Bottom Assessment

From on-chain data, the profit level of long-term holders has fallen back to the consolidation range (green zone) corresponding to the bottom of the last bull-bear cycle. This suggests that the most intense phase of the decline may be over, and the market is in a process of gradual bottoming. At the same time, short-term holders exhibited significant profit-taking behavior around $76,000, creating阶段性 (phase-specific) selling pressure.

4. Regulatory Positive (Clarity Act)

On the regulatory front, resistance to further consensus on the Cryptocurrency Clarity Act in the Senate has decreased. The market assesses its probability of passage has increased to 80%-90%. Concurrently, the banking system may gradually relax restrictions, allowing users to participate in yield-bearing products related to stablecoins through indirect means. This is seen as a clear policy positive, potentially opening channels for larger-scale capital from traditional finance to enter the crypto market.

İlgili Okumalar

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit6 saat önce

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit6 saat önce

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit8 saat önce

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit8 saat önce

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit8 saat önce

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit8 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片